Cargando…

Umbrella systematic review of potential quality indicators for the detection of dysplasia and cancer at upper gastrointestinal endoscopy

Background and study aims Upper gastrointestinal (UGI) endoscopy lacks established quality indicators. We conducted an umbrella systematic review of potential quality indicators for the detection of UGI cancer and dysplasia. Methods Bibliographic databases were searched up to December 2021 for syste...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Kamran, Umair, Abbasi, Abdullah, Umar, Nosheen, Tahir, Imran, Brookes, Matthew J, Rutter, Matt, McCord, Mimi, Adderley, Nicola J, Dretzke, Janine, Trudgill, Nigel
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Georg Thieme Verlag KG 2023
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10504040/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37719799
http://dx.doi.org/10.1055/a-2117-8621
_version_ 1785106640339468288
author Kamran, Umair
Abbasi, Abdullah
Umar, Nosheen
Tahir, Imran
Brookes, Matthew J
Rutter, Matt
McCord, Mimi
Adderley, Nicola J
Dretzke, Janine
Trudgill, Nigel
author_facet Kamran, Umair
Abbasi, Abdullah
Umar, Nosheen
Tahir, Imran
Brookes, Matthew J
Rutter, Matt
McCord, Mimi
Adderley, Nicola J
Dretzke, Janine
Trudgill, Nigel
author_sort Kamran, Umair
collection PubMed
description Background and study aims Upper gastrointestinal (UGI) endoscopy lacks established quality indicators. We conducted an umbrella systematic review of potential quality indicators for the detection of UGI cancer and dysplasia. Methods Bibliographic databases were searched up to December 2021 for systematic reviews and primary studies. Studies reporting diagnostic accuracy, detection rates or the association of endoscopy or endoscopist-related factors with UGI cancer or dysplasia detection were included. AMSTAR2 and JBI checklists were used to assess systematic review and primary study quality. Clinical heterogeneity precluded meta-analysis and findings are summarized narratively. Results Eight systematic reviews and nine primary studies were included. Image enhancement, especially narrow band imaging, had high diagnostic accuracy for dysplasia and early gastric cancer (pooled sensitivity 0.87 (95% CI 0.84–0.89) and specificity 0.97 (0.97–0.98)). Higher detection rates with longer endoscopy examination times were reported in three studies, but no difference was observed in one study. Endoscopist biopsy rate was associated with increased gastric cancer detection (odds ratio 2.5; 95% confidence interval [CI] 2.1–2.9). Early esophageal cancer (0.17% vs 0.14%, P =0.04) and gastric cancer (0.16% vs 0.12%, P =0.02) detection rates were higher with propofol sedation compared to no sedation. Endoscopies performed by trained endoscopists on dedicated Barrett’s surveillance lists had higher detection rates (8% vs 3%, P <0.001). The neoplasia detection rate during diagnostic endoscopies for Barrett’s esophagus was 7% (95% CI 4%-10%). Conclusions Image enhancement use, longer examination times, biopsy rate and propofol sedation are potential quality indicators for UGI endoscopy. Neoplasia detection rate and dedicated endoscopy lists are additional potential quality indicators for Barrett’s esophagus
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10504040
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher Georg Thieme Verlag KG
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-105040402023-09-16 Umbrella systematic review of potential quality indicators for the detection of dysplasia and cancer at upper gastrointestinal endoscopy Kamran, Umair Abbasi, Abdullah Umar, Nosheen Tahir, Imran Brookes, Matthew J Rutter, Matt McCord, Mimi Adderley, Nicola J Dretzke, Janine Trudgill, Nigel Endosc Int Open Background and study aims Upper gastrointestinal (UGI) endoscopy lacks established quality indicators. We conducted an umbrella systematic review of potential quality indicators for the detection of UGI cancer and dysplasia. Methods Bibliographic databases were searched up to December 2021 for systematic reviews and primary studies. Studies reporting diagnostic accuracy, detection rates or the association of endoscopy or endoscopist-related factors with UGI cancer or dysplasia detection were included. AMSTAR2 and JBI checklists were used to assess systematic review and primary study quality. Clinical heterogeneity precluded meta-analysis and findings are summarized narratively. Results Eight systematic reviews and nine primary studies were included. Image enhancement, especially narrow band imaging, had high diagnostic accuracy for dysplasia and early