Cargando…
Insertion of inflatable penile prosthesis in the neophallus of assigned female at birth individuals: a systematic review of surgical techniques, complications and outcomes
Devices such as inflatable penile prostheses (IPP) can be used to achieve erectile rigidity after phalloplasty in assigned female at birth (AFAB) individuals. The approach to inserting an IPP in a neophallus is different and more challenging compared to that of an anatomical penis due to the absence...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
SAGE Publications
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10503286/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37719136 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/17562872231199584 |
_version_ | 1785106495663243264 |
---|---|
author | Pang, Karl H. Christopher, Nim Ralph, David J. Lee, Wai Gin |
author_facet | Pang, Karl H. Christopher, Nim Ralph, David J. Lee, Wai Gin |
author_sort | Pang, Karl H. |
collection | PubMed |
description | Devices such as inflatable penile prostheses (IPP) can be used to achieve erectile rigidity after phalloplasty in assigned female at birth (AFAB) individuals. The approach to inserting an IPP in a neophallus is different and more challenging compared to that of an anatomical penis due to the absence of anatomical structures such as the corpora cavernosa, and the more tenuous blood supply of the neophallus and reconstructed urethra. In addition, the ideal surgical techniques and devices for use in the neophallus have not been defined. This review systematically summarises the literature on the insertion of IPP in the neophallus of individuals AFAB. In particular, the described techniques, types of devices used and peri-operative and patient-reported outcomes are emphasised. An initial search of the PubMed database was performed on 16 September 2022 and an updated search was performed on 26 May 2023. Overall, 185 articles were screened for eligibility and 15 studies fulfilled the inclusion criteria and were included in the analysis. Two studies reported outcomes on the zephyr surgical implant 475 FTM device and the others reported outcomes on the Boston Scientific AMS 600/700(TM) CX 3-piece inflatable, AMS Ambicor(TM) 2-piece inflatable, Coloplast Titan(®) or Dynaflex devices. Overall, 1106 IPPs were analysed. The infection rate was 4.2%–50%, with most studies reporting an infection rate of <30%. Mechanical failure or dysfunction occurred in 1.4%–36.4%, explantation was required in 3.3%–41.6%, and implant revision or replacement was performed in 6%–70%. Overall, 51.4%–90.6% of patients were satisfied and 77%–100% were engaging in sexual intercourse. An IPP in a neophallus is an acceptable option to achieve rigidity for sexual intercourse. However, this challenging procedure has good reports of patient and partner satisfaction despite significant risks of complications. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-10503286 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2023 |
publisher | SAGE Publications |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-105032862023-09-16 Insertion of inflatable penile prosthesis in the neophallus of assigned female at birth individuals: a systematic review of surgical techniques, complications and outcomes Pang, Karl H. Christopher, Nim Ralph, David J. Lee, Wai Gin Ther Adv Urol Advances in Prosthetic Urology Devices such as inflatable penile prostheses (IPP) can be used to achieve erectile rigidity after phalloplasty in assigned female at birth (AFAB) individuals. The approach to inserting an IPP in a neophallus is different and more challenging compared to that of an anatomical penis due to the absence of anatomical structures such as the corpora cavernosa, and the more tenuous blood supply of the neophallus and reconstructed urethra. In addition, the ideal surgical techniques and devices for use in the neophallus have not been defined. This review systematically summarises the literature on the insertion of IPP in the neophallus of individuals AFAB. In particular, the described techniques, types of devices used and peri-operative and patient-reported outcomes are emphasised. An initial search of the PubMed database was performed on 16 September 2022 and an updated search was performed on 26 May 2023. Overall, 185 articles were screened for eligibility and 15 studies fulfilled the inclusion criteria and were included in the analysis. Two studies reported outcomes on the zephyr surgical implant 475 FTM device and the others reported outcomes on the Boston Scientific AMS 600/700(TM) CX 3-piece inflatable, AMS Ambicor(TM) 2-piece inflatable, Coloplast Titan(®) or Dynaflex devices. Overall, 1106 IPPs were analysed. The infection rate was 4.2%–50%, with most studies reporting an infection rate of <30%. Mechanical failure or dysfunction occurred in 1.4%–36.4%, explantation was required in 3.3%–41.6%, and implant revision or replacement was performed in 6%–70%. Overall, 51.4%–90.6% of patients were satisfied and 77%–100% were engaging in sexual intercourse. An IPP in a neophallus is an acceptable option to achieve rigidity for sexual intercourse. However, this challenging procedure has good reports of patient and partner satisfaction despite significant risks of complications. SAGE Publications 2023-09-14 /pmc/articles/PMC10503286/ /pubmed/37719136 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/17562872231199584 Text en © The Author(s), 2023 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) which permits non-commercial use, reproduction and distribution of the work without further permission provided the original work is attributed as specified on the SAGE and Open Access pages (https://us.sagepub.com/en-us/nam/open-access-at-sage). |
spellingShingle | Advances in Prosthetic Urology Pang, Karl H. Christopher, Nim Ralph, David J. Lee, Wai Gin Insertion of inflatable penile prosthesis in the neophallus of assigned female at birth individuals: a systematic review of surgical techniques, complications and outcomes |
title | Insertion of inflatable penile prosthesis in the neophallus of assigned female at birth individuals: a systematic review of surgical techniques, complications and outcomes |
title_full | Insertion of inflatable penile prosthesis in the neophallus of assigned female at birth individuals: a systematic review of surgical techniques, complications and outcomes |
title_fullStr | Insertion of inflatable penile prosthesis in the neophallus of assigned female at birth individuals: a systematic review of surgical techniques, complications and outcomes |
title_full_unstemmed | Insertion of inflatable penile prosthesis in the neophallus of assigned female at birth individuals: a systematic review of surgical techniques, complications and outcomes |
title_short | Insertion of inflatable penile prosthesis in the neophallus of assigned female at birth individuals: a systematic review of surgical techniques, complications and outcomes |
title_sort | insertion of inflatable penile prosthesis in the neophallus of assigned female at birth individuals: a systematic review of surgical techniques, complications and outcomes |
topic | Advances in Prosthetic Urology |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10503286/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37719136 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/17562872231199584 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT pangkarlh insertionofinflatablepenileprosthesisintheneophallusofassignedfemaleatbirthindividualsasystematicreviewofsurgicaltechniquescomplicationsandoutcomes AT christophernim insertionofinflatablepenileprosthesisintheneophallusofassignedfemaleatbirthindividualsasystematicreviewofsurgicaltechniquescomplicationsandoutcomes AT ralphdavidj insertionofinflatablepenileprosthesisintheneophallusofassignedfemaleatbirthindividualsasystematicreviewofsurgicaltechniquescomplicationsandoutcomes AT leewaigin insertionofinflatablepenileprosthesisintheneophallusofassignedfemaleatbirthindividualsasystematicreviewofsurgicaltechniquescomplicationsandoutcomes |