Cargando…
Quantifying hormone receptor status in lobular breast cancer in an institutional series: the relationship between estrogen and progesterone receptor status and outcomes
PURPOSE: Recent guidelines defined a new reporting category of ER-low-positive breast cancer based on immunohistochemistry (IHC). While low positivity of either hormone receptor is uncommon in invasive lobular carcinoma (ILC), we sought to investigate whether relatively low hormone receptor positivi...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Springer US
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10505592/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37500962 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10549-023-07059-y |
_version_ | 1785106938569162752 |
---|---|
author | Clelland, Elle N. Rothschild, Harriet T. Patterson, Anne Molina-Vega, Julissa Kaur, Mandeep Symmans, W. Fraser Schwartz, Christopher J. Chien, A. Jo Benz, Christopher C. Mukhtar, Rita A. |
author_facet | Clelland, Elle N. Rothschild, Harriet T. Patterson, Anne Molina-Vega, Julissa Kaur, Mandeep Symmans, W. Fraser Schwartz, Christopher J. Chien, A. Jo Benz, Christopher C. Mukhtar, Rita A. |
author_sort | Clelland, Elle N. |
collection | PubMed |
description | PURPOSE: Recent guidelines defined a new reporting category of ER-low-positive breast cancer based on immunohistochemistry (IHC). While low positivity of either hormone receptor is uncommon in invasive lobular carcinoma (ILC), we sought to investigate whether relatively low hormone receptor positivity was associated with tumor characteristics and patient outcomes in a single institutional cohort. METHODS: We searched an institutional database for cases of stage I-III ILC with available IHC reports. Based on prior published categories in ILC, ER was classified as low, medium, or high as defined by ER staining of 10–69%, 70–89%, and ≥ 90% respectively. PR low and high tumors were defined by < 20%, or ≥ 20% staining respectively. We used chi-squared tests, t-tests, and Cox proportional hazards models to evaluate associations between ER/PR categories and tumor characteristics or disease-free survival (DFS). RESULTS: The cohort consisted of 707 ILC cases, with 11% of cases categorized as ER low, 15.1% as medium, and 73.8% as high. The majority (67.6%) were PR high. Patients with ER low/medium expression were significantly younger, and more likely to also have PR low and/or HER2 positive tumors compared to those that were ER high. In a Cox proportional hazards model adjusting for age, stage, grade, pleomorphic histology, and treatment, ER category was not prognostic for DFS, but PR negative and PR low status each had significantly worse DFS compared to PR high status (HR 3.5, 95% CI 1.8–6.7, p < 0.001; and HR 2.0, 95% CI 1.1–3.5, p = 0.015, respectively). CONCLUSION: These findings highlight the relevance of quantifying ER and PR within ILC. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-10505592 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2023 |
publisher | Springer US |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-105055922023-09-19 Quantifying hormone receptor status in lobular breast cancer in an institutional series: the relationship between estrogen and progesterone receptor status and outcomes Clelland, Elle N. Rothschild, Harriet T. Patterson, Anne Molina-Vega, Julissa Kaur, Mandeep Symmans, W. Fraser Schwartz, Christopher J. Chien, A. Jo Benz, Christopher C. Mukhtar, Rita A. Breast Cancer Res Treat Original Laboratory Investigation PURPOSE: Recent guidelines defined a new reporting category of ER-low-positive breast cancer based on immunohistochemistry (IHC). While low positivity of either hormone receptor is uncommon in invasive lobular carcinoma (ILC), we sought to investigate whether relatively low hormone receptor positivity was associated with tumor characteristics and patient outcomes in a single institutional cohort. METHODS: We searched an institutional database for cases of stage I-III ILC with available IHC reports. Based on prior published categories in ILC, ER was classified as low, medium, or high as defined by ER staining of 10–69%, 70–89%, and ≥ 90% respectively. PR low and high tumors were defined by < 20%, or ≥ 20% staining respectively. We used chi-squared tests, t-tests, and Cox proportional hazards models to evaluate associations between ER/PR categories and tumor characteristics