Cargando…
Management of zygomatico maxillary complex fractures
Zygomatic bone fractures should be effectively diagnosed and treated because they affect how the face is shaped for both aesthetically and functional reasons. It is possible to compare different surgical techniques and their comorbidities objectively through using outcome quantitative assessments, w...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Biomedical Informatics
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10504507/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37720278 http://dx.doi.org/10.6026/97320630019120 |
_version_ | 1785106739241156608 |
---|---|
author | Singh Payak, Abhishek Bhadouria, Preeti Singh, Alisha Nair, Gopakumar Randhawa, Rajbir Kaur Thakur, Sachin Singh Makkad, Ramanpal |
author_facet | Singh Payak, Abhishek Bhadouria, Preeti Singh, Alisha Nair, Gopakumar Randhawa, Rajbir Kaur Thakur, Sachin Singh Makkad, Ramanpal |
author_sort | Singh Payak, Abhishek |
collection | PubMed |
description | Zygomatic bone fractures should be effectively diagnosed and treated because they affect how the face is shaped for both aesthetically and functional reasons. It is possible to compare different surgical techniques and their comorbidities objectively through using outcome quantitative assessments, which call for a treatment programme and long-term follow-up. The purpose of this study was to compare the outcomes of two procedures and the effectiveness of the zygomatic bone following open reduction internal fixation (ORIF) employing two-point fixation and ORIF employing three-point fixation. Two groups of twenty patients each were randomly assigned to. Twenty patients in Group A had ORIF treatment using two-point miniplate fixation technique, and twenty patients in Group B received three-point miniplate fixation treatment. Differences between the two categories were ascertained after they had been evaluated in terms of their advantages and disadvantages. We discovered that the two-point fixation group had the fewest facial complications and neurological side effects. At 1 month follow up, Group B's average radiological evaluation score was 2.47± 0.30, and then at 6 months follow up, it was found out to be 1.87±0.47. A significant statistical distinction between the average radiological evaluations was observed in study participants of Group A at follow up done after one month and six months of procedure. Student's paired t- statistical test was utilized from this statistical analysis. (t = 6.54, P < 0.01). On carrying out follow up after one month of surgery, average neurological assessment score in study participants of group A was found out to be 0.22± 0.42, and then at 6 months follow up, it was 0.61±0.63. The average neurological evaluation score in study participants of Group A on carrying out follow up after one month of surgical procedure and and after six months of surgical procedure months showed a significant statistical distinction when utilizing Student's paired t- statistical test (t = 2.51, P = 0.021).It was determined that the best available rehabilitation for the treatment of zygomaticomaxillary complex fractures is open reduction and internal fixation employing two-point fixation by miniplates. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-10504507 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2023 |
publisher | Biomedical Informatics |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-105045072023-09-17 Management of zygomatico maxillary complex fractures Singh Payak, Abhishek Bhadouria, Preeti Singh, Alisha Nair, Gopakumar Randhawa, Rajbir Kaur Thakur, Sachin Singh Makkad, Ramanpal Bioinformation Research Article Zygomatic bone fractures should be effectively diagnosed and treated because they affect how the face is shaped for both aesthetically and functional reasons. It is possible to compare different surgical techniques and their comorbidities objectively through using outcome quantitative assessments, which call for a treatment programme and long-term follow-up. The purpose of this study was to compare the outcomes of two procedures and the effectiveness of the zygomatic bone following open reduction internal fixation (ORIF) employing two-point fixation and ORIF employing three-point fixation. Two groups of twenty patients each were randomly assigned to. Twenty patients in Group A had ORIF treatment using two-point miniplate fixation technique, and twenty patients in Group B received three-point miniplate fixation treatment. Differences between the two categories were ascertained after they had been evaluated in terms of their advantages and disadvantages. We discovered that the two-point fixation group had the fewest facial complications and neurological side effects. At 1 month follow up, Group B's average radiological evaluation score was 2.47± 0.30, and then at 6 months follow up, it was found out to be 1.87±0.47. A significant statistical distinction between the average radiological evaluations was observed in study participants of Group A at follow up done after one month and six months of procedure. Student's paired t- statistical test was utilized from this statistical analysis. (t = 6.54, P < 0.01). On carrying out follow up after one month of surgery, average neurological assessment score in study participants of group A was found out to be 0.22± 0.42, and then at 6 months follow up, it was 0.61±0.63. The average neurological evaluation score in study participants of Group A on carrying out follow up after one month of surgical procedure and and after six months of surgical procedure months showed a significant statistical distinction when utilizing Student's paired t- statistical test (t = 2.51, P = 0.021).It was determined that the best available rehabilitation for the treatment of zygomaticomaxillary complex fractures is open reduction and internal fixation employing two-point fixation by miniplates. Biomedical Informatics 2023-01-31 /pmc/articles/PMC10504507/ /pubmed/37720278 http://dx.doi.org/10.6026/97320630019120 Text en © 2023 Biomedical Informatics https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/This is an Open Access article which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly credited. This is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Singh Payak, Abhishek Bhadouria, Preeti Singh, Alisha Nair, Gopakumar Randhawa, Rajbir Kaur Thakur, Sachin Singh Makkad, Ramanpal Management of zygomatico maxillary complex fractures |
title | Management of zygomatico maxillary complex fractures |
title_full | Management of zygomatico maxillary complex fractures |
title_fullStr | Management of zygomatico maxillary complex fractures |
title_full_unstemmed | Management of zygomatico maxillary complex fractures |
title_short | Management of zygomatico maxillary complex fractures |
title_sort | management of zygomatico maxillary complex fractures |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10504507/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37720278 http://dx.doi.org/10.6026/97320630019120 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT singhpayakabhishek managementofzygomaticomaxillarycomplexfractures AT bhadouriapreeti managementofzygomaticomaxillarycomplexfractures AT singhalisha managementofzygomaticomaxillarycomplexfractures AT nairgopakumar managementofzygomaticomaxillarycomplexfractures AT randhawarajbirkaur managementofzygomaticomaxillarycomplexfractures AT thakursachin managementofzygomaticomaxillarycomplexfractures AT singhmakkadramanpal managementofzygomaticomaxillarycomplexfractures |