Cargando…

Protocol of the process evaluation of cluster randomised control trial for estimating the effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of a complex intervention to increase care home staff influenza vaccination rates compared to usual practice (FluCare)

BACKGROUND: Influenza (flu) vaccination rates in UK care home staff are extremely low. Less than 40% of staff in care homes are vaccinated for influenza (flu), presenting risks to the health of frail residents and potential staff absence from cross-infection. Staff often do not perceive a need for v...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Birt, Linda, Katangwe-Chigamba, Thando, Scott, Sion, Wright, David J, Wagner, Adam P., Sims, Erika, Bion, Veronica, Seeley, Carys, Alsaif, Faisal, Clarke, Allan, Griffiths, Alys, Jones, Liz, Bryant, Alison, Patel, Amrish
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10503150/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37715262
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13063-023-07613-5
_version_ 1785106464427212800
author Birt, Linda
Katangwe-Chigamba, Thando
Scott, Sion
Wright, David J
Wagner, Adam P.
Sims, Erika
Bion, Veronica
Seeley, Carys
Alsaif, Faisal
Clarke, Allan
Griffiths, Alys
Jones, Liz
Bryant, Alison
Patel, Amrish
author_facet Birt, Linda
Katangwe-Chigamba, Thando
Scott, Sion
Wright, David J
Wagner, Adam P.
Sims, Erika
Bion, Veronica
Seeley, Carys
Alsaif, Faisal
Clarke, Allan
Griffiths, Alys
Jones, Liz
Bryant, Alison
Patel, Amrish
author_sort Birt, Linda
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Influenza (flu) vaccination rates in UK care home staff are extremely low. Less than 40% of staff in care homes are vaccinated for influenza (flu), presenting risks to the health of frail residents and potential staff absence from cross-infection. Staff often do not perceive a need for vaccination and are unaware they are entitled to free flu vaccination. The FluCare study, a cluster randomised control trial (RCT), uses behavioural interventions to address barriers. Videos, posters, and leaflets are intended to raise awareness of flu vaccination benefits and debunk myths. On-site staff vaccination clinics increase accessibility. Financial incentives to care homes for improved vaccination rates and regular monitoring influence the environment. This paper outlines the planned process evaluation which will describe the intervention’s mechanisms of action, explain any changes in outcomes, identify local adaptations, and inform design of the implementation phase. METHODS/DESIGN: A mixed method process evaluation to inform the interpretation of trial findings. OBJECTIVES: • Describe the intervention as delivered in terms of dose and fidelity, including adaptations and variations across care homes. • Explore the effects of individual intervention components on primary outcomes. • Investigate the mechanisms of impact. • Describe the perceived effectiveness of relevant intervention components (including videos, leaflets, posters, and flu clinics) from participant perspectives (care home manager, care home staff, flu clinic providers). • Describe the characteristics of care homes and participants to assess reach. A purposive sample of twenty care homes (ten in the intervention arm, ten in the control arm) for inclusion in the process evaluation. Data will include (1) study records including care home site profiles, (2) responses to a mechanism of action questionnaire, and (3) semi-structured interviews with care home staff and clinic providers. Quantitative data will be descriptively reported. Interview data will be thematically analysed and then categories mapped to the Theoretical Domains Framework. DISCUSSION: Adopting this systematic and comprehensive process evaluation approach will help ensure data is captured on all aspects of the trial, enabling a full understanding of the intervention implementation and RCT findings. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ISRCTN ISRCTN22729870. Registered on 24 August 2022. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s13063-023-07613-5.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10503150
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-105031502023-09-16 Protocol of the process evaluation of cluster randomised control trial for estimating the effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of a complex intervention to increase care home staff influenza vaccination rates compared to usual practice (FluCare) Birt, Linda Katangwe-Chigamba, Thando Scott, Sion Wright, David J Wagner, Adam P. Sims, Erika Bion, Veronica Seeley, Carys Alsaif, Faisal Clarke, Allan Griffiths, Alys Jones, Liz Bryant, Alison Patel, Amrish Trials Study Protocol BACKGROUND: Influenza (flu) vaccination rates in UK care home staff are extremely low. Less than 40% of staff in care homes are vaccinated for influenza (flu), presenting risks to the health of frail residents and potential staff absence from cross-infection. Staff often do not perceive a need for vaccination and are unaware they are entitled to free flu vaccination. The FluCare study, a cluster randomised control trial (RCT), uses behavioural interventions to address barriers. Videos, posters, and leaflets are intended to raise awareness of flu vaccination benefits and debunk myths. On-site staff vaccination clinics increase accessibility. Financial incentives to care homes for improved vaccination rates and regular monitoring influence the environment. This paper outlines the planned process evaluation which will describe the intervention’s mechanisms of action, explain any changes in outcomes, identify local adaptations, and inform design of the implementation phase. METHODS/DESIGN: A mixed method process evaluation to inform the interpretation of trial findings. OBJECTIVES: • Describe the intervention as delivered in terms of dose and fidelity, including adaptations and variations across care homes. • Explore the effects of individual intervention components on primary outcomes. • Investigate the mechanisms of impact. • Describe the perceived effectiveness of relevant intervention components (including videos, leaflets, posters, and flu clinics) from participant perspectives (care home manager, care home staff, flu clinic providers). • Describe the characteristics of care homes and participants to assess reach. A purposive sample of twenty care homes (ten in the intervention arm, ten in the control arm) for inclusion in the process evaluation. Data will include (1) study records including care home site profiles, (2) responses to a mechanism of action questionnaire, and (3) semi-structured interviews with care home staff and clinic providers. Quantitative data will be descriptively reported. Interview data will be thematically analysed and then categories mapped to the Theoretical Domains Framework. DISCUSSION: Adopting this systematic and comprehensive process evaluation approach will help ensure data is captured on all aspects of the trial, enabling a full understanding of the intervention implementation and RCT findings. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ISRCTN ISRCTN22729870. Registered on 24 August 2022. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s13063-023-07613-5. BioMed Central 2023-09-15 /pmc/articles/PMC10503150/ /pubmed/37715262 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13063-023-07613-5 Text en © The Author(s) 2023 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
spellingShingle Study Protocol
Birt, Linda
Katangwe-Chigamba, Thando
Scott, Sion
Wright, David J
Wagner, Adam P.
