Cargando…

Is Dichotomization into Regular versus Irregular Dental Attenders Valid? A Qualitative Analysis

AIMS: To discover whether dental visiting behavior can be understood as a dichotomy of planned versus problem based, or whether there were a range of different types of understanding and patient behavior, recognizable as patterns of dental visiting behavior. METHODS: Secondary analysis drawing on 2...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: van der Zande, M.M., Exley, C.E., Freeman, R., Thetford, C., Harris, R.V.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: SAGE Publications 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10504811/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36032014
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/23800844221118515
_version_ 1785106809527205888
author van der Zande, M.M.
Exley, C.E.
Freeman, R.
Thetford, C.
Harris, R.V.
author_facet van der Zande, M.M.
Exley, C.E.
Freeman, R.
Thetford, C.
Harris, R.V.
author_sort van der Zande, M.M.
collection PubMed
description AIMS: To discover whether dental visiting behavior can be understood as a dichotomy of planned versus problem based, or whether there were a range of different types of understanding and patient behavior, recognizable as patterns of dental visiting behavior. METHODS: Secondary analysis drawing on 2 qualitative studies of patients’ accounts of dental attendance and oral health, with 1) opportunistic interviews with people attending urgent dental care services (n = 43; including 19 with follow-up) and 2) home-based, in-depth interviews with people attending a dental practice with a mixture of improved or deteriorated/poor periodontal health (n = 25). RESULTS: Four distinguishable patterns of dental visiting were identified in patients’ accounts: Accepting and Active Monitoring, as well as Ambivalent and Active Problem-based dental visiting behavior. Individuals’ patterns were relatively stable over time but could shift at turning points. Accepting Monitors were characterized as accepting dentists’ recommendations and dental practice policies relating to oral health and visits, whereas Active Monitors were more independent in judging how often to attend for preventive appointments, while still valuing anticipatory care. Ambivalent Problem–based visitors placed a relatively low value on anticipatory care for oral health maintenance and drifted into lapsed attendance, in part because of service-related factors. This contrasted with Active Problem–based visitors, for whom using services only in an emergency was a conscious decision, with low value placed on anticipatory care. CONCLUSION: This article demonstrates the dynamic nature of patterns of dental visiting where the dental system itself is partly instrumental in shaping patterns of utilization in an ecological way. Thus, service-related factors tend to combine with patients’ behavior in expanding inequalities. This illuminates the reasons why risk-based recalls are challenging to implement as a dental policy. KNOWLEDGE TRANSFER STATEMENT: The results of this analysis can be used by clinicians and policymakers to inform policy around supporting uptake of preventive health care visits, contributing in particular to understanding how risk-based preventive visiting policies may be better adapted to patients’ understanding of the purpose of visits, taking into account that this is in part shaped by service-related factors in an ecological way, arising from patients’ and dental teams’ expectations.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10504811
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher SAGE Publications
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-105048112023-09-17 Is Dichotomization into Regular versus Irregular Dental Attenders Valid? A Qualitative Analysis van der Zande, M.M. Exley, C.E. Freeman, R. Thetford, C. Harris, R.V. JDR Clin Trans Res Original Reports AIMS: To discover whether dental visiting behavior can be understood as a dichotomy of planned versus problem based, or whether there were a range of different types of understanding and patient behavior, recognizable as patterns of dental visiting behavior. METHODS: Secondary analysis drawing on 2 qualitative studies of patients’ accounts of dental attendance and oral health, with 1) opportunistic interviews with people attending urgent dental care services (n = 43; including 19 with follow-up) and 2) home-based, in-depth interviews with people attending a dental practice with a mixture of improved or deteriorated/poor periodontal health (n = 25). RESULTS: Four distinguishable patterns of dental visiting were identified in patients’ accounts: Accepting and Active Monitoring, as well as Ambivalent and Active Problem-based dental visiting behavior. Individuals’ patterns were relatively stable over time but could shift at turning points. Accepting Monitors were characterized as accepting dentists’ recommendations and dental practice policies relating to oral health and visits, whereas Active Monitors were more independent in judging how often to attend for preventive appointments, while still valuing anticipatory care. Ambivalent Problem–based visitors placed a relatively low value on anticipatory care for oral health maintenance and drifted into lapsed attendance, in part because of service-related factors. This contrasted with Active Problem–based visitors, for whom using services only in an emergency was a conscious decision, with low value placed on anticipatory care. CONCLUSION: This article demonstrates the dynamic nature of patterns of dental visiting where the dental system itself is partly instrumental in shaping patterns of utilization in an ecological way. Thus, service-related factors tend to combine with patients’ behavior in expanding inequalities. This illuminates the reasons why risk-based recalls are challenging to implement as a dental policy. KNOWLEDGE TRANSFER STATEMENT: The results of this analysis can be used by clinicians and policymakers to inform policy around supporting uptake of preventive health care visits, contributing in particular to understanding how risk-based preventive visiting policies may be better adapted to patients’ understanding of the purpose of visits, taking into account that this is in part shaped by service-related factors in an ecological way, arising from patients’ and dental teams’ expectations. SAGE Publications 2022-08-29 2023-10 /pmc/articles/PMC10504811/ /pubmed/36032014 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/23800844221118515 Text en © International Association for Dental, Oral, and Craniofacial Research and American Association for Dental, Oral, and Craniofacial Research 2022 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) which permits any use, reproduction and distribution of the work without further permission provided the original work is attributed as specified on the SAGE and Open Access pages (https://us.sagepub.com/en-us/nam/open-access-at-sage).
spellingShingle Original Reports
van der Zande, M.M.
Exley, C.E.
Freeman, R.
Thetford, C.
Harris, R.V.
Is Dichotomization into Regular versus Irregular Dental Attenders Valid? A Qualitative Analysis
title Is Dichotomization into Regular versus Irregular Dental Attenders Valid? A Qualitative Analysis
title_full Is Dichotomization into Regular versus Irregular Dental Attenders Valid? A Qualitative Analysis
title_fullStr Is Dichotomization into Regular versus Irregular Dental Attenders Valid? A Qualitative Analysis
title_full_unstemmed Is Dichotomization into Regular versus Irregular Dental Attenders Valid? A Qualitative Analysis
title_short Is Dichotomization into Regular versus Irregular Dental Attenders Valid? A Qualitative Analysis
title_sort is dichotomization into regular versus irregular dental attenders valid? a qualitative analysis
topic Original Reports
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10504811/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36032014
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/23800844221118515
work_keys_str_mv AT vanderzandemm isdichotomizationintoregularversusirregulardentalattendersvalidaqualitativeanalysis
AT exleyce isdichotomizationintoregularversusirregulardentalattendersvalidaqualitativeanalysis
AT freemanr isdichotomizationintoregularversusirregulardentalattendersvalidaqualitativeanalysis
AT thetfordc isdichotomizationintoregularversusirregulardentalattendersvalidaqualitativeanalysis
AT harrisrv isdichotomizationintoregularversusirregulardentalattendersvalidaqualitativeanalysis