Cargando…

Exploring the extent to which shared mechanisms contribute to motion-position illusions

Motion-position illusions (MPIs) are visual motion illusions in which motion signals bias the perceived position of an object. Due to phenomenological similarities between these illusions, previous research has assumed that some are caused by common mechanisms. However, this assumption has yet to be...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Cottier, Timothy V., Turner, William, Holcombe, Alex O., Hogendoorn, Hinze
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: The Association for Research in Vision and Ophthalmology 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10503592/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37703000
http://dx.doi.org/10.1167/jov.23.10.8
_version_ 1785106554390839296
author Cottier, Timothy V.
Turner, William
Holcombe, Alex O.
Hogendoorn, Hinze
author_facet Cottier, Timothy V.
Turner, William
Holcombe, Alex O.
Hogendoorn, Hinze
author_sort Cottier, Timothy V.
collection PubMed
description Motion-position illusions (MPIs) are visual motion illusions in which motion signals bias the perceived position of an object. Due to phenomenological similarities between these illusions, previous research has assumed that some are caused by common mechanisms. However, this assumption has yet to be directly tested. This study investigates this assumption by exploiting between-participant variations in illusion magnitude. During two sessions, 106 participants viewed the flash-lag effect, luminance flash-lag effect, Fröhlich effect, flash-drag effect, flash-grab effect, motion-induced position shift, twinkle-goes effect, and the flash-jump effect. For each effect, the magnitude of the illusion was reliable within participants, strongly correlating between sessions. When the pairwise correlations of averaged illusions magnitudes were explored, two clusters of statistically significant positively correlated illusions were identified. The first cluster comprised the flash-grab effect, motion-induced position shift, and twinkle-goes effect. The second cluster comprised the Fröhlich and flash-drag effect. The fact that within each of these two clusters, individual differences in illusion magnitude were correlated suggests that these clusters may reflect shared underlying mechanisms. An exploratory factor analysis provided additional evidence that these correlated clusters shared an underlying factor, with each cluster loading onto their own factor. Overall, our results reveal that, contrary to the prevailing perspective in the literature, while some motion-position illusions share processes, most of these illusions are unlikely to reflect any shared processes, instead implicating unique mechanisms.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10503592
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher The Association for Research in Vision and Ophthalmology
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-105035922023-09-16 Exploring the extent to which shared mechanisms contribute to motion-position illusions Cottier, Timothy V. Turner, William Holcombe, Alex O. Hogendoorn, Hinze J Vis Article Motion-position illusions (MPIs) are visual motion illusions in which motion signals bias the perceived position of an object. Due to phenomenological similarities between these illusions, previous research has assumed that some are caused by common mechanisms. However, this assumption has yet to be directly tested. This study investigates this assumption by exploiting between-participant variations in illusion magnitude. During two sessions, 106 participants viewed the flash-lag effect, luminance flash-lag effect, Fröhlich effect, flash-drag effect, flash-grab effect, motion-induced position shift, twinkle-goes effect, and the flash-jump effect. For each effect, the magnitude of the illusion was reliable within participants, strongly correlating between sessions. When the pairwise correlations of averaged illusions magnitudes were explored, two clusters of statistically significant positively correlated illusions were identified. The first cluster comprised the flash-grab effect, motion-induced position shift, and twinkle-goes effect. The second cluster comprised the Fröhlich and flash-drag effect. The fact that within each of these two clusters, individual differences in illusion magnitude were correlated suggests that these clusters may reflect shared underlying mechanisms. An exploratory factor analysis provided additional evidence that these correlated clusters shared an underlying factor, with each cluster loading onto their own factor. Overall, our results reveal that, contrary to the prevailing perspective in the literature, while some motion-position illusions share processes, most of these illusions are unlikely to reflect any shared processes, instead implicating unique mechanisms. The Association for Research in Vision and Ophthalmology 2023-09-13 /pmc/articles/PMC10503592/ /pubmed/37703000 http://dx.doi.org/10.1167/jov.23.10.8 Text en Copyright 2023 The Authors https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
spellingShingle Article
Cottier, Timothy V.
Turner, William
Holcombe, Alex O.
Hogendoorn, Hinze
Exploring the extent to which shared mechanisms contribute to motion-position illusions
title Exploring the extent to which shared mechanisms contribute to motion-position illusions
title_full Exploring the extent to which shared mechanisms contribute to motion-position illusions
title_fullStr Exploring the extent to which shared mechanisms contribute to motion-position illusions
title_full_unstemmed Exploring the extent to which shared mechanisms contribute to motion-position illusions
title_short Exploring the extent to which shared mechanisms contribute to motion-position illusions
title_sort exploring the extent to which shared mechanisms contribute to motion-position illusions
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10503592/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37703000
http://dx.doi.org/10.1167/jov.23.10.8
work_keys_str_mv AT cottiertimothyv exploringtheextenttowhichsharedmechanismscontributetomotionpositionillusions
AT turnerwilliam exploringtheextenttowhichsharedmechanismscontributetomotionpositionillusions
AT holcombealexo exploringtheextenttowhichsharedmechanismscontributetomotionpositionillusions
AT hogendoornhinze exploringtheextenttowhichsharedmechanismscontributetomotionpositionillusions