Cargando…

Machine learning and EEG can classify passive viewing of discrete categories of visual stimuli but not the observation of pain

Previous studies have demonstrated the potential of machine learning (ML) in classifying physical pain from non-pain states using electroencephalographic (EEG) data. However, the application of ML to EEG data to categorise the observation of pain versus non-pain images of human facial expressions or...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Mari, Tyler, Henderson, Jessica, Ali, S. Hasan, Hewitt, Danielle, Brown, Christopher, Stancak, Andrej, Fallon, Nicholas
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10504739/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37715119
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12868-023-00819-y
_version_ 1785106792455340032
author Mari, Tyler
Henderson, Jessica
Ali, S. Hasan
Hewitt, Danielle
Brown, Christopher
Stancak, Andrej
Fallon, Nicholas
author_facet Mari, Tyler
Henderson, Jessica
Ali, S. Hasan
Hewitt, Danielle
Brown, Christopher
Stancak, Andrej
Fallon, Nicholas
author_sort Mari, Tyler
collection PubMed
description Previous studies have demonstrated the potential of machine learning (ML) in classifying physical pain from non-pain states using electroencephalographic (EEG) data. However, the application of ML to EEG data to categorise the observation of pain versus non-pain images of human facial expressions or scenes depicting pain being inflicted has not been explored. The present study aimed to address this by training Random Forest (RF) models on cortical event-related potentials (ERPs) recorded while participants passively viewed faces displaying either pain or neutral expressions, as well as action scenes depicting pain or matched non-pain (neutral) scenarios. Ninety-one participants were recruited across three samples, which included a model development group (n = 40) and a cross-subject validation group (n = 51). Additionally, 25 participants from the model development group completed a second experimental session, providing a within-subject temporal validation sample. The analysis of ERPs revealed an enhanced N170 component in response to faces compared to action scenes. Moreover, an increased late positive potential (LPP) was observed during the viewing of pain scenes compared to neutral scenes. Additionally, an enhanced P3 response was found when participants viewed faces displaying pain expressions compared to neutral expressions. Subsequently, three RF models were developed to classify images into faces and scenes, neutral and pain scenes, and neutral and pain expressions. The RF model achieved classification accuracies of 75%, 64%, and 69% for cross-validation, cross-subject, and within-subject classifications, respectively, along with reasonably calibrated predictions for the classification of face versus scene images. However, the RF model was unable to classify pain versus neutral stimuli above chance levels when presented with subsequent tasks involving images from either category. These results expand upon previous findings by externally validating the use of ML in classifying ERPs related to different categories of visual images, namely faces and scenes. The results also indicate the limitations of ML in distinguishing pain and non-pain connotations using ERP responses to the passive viewing of visually similar images.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10504739
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-105047392023-09-17 Machine learning and EEG can classify passive viewing of discrete categories of visual stimuli but not the observation of pain Mari, Tyler Henderson, Jessica Ali, S. Hasan Hewitt, Danielle Brown, Christopher Stancak, Andrej Fallon, Nicholas BMC Neurosci Research Previous studies have demonstrated the potential of machine learning (ML) in classifying physical pain from non-pain states using electroencephalographic (EEG) data. However, the application of ML to EEG data to categorise the observation of pain versus non-pain images of human facial expressions or scenes depicting pain being inflicted has not been explored. The present study aimed to address this by training Random Forest (RF) models on cortical event-related potentials (ERPs) recorded while participants passively viewed faces displaying either pain or neutral expressions, as well as action scenes depicting pain or matched non-pain (neutral) scenarios. Ninety-one participants were recruited across three samples, which included a model development group (n = 40) and a cross-subject validation group (n = 51). Additionally, 25 participants from the model development group completed a second experimental session, providing a within-subject temporal validation sample. The analysis of ERPs revealed an enhanced N170 component in response to faces compared to action scenes. Moreover, an increased late positive potential (LPP) was observed during the viewing of pain scenes compared to neutral scenes. Additionally, an enhanced P3 response was found when participants viewed faces displaying pain expressions compared to neutral expressions. Subsequently, three RF models were developed to classify images into faces and scenes, neutral and pain scenes, and neutral and pain expressions. The RF model achieved classification accuracies of 75%, 64%, and 69% for cross-validation, cross-subject, and within-subject classifications, respectively, along with reasonably calibrated predictions for the classification of face versus scene images. However, the RF model was unable to classify pain versus neutral stimuli above chance levels when presented with subsequent tasks involving images from either category. These results expand upon previous findings by externally validating the use of ML in classifying ERPs related to different categories of visual images, namely faces and scenes. The results also indicate the limitations of ML in distinguishing pain and non-pain connotations using ERP responses to the passive viewing of visually similar images. BioMed Central 2023-09-15 /pmc/articles/PMC10504739/ /pubmed/37715119 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12868-023-00819-y Text en © The Author(s) 2023 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
spellingShingle Research
Mari, Tyler
Henderson, Jessica
Ali, S. Hasan
Hewitt, Danielle
Brown, Christopher
Stancak, Andrej
Fallon, Nicholas
Machine learning and EEG can classify passive viewing of discrete categories of visual stimuli but not the observation of pain
title Machine learning and EEG can classify passive viewing of discrete categories of visual stimuli but not the observation of pain
title_full Machine learning and EEG can classify passive viewing of discrete categories of visual stimuli but not the observation of pain
title_fullStr Machine learning and EEG can classify passive viewing of discrete categories of visual stimuli but not the observation of pain
title_full_unstemmed Machine learning and EEG can classify passive viewing of discrete categories of visual stimuli but not the observation of pain
title_short Machine learning and EEG can classify passive viewing of discrete categories of visual stimuli but not the observation of pain
title_sort machine learning and eeg can classify passive viewing of discrete categories of visual stimuli but not the observation of pain
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10504739/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37715119
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12868-023-00819-y
work_keys_str_mv AT marityler machinelearningandeegcanclassifypassiveviewingofdiscretecategoriesofvisualstimulibutnottheobservationofpain
AT hendersonjessica machinelearningandeegcanclassifypassiveviewingofdiscretecategoriesofvisualstimulibutnottheobservationofpain
AT alishasan machinelearningandeegcanclassifypassiveviewingofdiscretecategoriesofvisualstimulibutnottheobservationofpain
AT hewittdanielle machinelearningandeegcanclassifypassiveviewingofdiscretecategoriesofvisualstimulibutnottheobservationofpain
AT brownchristopher machinelearningandeegcanclassifypassiveviewingofdiscretecategoriesofvisualstimulibutnottheobservationofpain
AT stancakandrej machinelearningandeegcanclassifypassiveviewingofdiscretecategoriesofvisualstimulibutnottheobservationofpain
AT fallonnicholas machinelearningandeegcanclassifypassiveviewingofdiscretecategoriesofvisualstimulibutnottheobservationofpain