Cargando…

COVID-19 related change in breast cancer diagnosis, stage, treatment, and case volume: 2019–2021

PURPOSE: Evaluate the COVID-19 pandemic impact on breast cancer detection method, stage and treatment before, during and after health care restrictions. METHODS: In a retrospective tertiary cancer care center cohort, first primary breast cancer (BC) patients, years 2019–2021, were reviewed (n = 1787...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Malmgren, Judith A., Guo, Boya, Atwood, Mary K., Hallam, Paula, Roberts, Laura A., Kaplan, Henry G.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer US 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10504101/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37584882
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10549-023-06962-8
_version_ 1785106654433378304
author Malmgren, Judith A.
Guo, Boya
Atwood, Mary K.
Hallam, Paula
Roberts, Laura A.
Kaplan, Henry G.
author_facet Malmgren, Judith A.
Guo, Boya
Atwood, Mary K.
Hallam, Paula
Roberts, Laura A.
Kaplan, Henry G.
author_sort Malmgren, Judith A.
collection PubMed
description PURPOSE: Evaluate the COVID-19 pandemic impact on breast cancer detection method, stage and treatment before, during and after health care restrictions. METHODS: In a retrospective tertiary cancer care center cohort, first primary breast cancer (BC) patients, years 2019–2021, were reviewed (n = 1787). Chi-square statistical comparisons of detection method (patient (PtD)/mammography (MamD), Stage (0-IV) and treatment by pre-pandemic time 1: 2019 + Q1 2020; peak-pandemic time 2: Q2-Q4 2020; pandemic time 3: Q1-Q4 2021 (Q = quarter) periods and logistic regression for odds ratios were used. RESULTS: BC case volume decreased 22% in 2020 (N = 533) (p = .001). MamD declined from 64% pre-pandemic to 58% peak-pandemic, and increased to 71% in 2021 (p < .001). PtD increased from 30 to 36% peak-pandemic and declined to 25% in 2021 (p < .001). Diagnosis of Stage 0/I BC declined peak-pandemic when screening mammography was curtailed due to lock-down mandates but rebounded above pre-pandemic levels in 2021. In adjusted regression, peak-pandemic stage 0/I BC diagnosis decreased 24% (OR = 0.76, 95% CI: 0.60, 0.96, p = .021) and increased 34% in 2021 (OR = 1.34, 95% CI: 1.06, 1.70, p = .014). Peak-pandemic neoadjuvant therapy increased from 33 to 38% (p < .001), primarily for surgical delay cases. CONCLUSIONS: The COVID-19 pandemic restricted health-care access, reduced mammography screening and created surgical delays. During the peak-pandemic time, due to restricted or no access to mammography screening, we observed a decrease in stage 0/I BC by number and proportion. Continued low case numbers represent a need to re-establish screening behavior and staffing.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10504101
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher Springer US
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-105041012023-09-17 COVID-19 related change in breast cancer diagnosis, stage, treatment, and case volume: 2019–2021 Malmgren, Judith A. Guo, Boya Atwood, Mary K. Hallam, Paula Roberts, Laura A. Kaplan, Henry G. Breast Cancer Res Treat Epidemiology PURPOSE: Evaluate the COVID-19 pandemic impact on breast cancer detection method, stage and treatment before, during and after health care restrictions. METHODS: In a retrospective tertiary cancer care center cohort, first primary breast cancer (BC) patients, years 2019–2021, were reviewed (n = 1787). Chi-square statistical comparisons of detection method (patient (PtD)/mammography (MamD), Stage (0-IV) and treatment by pre-pandemic time 1: 2019 + Q1 2020; peak-pandemic time 2: Q2-Q4 2020; pandemic time 3: Q1-Q4 2021 (Q = quarter) periods and logistic regression for odds ratios were used. RESULTS: BC case volume decreased 22% in 2020 (N = 533) (p = .001). MamD declined from 64% pre-pandemic to 58% peak-pandemic, and increased to 71% in 2021 (p < .001). PtD increased from 30 to 36% peak-pandemic and declined to 25% in 2021 (p < .001). Diagnosis of Stage 0/I BC declined peak-pandemic when screening mammography was curtailed due to lock-down mandates but rebounded above pre-pandemic levels in 2021. In adjusted regression, peak-pandemic stage 0/I BC diagnosis decreased 24% (OR = 0.76, 95% CI: 0.60, 0.96, p = .021) and increased 34% in 2021 (OR = 1.34, 95% CI: 1.06, 1.70, p = .014). Peak-pandemic neoadjuvant therapy increased from 33 to 38% (p < .001), primarily for surgical delay cases. CONCLUSIONS: The COVID-19 pandemic restricted health-care access, reduced mammography screening and created surgical delays. During the peak-pandemic time, due to restricted or no access to mammography screening, we observed a decrease in stage 0/I BC by number and proportion. Continued low case numbers represent a need to re-establish screening behavior and staffing. Springer US 2023-08-16 2023 /pmc/articles/PMC10504101/ /pubmed/37584882 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10549-023-06962-8 Text en © The Author(s) 2023. Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Epidemiology
Malmgren, Judith A.
Guo, Boya
Atwood, Mary K.
Hallam, Paula
Roberts, Laura A.
Kaplan, Henry G.
COVID-19 related change in breast cancer diagnosis, stage, treatment, and case volume: 2019–2021
title COVID-19 related change in breast cancer diagnosis, stage, treatment, and case volume: 2019–2021
title_full COVID-19 related change in breast cancer diagnosis, stage, treatment, and case volume: 2019–2021
title_fullStr COVID-19 related change in breast cancer diagnosis, stage, treatment, and case volume: 2019–2021
title_full_unstemmed COVID-19 related change in breast cancer diagnosis, stage, treatment, and case volume: 2019–2021
title_short COVID-19 related change in breast cancer diagnosis, stage, treatment, and case volume: 2019–2021
title_sort covid-19 related change in breast cancer diagnosis, stage, treatment, and case volume: 2019–2021
topic Epidemiology
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10504101/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37584882
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10549-023-06962-8
work_keys_str_mv AT malmgrenjuditha covid19relatedchangeinbreastcancerdiagnosisstagetreatmentandcasevolume20192021
AT guoboya covid19relatedchangeinbreastcancerdiagnosisstagetreatmentandcasevolume20192021
AT atwoodmaryk covid19relatedchangeinbreastcancerdiagnosisstagetreatmentandcasevolume20192021
AT hallampaula covid19relatedchangeinbreastcancerdiagnosisstagetreatmentandcasevolume20192021
AT robertslauraa covid19relatedchangeinbreastcancerdiagnosisstagetreatmentandcasevolume20192021
AT kaplanhenryg covid19relatedchangeinbreastcancerdiagnosisstagetreatmentandcasevolume20192021