Cargando…

Development of a core outcome set for use in adult primary glioma phase III interventional trials: A mixed methods study

BACKGROUND: Glioma interventional studies should collect data aligned with patient priorities, enabling treatment benefit assessment and informed decision-making. This requires effective data synthesis and meta-analyses, underpinned by consistent trial outcome measurement, analysis, and reporting. D...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Retzer, Ameeta, Baddeley, Elin, Sivell, Stephanie, Scott, Hannah, Nelson, Annmarie, Bulbeck, Helen, Seddon, Kathy, Grant, Robin, Adams, Richard, Watts, Colin, Aiyegbusi, Olalekan Lee, Kearns, Pamela, Rivera, Samantha Cruz, Dirven, Linda, Calvert, Melanie, Byrne, Anthony
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Oxford University Press 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10503650/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37719788
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/noajnl/vdad096
Descripción
Sumario:BACKGROUND: Glioma interventional studies should collect data aligned with patient priorities, enabling treatment benefit assessment and informed decision-making. This requires effective data synthesis and meta-analyses, underpinned by consistent trial outcome measurement, analysis, and reporting. Development of a core outcome set (COS) may contribute to a solution. METHODS: A 5-stage process was used to develop a COS for glioma trials from the UK perspective. Outcome lists were generated in stages 1: a trial registry review and systematic review of qualitative studies and 2: interviews with glioma patients and caregivers. In stage 3, the outcome lists were de-duplicated with accessible terminology, in stage 4 outcomes were rated via a 2-round Delphi process, and stage 5 comprised a consensus meeting to finalize the COS. Patient-reportable COS outcomes were identified. RESULTS: In Delphi round 1, 96 participants rated 35 outcomes identified in stages 1 and 2, to which a further 10 were added. Participants (77/96) rated the resulting 45 outcomes in round 2. Of these, 22 outcomes met a priori threshold for inclusion in the COS. After further review, a COS consisting of 19 outcomes grouped into 7 outcome domains (survival, adverse events, activities of daily living, health-related quality of life, seizure activity, cognitive function, and physical function) was finalized by 13 participants at the consensus meeting. CONCLUSIONS: A COS for glioma trials was developed, comprising 7 outcome domains. Additional research will identify appropriate measurement tools and further validate this COS.