Cargando…

Rotational stability can be enhanced in revision anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction using the over-the-top augmentation technique compared to single bundle technique

PURPOSE: Revision anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction is technically challenging due to mispositioned tunnels, bone loss, and tunnel enlargement, which may compromise graft fixation and result in failure. To obtain firm graft fixation and strength in one stage, we utilized an over-the-to...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Lim, Sumin, Park, Ki-Hoon, Park, Do Young, Kim, Tae Hun, Koh, Jeong-Hyun, Chung, Jun Young
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10504798/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37715268
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13102-023-00724-1
_version_ 1785106806444392448
author Lim, Sumin
Park, Ki-Hoon
Park, Do Young
Kim, Tae Hun
Koh, Jeong-Hyun
Chung, Jun Young
author_facet Lim, Sumin
Park, Ki-Hoon
Park, Do Young
Kim, Tae Hun
Koh, Jeong-Hyun
Chung, Jun Young
author_sort Lim, Sumin
collection PubMed
description PURPOSE: Revision anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction is technically challenging due to mispositioned tunnels, bone loss, and tunnel enlargement, which may compromise graft fixation and result in failure. To obtain firm graft fixation and strength in one stage, we utilized an over-the-top augmentation technique using an Achilles tendon allograft in revision ACL reconstruction (OA-ACLR). This study compared OA-ACLR with single-bundle ACL reconstruction (SB-ACLR). We hypothesized that OA-ACLR would enhance the postoperative knee joint rotational stability. METHODS: We retrospectively analyzed 47 patients who underwent revisional OA-ACLR and 48 who underwent primary SB-ACLR with minimum follow-up of 6 months. Knee instability was evaluated with the anterior drawer, Lachman, and pivot shift tests preoperatively and at the final follow-up. Side-to-side differences were compared with the non-affected side at the final follow-up. Function was evaluated using the IKDC subjective and Lysholm knee scores preoperatively and at the final follow-up. RESULTS: The groups did not differ in terms of sex, age, BMI, and etiology. There were no significant differences in concomitant surgical procedures, such as meniscectomy and meniscus repair, between the two groups (p = 0.335, > 0.99). Both groups significantly improved in the anterior drawer, Lachman, pivot shift tests, and IKDC and Lysholm knee scores after surgery (all p < 0.001). The OA-ACLR group showed significantly higher rotational stability in the pivot shift test than the SB-ACLR group (p = 0.017). The postoperative side-to-side difference, the IKDC and Lysholm scores showed no significant differences between the groups (p = 0.34, 0.301, 0.438). CONCLUSIONS: OA-ACLR showed enhanced rotational stability with pivot shift test compared to SB-ACLR. It may be considered a useful alternative for revision ACL reconstruction.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10504798
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-105047982023-09-17 Rotational stability can be enhanced in revision anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction using the over-the-top augmentation technique compared to single bundle technique Lim, Sumin Park, Ki-Hoon Park, Do Young Kim, Tae Hun Koh, Jeong-Hyun Chung, Jun Young BMC Sports Sci Med Rehabil Research PURPOSE: Revision anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction is technically challenging due to mispositioned tunnels, bone loss, and tunnel enlargement, which may compromise graft fixation and result in failure. To obtain firm graft fixation and strength in one stage, we utilized an over-the-top augmentation technique using an Achilles tendon allograft in revision ACL reconstruction (OA-ACLR). This study compared OA-ACLR with single-bundle ACL reconstruction (SB-ACLR). We hypothesized that OA-ACLR would enhance the postoperative knee joint rotational stability. METHODS: We retrospectively analyzed 47 patients who underwent revisional OA-ACLR and 48 who underwent primary SB-ACLR with minimum follow-up of 6 months. Knee instability was evaluated with the anterior drawer, Lachman, and pivot shift tests preoperatively and at the final follow-up. Side-to-side differences were compared with the non-affected side at the final follow-up. Function was evaluated using the IKDC subjective and Lysholm knee scores preoperatively and at the final follow-up. RESULTS: The groups did not differ in terms of sex, age, BMI, and etiology. There were no significant differences in concomitant surgical procedures, such as meniscectomy and meniscus repair, between the two groups (p = 0.335, > 0.99). Both groups significantly improved in the anterior drawer, Lachman, pivot shift tests, and IKDC and Lysholm knee scores after surgery (all p < 0.001). The OA-ACLR group showed significantly higher rotational stability in the pivot shift test than the SB-ACLR group (p = 0.017). The postoperative side-to-side difference, the IKDC and Lysholm scores showed no significant differences between the groups (p = 0.34, 0.301, 0.438). CONCLUSIONS: OA-ACLR showed enhanced rotational stability with pivot shift test compared to SB-ACLR. It may be considered a useful alternative for revision ACL reconstruction. BioMed Central 2023-09-15 /pmc/articles/PMC10504798/ /pubmed/37715268 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13102-023-00724-1 Text en © The Author(s) 2023 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
spellingShingle Research
Lim, Sumin
Park, Ki-Hoon
Park, Do Young
Kim, Tae Hun
Koh, Jeong-Hyun
Chung, Jun Young
Rotational stability can be enhanced in revision anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction using the over-the-top augmentation technique compared to single bundle technique
title Rotational stability can be enhanced in revision anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction using the over-the-top augmentation technique compared to single bundle technique
title_full Rotational stability can be enhanced in revision anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction using the over-the-top augmentation technique compared to single bundle technique
title_fullStr Rotational stability can be enhanced in revision anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction using the over-the-top augmentation technique compared to single bundle technique
title_full_unstemmed Rotational stability can be enhanced in revision anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction using the over-the-top augmentation technique compared to single bundle technique
title_short Rotational stability can be enhanced in revision anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction using the over-the-top augmentation technique compared to single bundle technique
title_sort rotational stability can be enhanced in revision anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction using the over-the-top augmentation technique compared to single bundle technique
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10504798/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37715268
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13102-023-00724-1
work_keys_str_mv AT limsumin rotationalstabilitycanbeenhancedinrevisionanteriorcruciateligamentreconstructionusingtheoverthetopaugmentationtechniquecomparedtosinglebundletechnique
AT parkkihoon rotationalstabilitycanbeenhancedinrevisionanteriorcruciateligamentreconstructionusingtheoverthetopaugmentationtechniquecomparedtosinglebundletechnique
AT parkdoyoung rotationalstabilitycanbeenhancedinrevisionanteriorcruciateligamentreconstructionusingtheoverthetopaugmentationtechniquecomparedtosinglebundletechnique
AT kimtaehun rotationalstabilitycanbeenhancedinrevisionanteriorcruciateligamentreconstructionusingtheoverthetopaugmentationtechniquecomparedtosinglebundletechnique
AT kohjeonghyun rotationalstabilitycanbeenhancedinrevisionanteriorcruciateligamentreconstructionusingtheoverthetopaugmentationtechniquecomparedtosinglebundletechnique
AT chungjunyoung rotationalstabilitycanbeenhancedinrevisionanteriorcruciateligamentreconstructionusingtheoverthetopaugmentationtechniquecomparedtosinglebundletechnique