Sims, Erika
Bion, Veronica
Seeley, Carys
Alsaif, Faisal
Clarke, Allan
Griffiths, Alys
Jones, Liz
Bryant, Alison
Patel, Amrish
Protocol of the process evaluation of cluster randomised control trial for estimating the effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of a complex intervention to increase care home staff influenza vaccination rates compared to usual practice (FluCare)
title Protocol of the process evaluation of cluster randomised control trial for estimating the effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of a complex intervention to increase care home staff influenza vaccination rates compared to usual practice (FluCare)
title_full Protocol of the process evaluation of cluster randomised control trial for estimating the effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of a complex intervention to increase care home staff influenza vaccination rates compared to usual practice (FluCare)
title_fullStr Protocol of the process evaluation of cluster randomised control trial for estimating the effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of a complex intervention to increase care home staff influenza vaccination rates compared to usual practice (FluCare)
title_full_unstemmed Protocol of the process evaluation of cluster randomised control trial for estimating the effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of a complex intervention to increase care home staff influenza vaccination rates compared to usual practice (FluCare)
title_short Protocol of the process evaluation of cluster randomised control trial for estimating the effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of a complex intervention to increase care home staff influenza vaccination rates compared to usual practice (FluCare)
title_sort protocol of the process evaluation of cluster randomised control trial for estimating the effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of a complex intervention to increase care home staff influenza vaccination rates compared to usual practice (flucare)
topic Study Protocol
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10503150/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37715262
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13063-023-07613-5
work_keys_str_mv AT birtlinda protocoloftheprocessevaluationofclusterrandomisedcontroltrialforestimatingtheeffectivenessandcosteffectivenessofacomplexinterventiontoincreasecarehomestaffinfluenzavaccinationratescomparedtousualpracticeflucare
AT katangwechigambathando protocoloftheprocessevaluationofclusterrandomisedcontroltrialforestimatingtheeffectivenessandcosteffectivenessofacomplexinterventiontoincreasecarehomestaffinfluenzavaccinationratescomparedtousualpracticeflucare
AT scottsion protocoloftheprocessevaluationofclusterrandomisedcontroltrialforestimatingtheeffectivenessandcosteffectivenessofacomplexinterventiontoincreasecarehomestaffinfluenzavaccinationratescomparedtousualpracticeflucare
AT wrightdavidj protocoloftheprocessevaluationofclusterrandomisedcontroltrialforestimatingtheeffectivenessandcosteffectivenessofacomplexinterventiontoincreasecarehomestaffinfluenzavaccinationratescomparedtousualpracticeflucare
AT wagneradamp protocoloftheprocessevaluationofclusterrandomisedcontroltrialforestimatingtheeffectivenessandcosteffectivenessofacomplexinterventiontoincreasecarehomestaffinfluenzavaccinationratescomparedtousualpracticeflucare
AT simserika protocoloftheprocessevaluationofclusterrandomisedcontroltrialforestimatingtheeffectivenessandcosteffectivenessofacomplexinterventiontoincreasecarehomestaffinfluenzavaccinationratescomparedtousualpracticeflucare
AT bionveronica protocoloftheprocessevaluationofclusterrandomisedcontroltrialforestimatingtheeffectivenessandcosteffectivenessofacomplexinterventiontoincreasecarehomestaffinfluenzavaccinationratescomparedtousualpracticeflucare
AT seeleycarys protocoloftheprocessevaluationofclusterrandomisedcontroltrialforestimatingtheeffectivenessandcosteffectivenessofacomplexinterventiontoincreasecarehomestaffinfluenzavaccinationratescomparedtousualpracticeflucare
AT alsaiffaisal protocoloftheprocessevaluationofclusterrandomisedcontroltrialforestimatingtheeffectivenessandcosteffectivenessofacomplexinterventiontoincreasecarehomestaffinfluenzavaccinationratescomparedtousualpracticeflucare
AT clarkeallan protocoloftheprocessevaluationofclusterrandomisedcontroltrialforestimatingtheeffectivenessandcosteffectivenessofacomplexinterventiontoincreasecarehomestaffinfluenzavaccinationratescomparedtousualpracticeflucare
AT griffithsalys protocoloftheprocessevaluationofclusterrandomisedcontroltrialforestimatingtheeffectivenessandcosteffectivenessofacomplexinterventiontoincreasecarehomestaffinfluenzavaccinationratescomparedtousualpracticeflucare
AT jonesliz protocoloftheprocessevaluationofclusterrandomisedcontroltrialforestimatingtheeffectivenessandcosteffectivenessofacomplexinterventiontoincreasecarehomestaffinfluenzavaccinationratescomparedtousualpracticeflucare
AT bryantalison protocoloftheprocessevaluationofclusterrandomisedcontroltrialforestimatingtheeffectivenessandcosteffectivenessofacomplexinterventiontoincreasecarehomestaffinfluenzavaccinationratescomparedtousualpracticeflucare
AT patelamrish protocoloftheprocessevaluationofclusterrandomisedcontroltrialforestimatingtheeffectivenessandcosteffectivenessofacomplexinterventiontoincreasecarehomestaffinfluenzavaccinationratescomparedtousualpracticeflucare