Cargando…
Umbrella systematic review of potential quality indicators for the detection of dysplasia and cancer at upper gastrointestinal endoscopy
Background and study aims Upper gastrointestinal (UGI) endoscopy lacks established quality indicators. We conducted an umbrella systematic review of potential quality indicators for the detection of UGI cancer and dysplasia. Methods Bibliographic databases were searched up to December 2021 for syste...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Georg Thieme Verlag KG
2023
|
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10504040/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37719799 http://dx.doi.org/10.1055/a-2117-8621 |
_version_ | 1785106640339468288 |
---|---|
author | Kamran, Umair Abbasi, Abdullah Umar, Nosheen Tahir, Imran Brookes, Matthew J Rutter, Matt McCord, Mimi Adderley, Nicola J Dretzke, Janine Trudgill, Nigel |
author_facet | Kamran, Umair Abbasi, Abdullah Umar, Nosheen Tahir, Imran Brookes, Matthew J Rutter, Matt McCord, Mimi Adderley, Nicola J Dretzke, Janine Trudgill, Nigel |
author_sort | Kamran, Umair |
collection | PubMed |
description | Background and study aims Upper gastrointestinal (UGI) endoscopy lacks established quality indicators. We conducted an umbrella systematic review of potential quality indicators for the detection of UGI cancer and dysplasia. Methods Bibliographic databases were searched up to December 2021 for systematic reviews and primary studies. Studies reporting diagnostic accuracy, detection rates or the association of endoscopy or endoscopist-related factors with UGI cancer or dysplasia detection were included. AMSTAR2 and JBI checklists were used to assess systematic review and primary study quality. Clinical heterogeneity precluded meta-analysis and findings are summarized narratively. Results Eight systematic reviews and nine primary studies were included. Image enhancement, especially narrow band imaging, had high diagnostic accuracy for dysplasia and early gastric cancer (pooled sensitivity 0.87 (95% CI 0.84–0.89) and specificity 0.97 (0.97–0.98)). Higher detection rates with longer endoscopy examination times were reported in three studies, but no difference was observed in one study. Endoscopist biopsy rate was associated with increased gastric cancer detection (odds ratio 2.5; 95% confidence interval [CI] 2.1–2.9). Early esophageal cancer (0.17% vs 0.14%, P =0.04) and gastric cancer (0.16% vs 0.12%, P =0.02) detection rates were higher with propofol sedation compared to no sedation. Endoscopies performed by trained endoscopists on dedicated Barrett’s surveillance lists had higher detection rates (8% vs 3%, P <0.001). The neoplasia detection rate during diagnostic endoscopies for Barrett’s esophagus was 7% (95% CI 4%-10%). Conclusions Image enhancement use, longer examination times, biopsy rate and propofol sedation are potential quality indicators for UGI endoscopy. Neoplasia detection rate and dedicated endoscopy lists are additional potential quality indicators for Barrett’s esophagus |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-10504040 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2023 |
publisher | Georg Thieme Verlag KG |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-105040402023-09-16 Umbrella systematic review of potential quality indicators for the detection of dysplasia and cancer at upper gastrointestinal endoscopy Kamran, Umair Abbasi, Abdullah Umar, Nosheen Tahir, Imran Brookes, Matthew J Rutter, Matt McCord, Mimi Adderley, Nicola J Dretzke, Janine Trudgill, Nigel Endosc Int Open Background and study aims Upper gastrointestinal (UGI) endoscopy lacks established quality indicators. We conducted an umbrella systematic review of potential quality indicators for the detection of UGI cancer and dysplasia. Methods Bibliographic databases were searched up to December 2021 for systematic reviews and primary studies. Studies reporting diagnostic accuracy, detection rates or the association of endoscopy or endoscopist-related factors with UGI cancer or dysplasia detection were included. AMSTAR2 and JBI checklists were used to assess systematic review and primary study quality. Clinical heterogeneity precluded meta-analysis and findings are summarized narratively. Results Eight systematic reviews and nine primary studies were included. Image enhancement, especially narrow band imaging, had high diagnostic accuracy for dysplasia and early gastric cancer (pooled sensitivity 0.87 (95% CI 0.84–0.89) and specificity 0.97 (0.97–0.98)). Higher detection rates