Cargando…

A single center prospective study: Influences of different hip flexion angles on the measurement of lumbar spine bone mineral density by dual energy X-ray absorptiometry

To investigate whether there is an influence on the results of lumbar spine bone mineral density (BMD) measured by dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) under three different hip flexion angles (90°, 45°, 0° of hip flexion). We collected a total of 60 outpatients, including 44 females (56.4 ± 5.7 y...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Yan, Lisheng, Cai, Donglu, Zhuang, Huafeng, Lin, Yongjun
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: De Gruyter 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10505299/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37724123
http://dx.doi.org/10.1515/med-2023-0778
_version_ 1785106887877853184
author Yan, Lisheng
Cai, Donglu
Zhuang, Huafeng
Lin, Yongjun
author_facet Yan, Lisheng
Cai, Donglu
Zhuang, Huafeng
Lin, Yongjun
author_sort Yan, Lisheng
collection PubMed
description To investigate whether there is an influence on the results of lumbar spine bone mineral density (BMD) measured by dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) under three different hip flexion angles (90°, 45°, 0° of hip flexion). We collected a total of 60 outpatients, including 44 females (56.4 ± 5.7 years) and 16 males (50.2 ± 13.7 years). The DXA results of the lumbar spine were scanned and analyzed in three different positions with hip flexion of 90°, 45°, and 0°. We found that there was no significant difference in the area of interest, bone mineral content, BMD, and vertebral body height of the lumbar vertebral body measured by DXA in three hip flexion positions of 90°, 45°, and 0°; Pearson’s correlation analysis showed that lumbar BMD in hip flexion 90° was correlated with it in hip flexion 45° (r = 0.998, P<0.01) and in hip flexion 0° (r = 0.996, P<0.01) respectively. There was no statistically significant difference in the diagnosis of BMD between 90° and 45° hip flexion (P = 0.903), which was the same as 90° and 0° hip flexion (P = 0.822). Therefore, we conclude that different hip flexion angles can be used in lumbar BMD detection by DXA, which is beneficial to patients who have difficulty in hip flexion, especially for elderly patients with osteoporosis.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10505299
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher De Gruyter
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-105052992023-09-18 A single center prospective study: Influences of different hip flexion angles on the measurement of lumbar spine bone mineral density by dual energy X-ray absorptiometry Yan, Lisheng Cai, Donglu Zhuang, Huafeng Lin, Yongjun Open Med (Wars) Research Article To investigate whether there is an influence on the results of lumbar spine bone mineral density (BMD) measured by dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) under three different hip flexion angles (90°, 45°, 0° of hip flexion). We collected a total of 60 outpatients, including 44 females (56.4 ± 5.7 years) and 16 males (50.2 ± 13.7 years). The DXA results of the lumbar spine were scanned and analyzed in three different positions with hip flexion of 90°, 45°, and 0°. We found that there was no significant difference in the area of interest, bone mineral content, BMD, and vertebral body height of the lumbar vertebral body measured by DXA in three hip flexion positions of 90°, 45°, and 0°; Pearson’s correlation analysis showed that lumbar BMD in hip flexion 90° was correlated with it in hip flexion 45° (r = 0.998, P<0.01) and in hip flexion 0° (r = 0.996, P<0.01) respectively. There was no statistically significant difference in the diagnosis of BMD between 90° and 45° hip flexion (P = 0.903), which was the same as 90° and 0° hip flexion (P = 0.822). Therefore, we conclude that different hip flexion angles can be used in lumbar BMD detection by DXA, which is beneficial to patients who have difficulty in hip flexion, especially for elderly patients with osteoporosis. De Gruyter 2023-09-12 /pmc/articles/PMC10505299/ /pubmed/37724123 http://dx.doi.org/10.1515/med-2023-0778 Text en © 2023 the author(s), published by De Gruyter https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
spellingShingle Research Article
Yan, Lisheng
Cai, Donglu
Zhuang, Huafeng
Lin, Yongjun
A single center prospective study: Influences of different hip flexion angles on the measurement of lumbar spine bone mineral density by dual energy X-ray absorptiometry
title A single center prospective study: Influences of different hip flexion angles on the measurement of lumbar spine bone mineral density by dual energy X-ray absorptiometry
title_full A single center prospective study: Influences of different hip flexion angles on the measurement of lumbar spine bone mineral density by dual energy X-ray absorptiometry
title_fullStr A single center prospective study: Influences of different hip flexion angles on the measurement of lumbar spine bone mineral density by dual energy X-ray absorptiometry
title_full_unstemmed A single center prospective study: Influences of different hip flexion angles on the measurement of lumbar spine bone mineral density by dual energy X-ray absorptiometry
title_short A single center prospective study: Influences of different hip flexion angles on the measurement of lumbar spine bone mineral density by dual energy X-ray absorptiometry
title_sort single center prospective study: influences of different hip flexion angles on the measurement of lumbar spine bone mineral density by dual energy x-ray absorptiometry
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10505299/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37724123
http://dx.doi.org/10.1515/med-2023-0778
work_keys_str_mv AT yanlisheng asinglecenterprospectivestudyinfluencesofdifferenthipflexionanglesonthemeasurementoflumbarspinebonemineraldensitybydualenergyxrayabsorptiometry
AT caidonglu asinglecenterprospectivestudyinfluencesofdifferenthipflexionanglesonthemeasurementoflumbarspinebonemineraldensitybydualenergyxrayabsorptiometry
AT zhuanghuafeng asinglecenterprospectivestudyinfluencesofdifferenthipflexionanglesonthemeasurementoflumbarspinebonemineraldensitybydualenergyxrayabsorptiometry
AT linyongjun asinglecenterprospectivestudyinfluencesofdifferenthipflexionanglesonthemeasurementoflumbarspinebonemineraldensitybydualenergyxrayabsorptiometry
AT yanlisheng singlecenterprospectivestudyinfluencesofdifferenthipflexionanglesonthemeasurementoflumbarspinebonemineraldensitybydualenergyxrayabsorptiometry
AT caidonglu singlecenterprospectivestudyinfluencesofdifferenthipflexionanglesonthemeasurementoflumbarspinebonemineraldensitybydualenergyxrayabsorptiometry
AT zhuanghuafeng singlecenterprospectivestudyinfluencesofdifferenthipflexionanglesonthemeasurementoflumbarspinebonemineraldensitybydualenergyxrayabsorptiometry
AT linyongjun singlecenterprospectivestudyinfluencesofdifferenthipflexionanglesonthemeasurementoflumbarspinebonemineraldensitybydualenergyxrayabsorptiometry