Cargando…

Confidence is predicted by pre- and post-choice decision signal dynamics

It is well established that one’s confidence in a choice can be influenced by new evidence encountered after commitment has been reached, but the processes through which post-choice evidence is sampled remain unclear. To investigate this, we traced the pre- and post-choice dynamics of electrophysiol...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Grogan, John P., Rys, Wouter, Kelly, Simon P., O’Connell, Redmond G.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MIT Press 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10503486/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37719838
http://dx.doi.org/10.1162/imag_a_00005
_version_ 1785106531111403520
author Grogan, John P.
Rys, Wouter
Kelly, Simon P.
O’Connell, Redmond G.
author_facet Grogan, John P.
Rys, Wouter
Kelly, Simon P.
O’Connell, Redmond G.
author_sort Grogan, John P.
collection PubMed
description It is well established that one’s confidence in a choice can be influenced by new evidence encountered after commitment has been reached, but the processes through which post-choice evidence is sampled remain unclear. To investigate this, we traced the pre- and post-choice dynamics of electrophysiological signatures of evidence accumulation (Centro-parietal Positivity, CPP) and motor preparation (mu/beta band) to determine their sensitivity to participants’ confidence in their perceptual discriminations. Pre-choice CPP amplitudes scaled with confidence both when confidence was reported simultaneously with choice, and when reported 1 second after the initial direction decision with no intervening evidence. When additional evidence was presented during the post-choice delay period, the CPP exhibited sustained activation after the initial choice, with a more prolonged build-up on trials with lower certainty in the alternative that was finally endorsed, irrespective of whether this entailed a change-of-mind from the initial choice or not. Further investigation established that this pattern was accompanied by later lateralisation of motor preparation signals toward the ultimately chosen response and slower confidence reports when participants indicated low certainty in this response. These observations are consistent with certainty-dependent stopping theories according to which post-choice evidence accumulation ceases when a criterion level of certainty in a choice alternative has been reached, but continues otherwise. Our findings have implications for current models of choice confidence, and predictions they may make about EEG signatures.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10503486
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher MIT Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-105034862023-09-16 Confidence is predicted by pre- and post-choice decision signal dynamics Grogan, John P. Rys, Wouter Kelly, Simon P. O’Connell, Redmond G. Imaging Neurosci (Camb) Research Article It is well established that one’s confidence in a choice can be influenced by new evidence encountered after commitment has been reached, but the processes through which post-choice evidence is sampled remain unclear. To investigate this, we traced the pre- and post-choice dynamics of electrophysiological signatures of evidence accumulation (Centro-parietal Positivity, CPP) and motor preparation (mu/beta band) to determine their sensitivity to participants’ confidence in their perceptual discriminations. Pre-choice CPP amplitudes scaled with confidence both when confidence was reported simultaneously with choice, and when reported 1 second after the initial direction decision with no intervening evidence. When additional evidence was presented during the post-choice delay period, the CPP exhibited sustained activation after the initial choice, with a more prolonged build-up on trials with lower certainty in the alternative that was finally endorsed, irrespective of whether this entailed a change-of-mind from the initial choice or not. Further investigation established that this pattern was accompanied by later lateralisation of motor preparation signals toward the ultimately chosen response and slower confidence reports when participants indicated low certainty in this response. These observations are consistent with certainty-dependent stopping theories according to which post-choice evidence accumulation ceases when a criterion level of certainty in a choice alternative has been reached, but continues otherwise. Our findings have implications for current models of choice confidence, and predictions they may make about EEG signatures. MIT Press 2023-08-10 /pmc/articles/PMC10503486/ /pubmed/37719838 http://dx.doi.org/10.1162/imag_a_00005 Text en © 2023 Massachusetts Institute of Technology. Published under a Creative Commons CC BY-NC 4.0 license. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits copying and redistributing the material in any medium or format for noncommercial purposes only. For a full description of the license, please visit https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/legalcode (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Research Article
Grogan, John P.
Rys, Wouter
Kelly, Simon P.
O’Connell, Redmond G.
Confidence is predicted by pre- and post-choice decision signal dynamics
title Confidence is predicted by pre- and post-choice decision signal dynamics
title_full Confidence is predicted by pre- and post-choice decision signal dynamics
title_fullStr Confidence is predicted by pre- and post-choice decision signal dynamics
title_full_unstemmed Confidence is predicted by pre- and post-choice decision signal dynamics
title_short Confidence is predicted by pre- and post-choice decision signal dynamics
title_sort confidence is predicted by pre- and post-choice decision signal dynamics
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10503486/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37719838
http://dx.doi.org/10.1162/imag_a_00005
work_keys_str_mv AT groganjohnp confidenceispredictedbypreandpostchoicedecisionsignaldynamics
AT ryswouter confidenceispredictedbypreandpostchoicedecisionsignaldynamics
AT kellysimonp confidenceispredictedbypreandpostchoicedecisionsignaldynamics
AT oconnellredmondg confidenceispredictedbypreandpostchoicedecisionsignaldynamics