Cargando…

Management of zygomatico maxillary complex fractures

Zygomatic bone fractures should be effectively diagnosed and treated because they affect how the face is shaped for both aesthetically and functional reasons. It is possible to compare different surgical techniques and their comorbidities objectively through using outcome quantitative assessments, w...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Singh Payak, Abhishek, Bhadouria, Preeti, Singh, Alisha, Nair, Gopakumar, Randhawa, Rajbir Kaur, Thakur, Sachin, Singh Makkad, Ramanpal
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Biomedical Informatics 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10504507/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37720278
http://dx.doi.org/10.6026/97320630019120
_version_ 1785106739241156608
author Singh Payak, Abhishek
Bhadouria, Preeti
Singh, Alisha
Nair, Gopakumar
Randhawa, Rajbir Kaur
Thakur, Sachin
Singh Makkad, Ramanpal
author_facet Singh Payak, Abhishek
Bhadouria, Preeti
Singh, Alisha
Nair, Gopakumar
Randhawa, Rajbir Kaur
Thakur, Sachin
Singh Makkad, Ramanpal
author_sort Singh Payak, Abhishek
collection PubMed
description Zygomatic bone fractures should be effectively diagnosed and treated because they affect how the face is shaped for both aesthetically and functional reasons. It is possible to compare different surgical techniques and their comorbidities objectively through using outcome quantitative assessments, which call for a treatment programme and long-term follow-up. The purpose of this study was to compare the outcomes of two procedures and the effectiveness of the zygomatic bone following open reduction internal fixation (ORIF) employing two-point fixation and ORIF employing three-point fixation. Two groups of twenty patients each were randomly assigned to. Twenty patients in Group A had ORIF treatment using two-point miniplate fixation technique, and twenty patients in Group B received three-point miniplate fixation treatment. Differences between the two categories were ascertained after they had been evaluated in terms of their advantages and disadvantages. We discovered that the two-point fixation group had the fewest facial complications and neurological side effects. At 1 month follow up, Group B's average radiological evaluation score was 2.47± 0.30, and then at 6 months follow up, it was found out to be 1.87±0.47. A significant statistical distinction between the average radiological evaluations was observed in study participants of Group A at follow up done after one month and six months of procedure. Student's paired t- statistical test was utilized from this statistical analysis. (t = 6.54, P < 0.01). On carrying out follow up after one month of surgery, average neurological assessment score in study participants of group A was found out to be 0.22± 0.42, and then at 6 months follow up, it was 0.61±0.63. The average neurological evaluation score in study participants of Group A on carrying out follow up after one month of surgical procedure and and after six months of surgical procedure months showed a significant statistical distinction when utilizing Student's paired t- statistical test (t = 2.51, P = 0.021).It was determined that the best available rehabilitation for the treatment of zygomaticomaxillary complex fractures is open reduction and internal fixation employing two-point fixation by miniplates.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10504507
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher Biomedical Informatics
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-105045072023-09-17 Management of zygomatico maxillary complex fractures Singh Payak, Abhishek Bhadouria, Preeti Singh, Alisha Nair, Gopakumar Randhawa, Rajbir Kaur Thakur, Sachin Singh Makkad, Ramanpal Bioinformation Research Article Zygomatic bone fractures should be effectively diagnosed and treated because they affect how the face is shaped for both aesthetically and functional reasons. It is possible to compare different surgical techniques and their comorbidities objectively through using outcome quantitative assessments, which call for a treatment programme and long-term follow-up. The purpose of this study was to compare the outcomes of two procedures and the effectiveness of the zygomatic bone following open reduction internal fixation (ORIF) employing two-point fixation and ORIF employing three-point fixation. Two groups of twenty patients each were randomly assigned to. Twenty patients in Group A had ORIF treatment using two-point miniplate fixation technique, and twenty patients in Group B received three-point miniplate fixation treatment. Differences between the two categories were ascertained after they had been evaluated in terms of their advantages and disadvantages. We discovered that the two-point fixation group had the fewest facial complications and neurological side effects. At 1 month follow up, Group B's average radiological evaluation score was 2.47± 0.30, and then at 6 months follow up, it was found out to be 1.87±0.47. A significant statistical distinction between the average radiological evaluations was observed in study participants of Group A at follow up done after one month and six months of procedure. Student's paired t- statistical test was utilized from this statistical analysis. (t = 6.54, P < 0.01). On carrying out follow up after one month of surgery, average neurological assessment score in study participants of group A was found out to be 0.22± 0.42, and then at 6 months follow up, it was 0.61±0.63. The average neurological evaluation score in study participants of Group A on carrying out follow up after one month of surgical procedure and and after six months of surgical procedure months showed a significant statistical distinction when utilizing Student's paired t- statistical test (t = 2.51, P = 0.021).It was determined that the best available rehabilitation for the treatment of zygomaticomaxillary complex fractures is open reduction and internal fixation employing two-point fixation by miniplates. Biomedical Informatics 2023-01-31 /pmc/articles/PMC10504507/ /pubmed/37720278 http://dx.doi.org/10.6026/97320630019120 Text en © 2023 Biomedical Informatics https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/This is an Open Access article which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly credited. This is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License.
spellingShingle Research Article
Singh Payak, Abhishek
Bhadouria, Preeti
Singh, Alisha
Nair, Gopakumar
Randhawa, Rajbir Kaur
Thakur, Sachin
Singh Makkad, Ramanpal
Management of zygomatico maxillary complex fractures
title Management of zygomatico maxillary complex fractures
title_full Management of zygomatico maxillary complex fractures
title_fullStr Management of zygomatico maxillary complex fractures
title_full_unstemmed Management of zygomatico maxillary complex fractures
title_short Management of zygomatico maxillary complex fractures
title_sort management of zygomatico maxillary complex fractures
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10504507/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37720278
http://dx.doi.org/10.6026/97320630019120
work_keys_str_mv AT singhpayakabhishek managementofzygomaticomaxillarycomplexfractures
AT bhadouriapreeti managementofzygomaticomaxillarycomplexfractures
AT singhalisha managementofzygomaticomaxillarycomplexfractures
AT nairgopakumar managementofzygomaticomaxillarycomplexfractures
AT randhawarajbirkaur managementofzygomaticomaxillarycomplexfractures
AT thakursachin managementofzygomaticomaxillarycomplexfractures
AT singhmakkadramanpal managementofzygomaticomaxillarycomplexfractures