Cargando…

Development of a core outcome set for use in adult primary glioma phase III interventional trials: A mixed methods study

BACKGROUND: Glioma interventional studies should collect data aligned with patient priorities, enabling treatment benefit assessment and informed decision-making. This requires effective data synthesis and meta-analyses, underpinned by consistent trial outcome measurement, analysis, and reporting. D...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Retzer, Ameeta, Baddeley, Elin, Sivell, Stephanie, Scott, Hannah, Nelson, Annmarie, Bulbeck, Helen, Seddon, Kathy, Grant, Robin, Adams, Richard, Watts, Colin, Aiyegbusi, Olalekan Lee, Kearns, Pamela, Rivera, Samantha Cruz, Dirven, Linda, Calvert, Melanie, Byrne, Anthony
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Oxford University Press 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10503650/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37719788
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/noajnl/vdad096
_version_ 1785106566363480064
author Retzer, Ameeta
Baddeley, Elin
Sivell, Stephanie
Scott, Hannah
Nelson, Annmarie
Bulbeck, Helen
Seddon, Kathy
Grant, Robin
Adams, Richard
Watts, Colin
Aiyegbusi, Olalekan Lee
Kearns, Pamela
Rivera, Samantha Cruz
Dirven, Linda
Calvert, Melanie
Byrne, Anthony
author_facet Retzer, Ameeta
Baddeley, Elin
Sivell, Stephanie
Scott, Hannah
Nelson, Annmarie
Bulbeck, Helen
Seddon, Kathy
Grant, Robin
Adams, Richard
Watts, Colin
Aiyegbusi, Olalekan Lee
Kearns, Pamela
Rivera, Samantha Cruz
Dirven, Linda
Calvert, Melanie
Byrne, Anthony
author_sort Retzer, Ameeta
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Glioma interventional studies should collect data aligned with patient priorities, enabling treatment benefit assessment and informed decision-making. This requires effective data synthesis and meta-analyses, underpinned by consistent trial outcome measurement, analysis, and reporting. Development of a core outcome set (COS) may contribute to a solution. METHODS: A 5-stage process was used to develop a COS for glioma trials from the UK perspective. Outcome lists were generated in stages 1: a trial registry review and systematic review of qualitative studies and 2: interviews with glioma patients and caregivers. In stage 3, the outcome lists were de-duplicated with accessible terminology, in stage 4 outcomes were rated via a 2-round Delphi process, and stage 5 comprised a consensus meeting to finalize the COS. Patient-reportable COS outcomes were identified. RESULTS: In Delphi round 1, 96 participants rated 35 outcomes identified in stages 1 and 2, to which a further 10 were added. Participants (77/96) rated the resulting 45 outcomes in round 2. Of these, 22 outcomes met a priori threshold for inclusion in the COS. After further review, a COS consisting of 19 outcomes grouped into 7 outcome domains (survival, adverse events, activities of daily living, health-related quality of life, seizure activity, cognitive function, and physical function) was finalized by 13 participants at the consensus meeting. CONCLUSIONS: A COS for glioma trials was developed, comprising 7 outcome domains. Additional research will identify appropriate measurement tools and further validate this COS.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10503650
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher Oxford University Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-105036502023-09-16 Development of a core outcome set for use in adult primary glioma phase III interventional trials: A mixed methods study Retzer, Ameeta Baddeley, Elin Sivell, Stephanie Scott, Hannah Nelson, Annmarie Bulbeck, Helen Seddon, Kathy Grant, Robin Adams, Richard Watts, Colin Aiyegbusi, Olalekan Lee Kearns, Pamela Rivera, Samantha Cruz Dirven, Linda Calvert, Melanie Byrne, Anthony Neurooncol Adv Clinical Investigations BACKGROUND: Glioma interventional studies should collect data aligned with patient priorities, enabling treatment benefit assessment and informed decision-making. This requires effective data synthesis and meta-analyses, underpinned by consistent trial outcome measurement, analysis, and reporting. Development of a core outcome set (COS) may contribute to a solution. METHODS: A 5-stage process was used to develop a COS for glioma trials from the UK perspective. Outcome lists were generated in stages 1: a trial registry review and systematic review of qualitative studies and 2: interviews with glioma patients and caregivers. In stage 3, the outcome lists were de-duplicated with accessible terminology, in stage 4 outcomes