Cargando…
Ovarian cancer in the older patient: where are we now? What to do next?
In recent years, major advances have been made toward the individualization of epithelial ovarian cancer care, leading to an overall improvement of patient outcomes. However, real-life data indicate that the oldest populations do not benefit from this, due to aspects related to cancer (more aggressi...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
SAGE Publications
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10505350/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37724138 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/17588359231192397 |
_version_ | 1785106900460765184 |
---|---|
author | Rousseau, Frédérique Ranchon, Florence Bardin, Christophe Bakrin, Naoual Lavoué, Vincent Bengrine-Lefevre, Leila Falandry, Claire |
author_facet | Rousseau, Frédérique Ranchon, Florence Bardin, Christophe Bakrin, Naoual Lavoué, Vincent Bengrine-Lefevre, Leila Falandry, Claire |
author_sort | Rousseau, Frédérique |
collection | PubMed |
description | In recent years, major advances have been made toward the individualization of epithelial ovarian cancer care, leading to an overall improvement of patient outcomes. However, real-life data indicate that the oldest populations do not benefit from this, due to aspects related to cancer (more aggressive histopathological features), treatment (i.e. frequently suboptimal), and the host (increased toxicities in patients with lower physiological reserve). A specific risk–benefit perspective should therefore be taken when considering surgery, chemotherapy, and maintenance treatments: the decision for cytoreductive surgery should include geriatric vulnerability and surgical complexity, neo-adjuvant chemotherapy being an option when primary surgery appears at high risk; carboplatin paclitaxel association remains the standard even in vulnerable older patients; and bevacizumab and poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase inhibitors maintenance are interesting options provided they are prescribed according to their indications with a close monitoring of their toxicities. Future studies should aim to individualize care without limiting access of older patients to innovation. A specific focus is needed on age-specific translational analyses (focusing on tumor mutational burden and impaired biological pathways), a better patient stratification according to geriatric parameters, an adaptation of both oncological treatment and geriatric interventions, and treatment adaptations not a priori but according to formal pharmacokinetic data. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-10505350 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2023 |
publisher | SAGE Publications |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-105053502023-09-18 Ovarian cancer in the older patient: where are we now? What to do next? Rousseau, Frédérique Ranchon, Florence Bardin, Christophe Bakrin, Naoual Lavoué, Vincent Bengrine-Lefevre, Leila Falandry, Claire Ther Adv Med Oncol Review In recent years, major advances have been made toward the individualization of epithelial ovarian cancer care, leading to an overall improvement of patient outcomes. However, real-life data indicate that the oldest populations do not benefit from this, due to aspects related to cancer (more aggressive histopathological features), treatment (i.e. frequently suboptimal), and the host (increased toxicities in patients with lower physiological reserve). A specific risk–benefit perspective should therefore be taken when considering surgery, chemotherapy, and maintenance treatments: the decision for cytoreductive surgery should include geriatric vulnerability and surgical complexity, neo-adjuvant chemotherapy being an option when primary surgery appears at high risk; carboplatin paclitaxel association remains the standard even in vulnerable older patients; and bevacizumab and poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase inhibitors maintenance are interesting options provided they are prescribed according to their indications with a close monitoring of their toxicities. Future studies should aim to individualize care without limiting access of older patients to innovation. A specific focus is needed on age-specific translational analyses (focusing on tumor mutational burden and impaired biological pathways), a better patient stratification according to geriatric parameters, an adaptation of both oncological treatment and geriatric interventions, and treatment adaptations not a priori but according to formal pharmacokinetic data. SAGE Publications 2023-09-16 /pmc/articles/PMC10505350/ /pubmed/37724138 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/17588359231192397 Text en © The Author(s), 2023 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) which permits non-commercial use, reproduction and distribution of the work without further permission provided the original work is attributed as specified on the SAGE and Open Access pages (https://us.sagepub.com/en-us/nam/open-access-at-sage). |
spellingShingle | Review Rousseau, Frédérique Ranchon, Florence Bardin, Christophe Bakrin, Naoual Lavoué, Vincent Bengrine-Lefevre, Leila Falandry, Claire Ovarian cancer in the older patient: where are we now? What to do next? |
title | Ovarian cancer in the older patient: where are we now? What to do next? |
title_full | Ovarian cancer in the older patient: where are we now? What to do next? |
title_fullStr | Ovarian cancer in the older patient: where are we now? What to do next? |
title_full_unstemmed | Ovarian cancer in the older patient: where are we now? What to do next? |
title_short | Ovarian cancer in the older patient: where are we now? What to do next? |
title_sort | ovarian cancer in the older patient: where are we now? what to do next? |
topic | Review |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10505350/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37724138 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/17588359231192397 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT rousseaufrederique ovariancancerintheolderpatientwherearewenowwhattodonext AT ranchonflorence ovariancancerintheolderpatientwherearewenowwhattodonext AT bardinchristophe ovariancancerintheolderpatientwherearewenowwhattodonext AT bakrinnaoual ovariancancerintheolderpatientwherearewenowwhattodonext AT lavouevincent ovariancancerintheolderpatientwherearewenowwhattodonext AT bengrinelefevreleila ovariancancerintheolderpatientwherearewenowwhattodonext AT falandryclaire ovariancancerintheolderpatientwherearewenowwhattodonext |