Cargando…
Sensitivity, specificity, and diagnostic accuracy of WHO 2013 criteria for diagnosis of gestational diabetes mellitus in low risk early pregnancies: international, prospective, multicentre cohort study
OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the predictability of gestational diabetes mellitus wth a 75 g oral glucose tolerance test (OGTT) in early pregnancy, based on the 2013 criteria of the World Health Organization, and to test newly proposed cut-off values. DESIGN: International, prospective, multicentre cohort...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BMJ Publishing Group
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10503330/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37720695 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjmed-2022-000330 |
_version_ | 1785106503331479552 |
---|---|
author | Huhn, Evelyn A Göbl, Christian S Fischer, Thorsten Todesco Bernasconi, Monya Kreft, Martina Kunze, Mirjam Vogt, Deborah R Dölzlmüller, Eva Jaksch-Bogensperger, Heidi Heldstab, Sandra Eppel, Wolfgang Husslein, Peter Ochsenbein Kölble, Nicole Richter, Anne Bäz, Elke Winzeler, Bettina Hoesli, Irene |
author_facet | Huhn, Evelyn A Göbl, Christian S Fischer, Thorsten Todesco Bernasconi, Monya Kreft, Martina Kunze, Mirjam Vogt, Deborah R Dölzlmüller, Eva Jaksch-Bogensperger, Heidi Heldstab, Sandra Eppel, Wolfgang Husslein, Peter Ochsenbein Kölble, Nicole Richter, Anne Bäz, Elke Winzeler, Bettina Hoesli, Irene |
author_sort | Huhn, Evelyn A |
collection | PubMed |
description | OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the predictability of gestational diabetes mellitus wth a 75 g oral glucose tolerance test (OGTT) in early pregnancy, based on the 2013 criteria of the World Health Organization, and to test newly proposed cut-off values. DESIGN: International, prospective, multicentre cohort study. SETTING: Six university or cantonal departments in Austria, Germany, and Switzerland, from 1 May 2016 to 31 January 2019. PARTICIPANTS: Low risk cohort of 829 participants aged 18-45 years with singleton pregnancies attending first trimester screening and consenting to have an early 75 g OGTT at 12-15 weeks of gestation. Participants and healthcare providers were blinded to the results. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Fasting, one hour, and two hour plasma glucose concentrations after an early 75 g OGTT (12-15 weeks of gestation) and a late 75 g OGTT (24-28 weeks of gestation). RESULTS: Of 636 participants, 74 (12%) developed gestational diabetes mellitus, according to World Health Organization 2013 criteria, at 24-28 weeks of gestation. Applying WHO 2013 criteria to the early OGTT with at least one abnormal value gave a low sensitivity of 0.35 (95% confidence interval 0.24 to 0.47), high specificity of 0.96 (0.95 to 0.98), positive predictive value of 0.57 (0.41 to 0.71), negative predictive value of 0.92 (0.89 to 0.94), positive likelihood ratio of 10.46 (6.21 to 17.63), negative likelihood ratio of 0.65 (0.55 to 0.78), and diagnostic odds ratio of 15.98 (8.38 to 30.47). Lowering the postload glucose values (75 g OGTT cut-off values of 5.1, 8.9, and 7.8 mmol/L) improved the detection rate (53%, 95% confidence interval 41% to 64%) and negative predictive value (0.94, 0.91 to 0.95), but decreased the specificity (0.91, 0.88 to 0.93) and positive predictive value (0.42, 0.32 to 0.53) at a false positive rate of 9% (positive likelihood ratio 5.59, 4.0 to 7.81; negative likelihood ratio 0.64, 0.52 to 0.77; and diagnostic odds ratio 10.07, 6.26 to 18.31). CONCLUSIONS: The results of this prospective low risk cohort study indicated that the 75 g OGTT as a screening tool in early pregnancy is not sensitive enough when applying WHO 2013 criteria. Postload glucose values were higher in early pregnancy complicated by diabetes in pregnancy. Lowering the postload cut-off values identified a high risk group for later development of gestational diabetes mellitus or those who might benefit from earlier treatment. Results from randomised controlled trials showing a beneficial effect of early intervention are unclear. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT02035059. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-10503330 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2023 |
