Cargando…
Clinical Outcomes Following Open Olecranon Bursa Excision for Septic and Aseptic Olecranon Bursitis: An Observational Study
Background and objective Olecranon bursitis (aseptic or septic) is caused by inflammation in the bursal tissue. While it is typically managed with conservative measures, refractory cases may indicate surgical intervention. There is currently limited research about outcomes following bursal excision...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Cureus
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10505354/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37724223 http://dx.doi.org/10.7759/cureus.43696 |
_version_ | 1785106901608955904 |
---|---|
author | Pohl, Nicholas B Brush, Parker L Toci, Gregory R Heinle, Jeremy T Thomas, Anna Hornstein, Joshua Aita, Daren Beredjiklian, Pedro Katt, Brian Fletcher, Daniel |
author_facet | Pohl, Nicholas B Brush, Parker L Toci, Gregory R Heinle, Jeremy T Thomas, Anna Hornstein, Joshua Aita, Daren Beredjiklian, Pedro Katt, Brian Fletcher, Daniel |
author_sort | Pohl, Nicholas B |
collection | PubMed |
description | Background and objective Olecranon bursitis (aseptic or septic) is caused by inflammation in the bursal tissue. While it is typically managed with conservative measures, refractory cases may indicate surgical intervention. There is currently limited research about outcomes following bursal excision for both septic and aseptic etiologies. In light of this, the purpose of this study was to determine if patients experienced improvement following surgical olecranon bursa excision and to compare outcomes between septic and aseptic forms. Materials and methods A retrospective review was performed involving patients who underwent olecranon bursa excision from 2014 to 2021. Demographic data, patient characteristics, surgical data, and outcome-related data were collected from the medical records. Patients were classified into subgroups based on the type of olecranon bursitis (septic or aseptic). Preoperative and one-year postoperative 12-item short-form survey (SF-12) results and range of motion (ROM) outcomes were evaluated for the entire cohort as well as the subgroups. Results We included 61 patients in our study and found significant improvement in the Physical Component Scale 12 (PCS-12) score for all patients (42.0 vs. 45.5, p=0.010) following surgery. However, based on subgroup analysis, the aseptic group improved in PCS-12 following surgery (41.5 vs. 46.8, p<0.001), but the septic group did not (43.6 vs. 40.5, p=0.277). No improvements were found in the Mental Component Scale 12 (MCS-12) scores following surgery in either group. Eighteen of the 61 patients experienced postoperative complications (29.5%), but only 6.5% required a second surgical procedure. Specifically, 14 of the 18 complications occurred in the aseptic group while two septic and two aseptic patients required additional surgeries. Elbow ROM did not change significantly after surgery but more patients were found to have full ROM postoperatively (83.0% to 91.8%, p=0.228). Conclusion Our findings suggest that patients with refractory olecranon bursitis, particularly if aseptic, tend to gain significant physical health benefits from open bursectomy. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-10505354 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2023 |
publisher | Cureus |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-105053542023-09-18 Clinical Outcomes Following Open Olecranon Bursa Excision for Septic and Aseptic Olecranon Bursitis: An Observational Study Pohl, Nicholas B Brush, Parker L Toci, Gregory R Heinle, Jeremy T Thomas, Anna Hornstein, Joshua Aita, Daren Beredjiklian, Pedro Katt, Brian Fletcher, Daniel Cureus Orthopedics Background and objective Olecranon bursitis (aseptic or septic) is caused by inflammation in the bursal tissue. While it is typically managed with conservative measures, refractory cases may indicate surgical intervention. There is currently limited research about outcomes following bursal excision for both septic and aseptic etiologies. In light of this, the purpose of this study was to determine if patients experienced improvement following surgical olecranon bursa excision and to compare outcomes between septic and aseptic forms. Materials and methods A retrospective review was performed