gastric cancer (pooled sensitivity 0.87 (95% CI 0.84–0.89) and specificity 0.97 (0.97–0.98)). Higher detection rates with longer endoscopy examination times were reported in three studies, but no difference was observed in one study. Endoscopist biopsy rate was associated with increased gastric cancer detection (odds ratio 2.5; 95% confidence interval [CI] 2.1–2.9). Early esophageal cancer (0.17% vs 0.14%, P =0.04) and gastric cancer (0.16% vs 0.12%, P =0.02) detection rates were higher with propofol sedation compared to no sedation. Endoscopies performed by trained endoscopists on dedicated Barrett’s surveillance lists had higher detection rates (8% vs 3%, P <0.001). The neoplasia detection rate during diagnostic endoscopies for Barrett’s esophagus was 7% (95% CI 4%-10%). Conclusions Image enhancement use, longer examination times, biopsy rate and propofol sedation are potential quality indicators for UGI endoscopy. Neoplasia detection rate and dedicated endoscopy lists are additional potential quality indicators for Barrett’s esophagus Georg Thieme Verlag KG 2023-09-15 /pmc/articles/PMC10504040/ /pubmed/37719799 http://dx.doi.org/10.1055/a-2117-8621 Text en The Author(s). This is an open access article published by Thieme under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonDerivative-NonCommercial-License, permitting copying and reproduction so long as the original work is given appropriate credit. Contents may not be used for commercial purposes, or adapted, remixed, transformed or built upon. (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/). https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives License, which permits unrestricted reproduction and distribution, for non-commercial purposes only; and use and reproduction, but not distribution, of adapted material for non-commercial purposes only, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Kamran, Umair
Abbasi, Abdullah
Umar, Nosheen
Tahir, Imran
Brookes, Matthew J
Rutter, Matt
McCord, Mimi
Adderley, Nicola J
Dretzke, Janine
Trudgill, Nigel
Umbrella systematic review of potential quality indicators for the detection of dysplasia and cancer at upper gastrointestinal endoscopy
title Umbrella systematic review of potential quality indicators for the detection of dysplasia and cancer at upper gastrointestinal endoscopy
title_full Umbrella systematic review of potential quality indicators for the detection of dysplasia and cancer at upper gastrointestinal endoscopy
title_fullStr Umbrella systematic review of potential quality indicators for the detection of dysplasia and cancer at upper gastrointestinal endoscopy
title_full_unstemmed Umbrella systematic review of potential quality indicators for the detection of dysplasia and cancer at upper gastrointestinal endoscopy
title_short Umbrella systematic review of potential quality indicators for the detection of dysplasia and cancer at upper gastrointestinal endoscopy
title_sort umbrella systematic review of potential quality indicators for the detection of dysplasia and cancer at upper gastrointestinal endoscopy
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10504040/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37719799
http://dx.doi.org/10.1055/a-2117-8621
work_keys_str_mv AT kamranumair umbrellasystematicreviewofpotentialqualityindicatorsforthedetectionofdysplasiaandcanceratuppergastrointestinalendoscopy
AT abbasiabdullah umbrellasystematicreviewofpotentialqualityindicatorsforthedetectionofdysplasiaandcanceratuppergastrointestinalendoscopy
AT umarnosheen umbrellasystematicreviewofpotentialqualityindicatorsforthedetectionofdysplasiaandcanceratuppergastrointestinalendoscopy
AT tahirimran umbrellasystematicreviewofpotentialqualityindicatorsforthedetectionofdysplasiaandcanceratuppergastrointestinalendoscopy
AT brookesmatthewj umbrellasystematicreviewofpotentialqualityindicatorsforthedetectionofdysplasiaandcanceratuppergastrointestinalendoscopy
AT ruttermatt umbrellasystematicreviewofpotentialqualityindicatorsforthedetectionofdysplasiaandcanceratuppergastrointestinalendoscopy
AT mccordmimi umbrellasystematicreviewofpotentialqualityindicatorsforthedetectionofdysplasiaandcanceratuppergastrointestinalendoscopy
AT adderleynicolaj umbrellasystematicreviewofpotentialqualityindicatorsforthedetectionofdysplasiaandcanceratuppergastrointestinalendoscopy
AT dretzkejanine umbrellasystematicreviewofpotentialqualityindicatorsforthedetectionofdysplasiaandcanceratuppergastrointestinalendoscopy
AT trudgillnigel umbrellasystematicreviewofpotentialqualityindicatorsforthedetectionofdysplasiaandcanceratuppergastrointestinalendoscopy