Cargando…

Patient-reported outcomes in clinical HIV care: protocol for a single-centre, multistage, mixed-methods study in Denmark

INTRODUCTION: People with HIV-1 (PWH) have worse health-related quality of life (HRQoL) compared with the general population. Using patient-reported outcomes (PROs) may help reorient the focus of HIV care towards improving HRQoL. This study aims to develop, implement and evaluate the use of PROs in...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Borchmann, Olivia, Weis, Nina, Hansen, Ann-Brit Eg, Storgaard, Merete, Fetters, Michael D, Chandanabhumma, P Paul, Moseholm, Ellen
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BMJ Publishing Group 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10503392/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37709310
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2023-077303
_version_ 1785106516349550592
author Borchmann, Olivia
Weis, Nina
Hansen, Ann-Brit Eg
Storgaard, Merete
Fetters, Michael D
Chandanabhumma, P Paul
Moseholm, Ellen
author_facet Borchmann, Olivia
Weis, Nina
Hansen, Ann-Brit Eg
Storgaard, Merete
Fetters, Michael D
Chandanabhumma, P Paul
Moseholm, Ellen
author_sort Borchmann, Olivia
collection PubMed
description INTRODUCTION: People with HIV-1 (PWH) have worse health-related quality of life (HRQoL) compared with the general population. Using patient-reported outcomes (PROs) may help reorient the focus of HIV care towards improving HRQoL. This study aims to develop, implement and evaluate the use of PROs in HIV care. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: This is a Danish single-centre, multistage mixed-methods study consisting of four substudies (studies I–IV). Study I is a qualitative focus group interview study aiming to identify relevant PRO domains, and barriers and benefits to PRO use. Participants are 5–10 PWH and 5–10 HIV healthcare providers (HCPs). Data are thematically analysed. Results will guide the design of a PRO measure (PROM). Study II is a quantitative study aiming to assess PWH’s willingness and ability to engage with PRO. All PWH are consecutively invited to complete the PROMs before their next consultations. Demographic data are collected at enrolment. Differences between PWH who do/do not complete the PROMs are assessed. Study III is a quantitative before-and-after study aiming to assess the impact of PRO use on HCP awareness. Participants are all who complete the PROMs in Study II. In contrast to study II, HCPs are notified of the PROM results. The number of problems documented by the HCP in patients’ medical records during studies II and III are compared using χ(2) tests. Multiple regression models are used to identify factors associated with HCP awareness. Study IV is a qualitative study aiming to explore PWH and HCP experiences of using PROs. Participants are 15–20 PWH and 10–15 HCP. Data are collected from participant observation of PRO consultations and individual interviews. Data are analysed thematically. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: This study is approved by the Danish Data Protection Agency. Participants will provide written consent prior to participation. Results will be published in peer-reviewed journals.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10503392
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher BMJ Publishing Group
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-105033922023-09-16 Patient-reported outcomes in clinical HIV care: protocol for a single-centre, multistage, mixed-methods study in Denmark Borchmann, Olivia Weis, Nina Hansen, Ann-Brit Eg Storgaard, Merete Fetters, Michael D Chandanabhumma, P Paul Moseholm, Ellen BMJ Open HIV/AIDS INTRODUCTION: People with HIV-1 (PWH) have worse health-related quality of life (HRQoL) compared with the general population. Using patient-reported outcomes (PROs) may help reorient the focus of HIV care towards improving HRQoL. This study aims to develop, implement and evaluate the use of PROs in HIV care. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: This is a Danish single-centre, multistage mixed-methods study consisting of four substudies (studies I–IV). Study I is a qualitative focus group interview study aiming to identify relevant PRO domains, and barriers and benefits to PRO use. Participants are 5–10 PWH and 5–10 HIV healthcare providers (HCPs). Data are thematically analysed. Results will guide the design of a PRO measure (PROM). Study II is a quantitative study aiming to assess PWH’s willingness and ability to engage with PRO. All PWH are consecutively invited to complete the PROMs before their next consultations. Demographic data are collected at enrolment. Differences between PWH who do/do not complete the PROMs are assessed. Study III is a quantitative before-and-after study aiming to assess the impact of PRO use on HCP awareness. Participants are all who complete the PROMs in Study II. In contrast to study II, HCPs are notified of the PROM results. The number of problems documented by the HCP in patients’ medical records during studies II and III are compared using χ(2) tests. Multiple regression models are used to identify factors associated with HCP awareness. Study IV is a qualitative study aiming to explore PWH and HCP experiences of using PROs. Participants are 15–20 PWH and 10–15 HCP. Data are collected from participant observation of PRO consultations and individual interviews. Data are analysed thematically. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: This study is approved by the Danish Data Protection Agency. Participants will provide written consent prior to participation. Results will be published in peer-reviewed journals. BMJ Publishing Group 2023-09-13 /pmc/articles/PMC10503392/ /pubmed/37709310 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2023-077303 Text en © Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2023. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited, appropriate credit is given, any changes made indicated, and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) .
spellingShingle HIV/AIDS
Borchmann, Olivia
Weis, Nina
Hansen, Ann-Brit Eg
Storgaard, Merete
Fetters, Michael D
Chandanabhumma, P Paul
Moseholm, Ellen
Patient-reported outcomes in clinical HIV care: protocol for a single-centre, multistage, mixed-methods study in Denmark
title Patient-reported outcomes in clinical HIV care: protocol for a single-centre, multistage, mixed-methods study in Denmark
title_full Patient-reported outcomes in clinical HIV care: protocol for a single-centre, multistage, mixed-methods study in Denmark
title_fullStr Patient-reported outcomes in clinical HIV care: protocol for a single-centre, multistage, mixed-methods study in Denmark
title_full_unstemmed Patient-reported outcomes in clinical HIV care: protocol for a single-centre, multistage, mixed-methods study in Denmark
title_short Patient-reported outcomes in clinical HIV care: protocol for a single-centre, multistage, mixed-methods study in Denmark
title_sort patient-reported outcomes in clinical hiv care: protocol for a single-centre, multistage, mixed-methods study in denmark
topic HIV/AIDS
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10503392/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37709310
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2023-077303
work_keys_str_mv AT borchmannolivia patientreportedoutcomesinclinicalhivcareprotocolforasinglecentremultistagemixedmethodsstudyindenmark
AT weisnina patientreportedoutcomesinclinicalhivcareprotocolforasinglecentremultistagemixedmethodsstudyindenmark
AT hansenannbriteg patientreportedoutcomesinclinicalhivcareprotocolforasinglecentremultistagemixedmethodsstudyindenmark
AT storgaardmerete patientreportedoutcomesinclinicalhivcareprotocolforasinglecentremultistagemixedmethodsstudyindenmark
AT fettersmichaeld patientreportedoutcomesinclinicalhivcareprotocolforasinglecentremultistagemixedmethodsstudyindenmark
AT chandanabhummappaul patientreportedoutcomesinclinicalhivcareprotocolforasinglecentremultistagemixedmethodsstudyindenmark
AT moseholmellen patientreportedoutcomesinclinicalhivcareprotocolforasinglecentremultistagemixedmethodsstudyindenmark