publisher | BMJ Publishing Group |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-105033302023-09-16 Sensitivity, specificity, and diagnostic accuracy of WHO 2013 criteria for diagnosis of gestational diabetes mellitus in low risk early pregnancies: international, prospective, multicentre cohort study Huhn, Evelyn A Göbl, Christian S Fischer, Thorsten Todesco Bernasconi, Monya Kreft, Martina Kunze, Mirjam Vogt, Deborah R Dölzlmüller, Eva Jaksch-Bogensperger, Heidi Heldstab, Sandra Eppel, Wolfgang Husslein, Peter Ochsenbein Kölble, Nicole Richter, Anne Bäz, Elke Winzeler, Bettina Hoesli, Irene BMJ Med Research OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the predictability of gestational diabetes mellitus wth a 75 g oral glucose tolerance test (OGTT) in early pregnancy, based on the 2013 criteria of the World Health Organization, and to test newly proposed cut-off values. DESIGN: International, prospective, multicentre cohort study. SETTING: Six university or cantonal departments in Austria, Germany, and Switzerland, from 1 May 2016 to 31 January 2019. PARTICIPANTS: Low risk cohort of 829 participants aged 18-45 years with singleton pregnancies attending first trimester screening and consenting to have an early 75 g OGTT at 12-15 weeks of gestation. Participants and healthcare providers were blinded to the results. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Fasting, one hour, and two hour plasma glucose concentrations after an early 75 g OGTT (12-15 weeks of gestation) and a late 75 g OGTT (24-28 weeks of gestation). RESULTS: Of 636 participants, 74 (12%) developed gestational diabetes mellitus, according to World Health Organization 2013 criteria, at 24-28 weeks of gestation. Applying WHO 2013 criteria to the early OGTT with at least one abnormal value gave a low sensitivity of 0.35 (95% confidence interval 0.24 to 0.47), high specificity of 0.96 (0.95 to 0.98), positive predictive value of 0.57 (0.41 to 0.71), negative predictive value of 0.92 (0.89 to 0.94), positive likelihood ratio of 10.46 (6.21 to 17.63), negative likelihood ratio of 0.65 (0.55 to 0.78), and diagnostic odds ratio of 15.98 (8.38 to 30.47). Lowering the postload glucose values (75 g OGTT cut-off values of 5.1, 8.9, and 7.8 mmol/L) improved the detection rate (53%, 95% confidence interval 41% to 64%) and negative predictive value (0.94, 0.91 to 0.95), but decreased the specificity (0.91, 0.88 to 0.93) and positive predictive value (0.42, 0.32 to 0.53) at a false positive rate of 9% (positive likelihood ratio 5.59, 4.0 to 7.81; negative likelihood ratio 0.64, 0.52 to 0.77; and diagnostic odds ratio 10.07, 6.26 to 18.31). CONCLUSIONS: The results of this prospective low risk cohort study indicated that the 75 g OGTT as a screening tool in early pregnancy is not sensitive enough when applying WHO 2013 criteria. Postload glucose values were higher in early pregnancy complicated by diabetes in pregnancy. Lowering the postload cut-off values identified a high risk group for later development of gestational diabetes mellitus or those who might benefit from earlier treatment. Results from randomised controlled trials showing a beneficial effect of early intervention are unclear. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT02035059. BMJ Publishing Group 2023-09-13 /pmc/articles/PMC10503330/ /pubmed/37720695 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjmed-2022-000330 Text en © Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2023. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited, appropriate credit is given, any changes made indicated, and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) . |
spellingShingle | Research Huhn, Evelyn A Göbl, Christian S Fischer, Thorsten Todesco Bernasconi, Monya Kreft, Martina Kunze, Mirjam Vogt, Deborah R Dölzlmüller, Eva Jaksch-Bogensperger, Heidi Heldstab, Sandra Eppel, Wolfgang Husslein, Peter Ochsenbein Kölble, Nicole Richter, Anne Bäz, Elke Winzeler, Bettina Hoesli, Irene Sensitivity, specificity, and diagnostic accuracy of WHO 2013 criteria for diagnosis of gestational diabetes mellitus in low risk early pregnancies: international, prospective, multicentre cohort study |
title | Sensitivity, specificity, and diagnostic accuracy of WHO 2013 criteria for diagnosis of gestational diabetes mellitus in low risk early pregnancies: international, prospective, multicentre cohort study |
title_full | Sensitivity, specificity, and diagnostic accuracy of WHO 2013 criteria for diagnosis of gestational diabetes mellitus in low risk early pregnancies: international, prospective, multicentre cohort study |
