Cargando…

Quantifying hormone receptor status in lobular breast cancer in an institutional series: the relationship between estrogen and progesterone receptor status and outcomes

PURPOSE: Recent guidelines defined a new reporting category of ER-low-positive breast cancer based on immunohistochemistry (IHC). While low positivity of either hormone receptor is uncommon in invasive lobular carcinoma (ILC), we sought to investigate whether relatively low hormone receptor positivi...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Clelland, Elle N., Rothschild, Harriet T., Patterson, Anne, Molina-Vega, Julissa, Kaur, Mandeep, Symmans, W. Fraser, Schwartz, Christopher J., Chien, A. Jo, Benz, Christopher C., Mukhtar, Rita A.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer US 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10505592/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37500962
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10549-023-07059-y
_version_ 1785106938569162752
author Clelland, Elle N.
Rothschild, Harriet T.
Patterson, Anne
Molina-Vega, Julissa
Kaur, Mandeep
Symmans, W. Fraser
Schwartz, Christopher J.
Chien, A. Jo
Benz, Christopher C.
Mukhtar, Rita A.
author_facet Clelland, Elle N.
Rothschild, Harriet T.
Patterson, Anne
Molina-Vega, Julissa
Kaur, Mandeep
Symmans, W. Fraser
Schwartz, Christopher J.
Chien, A. Jo
Benz, Christopher C.
Mukhtar, Rita A.
author_sort Clelland, Elle N.
collection PubMed
description PURPOSE: Recent guidelines defined a new reporting category of ER-low-positive breast cancer based on immunohistochemistry (IHC). While low positivity of either hormone receptor is uncommon in invasive lobular carcinoma (ILC), we sought to investigate whether relatively low hormone receptor positivity was associated with tumor characteristics and patient outcomes in a single institutional cohort. METHODS: We searched an institutional database for cases of stage I-III ILC with available IHC reports. Based on prior published categories in ILC, ER was classified as low, medium, or high as defined by ER staining of 10–69%, 70–89%, and ≥ 90% respectively. PR low and high tumors were defined by < 20%, or ≥ 20% staining respectively. We used chi-squared tests, t-tests, and Cox proportional hazards models to evaluate associations between ER/PR categories and tumor characteristics or disease-free survival (DFS). RESULTS: The cohort consisted of 707 ILC cases, with 11% of cases categorized as ER low, 15.1% as medium, and 73.8% as high. The majority (67.6%) were PR high. Patients with ER low/medium expression were significantly younger, and more likely to also have PR low and/or HER2 positive tumors compared to those that were ER high. In a Cox proportional hazards model adjusting for age, stage, grade, pleomorphic histology, and treatment, ER category was not prognostic for DFS, but PR negative and PR low status each had significantly worse DFS compared to PR high status (HR 3.5, 95% CI 1.8–6.7, p < 0.001; and HR 2.0, 95% CI 1.1–3.5, p = 0.015, respectively). CONCLUSION: These findings highlight the relevance of quantifying ER and PR within ILC.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10505592
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher Springer US
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-105055922023-09-19 Quantifying hormone receptor status in lobular breast cancer in an institutional series: the relationship between estrogen and progesterone receptor status and outcomes Clelland, Elle N. Rothschild, Harriet T. Patterson, Anne Molina-Vega, Julissa Kaur, Mandeep Symmans, W. Fraser Schwartz, Christopher J. Chien, A. Jo Benz, Christopher C. Mukhtar, Rita A. Breast Cancer Res Treat Original Laboratory Investigation PURPOSE: Recent guidelines defined a new reporting category of ER-low-positive breast cancer based on immunohistochemistry (IHC). While low positivity of either hormone receptor is uncommon in invasive lobular carcinoma (ILC), we sought to investigate whether relatively low hormone receptor positivity was associated with tumor characteristics and patient outcomes in a single institutional cohort. METHODS: We searched an institutional database for cases of stage I-III ILC with available IHC reports. Based on prior published categories in ILC, ER was classified as low, medium, or high as defined by ER staining of 10–69%, 70–89%, and ≥ 90% respectively. PR low and high tumors were defined by < 20%, or ≥ 20% staining respectively. We used chi-squared tests, t-tests, and Cox proportional hazards models to evaluate associations between ER/PR categories and tumor characteristics or disease-free survival (DFS). RESULTS: The cohort consisted of 707 ILC cases, with 11% of cases categorized as ER low, 15.1% as medium, and 73.8% as high. The majority (67.6%) were PR high. Patients with ER low/medium expression were significantly younger, and more likely to also have PR low and/or HER2 positive tumors compared to those that were ER high. In a Cox proportional hazards model adjusting for age, stage, grade, pleomorphic histology, and treatment, ER category was not prognostic for DFS, but PR negative and PR low status each had significantly worse DFS compared to PR high status (HR 3.5, 95% CI 1.8–6.7, p < 0.001; and HR 2.0, 95% CI 1.1–3.5, p = 0.015, respectively). CONCLUSION: These findings highlight the relevance of quantifying ER and PR within ILC. Springer US 2023-07-27 2023 /pmc/articles/PMC10505592/ /pubmed/37500962 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10549-023-07059-y Text en © The Author(s) 2023 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Original Laboratory Investigation
Clelland, Elle N.
