Cargando…

Bilateral orthodontic extractions using physics versus conventional forceps among Indian patients

It is of interest to assess whether or not physics forceps are superior to traditional forceps for the extraction of premolar teeth in orthodontic procedures. Tooth and buccal bone fractures, as well as extraction time, lacerated gingiva, postoperative discomfort, and infection, were all measured in...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Sangra, Vidhi, Hemanth Kumar, HR, Singh, Arundhati, Singh, Sandeep, Akhilasiri, Godana, Agarwal, Vivek
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Biomedical Informatics 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10504498/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37720274
http://dx.doi.org/10.6026/97320630019143
_version_ 1785106737105207296
author Sangra, Vidhi
Hemanth Kumar, HR
Singh, Arundhati
Singh, Sandeep
Akhilasiri, Godana
Agarwal, Vivek
author_facet Sangra, Vidhi
Hemanth Kumar, HR
Singh, Arundhati
Singh, Sandeep
Akhilasiri, Godana
Agarwal, Vivek
author_sort Sangra, Vidhi
collection PubMed
description It is of interest to assess whether or not physics forceps are superior to traditional forceps for the extraction of premolar teeth in orthodontic procedures. Tooth and buccal bone fractures, as well as extraction time, lacerated gingiva, postoperative discomfort, and infection, were all measured in this research of both types of forceps extraction. Twenty individuals who need orthodontic extraction on both jaws were enrolled in the research. One arch's premolars were removed in two appointments, the first using Physics forceps and the second using conventional ones. The subsequent assignment included extraction from the obverse arch. Intraoperative evaluations included assessments of factors such as tooth and buccal bone fractures, surgical time, and gingival lacerations; postoperative assessments of pain and infection were conducted on days 1, 3, and 7. With physics forceps, the average time to remove a patient's mandible was 86.55 seconds, whereas traditional forceps required just 35.70 seconds. Using traditional forceps, the average pain score was 0.865 on day one after surgery, but with physics forceps, it was 3.30. The use of physics forceps resulted in one buccal bone fracture out of twenty premolar extractions. That so, no meaningful statistical change was seen. There was no tooth damage or post-operative infection with either set of forceps, it was found. Each forceps caused a Grade I laceration to the gingiva. The average time required removing a maxillary using physics forceps was 224.05 seconds, whereas the time required doing it with conventional forceps was 141.50 seconds. On a Visual Analogue Scale (VAS), the average first-day pain after surgery using physics forceps was 4.90, whereas using traditional forceps resulted in just 3.15. The difference between using physics forceps and regular forceps was statistically significant by the third postoperative day (2.05 vs 0.75). There was a statistically insignificant increase in the occurrence of buccal bone fracture and tooth fracture while using physics forceps. Both forceps and scissors caused just grade I lacerations, and there was no postoperative infection. These findings suggest that the use of physics forceps, as opposed to conventional forceps, may significantly lengthen the time required to remove orthodontic premolars on both sides of the mouth. Non-significant results were also found for additional criteria such as buccal bone fracture, tooth fracture, gingival laceration, and post-operative discomfort. When it comes to orthodontic premolar extraction, this research found that traditional forceps performed better than modern forceps across a range of measures, including intraoperative time and postoperative discomfort.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10504498
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher Biomedical Informatics
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-105044982023-09-17 Bilateral orthodontic extractions using physics versus conventional forceps among Indian patients Sangra, Vidhi Hemanth Kumar, HR Singh, Arundhati Singh, Sandeep Akhilasiri, Godana Agarwal, Vivek Bioinformation Research Article It is of interest to assess whether or not physics forceps are superior to traditional forceps for the extraction of premolar teeth in orthodontic procedures. Tooth and buccal bone fractures, as well as extraction time, lacerated gingiva, postoperative discomfort, and infection, were all measured in this research of both types of forceps extraction. Twenty individuals who need orthodontic extraction on both jaws were enrolled in the research. One arch's premolars were removed in two appointments, the first using Physics forceps and the second using conventional ones. The subsequent assignment included extraction from the obverse arch. Intraoperative evaluations included assessments of factors such as tooth and buccal bone fractures, surgical time, and gingival lacerations; postoperative assessments of pain and infection were conducted on days 1, 3, and 7. With physics forceps, the average time to remove a patient's mandible was 86.55 seconds, whereas traditional forceps required just 35.70 seconds. Using traditional forceps, the average pain score was 0.865 on day one after surgery, but with physics forceps, it was 3.30. The use of physics forceps resulted in one buccal bone fracture out of twenty premolar extractions. That so, no meaningful statistical change was seen. There was no tooth damage or post-operative infection with either set of forceps, it was found. Each forceps caused a Grade I laceration to the gingiva. The average time required removing a maxillary using physics forceps was 224.05 seconds, whereas the time required doing it with conventional forceps was 141.50 seconds. On a Visual Analogue Scale (VAS), the average first-day pain after surgery using physics forceps was 4.90, whereas using traditional forceps resulted in just 3.15. The difference between using physics forceps and regular forceps was statistically significant by the third postoperative day (2.05 vs 0.75). There was a statistically insignificant increase in the occurrence of buccal bone fracture and tooth fracture while using physics forceps. Both forceps and scissors caused just grade I lacerations, and there was no postoperative infection. These findings suggest that the use of physics forceps, as opposed to conventional forceps, may significantly lengthen the time required to remove orthodontic premolars on both sides of the mouth. Non-significant results were also found for additional criteria such as buccal bone fracture, tooth fracture, gingival laceration, and post-operative discomfort. When it comes to orthodontic premolar extraction, this research found that traditional forceps performed better than modern forceps across a range of measures, including intraoperative time and postoperative discomfort. Biomedical Informatics 2023-01-31 /pmc/articles/PMC10504498/ /pubmed/37720274 http://dx.doi.org/10.6026/97320630019143 Text en © 2023 Biomedical Informatics https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/This is an Open Access article which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly credited. This is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License.
spellingShingle Research Article
Sangra, Vidhi
Hemanth Kumar, HR
Singh, Arundhati
Singh, Sandeep
Akhilasiri, Godana
Agarwal, Vivek
Bilateral orthodontic extractions using physics versus conventional forceps among Indian patients
title Bilateral orthodontic extractions using physics versus conventional forceps among Indian patients
title_full Bilateral orthodontic extractions using physics versus conventional forceps among Indian patients
title_fullStr Bilateral orthodontic extractions using physics versus conventional forceps among Indian patients
title_full_unstemmed Bilateral orthodontic extractions using physics versus conventional forceps among Indian patients
title_short Bilateral orthodontic extractions using physics versus conventional forceps among Indian patients
title_sort bilateral orthodontic extractions using physics versus conventional forceps among indian patients
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10504498/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37720274
http://dx.doi.org/10.6026/97320630019143
work_keys_str_mv AT sangravidhi bilateralorthodonticextractionsusingphysicsversusconventionalforcepsamongindianpatients
AT hemanthkumarhr bilateralorthodonticextractionsusingphysicsversusconventionalforcepsamongindianpatients
AT singharundhati bilateralorthodonticextractionsusingphysicsversusconventionalforcepsamongindianpatients
AT singhsandeep bilateralorthodonticextractionsusingphysicsversusconventionalforcepsamongindianpatients
AT akhilasirigodana bilateralorthodonticextractionsusingphysicsversusconventionalforcepsamongindianpatients
AT agarwalvivek bilateralorthodonticextractionsusingphysicsversusconventionalforcepsamongindianpatients