Cargando…

Handling intercurrent events and missing data in non-inferiority trials using the estimand framework: A tuberculosis case study

INTRODUCTION: The ICH E9 addendum outlining the estimand framework for clinical trials was published in 2019 but provides limited guidance around how to handle intercurrent events for non-inferiority studies. Once an estimand is defined, it is also unclear how to deal with missing values using princ...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Rehal, Sunita, Cro, Suzie, Phillips, Patrick PJ, Fielding, Katherine, Carpenter, James R
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: SAGE Publications 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10504812/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37277978
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/17407745231176773
_version_ 1785106809763135488
author Rehal, Sunita
Cro, Suzie
Phillips, Patrick PJ
Fielding, Katherine
Carpenter, James R
author_facet Rehal, Sunita
Cro, Suzie
Phillips, Patrick PJ
Fielding, Katherine
Carpenter, James R
author_sort Rehal, Sunita
collection PubMed
description INTRODUCTION: The ICH E9 addendum outlining the estimand framework for clinical trials was published in 2019 but provides limited guidance around how to handle intercurrent events for non-inferiority studies. Once an estimand is defined, it is also unclear how to deal with missing values using principled analyses for non-inferiority studies. METHODS: Using a tuberculosis clinical trial as a case study, we propose a primary estimand, and an additional estimand suitable for non-inferiority studies. For estimation, multiple imputation methods that align with the estimands for both primary and sensitivity analysis are proposed. We demonstrate estimation methods using the twofold fully conditional specification multiple imputation algorithm and then extend and use reference-based multiple imputation for a binary outcome to target the relevant estimands, proposing sensitivity analyses under each. We compare the results from using these multiple imputation methods with those from the original study. RESULTS: Consistent with the ICH E9 addendum, estimands can be constructed for a non-inferiority trial which improves on the per-protocol/intention-to-treat-type analysis population previously advocated, involving respectively a hypothetical or treatment policy strategy to handle relevant intercurrent events. Results from using the ‘twofold’ multiple imputation approach to estimate the primary hypothetical estimand, and using reference-based methods for an additional treatment policy estimand, including sensitivity analyses to handle the missing data, were consistent with the original study’s reported per-protocol and intention-to-treat analysis in failing to demonstrate non-inferiority. CONCLUSIONS: Using carefully constructed estimands and appropriate primary and sensitivity estimators, using all the information available, results in a more principled and statistically rigorous approach to analysis. Doing so provides an accurate interpretation of the estimand.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10504812
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher SAGE Publications
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-105048122023-09-17 Handling intercurrent events and missing data in non-inferiority trials using the estimand framework: A tuberculosis case study Rehal, Sunita Cro, Suzie Phillips, Patrick PJ Fielding, Katherine Carpenter, James R Clin Trials Articles INTRODUCTION: The ICH E9 addendum outlining the estimand framework for clinical trials was published in 2019 but provides limited guidance around how to handle intercurrent events for non-inferiority studies. Once an estimand is defined, it is also unclear how to deal with missing values using principled analyses for non-inferiority studies. METHODS: Using a tuberculosis clinical trial as a case study, we propose a primary estimand, and an additional estimand suitable for non-inferiority studies. For estimation, multiple imputation methods that align with the estimands for both primary and sensitivity analysis are proposed. We demonstrate estimation methods using the twofold fully conditional specification multiple imputation algorithm and then extend and use reference-based multiple imputation for a binary outcome to target the relevant estimands, proposing sensitivity analyses under each. We compare the results from using these multiple imputation methods with those from the original study. RESULTS: Consistent with the ICH E9 addendum, estimands can be constructed for a non-inferiority trial which improves on the per-protocol/intention-to-treat-type analysis population previously advocated, involving respectively a hypothetical or treatment policy strategy to handle relevant intercurrent events. Results from using the ‘twofold’ multiple imputation approach to estimate the primary hypothetical estimand, and using reference-based methods for an additional treatment policy estimand, including sensitivity analyses to handle the missing data, were consistent with the original study’s reported per-protocol and intention-to-treat analysis in failing to demonstrate non-inferiority. CONCLUSIONS: Using carefully constructed estimands and appropriate primary and sensitivity estimators, using all the information available, results in a more principled and statistically rigorous approach to analysis. Doing so provides an accurate interpretation of the estimand. SAGE Publications 2023-06-05 2023-10 /pmc/articles/PMC10504812/ /pubmed/37277978 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/17407745231176773 Text en © The Author(s) 2023 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) which permits any use, reproduction and distribution of the work without further permission provided the original work is attributed as specified on the SAGE and Open Access page (https://us.sagepub.com/en-us/nam/open-access-at-sage).
spellingShingle Articles
Rehal, Sunita
Cro, Suzie
Phillips, Patrick PJ
Fielding, Katherine
Carpenter, James R
Handling intercurrent events and missing data in non-inferiority trials using the estimand framework: A tuberculosis case study
title Handling intercurrent events and missing data in non-inferiority trials using the estimand framework: A tuberculosis case study
title_full Handling intercurrent events and missing data in non-inferiority trials using the estimand framework: A tuberculosis case study
title_fullStr Handling intercurrent events and missing data in non-inferiority trials using the estimand framework: A tuberculosis case study
title_full_unstemmed Handling intercurrent events and missing data in non-inferiority trials using the estimand framework: A tuberculosis case study
title_short Handling intercurrent events and missing data in non-inferiority trials using the estimand framework: A tuberculosis case study
title_sort handling intercurrent events and missing data in non-inferiority trials using the estimand framework: a tuberculosis case study
topic Articles
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10504812/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37277978
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/17407745231176773
work_keys_str_mv AT rehalsunita handlingintercurrenteventsandmissingdatainnoninferioritytrialsusingtheestimandframeworkatuberculosiscasestudy
AT crosuzie handlingintercurrenteventsandmissingdatainnoninferioritytrialsusingtheestimandframeworkatuberculosiscasestudy
AT phillipspatrickpj handlingintercurrenteventsandmissingdatainnoninferioritytrialsusingtheestimandframeworkatuberculosiscasestudy
AT fieldingkatherine handlingintercurrenteventsandmissingdatainnoninferioritytrialsusingtheestimandframeworkatuberculosiscasestudy
AT carpenterjamesr handlingintercurrenteventsandmissingdatainnoninferioritytrialsusingtheestimandframeworkatuberculosiscasestudy