Rothschild, Harriet T.
Patterson, Anne
Molina-Vega, Julissa
Kaur, Mandeep
Symmans, W. Fraser
Schwartz, Christopher J.
Chien, A. Jo
Benz, Christopher C.
Mukhtar, Rita A.
Quantifying hormone receptor status in lobular breast cancer in an institutional series: the relationship between estrogen and progesterone receptor status and outcomes
title Quantifying hormone receptor status in lobular breast cancer in an institutional series: the relationship between estrogen and progesterone receptor status and outcomes
title_full Quantifying hormone receptor status in lobular breast cancer in an institutional series: the relationship between estrogen and progesterone receptor status and outcomes
title_fullStr Quantifying hormone receptor status in lobular breast cancer in an institutional series: the relationship between estrogen and progesterone receptor status and outcomes
title_full_unstemmed Quantifying hormone receptor status in lobular breast cancer in an institutional series: the relationship between estrogen and progesterone receptor status and outcomes
title_short Quantifying hormone receptor status in lobular breast cancer in an institutional series: the relationship between estrogen and progesterone receptor status and outcomes
title_sort quantifying hormone receptor status in lobular breast cancer in an institutional series: the relationship between estrogen and progesterone receptor status and outcomes
topic Original Laboratory Investigation
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10505592/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37500962
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10549-023-07059-y
work_keys_str_mv AT clellandellen quantifyinghormonereceptorstatusinlobularbreastcancerinaninstitutionalseriestherelationshipbetweenestrogenandprogesteronereceptorstatusandoutcomes
AT rothschildharriett quantifyinghormonereceptorstatusinlobularbreastcancerinaninstitutionalseriestherelationshipbetweenestrogenandprogesteronereceptorstatusandoutcomes
AT pattersonanne quantifyinghormonereceptorstatusinlobularbreastcancerinaninstitutionalseriestherelationshipbetweenestrogenandprogesteronereceptorstatusandoutcomes
AT molinavegajulissa quantifyinghormonereceptorstatusinlobularbreastcancerinaninstitutionalseriestherelationshipbetweenestrogenandprogesteronereceptorstatusandoutcomes
AT kaurmandeep quantifyinghormonereceptorstatusinlobularbreastcancerinaninstitutionalseriestherelationshipbetweenestrogenandprogesteronereceptorstatusandoutcomes
AT symmanswfraser quantifyinghormonereceptorstatusinlobularbreastcancerinaninstitutionalseriestherelationshipbetweenestrogenandprogesteronereceptorstatusandoutcomes
AT schwartzchristopherj quantifyinghormonereceptorstatusinlobularbreastcancerinaninstitutionalseriestherelationshipbetweenestrogenandprogesteronereceptorstatusandoutcomes
AT chienajo quantifyinghormonereceptorstatusinlobularbreastcancerinaninstitutionalseriestherelationshipbetweenestrogenandprogesteronereceptorstatusandoutcomes
AT benzchristopherc quantifyinghormonereceptorstatusinlobularbreastcancerinaninstitutionalseriestherelationshipbetweenestrogenandprogesteronereceptorstatusandoutcomes
AT mukhtarritaa quantifyinghormonereceptorstatusinlobularbreastcancerinaninstitutionalseriestherelationshipbetweenestrogenandprogesteronereceptorstatusandoutcomes