Cargando…

Application of machine learning approaches in predicting clinical outcomes in older adults – a systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND: Machine learning-based prediction models have the potential to have a considerable positive impact on geriatric care. DESIGN: Systematic review and meta-analyses. PARTICIPANTS: Older adults (≥ 65 years) in any setting. INTERVENTION: Machine learning models for predicting clinical outcome...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Olender, Robert T., Roy, Sandipan, Nishtala, Prasad S.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10503191/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37710210
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12877-023-04246-w
_version_ 1785106474672848896
author Olender, Robert T.
Roy, Sandipan
Nishtala, Prasad S.
author_facet Olender, Robert T.
Roy, Sandipan
Nishtala, Prasad S.
author_sort Olender, Robert T.
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Machine learning-based prediction models have the potential to have a considerable positive impact on geriatric care. DESIGN: Systematic review and meta-analyses. PARTICIPANTS: Older adults (≥ 65 years) in any setting. INTERVENTION: Machine learning models for predicting clinical outcomes in older adults were evaluated. A random-effects meta-analysis was conducted in two grouped cohorts, where the predictive models were compared based on their performance in predicting mortality i) under and including 6 months ii) over 6 months. OUTCOME MEASURES: Studies were grouped into two groups by the clinical outcome, and the models were compared based on the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve metric. RESULTS: Thirty-seven studies that satisfied the systematic review criteria were appraised, and eight studies predicting a mortality outcome were included in the meta-analyses. We could only pool studies by mortality as there were inconsistent definitions and sparse data to pool studies for other clinical outcomes. The area under the receiver operating characteristic curve from the meta-analysis yielded a summary estimate of 0.80 (95% CI: 0.76 – 0.84) for mortality within 6 months and 0.81 (95% CI: 0.76 – 0.86) for mortality over 6 months, signifying good discriminatory power. CONCLUSION: The meta-analysis indicates that machine learning models display good discriminatory power in predicting mortality. However, more large-scale validation studies are necessary. As electronic healthcare databases grow larger and more comprehensive, the available computational power increases and machine learning models become more sophisticated; there should be an effort to integrate these models into a larger research setting to predict various clinical outcomes. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12877-023-04246-w.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10503191
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-105031912023-09-16 Application of machine learning approaches in predicting clinical outcomes in older adults – a systematic review and meta-analysis Olender, Robert T. Roy, Sandipan Nishtala, Prasad S. BMC Geriatr Research BACKGROUND: Machine learning-based prediction models have the potential to have a considerable positive impact on geriatric care. DESIGN: Systematic review and meta-analyses. PARTICIPANTS: Older adults (≥ 65 years) in any setting. INTERVENTION: Machine learning models for predicting clinical outcomes in older adults were evaluated. A random-effects meta-analysis was conducted in two grouped cohorts, where the predictive models were compared based on their performance in predicting mortality i) under and including 6 months ii) over 6 months. OUTCOME MEASURES: Studies were grouped into two groups by the clinical outcome, and the models were compared based on the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve metric. RESULTS: Thirty-seven studies that satisfied the systematic review criteria were appraised, and eight studies predicting a mortality outcome were included in the meta-analyses. We could only pool studies by mortality as there were inconsistent definitions and sparse data to pool studies for other clinical outcomes. The area under the receiver operating characteristic curve from the meta-analysis yielded a summary estimate of 0.80 (95% CI: 0.76 – 0.84) for mortality within 6 months and 0.81 (95% CI: 0.76 – 0.86) for mortality over 6 months, signifying good discriminatory power. CONCLUSION: The meta-analysis indicates that machine learning models display good discriminatory power in predicting mortality. However, more large-scale validation studies are necessary. As electronic healthcare databases grow larger and more comprehensive, the available computational power increases and machine learning models become more sophisticated; there should be an effort to integrate these models into a larger research setting to predict various clinical outcomes. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12877-023-04246-w. BioMed Central 2023-09-14 /pmc/articles/PMC10503191/ /pubmed/37710210 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12877-023-04246-w Text en © The Author(s) 2023 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
spellingShingle Research
Olender, Robert T.
Roy, Sandipan
Nishtala, Prasad S.
Application of machine learning approaches in predicting clinical outcomes in older adults – a systematic review and meta-analysis
title Application of machine learning approaches in predicting clinical outcomes in older adults – a systematic review and meta-analysis
title_full Application of machine learning approaches in predicting clinical outcomes in older adults – a systematic review and meta-analysis
title_fullStr Application of machine learning approaches in predicting clinical outcomes in older adults – a systematic review and meta-analysis
title_full_unstemmed Application of machine learning approaches in predicting clinical outcomes in older adults – a systematic review and meta-analysis
title_short Application of machine learning approaches in predicting clinical outcomes in older adults – a systematic review and meta-analysis
title_sort application of machine learning approaches in predicting clinical outcomes in older adults – a systematic review and meta-analysis
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10503191/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37710210
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12877-023-04246-w
work_keys_str_mv AT olenderrobertt applicationofmachinelearningapproachesinpredictingclinicaloutcomesinolderadultsasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT roysandipan applicationofmachinelearningapproachesinpredictingclinicaloutcomesinolderadultsasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT nishtalaprasads applicationofmachinelearningapproachesinpredictingclinicaloutcomesinolderadultsasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis