Cargando…
Characterizing recurrent infections after one-stage revision for periprosthetic joint infection of the knee: a systematic review of the literature
BACKGROUND: Periprosthetic joint infection (PJI) of the knee represents a severe complication after 1.5% to 2% of primary total knee replacement. Although two-stage revision was considered the gold-standard treatment for PJI of the knee, in the last decades, more studies reported the outcomes of one...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Springer Paris
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10504163/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36867259 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00590-023-03480-7 |
_version_ | 1785106666836983808 |
---|---|
author | Bosco, Francesco Cacciola, Giorgio Giustra, Fortunato Risitano, Salvatore Capella, Marcello Vezza, Daniele Barberis, Luca Cavaliere, Pietro Massè, Alessandro Sabatini, Luigi |
author_facet | Bosco, Francesco Cacciola, Giorgio Giustra, Fortunato Risitano, Salvatore Capella, Marcello Vezza, Daniele Barberis, Luca Cavaliere, Pietro Massè, Alessandro Sabatini, Luigi |
author_sort | Bosco, Francesco |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Periprosthetic joint infection (PJI) of the knee represents a severe complication after 1.5% to 2% of primary total knee replacement. Although two-stage revision was considered the gold-standard treatment for PJI of the knee, in the last decades, more studies reported the outcomes of one-stage revisions. This systematic review aims to assess reinfection rate, infection-free survival after reoperation for recurrent infection, and the microorganisms involved in both primary and recurrent infection. MATERIAL AND METHODS: A systematic review of all studies reporting the outcome of one-stage revision for PJI of the knee up to September 2022, according to PRISMA criteria and AMSTAR2 guidelines, was performed. Patient demographics, clinical, surgical, and postoperative data were recorded. PROSPERO ID: CRD42022362767. RESULTS: Eighteen studies with a total of 881 one-stage revisions for PJI of the knee were analyzed. A reinfection rate of 12.2% after an average follow-up of 57.6 months was reported. The most frequent causative microorganism were gram-positive bacteria (71.1%), gram-negative bacteria (7.1%), and polymicrobial infections (8%). The average postoperative knee society score was 81.5, and the average postoperative knee function score was 74.2. The infection-free survival after treatment for recurrent infection was 92.1%. The causative microorganisms at reinfections differed significantly from the primary infection (gram-positive 44.4%, gram-negative 11.1%). CONCLUSION: Patients who underwent a one-stage revision for PJI of the knee showed a reinfection rate lower or comparable to other surgical treatments as two-stage or DAIR (debridement, antibiotics, and implant retention). Reoperation for reinfection demonstrates a lower success compared to one-stage revision. Moreover, microbiology differs between primary infection and recurrent infection. Level of evidence Level IV. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-10504163 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2023 |
publisher | Springer Paris |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-105041632023-09-17 Characterizing recurrent infections after one-stage revision for periprosthetic joint infection of the knee: a systematic review of the literature Bosco, Francesco Cacciola, Giorgio Giustra, Fortunato Risitano, Salvatore Capella, Marcello Vezza, Daniele Barberis, Luca Cavaliere, Pietro Massè, Alessandro Sabatini, Luigi Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol General Review BACKGROUND: Periprosthetic joint infection (PJI) of the knee represents a severe complication after 1.5% to 2% of primary total knee replacement. Although two-stage revision was considered the gold-standard treatment for PJI of the knee, in the last decades, more studies reported the outcomes of one-stage revisions. This systematic review aims to assess reinfection rate, infection-free survival after reoperation for recurrent infection, and the microorganisms involved in both primary and recurrent infection. MATERIAL AND METHODS: A systematic review of all studies reporting the outcome of one-stage revision for PJI of the knee up to September 2022, according to PRISMA criteria and AMSTAR2 guidelines, was performed. Patient demographics, clinical, surgical, and postoperative data were recorded. PROSPERO ID: CRD42022362767. RESULTS: Eighteen studies with a total of 881 one-stage revisions for PJI of the knee were analyzed. A reinfection rate of 12.2% after an average follow-up of 57.6 months was reported. The most frequent causative microorganism were gram-positive bacteria (71.1%), gram-negative bacteria (7.1%), and polymicrobial infections (8%). The average postoperative knee society score was 81.5, and the average postoperative knee function score was 74.2. The infection-free survival after treatment for recurrent infection was 92.1%. The causative microorganisms at reinfections differed significantly from the primary infection (gram-positive 44.4%, gram-negative 11.1%). CONCLUSION: Patients who underwent a one-stage revision for PJI of the knee showed a reinfection rate lower or comparable to other surgical treatments as two-stage or DAIR (debridement, antibiotics, and implant retention). Reoperation for reinfection demonstrates a lower success compared to one-stage revision. Moreover, microbiology differs between primary infection and recurrent infection. Level of evidence Level IV. Springer Paris 2023-03-03 2023 /pmc/articles/PMC10504163/ /pubmed/36867259 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00590-023-03480-7 Text en © The Author(s) 2023 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . |
spellingShingle | General Review Bosco, Francesco Cacciola, Giorgio Giustra, Fortunato Risitano, Salvatore Capella, Marcello Vezza, Daniele Barberis, Luca Cavaliere, Pietro Massè, Alessandro Sabatini, Luigi Characterizing recurrent infections after one-stage revision for periprosthetic joint infection of the knee: a systematic review of the literature |
title | Characterizing recurrent infections after one-stage revision for periprosthetic joint infection of the knee: a systematic review of the literature |
title_full | Characterizing recurrent infections after one-stage revision for periprosthetic joint infection of the knee: a systematic review of the literature |
title_fullStr | Characterizing recurrent infections after one-stage revision for periprosthetic joint infection of the knee: a systematic review of the literature |
title_full_unstemmed | Characterizing recurrent infections after one-stage revision for periprosthetic joint infection of the knee: a systematic review of the literature |
title_short | Characterizing recurrent infections after one-stage revision for periprosthetic joint infection of the knee: a systematic review of the literature |
title_sort | characterizing recurrent infections after one-stage revision for periprosthetic joint infection of the knee: a systematic review of the literature |
topic | General Review |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10504163/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36867259 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00590-023-03480-7 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT boscofrancesco characterizingrecurrentinfectionsafteronestagerevisionforperiprostheticjointinfectionofthekneeasystematicreviewoftheliterature AT cacciolagiorgio characterizingrecurrentinfectionsafteronestagerevisionforperiprostheticjointinfectionofthekneeasystematicreviewoftheliterature AT giustrafortunato characterizingrecurrentinfectionsafteronestagerevisionforperiprostheticjointinfectionofthekneeasystematicreviewoftheliterature AT risitanosalvatore characterizingrecurrentinfectionsafteronestagerevisionforperiprostheticjointinfectionofthekneeasystematicreviewoftheliterature AT capellamarcello characterizingrecurrentinfectionsafteronestagerevisionforperiprostheticjointinfectionofthekneeasystematicreviewoftheliterature AT vezzadaniele characterizingrecurrentinfectionsafteronestagerevisionforperiprostheticjointinfectionofthekneeasystematicreviewoftheliterature AT barberisluca characterizingrecurrentinfectionsafteronestagerevisionforperiprostheticjointinfectionofthekneeasystematicreviewoftheliterature AT cavalierepietro characterizingrecurrentinfectionsafteronestagerevisionforperiprostheticjointinfectionofthekneeasystematicreviewoftheliterature AT massealessandro characterizingrecurrentinfectionsafteronestagerevisionforperiprostheticjointinfectionofthekneeasystematicreviewoftheliterature AT sabatiniluigi characterizingrecurrentinfectionsafteronestagerevisionforperiprostheticjointinfectionofthekneeasystematicreviewoftheliterature |