with longer endoscopy examination times were reported in three studies, but no difference was observed in one study. Endoscopist biopsy rate was associated with increased gastric cancer detection (odds ratio 2.5; 95% confidence interval [CI] 2.1–2.9). Early esophageal cancer (0.17% vs 0.14%, P =0.04) and gastric cancer (0.16% vs 0.12%, P =0.02) detection rates were higher with propofol sedation compared to no sedation. Endoscopies performed by trained endoscopists on dedicated Barrett’s surveillance lists had higher detection rates (8% vs 3%, P <0.001). The neoplasia detection rate during diagnostic endoscopies for Barrett’s esophagus was 7% (95% CI 4%-10%). Conclusions Image enhancement use, longer examination times, biopsy rate and propofol sedation are potential quality indicators for UGI endoscopy. Neoplasia detection rate and dedicated endoscopy lists are additional potential quality indicators for Barrett’s esophagus Georg Thieme Verlag KG 2023-09-15 /pmc/articles/PMC10504040/ /pubmed/37719799 http://dx.doi.org/10.1055/a-2117-8621 Text en The Author(s). This is an open access article published by Thieme under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonDerivative-NonCommercial-License, permitting copying and reproduction so long as the original work is given appropriate credit. Contents may not be used for commercial purposes, or adapted, remixed, transformed or built upon. (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/). https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives License, which permits unrestricted reproduction and distribution, for non-commercial purposes only; and use and reproduction, but not distribution, of adapted material for non-commercial purposes only, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Kamran, Umair Abbasi, Abdullah Umar, Nosheen Tahir, Imran Brookes, Matthew J Rutter, Matt McCord, Mimi Adderley, Nicola J Dretzke, Janine Trudgill, Nigel Umbrella systematic review of potential quality indicators for the detection of dysplasia and cancer at upper gastrointestinal endoscopy |
title | Umbrella systematic review of potential quality indicators for the detection of dysplasia and cancer at upper gastrointestinal endoscopy |
title_full | Umbrella systematic review of potential quality indicators for the detection of dysplasia and cancer at upper gastrointestinal endoscopy |
title_fullStr | Umbrella systematic review of potential quality indicators for the detection of dysplasia and cancer at upper gastrointestinal endoscopy |
title_full_unstemmed | Umbrella systematic review of potential quality indicators for the detection of dysplasia and cancer at upper gastrointestinal endoscopy |
title_short | Umbrella systematic review of potential quality indicators for the detection of dysplasia and cancer at upper gastrointestinal endoscopy |
title_sort | umbrella systematic review of potential quality indicators for the detection of dysplasia and cancer at upper gastrointestinal endoscopy |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10504040/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37719799 http://dx.doi.org/10.1055/a-2117-8621 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT kamranumair umbrellasystematicreviewofpotentialqualityindicatorsforthedetectionofdysplasiaandcanceratuppergastrointestinalendoscopy AT abbasiabdullah umbrellasystematicreviewofpotentialqualityindicatorsforthedetectionofdysplasiaandcanceratuppergastrointestinalendoscopy AT umarnosheen umbrellasystematicreviewofpotentialqualityindicatorsforthedetectionofdysplasiaandcanceratuppergastrointestinalendoscopy AT tahirimran umbrellasystematicreviewofpotentialqualityindicatorsforthedetectionofdysplasiaandcanceratuppergastrointestinalendoscopy AT brookesmatthewj umbrellasystematicreviewofpotentialqualityindicatorsforthedetectionofdysplasiaandcanceratuppergastrointestinalendoscopy AT ruttermatt umbrellasystematicreviewofpotentialqualityindicatorsforthedetectionofdysplasiaandcanceratuppergastrointestinalendoscopy AT mccordmimi umbrellasystematicreviewofpotentialqualityindicatorsforthedetectionofdysplasiaandcanceratuppergastrointestinalendoscopy AT adderleynicolaj umbrellasystematicreviewofpotentialqualityindicatorsforthedetectionofdysplasiaandcanceratuppergastrointestinalendoscopy AT dretzkejanine umbrellasystematicreviewofpotentialqualityindicatorsforthedetectionofdysplasiaandcanceratuppergastrointestinalendoscopy AT trudgillnigel umbrellasystematicreviewofpotentialqualityindicatorsforthedetectionofdysplasiaandcanceratuppergastrointestinalendoscopy |