Cargando…

Clinical Outcomes Following Open Olecranon Bursa Excision for Septic and Aseptic Olecranon Bursitis: An Observational Study

Background and objective Olecranon bursitis (aseptic or septic) is caused by inflammation in the bursal tissue. While it is typically managed with conservative measures, refractory cases may indicate surgical intervention. There is currently limited research about outcomes following bursal excision...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Pohl, Nicholas B, Brush, Parker L, Toci, Gregory R, Heinle, Jeremy T, Thomas, Anna, Hornstein, Joshua, Aita, Daren, Beredjiklian, Pedro, Katt, Brian, Fletcher, Daniel
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Cureus 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10505354/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37724223
http://dx.doi.org/10.7759/cureus.43696
_version_ 1785106901608955904
author Pohl, Nicholas B
Brush, Parker L
Toci, Gregory R
Heinle, Jeremy T
Thomas, Anna
Hornstein, Joshua
Aita, Daren
Beredjiklian, Pedro
Katt, Brian
Fletcher, Daniel
author_facet Pohl, Nicholas B
Brush, Parker L
Toci, Gregory R
Heinle, Jeremy T
Thomas, Anna
Hornstein, Joshua
Aita, Daren
Beredjiklian, Pedro
Katt, Brian
Fletcher, Daniel
author_sort Pohl, Nicholas B
collection PubMed
description Background and objective Olecranon bursitis (aseptic or septic) is caused by inflammation in the bursal tissue. While it is typically managed with conservative measures, refractory cases may indicate surgical intervention. There is currently limited research about outcomes following bursal excision for both septic and aseptic etiologies. In light of this, the purpose of this study was to determine if patients experienced improvement following surgical olecranon bursa excision and to compare outcomes between septic and aseptic forms. Materials and methods A retrospective review was performed involving patients who underwent olecranon bursa excision from 2014 to 2021. Demographic data, patient characteristics, surgical data, and outcome-related data were collected from the medical records. Patients were classified into subgroups based on the type of olecranon bursitis (septic or aseptic). Preoperative and one-year postoperative 12-item short-form survey (SF-12) results and range of motion (ROM) outcomes were evaluated for the entire cohort as well as the subgroups. Results We included 61 patients in our study and found significant improvement in the Physical Component Scale 12 (PCS-12) score for all patients (42.0 vs. 45.5, p=0.010) following surgery. However, based on subgroup analysis, the aseptic group improved in PCS-12 following surgery (41.5 vs. 46.8, p<0.001), but the septic group did not (43.6 vs. 40.5, p=0.277). No improvements were found in the Mental Component Scale 12 (MCS-12) scores following surgery in either group. Eighteen of the 61 patients experienced postoperative complications (29.5%), but only 6.5% required a second surgical procedure. Specifically, 14 of the 18 complications occurred in the aseptic group while two septic and two aseptic patients required additional surgeries. Elbow ROM did not change significantly after surgery but more patients were found to have full ROM postoperatively (83.0% to 91.8%, p=0.228). Conclusion Our findings suggest that patients with refractory olecranon bursitis, particularly if aseptic, tend to gain significant physical health benefits from open bursectomy.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10505354
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher Cureus
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-105053542023-09-18 Clinical Outcomes Following Open Olecranon Bursa Excision for Septic and Aseptic Olecranon Bursitis: An Observational Study Pohl, Nicholas B Brush, Parker L Toci, Gregory R Heinle, Jeremy T Thomas, Anna Hornstein, Joshua Aita, Daren Beredjiklian, Pedro Katt, Brian Fletcher, Daniel Cureus Orthopedics Background and objective Olecranon bursitis (aseptic or septic) is caused by inflammation in the bursal tissue. While it is typically managed with conservative measures, refractory cases may indicate surgical intervention. There is currently limited research about outcomes following bursal excision for both septic and aseptic etiologies. In light of this, the purpose of this study was to determine if patients experienced improvement following surgical olecranon bursa excision