involving patients who underwent olecranon bursa excision from 2014 to 2021. Demographic data, patient characteristics, surgical data, and outcome-related data were collected from the medical records. Patients were classified into subgroups based on the type of olecranon bursitis (septic or aseptic). Preoperative and one-year postoperative 12-item short-form survey (SF-12) results and range of motion (ROM) outcomes were evaluated for the entire cohort as well as the subgroups. Results We included 61 patients in our study and found significant improvement in the Physical Component Scale 12 (PCS-12) score for all patients (42.0 vs. 45.5, p=0.010) following surgery. However, based on subgroup analysis, the aseptic group improved in PCS-12 following surgery (41.5 vs. 46.8, p<0.001), but the septic group did not (43.6 vs. 40.5, p=0.277). No improvements were found in the Mental Component Scale 12 (MCS-12) scores following surgery in either group. Eighteen of the 61 patients experienced postoperative complications (29.5%), but only 6.5% required a second surgical procedure. Specifically, 14 of the 18 complications occurred in the aseptic group while two septic and two aseptic patients required additional surgeries. Elbow ROM did not change significantly after surgery but more patients were found to have full ROM postoperatively (83.0% to 91.8%, p=0.228). Conclusion Our findings suggest that patients with refractory olecranon bursitis, particularly if aseptic, tend to gain significant physical health benefits from open bursectomy. Cureus 2023-08-18 /pmc/articles/PMC10505354/ /pubmed/37724223 http://dx.doi.org/10.7759/cureus.43696 Text en Copyright © 2023, Pohl et al. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited. |
spellingShingle | Orthopedics Pohl, Nicholas B Brush, Parker L Toci, Gregory R Heinle, Jeremy T Thomas, Anna Hornstein, Joshua Aita, Daren Beredjiklian, Pedro Katt, Brian Fletcher, Daniel Clinical Outcomes Following Open Olecranon Bursa Excision for Septic and Aseptic Olecranon Bursitis: An Observational Study |
title | Clinical Outcomes Following Open Olecranon Bursa Excision for Septic and Aseptic Olecranon Bursitis: An Observational Study |
title_full | Clinical Outcomes Following Open Olecranon Bursa Excision for Septic and Aseptic Olecranon Bursitis: An Observational Study |
title_fullStr | Clinical Outcomes Following Open Olecranon Bursa Excision for Septic and Aseptic Olecranon Bursitis: An Observational Study |
title_full_unstemmed | Clinical Outcomes Following Open Olecranon Bursa Excision for Septic and Aseptic Olecranon Bursitis: An Observational Study |
title_short | Clinical Outcomes Following Open Olecranon Bursa Excision for Septic and Aseptic Olecranon Bursitis: An Observational Study |
title_sort | clinical outcomes following open olecranon bursa excision for septic and aseptic olecranon bursitis: an observational study |
topic | Orthopedics |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10505354/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37724223 http://dx.doi.org/10.7759/cureus.43696 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT pohlnicholasb clinicaloutcomesfollowingopenolecranonbursaexcisionforsepticandasepticolecranonbursitisanobservationalstudy AT brushparkerl clinicaloutcomesfollowingopenolecranonbursaexcisionforsepticandasepticolecranonbursitisanobservationalstudy AT tocigregoryr clinicaloutcomesfollowingopenolecranonbursaexcisionforsepticandasepticolecranonbursitisanobservationalstudy AT heinlejeremyt clinicaloutcomesfollowingopenolecranonbursaexcisionforsepticandasepticolecranonbursitisanobservationalstudy AT thomasanna clinicaloutcomesfollowingopenolecranonbursaexcisionforsepticandasepticolecranonbursitisanobservationalstudy AT hornsteinjoshua clinicaloutcomesfollowingopenolecranonbursaexcisionforsepticandasepticolecranonbursitisanobservationalstudy AT aitadaren clinicaloutcomesfollowingopenolecranonbursaexcisionforsepticandasepticolecranonbursitisanobservationalstudy AT beredjiklianpedro clinicaloutcomesfollowingopenolecranonbursaexcisionforsepticandasepticolecranonbursitisanobservationalstudy AT kattbrian clinicaloutcomesfollowingopenolecranonbursaexcisionforsepticandasepticolecranonbursitisanobservationalstudy AT fletcherdaniel clinicaloutcomesfollowingopenolecranonbursaexcisionforsepticandasepticolecranonbursitisanobservationalstudy |