Cargando…

Fast Approximate Quantification of Endovascular Stent Graft Displacement Forces in the Bovine Aortic Arch Variant

PURPOSE: Displacement forces ( DF s) identify hostile landing zones for stent graft deployment in thoracic endovascular aortic repair (TEVAR). However, their use in TEVAR planning is hampered by the need for time-expensive computational fluid dynamics (CFD). We propose a novel fast-approximate compu...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Sturla, Francesco, Caimi, Alessandro, Romarowski, Rodrigo M., Nano, Giovanni, Glauber, Mattia, Redaelli, Alberto, Votta, Emiliano, Marrocco-Trischitta, Massimiliano M.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: SAGE Publications 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10503258/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35588222
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/15266028221095403
Descripción
Sumario:PURPOSE: Displacement forces ( DF s) identify hostile landing zones for stent graft deployment in thoracic endovascular aortic repair (TEVAR). However, their use in TEVAR planning is hampered by the need for time-expensive computational fluid dynamics (CFD). We propose a novel fast-approximate computation of DF s merely exploiting aortic arch anatomy, as derived from the computed tomography (CT) and a measure of central aortic pressure. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We tested the fast-approximate approach against CFD gold-standard in 34 subjects with the “bovine” aortic arch variant. For each dataset, a 3-dimensional (3D) model of the aortic arch lumen was reconstructed from computed tomography angiography and CFD then employed to compute DF s within the aortic proximal landing zones. To quantify fast-approximate DF s, the wall shear stress contribution to the DF was neglected and blood pressure space-distribution was averaged on the entire aortic wall to reliably approximate the patient-specific central blood pressure. Also, DF values were normalized on the corresponding proximal landing zone area to obtain the equivalent surface traction ( EST ). RESULTS: Fast-approximate approach consistently reflected (r(2)=0.99, p<0.0001) the DF pattern obtained by CFD, with a −1.1% and 0.7° bias in DF s magnitude and orientation, respectively. The normalized EST progressively increased (p<0.0001) from zone 0 to zone 3 regardless of the type of arch, with proximal landing zone 3 showing significantly greater forces than zone 2 (p<0.0001). Upon DF normalization to the corresponding aortic surface, fast-approximate EST was decoupled in blood pressure and a dimensionless shape vector (S) reflecting aortic arch morphology. S showed a zone-specific pattern of orientation and proved a valid biomechanical blueprint of DF impact on the thoracic aortic wall. CONCLUSION: Requiring only a few seconds and quantifying clinically relevant biomechanical parameters of proximal landing zones for arch TEVAR, our method suits the real preoperative decision-making process. It paves the way toward analyzing large population of patients and hence to define threshold values for a future patient-specific preoperative TEVAR planning.