Cargando…
Handling intercurrent events and missing data in non-inferiority trials using the estimand framework: A tuberculosis case study
INTRODUCTION: The ICH E9 addendum outlining the estimand framework for clinical trials was published in 2019 but provides limited guidance around how to handle intercurrent events for non-inferiority studies. Once an estimand is defined, it is also unclear how to deal with missing values using princ...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
SAGE Publications
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10504812/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37277978 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/17407745231176773 |
_version_ | 1785106809763135488 |
---|---|
author | Rehal, Sunita Cro, Suzie Phillips, Patrick PJ Fielding, Katherine Carpenter, James R |
author_facet | Rehal, Sunita Cro, Suzie Phillips, Patrick PJ Fielding, Katherine Carpenter, James R |
author_sort | Rehal, Sunita |
collection | PubMed |
description | INTRODUCTION: The ICH E9 addendum outlining the estimand framework for clinical trials was published in 2019 but provides limited guidance around how to handle intercurrent events for non-inferiority studies. Once an estimand is defined, it is also unclear how to deal with missing values using principled analyses for non-inferiority studies. METHODS: Using a tuberculosis clinical trial as a case study, we propose a primary estimand, and an additional estimand suitable for non-inferiority studies. For estimation, multiple imputation methods that align with the estimands for both primary and sensitivity analysis are proposed. We demonstrate estimation methods using the twofold fully conditional specification multiple imputation algorithm and then extend and use reference-based multiple imputation for a binary outcome to target the relevant estimands, proposing sensitivity analyses under each. We compare the results from using these multiple imputation methods with those from the original study. RESULTS: Consistent with the ICH E9 addendum, estimands can be constructed for a non-inferiority trial which improves on the per-protocol/intention-to-treat-type analysis population previously advocated, involving respectively a hypothetical or treatment policy strategy to handle relevant intercurrent events. Results from using the ‘twofold’ multiple imputation approach to estimate the primary hypothetical estimand, and using reference-based methods for an additional treatment policy estimand, including sensitivity analyses to handle the missing data, were consistent with the original study’s reported per-protocol and intention-to-treat analysis in failing to demonstrate non-inferiority. CONCLUSIONS: Using carefully constructed estimands and appropriate primary and sensitivity estimators, using all the information available, results in a more principled and statistically rigorous approach to analysis. Doing so provides an accurate interpretation of the estimand. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-10504812 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2023 |
publisher | SAGE Publications |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-105048122023-09-17 Handling intercurrent events and missing data in non-inferiority trials using the estimand framework: A tuberculosis case study Rehal, Sunita Cro, Suzie Phillips, Patrick PJ Fielding, Katherine Carpenter, James R Clin Trials Articles INTRODUCTION: The ICH E9 addendum outlining the estimand framework for clinical trials was published in 2019 but provides limited guidance around how to handle intercurrent events for non-inferiority studies. Once an estimand is defined, it is also unclear how to deal with missing values using principled analyses for non-inferiority studies. METHODS: Using a tuberculosis clinical trial as a case study, we propose a primary estimand, and an additional estimand suitable for non-inferiority studies. For estimation, multiple imputation methods that align with the estimands for both primary and sensitivity analysis are proposed. We demonstrate estimation methods using the twofold fully conditional specification multiple imputation algorithm and then extend and use reference-based multiple imputation for a binary outcome to target the relevant estimands, proposing sensitivity analyses under each. We compare the results from using these multiple imputation methods with those from the original study. RESULTS: Consistent with the ICH E9 addendum, estimands can be constructed for a non-inferiority trial which improves on the per-protocol/intention-to-treat-type analysis population previously advocated, involving respectively a hypothetical or treatment policy strategy to handle relevant intercurrent events. Results from using the ‘twofold’ multiple imputation approach to estimate the primary hypothetical estimand, and using reference-based methods for an additional treatment policy estimand, including sensitivity analyses to handle the missing data, were consistent with the original study’s reported per-protocol and intention-to-treat analysis in failing to demonstrate non-inferiority. CONCLUSIONS: Using carefully constructed estimands and appropriate primary and sensitivity estimators, using all the information available, results in a more principled and statistically rigorous approach to analysis. Doing so provides an accurate interpretation of the estimand. SAGE Publications 2023-06-05 2023-10 /pmc/articles/PMC10504812/ /pubmed/37277978 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/17407745231176773 Text en © The Author(s) 2023 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) which permits any use, reproduction and distribution of the work without further permission provided the original work is attributed as specified on the SAGE and Open Access page (https://us.sagepub.com/en-us/nam/open-access-at-sage). |
spellingShingle | Articles Rehal, Sunita Cro, Suzie Phillips, Patrick PJ Fielding, Katherine Carpenter, James R Handling intercurrent events and missing data in non-inferiority trials using the estimand framework: A tuberculosis case study |
title | Handling intercurrent events and missing data in non-inferiority trials using the estimand framework: A tuberculosis case study |
title_full | Handling intercurrent events and missing data in non-inferiority trials using the estimand framework: A tuberculosis case study |
title_fullStr | Handling intercurrent events and missing data in non-inferiority trials using the estimand framework: A tuberculosis case study |
title_full_unstemmed | Handling intercurrent events and missing data in non-inferiority trials using the estimand framework: A tuberculosis case study |
title_short | Handling intercurrent events and missing data in non-inferiority trials using the estimand framework: A tuberculosis case study |
title_sort | handling intercurrent events and missing data in non-inferiority trials using the estimand framework: a tuberculosis case study |
topic | Articles |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10504812/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37277978 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/17407745231176773 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT rehalsunita handlingintercurrenteventsandmissingdatainnoninferioritytrialsusingtheestimandframeworkatuberculosiscasestudy AT crosuzie handlingintercurrenteventsandmissingdatainnoninferioritytrialsusingtheestimandframeworkatuberculosiscasestudy AT phillipspatrickpj handlingintercurrenteventsandmissingdatainnoninferioritytrialsusingtheestimandframeworkatuberculosiscasestudy AT fieldingkatherine handlingintercurrenteventsandmissingdatainnoninferioritytrialsusingtheestimandframeworkatuberculosiscasestudy AT carpenterjamesr handlingintercurrenteventsandmissingdatainnoninferioritytrialsusingtheestimandframeworkatuberculosiscasestudy |