were rated via a 2-round Delphi process, and stage 5 comprised a consensus meeting to finalize the COS. Patient-reportable COS outcomes were identified. RESULTS: In Delphi round 1, 96 participants rated 35 outcomes identified in stages 1 and 2, to which a further 10 were added. Participants (77/96) rated the resulting 45 outcomes in round 2. Of these, 22 outcomes met a priori threshold for inclusion in the COS. After further review, a COS consisting of 19 outcomes grouped into 7 outcome domains (survival, adverse events, activities of daily living, health-related quality of life, seizure activity, cognitive function, and physical function) was finalized by 13 participants at the consensus meeting. CONCLUSIONS: A COS for glioma trials was developed, comprising 7 outcome domains. Additional research will identify appropriate measurement tools and further validate this COS. Oxford University Press 2023-08-02 /pmc/articles/PMC10503650/ /pubmed/37719788 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/noajnl/vdad096 Text en © The Author(s) 2023. Published by Oxford University Press, the Society for Neuro-Oncology and the European Association of Neuro-Oncology. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted reuse, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Clinical Investigations
Retzer, Ameeta
Baddeley, Elin
Sivell, Stephanie
Scott, Hannah
Nelson, Annmarie
Bulbeck, Helen
Seddon, Kathy
Grant, Robin
Adams, Richard
Watts, Colin
Aiyegbusi, Olalekan Lee
Kearns, Pamela
Rivera, Samantha Cruz
Dirven, Linda
Calvert, Melanie
Byrne, Anthony
Development of a core outcome set for use in adult primary glioma phase III interventional trials: A mixed methods study
title Development of a core outcome set for use in adult primary glioma phase III interventional trials: A mixed methods study
title_full Development of a core outcome set for use in adult primary glioma phase III interventional trials: A mixed methods study
title_fullStr Development of a core outcome set for use in adult primary glioma phase III interventional trials: A mixed methods study
title_full_unstemmed Development of a core outcome set for use in adult primary glioma phase III interventional trials: A mixed methods study
title_short Development of a core outcome set for use in adult primary glioma phase III interventional trials: A mixed methods study
title_sort development of a core outcome set for use in adult primary glioma phase iii interventional trials: a mixed methods study
topic Clinical Investigations
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10503650/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37719788
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/noajnl/vdad096
work_keys_str_mv AT retzerameeta developmentofacoreoutcomesetforuseinadultprimarygliomaphaseiiiinterventionaltrialsamixedmethodsstudy
AT baddeleyelin developmentofacoreoutcomesetforuseinadultprimarygliomaphaseiiiinterventionaltrialsamixedmethodsstudy
AT sivellstephanie developmentofacoreoutcomesetforuseinadultprimarygliomaphaseiiiinterventionaltrialsamixedmethodsstudy
AT scotthannah developmentofacoreoutcomesetforuseinadultprimarygliomaphaseiiiinterventionaltrialsamixedmethodsstudy
AT nelsonannmarie developmentofacoreoutcomesetforuseinadultprimarygliomaphaseiiiinterventionaltrialsamixedmethodsstudy
AT bulbeckhelen developmentofacoreoutcomesetforuseinadultprimarygliomaphaseiiiinterventionaltrialsamixedmethodsstudy
AT seddonkathy developmentofacoreoutcomesetforuseinadultprimarygliomaphaseiiiinterventionaltrialsamixedmethodsstudy
AT grantrobin developmentofacoreoutcomesetforuseinadultprimarygliomaphaseiiiinterventionaltrialsamixedmethodsstudy
AT adamsrichard developmentofacoreoutcomesetforuseinadultprimarygliomaphaseiiiinterventionaltrialsamixedmethodsstudy
AT wattscolin developmentofacoreoutcomesetforuseinadultprimarygliomaphaseiiiinterventionaltrialsamixedmethodsstudy
AT aiyegbusiolalekanlee developmentofacoreoutcomesetforuseinadultprimarygliomaphaseiiiinterventionaltrialsamixedmethodsstudy
AT kearnspamela developmentofacoreoutcomesetforuseinadultprimarygliomaphaseiiiinterventionaltrialsamixedmethodsstudy
AT riverasamanthacruz developmentofacoreoutcomesetforuseinadultprimarygliomaphaseiiiinterventionaltrialsamixedmethodsstudy
AT dirvenlinda developmentofacoreoutcomesetforuseinadultprimarygliomaphaseiiiinterventionaltrialsamixedmethodsstudy
AT calvertmelanie developmentofacoreoutcomesetforuseinadultprimarygliomaphaseiiiinterventionaltrialsamixedmethodsstudy
AT byrneanthony developmentofacoreoutcomesetforuseinadultprimarygliomaphaseiiiinterventionaltrialsamixedmethodsstudy