Cargando…

Are social interactions preferentially attended in real-world scenes? Evidence from change blindness

In change detection paradigms, changes to social or animate aspects of a scene are detected better and faster compared with non-social or inanimate aspects. While previous studies have focused on how changes to individual faces/bodies are detected, it is possible that individuals presented within a...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Barzy, Mahsa, Morgan, Rachel, Cook, Richard, Gray, Katie LH
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: SAGE Publications 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10503233/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36847458
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/17470218231161044
_version_ 1785106484681506816
author Barzy, Mahsa
Morgan, Rachel
Cook, Richard
Gray, Katie LH
author_facet Barzy, Mahsa
Morgan, Rachel
Cook, Richard
Gray, Katie LH
author_sort Barzy, Mahsa
collection PubMed
description In change detection paradigms, changes to social or animate aspects of a scene are detected better and faster compared with non-social or inanimate aspects. While previous studies have focused on how changes to individual faces/bodies are detected, it is possible that individuals presented within a social interaction may be further prioritised, as the accurate interpretation of social interactions may convey a competitive advantage. Over three experiments, we explored change detection to complex real-world scenes, in which changes either occurred by the removal of (a) an individual on their own, (b) an individual who was interacting with others, or (c) an object. In Experiment 1 (N = 50), we measured change detection for non-interacting individuals versus objects. In Experiment 2 (N = 49), we measured change detection for interacting individuals versus objects. Finally, in Experiment 3 (N = 85), we measured change detection for non-interacting versus interacting individuals. We also ran an inverted version of each task to determine whether differences were driven by low-level visual features. In Experiments 1 and 2, we found that changes to non-interacting and interacting individuals were detected better and more quickly than changes to objects. We also found inversion effects for both non-interaction and interaction changes, whereby they were detected more quickly when upright compared with inverted. No such inversion effect was seen for objects. This suggests that the high-level, social content of the images was driving the faster change detection for social versus object targets. Finally, we found that changes to individuals in non-interactions were detected faster than those presented within an interaction. Our results replicate the social advantage often found in change detection paradigms. However, we find that changes to individuals presented within social interaction configurations do not appear to be more quickly and easily detected than those in non-interacting configurations.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10503233
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher SAGE Publications
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-105032332023-09-16 Are social interactions preferentially attended in real-world scenes? Evidence from change blindness Barzy, Mahsa Morgan, Rachel Cook, Richard Gray, Katie LH Q J Exp Psychol (Hove) Original Articles In change detection paradigms, changes to social or animate aspects of a scene are detected better and faster compared with non-social or inanimate aspects. While previous studies have focused on how changes to individual faces/bodies are detected, it is possible that individuals presented within a social interaction may be further prioritised, as the accurate interpretation of social interactions may convey a competitive advantage. Over three experiments, we explored change detection to complex real-world scenes, in which changes either occurred by the removal of (a) an individual on their own, (b) an individual who was interacting with others, or (c) an object. In Experiment 1 (N = 50), we measured change detection for non-interacting individuals versus objects. In Experiment 2 (N = 49), we measured change detection for interacting individuals versus objects. Finally, in Experiment 3 (N = 85), we measured change detection for non-interacting versus interacting individuals. We also ran an inverted version of each task to determine whether differences were driven by low-level visual features. In Experiments 1 and 2, we found that changes to non-interacting and interacting individuals were detected better and more quickly than changes to objects. We also found inversion effects for both non-interaction and interaction changes, whereby they were detected more quickly when upright compared with inverted. No such inversion effect was seen for objects. This suggests that the high-level, social content of the images was driving the faster change detection for social versus object targets. Finally, we found that changes to individuals in non-interactions were detected faster than those presented within an interaction. Our results replicate the social advantage often found in change detection paradigms. However, we find that changes to individuals presented within social interaction configurations do not appear to be more quickly and easily detected than those in non-interacting configurations. SAGE Publications 2023-03-26 2023-10 /pmc/articles/PMC10503233/ /pubmed/36847458 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/17470218231161044 Text en © Experimental Psychology Society 2023 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) which permits any use, reproduction and distribution of the work without further permission provided the original work is attributed as specified on the SAGE and Open Access pages (https://us.sagepub.com/en-us/nam/open-access-at-sage).
spellingShingle Original Articles
Barzy, Mahsa
Morgan, Rachel
Cook, Richard
Gray, Katie LH
Are social interactions preferentially attended in real-world scenes? Evidence from change blindness
title Are social interactions preferentially attended in real-world scenes? Evidence from change blindness
title_full Are social interactions preferentially attended in real-world scenes? Evidence from change blindness
title_fullStr Are social interactions preferentially attended in real-world scenes? Evidence from change blindness
title_full_unstemmed Are social interactions preferentially attended in real-world scenes? Evidence from change blindness
title_short Are social interactions preferentially attended in real-world scenes? Evidence from change blindness
title_sort are social interactions preferentially attended in real-world scenes? evidence from change blindness
topic Original Articles
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10503233/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36847458
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/17470218231161044
work_keys_str_mv AT barzymahsa aresocialinteractionspreferentiallyattendedinrealworldscenesevidencefromchangeblindness
AT morganrachel aresocialinteractionspreferentiallyattendedinrealworldscenesevidencefromchangeblindness
AT cookrichard aresocialinteractionspreferentiallyattendedinrealworldscenesevidencefromchangeblindness
AT graykatielh aresocialinteractionspreferentiallyattendedinrealworldscenesevidencefromchangeblindness