Cargando…

The effect of abdominal bracing on respiration during a lifting task: a cross-sectional study

BACKGROUND: Abdominal bracing is a maneuver widely used by rehabilitation specialists and sports trainers to improve spinal stability. This study aimed to investigate how lifting tasks with and without abdominal bracing affect the respiratory function of the diaphragm. METHODS: M-mode ultrasonograph...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Sembera, Martin, Busch, Andrew, Kobesova, Alena, Hanychova, Barbora, Sulc, Jan, Kolar, Pavel
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10504786/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37715283
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13102-023-00729-w
_version_ 1785106803592265728
author Sembera, Martin
Busch, Andrew
Kobesova, Alena
Hanychova, Barbora
Sulc, Jan
Kolar, Pavel
author_facet Sembera, Martin
Busch, Andrew
Kobesova, Alena
Hanychova, Barbora
Sulc, Jan
Kolar, Pavel
author_sort Sembera, Martin
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Abdominal bracing is a maneuver widely used by rehabilitation specialists and sports trainers to improve spinal stability. This study aimed to investigate how lifting tasks with and without abdominal bracing affect the respiratory function of the diaphragm. METHODS: M-mode ultrasonographic assessment of diaphragmatic motion combined with spirometry was performed on 31 healthy adults. Participants were asked to breathe continuously whilst lifting a load with spontaneous abdominal muscle contraction (natural loaded breathing) and abdominal bracing (AB loaded breathing). RESULTS: Pearson’s correlations revealed strong correlations between ultrasonography and spirometry measures (p < 0.001) for all types of breathing: tidal breathing (r = 0.709, r(2) = 0.503), natural loaded breathing (r = 0.731, r(2) = 0.534) and AB loaded breathing (r = 0.795, r(2) = 0.632). Using paired-samples t-tests, the natural loaded breathing ultrasonography revealed more caudal diaphragm positions during inspiration (p < 0.001) but not during expiration (p = .101). Spirometry demonstrated lower lung volumes (L) at the end of inspiration and expiration (p < 0.001), with no changes in total lung volume (p = 0.06). The AB loaded breathing ultrasonography revealed more caudal diaphragm positions during inspiration (p = 0.002) but not during expiration (p = 0.05). Spirometry demonstrated lower lung volumes at the end of inspiration (p < 0.001), expiration (p = 0.002), and total lung volumes (p = 0.019). CONCLUSION: This study demonstrated that abdominal bracing performed during a lifting task reduces lung volume despite an increase in diaphragmatic motion. Diaphragm excursions strongly correlate with lung volumes even under postural loading. TRIAL REGISTRATION: The study was prospectively registered on 8 April 2021 at ClinicalTrials.gov with identification number NCT04841109.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10504786
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-105047862023-09-17 The effect of abdominal bracing on respiration during a lifting task: a cross-sectional study Sembera, Martin Busch, Andrew Kobesova, Alena Hanychova, Barbora Sulc, Jan Kolar, Pavel BMC Sports Sci Med Rehabil Research BACKGROUND: Abdominal bracing is a maneuver widely used by rehabilitation specialists and sports trainers to improve spinal stability. This study aimed to investigate how lifting tasks with and without abdominal bracing affect the respiratory function of the diaphragm. METHODS: M-mode ultrasonographic assessment of diaphragmatic motion combined with spirometry was performed on 31 healthy adults. Participants were asked to breathe continuously whilst lifting a load with spontaneous abdominal muscle contraction (natural loaded breathing) and abdominal bracing (AB loaded breathing). RESULTS: Pearson’s correlations revealed strong correlations between ultrasonography and spirometry measures (p < 0.001) for all types of breathing: tidal breathing (r = 0.709, r(2) = 0.503), natural loaded breathing (r = 0.731, r(2) = 0.534) and AB loaded breathing (r = 0.795, r(2) = 0.632). Using paired-samples t-tests, the natural loaded breathing ultrasonography revealed more caudal diaphragm positions during inspiration (p < 0.001) but not during expiration (p = .101). Spirometry demonstrated lower lung volumes (L) at the end of inspiration and expiration (p < 0.001), with no changes in total lung volume (p = 0.06). The AB loaded breathing ultrasonography revealed more caudal diaphragm positions during inspiration (p = 0.002) but not during expiration (p = 0.05). Spirometry demonstrated lower lung volumes at the end of inspiration (p < 0.001), expiration (p = 0.002), and total lung volumes (p = 0.019). CONCLUSION: This study demonstrated that abdominal bracing performed during a lifting task reduces lung volume despite an increase in diaphragmatic motion. Diaphragm excursions strongly correlate with lung volumes even under postural loading. TRIAL REGISTRATION: The study was prospectively registered on 8 April 2021 at ClinicalTrials.gov with identification number NCT04841109. BioMed Central 2023-09-15 /pmc/articles/PMC10504786/ /pubmed/37715283 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13102-023-00729-w Text en © The Author(s) 2023 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
spellingShingle Research
Sembera, Martin
Busch, Andrew
Kobesova, Alena
Hanychova, Barbora
Sulc, Jan
Kolar, Pavel
The effect of abdominal bracing on respiration during a lifting task: a cross-sectional study
title The effect of abdominal bracing on respiration during a lifting task: a cross-sectional study
title_full The effect of abdominal bracing on respiration during a lifting task: a cross-sectional study
title_fullStr The effect of abdominal bracing on respiration during a lifting task: a cross-sectional study
title_full_unstemmed The effect of abdominal bracing on respiration during a lifting task: a cross-sectional study
title_short The effect of abdominal bracing on respiration during a lifting task: a cross-sectional study
title_sort effect of abdominal bracing on respiration during a lifting task: a cross-sectional study
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10504786/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37715283
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13102-023-00729-w
work_keys_str_mv AT semberamartin theeffectofabdominalbracingonrespirationduringaliftingtaskacrosssectionalstudy
AT buschandrew theeffectofabdominalbracingonrespirationduringaliftingtaskacrosssectionalstudy
AT kobesovaalena theeffectofabdominalbracingonrespirationduringaliftingtaskacrosssectionalstudy
AT hanychovabarbora theeffectofabdominalbracingonrespirationduringaliftingtaskacrosssectionalstudy
AT sulcjan theeffectofabdominalbracingonrespirationduringaliftingtaskacrosssectionalstudy
AT kolarpavel theeffectofabdominalbracingonrespirationduringaliftingtaskacrosssectionalstudy
AT semberamartin effectofabdominalbracingonrespirationduringaliftingtaskacrosssectionalstudy
AT buschandrew effectofabdominalbracingonrespirationduringaliftingtaskacrosssectionalstudy
AT kobesovaalena effectofabdominalbracingonrespirationduringaliftingtaskacrosssectionalstudy
AT hanychovabarbora effectofabdominalbracingonrespirationduringaliftingtaskacrosssectionalstudy
AT sulcjan effectofabdominalbracingonrespirationduringaliftingtaskacrosssectionalstudy
AT kolarpavel effectofabdominalbracingonrespirationduringaliftingtaskacrosssectionalstudy