and to compare outcomes between septic and aseptic forms. Materials and methods A retrospective review was performed involving patients who underwent olecranon bursa excision from 2014 to 2021. Demographic data, patient characteristics, surgical data, and outcome-related data were collected from the medical records. Patients were classified into subgroups based on the type of olecranon bursitis (septic or aseptic). Preoperative and one-year postoperative 12-item short-form survey (SF-12) results and range of motion (ROM) outcomes were evaluated for the entire cohort as well as the subgroups. Results We included 61 patients in our study and found significant improvement in the Physical Component Scale 12 (PCS-12) score for all patients (42.0 vs. 45.5, p=0.010) following surgery. However, based on subgroup analysis, the aseptic group improved in PCS-12 following surgery (41.5 vs. 46.8, p<0.001), but the septic group did not (43.6 vs. 40.5, p=0.277). No improvements were found in the Mental Component Scale 12 (MCS-12) scores following surgery in either group. Eighteen of the 61 patients experienced postoperative complications (29.5%), but only 6.5% required a second surgical procedure. Specifically, 14 of the 18 complications occurred in the aseptic group while two septic and two aseptic patients required additional surgeries. Elbow ROM did not change significantly after surgery but more patients were found to have full ROM postoperatively (83.0% to 91.8%, p=0.228). Conclusion Our findings suggest that patients with refractory olecranon bursitis, particularly if aseptic, tend to gain significant physical health benefits from open bursectomy. Cureus 2023-08-18 /pmc/articles/PMC10505354/ /pubmed/37724223 http://dx.doi.org/10.7759/cureus.43696 Text en Copyright © 2023, Pohl et al. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
spellingShingle Orthopedics
Pohl, Nicholas B
Brush, Parker L
Toci, Gregory R
Heinle, Jeremy T
Thomas, Anna
Hornstein, Joshua
Aita, Daren
Beredjiklian, Pedro
Katt, Brian
Fletcher, Daniel
Clinical Outcomes Following Open Olecranon Bursa Excision for Septic and Aseptic Olecranon Bursitis: An Observational Study
title Clinical Outcomes Following Open Olecranon Bursa Excision for Septic and Aseptic Olecranon Bursitis: An Observational Study
title_full Clinical Outcomes Following Open Olecranon Bursa Excision for Septic and Aseptic Olecranon Bursitis: An Observational Study
title_fullStr Clinical Outcomes Following Open Olecranon Bursa Excision for Septic and Aseptic Olecranon Bursitis: An Observational Study
title_full_unstemmed Clinical Outcomes Following Open Olecranon Bursa Excision for Septic and Aseptic Olecranon Bursitis: An Observational Study
title_short Clinical Outcomes Following Open Olecranon Bursa Excision for Septic and Aseptic Olecranon Bursitis: An Observational Study
title_sort clinical outcomes following open olecranon bursa excision for septic and aseptic olecranon bursitis: an observational study
topic Orthopedics
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10505354/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37724223
http://dx.doi.org/10.7759/cureus.43696
work_keys_str_mv AT pohlnicholasb clinicaloutcomesfollowingopenolecranonbursaexcisionforsepticandasepticolecranonbursitisanobservationalstudy
AT brushparkerl clinicaloutcomesfollowingopenolecranonbursaexcisionforsepticandasepticolecranonbursitisanobservationalstudy
AT tocigregoryr clinicaloutcomesfollowingopenolecranonbursaexcisionforsepticandasepticolecranonbursitisanobservationalstudy
AT heinlejeremyt clinicaloutcomesfollowingopenolecranonbursaexcisionforsepticandasepticolecranonbursitisanobservationalstudy
AT thomasanna clinicaloutcomesfollowingopenolecranonbursaexcisionforsepticandasepticolecranonbursitisanobservationalstudy
AT hornsteinjoshua clinicaloutcomesfollowingopenolecranonbursaexcisionforsepticandasepticolecranonbursitisanobservationalstudy
AT aitadaren clinicaloutcomesfollowingopenolecranonbursaexcisionforsepticandasepticolecranonbursitisanobservationalstudy
AT beredjiklianpedro clinicaloutcomesfollowingopenolecranonbursaexcisionforsepticandasepticolecranonbursitisanobservationalstudy
AT kattbrian clinicaloutcomesfollowingopenolecranonbursaexcisionforsepticandasepticolecranonbursitisanobservationalstudy
AT fletcherdaniel clinicaloutcomesfollowingopenolecranonbursaexcisionforsepticandasepticolecranonbursitisanobservationalstudy