title_fullStr | Sensitivity, specificity, and diagnostic accuracy of WHO 2013 criteria for diagnosis of gestational diabetes mellitus in low risk early pregnancies: international, prospective, multicentre cohort study |
title_full_unstemmed | Sensitivity, specificity, and diagnostic accuracy of WHO 2013 criteria for diagnosis of gestational diabetes mellitus in low risk early pregnancies: international, prospective, multicentre cohort study |
title_short | Sensitivity, specificity, and diagnostic accuracy of WHO 2013 criteria for diagnosis of gestational diabetes mellitus in low risk early pregnancies: international, prospective, multicentre cohort study |
title_sort | sensitivity, specificity, and diagnostic accuracy of who 2013 criteria for diagnosis of gestational diabetes mellitus in low risk early pregnancies: international, prospective, multicentre cohort study |
topic | Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10503330/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37720695 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjmed-2022-000330 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT huhnevelyna sensitivityspecificityanddiagnosticaccuracyofwho2013criteriafordiagnosisofgestationaldiabetesmellitusinlowriskearlypregnanciesinternationalprospectivemulticentrecohortstudy AT goblchristians sensitivityspecificityanddiagnosticaccuracyofwho2013criteriafordiagnosisofgestationaldiabetesmellitusinlowriskearlypregnanciesinternationalprospectivemulticentrecohortstudy AT fischerthorsten sensitivityspecificityanddiagnosticaccuracyofwho2013criteriafordiagnosisofgestationaldiabetesmellitusinlowriskearlypregnanciesinternationalprospectivemulticentrecohortstudy AT todescobernasconimonya sensitivityspecificityanddiagnosticaccuracyofwho2013criteriafordiagnosisofgestationaldiabetesmellitusinlowriskearlypregnanciesinternationalprospectivemulticentrecohortstudy AT kreftmartina sensitivityspecificityanddiagnosticaccuracyofwho2013criteriafordiagnosisofgestationaldiabetesmellitusinlowriskearlypregnanciesinternationalprospectivemulticentrecohortstudy AT kunzemirjam sensitivityspecificityanddiagnosticaccuracyofwho2013criteriafordiagnosisofgestationaldiabetesmellitusinlowriskearlypregnanciesinternationalprospectivemulticentrecohortstudy AT vogtdeborahr sensitivityspecificityanddiagnosticaccuracyofwho2013criteriafordiagnosisofgestationaldiabetesmellitusinlowriskearlypregnanciesinternationalprospectivemulticentrecohortstudy AT dolzlmullereva sensitivityspecificityanddiagnosticaccuracyofwho2013criteriafordiagnosisofgestationaldiabetesmellitusinlowriskearlypregnanciesinternationalprospectivemulticentrecohortstudy AT jakschbogenspergerheidi sensitivityspecificityanddiagnosticaccuracyofwho2013criteriafordiagnosisofgestationaldiabetesmellitusinlowriskearlypregnanciesinternationalprospectivemulticentrecohortstudy AT heldstabsandra sensitivityspecificityanddiagnosticaccuracyofwho2013criteriafordiagnosisofgestationaldiabetesmellitusinlowriskearlypregnanciesinternationalprospectivemulticentrecohortstudy AT eppelwolfgang sensitivityspecificityanddiagnosticaccuracyofwho2013criteriafordiagnosisofgestationaldiabetesmellitusinlowriskearlypregnanciesinternationalprospectivemulticentrecohortstudy AT hussleinpeter sensitivityspecificityanddiagnosticaccuracyofwho2013criteriafordiagnosisofgestationaldiabetesmellitusinlowriskearlypregnanciesinternationalprospectivemulticentrecohortstudy AT ochsenbeinkolblenicole sensitivityspecificityanddiagnosticaccuracyofwho2013criteriafordiagnosisofgestationaldiabetesmellitusinlowriskearlypregnanciesinternationalprospectivemulticentrecohortstudy AT richteranne sensitivityspecificityanddiagnosticaccuracyofwho2013criteriafordiagnosisofgestationaldiabetesmellitusinlowriskearlypregnanciesinternationalprospectivemulticentrecohortstudy AT bazelke sensitivityspecificityanddiagnosticaccuracyofwho2013criteriafordiagnosisofgestationaldiabetesmellitusinlowriskearlypregnanciesinternationalprospectivemulticentrecohortstudy AT winzelerbettina sensitivityspecificityanddiagnosticaccuracyofwho2013criteriafordiagnosisofgestationaldiabetesmellitusinlowriskearlypregnanciesinternationalprospectivemulticentrecohortstudy AT hoesliirene sensitivityspecificityanddiagnosticaccuracyofwho2013criteriafordiagnosisofgestationaldiabetesmellitusinlowriskearlypregnanciesinternationalprospectivemulticentrecohortstudy |