or disease-free survival (DFS). RESULTS: The cohort consisted of 707 ILC cases, with 11% of cases categorized as ER low, 15.1% as medium, and 73.8% as high. The majority (67.6%) were PR high. Patients with ER low/medium expression were significantly younger, and more likely to also have PR low and/or HER2 positive tumors compared to those that were ER high. In a Cox proportional hazards model adjusting for age, stage, grade, pleomorphic histology, and treatment, ER category was not prognostic for DFS, but PR negative and PR low status each had significantly worse DFS compared to PR high status (HR 3.5, 95% CI 1.8–6.7, p < 0.001; and HR 2.0, 95% CI 1.1–3.5, p = 0.015, respectively). CONCLUSION: These findings highlight the relevance of quantifying ER and PR within ILC. Springer US 2023-07-27 2023 /pmc/articles/PMC10505592/ /pubmed/37500962 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10549-023-07059-y Text en © The Author(s) 2023 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . |
spellingShingle | Original Laboratory Investigation Clelland, Elle N. Rothschild, Harriet T. Patterson, Anne Molina-Vega, Julissa Kaur, Mandeep Symmans, W. Fraser Schwartz, Christopher J. Chien, A. Jo Benz, Christopher C. Mukhtar, Rita A. Quantifying hormone receptor status in lobular breast cancer in an institutional series: the relationship between estrogen and progesterone receptor status and outcomes |
title | Quantifying hormone receptor status in lobular breast cancer in an institutional series: the relationship between estrogen and progesterone receptor status and outcomes |
title_full | Quantifying hormone receptor status in lobular breast cancer in an institutional series: the relationship between estrogen and progesterone receptor status and outcomes |
title_fullStr | Quantifying hormone receptor status in lobular breast cancer in an institutional series: the relationship between estrogen and progesterone receptor status and outcomes |
title_full_unstemmed | Quantifying hormone receptor status in lobular breast cancer in an institutional series: the relationship between estrogen and progesterone receptor status and outcomes |
title_short | Quantifying hormone receptor status in lobular breast cancer in an institutional series: the relationship between estrogen and progesterone receptor status and outcomes |
title_sort | quantifying hormone receptor status in lobular breast cancer in an institutional series: the relationship between estrogen and progesterone receptor status and outcomes |
topic | Original Laboratory Investigation |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10505592/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37500962 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10549-023-07059-y |
work_keys_str_mv | AT clellandellen quantifyinghormonereceptorstatusinlobularbreastcancerinaninstitutionalseriestherelationshipbetweenestrogenandprogesteronereceptorstatusandoutcomes AT rothschildharriett quantifyinghormonereceptorstatusinlobularbreastcancerinaninstitutionalseriestherelationshipbetweenestrogenandprogesteronereceptorstatusandoutcomes AT pattersonanne quantifyinghormonereceptorstatusinlobularbreastcancerinaninstitutionalseriestherelationshipbetweenestrogenandprogesteronereceptorstatusandoutcomes AT molinavegajulissa quantifyinghormonereceptorstatusinlobularbreastcancerinaninstitutionalseriestherelationshipbetweenestrogenandprogesteronereceptorstatusandoutcomes AT kaurmandeep quantifyinghormonereceptorstatusinlobularbreastcancerinaninstitutionalseriestherelationshipbetweenestrogenandprogesteronereceptorstatusandoutcomes AT symmanswfraser quantifyinghormonereceptorstatusinlobularbreastcancerinaninstitutionalseriestherelationshipbetweenestrogenandprogesteronereceptorstatusandoutcomes AT schwartzchristopherj quantifyinghormonereceptorstatusinlobularbreastcancerinaninstitutionalseriestherelationshipbetweenestrogenandprogesteronereceptorstatusandoutcomes AT chienajo quantifyinghormonereceptorstatusinlobularbreastcancerinaninstitutionalseriestherelationshipbetweenestrogenandprogesteronereceptorstatusandoutcomes AT benzchristopherc quantifyinghormonereceptorstatusinlobularbreastcancerinaninstitutionalseriestherelationshipbetweenestrogenandprogesteronereceptorstatusandoutcomes AT mukhtarritaa quantifyinghormonereceptorstatusinlobularbreastcancerinaninstitutionalseriestherelationshipbetweenestrogenandprogesteronereceptorstatusandoutcomes |