Cargando…

Ultrasound-guided carotid angioplasty and stenting in a patient with iodinated contrast allergy: A case report

BACKGROUND: Ischemic stroke is an entity with high incidence, morbidity, and mortality rates. Carotid artery stenosis is an important and independent risk factor for ischemic stroke. The three current approaches for treating carotid artery stenosis are drug treatment, carotid endarterectomy (CEA), c...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Li, Le, Wang, Zi-Yan, Liu, Bo
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Baishideng Publishing Group Inc 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10506023/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37727497
http://dx.doi.org/10.12998/wjcc.v11.i25.5926
_version_ 1785107033014403072
author Li, Le
Wang, Zi-Yan
Liu, Bo
author_facet Li, Le
Wang, Zi-Yan
Liu, Bo
author_sort Li, Le
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Ischemic stroke is an entity with high incidence, morbidity, and mortality rates. Carotid artery stenosis is an important and independent risk factor for ischemic stroke. The three current approaches for treating carotid artery stenosis are drug treatment, carotid endarterectomy (CEA), carotid angioplasty and stenting (CAS). The approach is chosen based on the degree of stenosis. CEA or CAS could have been chosen for the current patient, who had severe carotid stenosis and an iodinated contrast allergy. After thoroughly communicating with the patient, the patient chose CAS for treatment. Therefore, we performed ultrasound-guided CAS to avoid the use of iodinated contrast. CASE SUMMARY: The main symptoms of the patient were numbness and weakness of the left limb. Computed tomography angiography of the head and neck at another hospital indicated multiple sites of stenosis in the arteries of the head and neck. The patient requested CAS for treatment but was allergic to iodinated contrast media. Thus, routine digital subtraction angiography (DSA) with iodinated contrast could not be used for the procedure. The diagnosis of this patient was as follows: (1) Right parietal lobe cerebral infarction; (2) multiple sites of stenosis in the arteries of the head and neck (severe stenosis of the right internal carotid artery, severe stenosis of the right subclavian artery); (3) right subclavian steal syndrome; and (4) hypertension (stage 3, high risk). The interventions included routine treatment for cerebral infarction, oral administration of clopidogrel (75 mg qd) and aspirin (100 mg qd), ultrasound-guided CAS, and postoperative follow-up. Postoperative color Doppler ultrasound and cerebrovascular magnetic resonance angiography of the carotid artery showed good vascular recovery, and the postoperative follow-up indicated a good prognosis. CONCLUSION: This case study suggests that ultrasound-guided endovascular treatment is a potential option for patients with contraindications to the iodinated contrast agents used in DSA-guided surgery, although excellent surgical operating skills are needed.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10506023
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher Baishideng Publishing Group Inc
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-105060232023-09-19 Ultrasound-guided carotid angioplasty and stenting in a patient with iodinated contrast allergy: A case report Li, Le Wang, Zi-Yan Liu, Bo World J Clin Cases Case Report BACKGROUND: Ischemic stroke is an entity with high incidence, morbidity, and mortality rates. Carotid artery stenosis is an important and independent risk factor for ischemic stroke. The three current approaches for treating carotid artery stenosis are drug treatment, carotid endarterectomy (CEA), carotid angioplasty and stenting (CAS). The approach is chosen based on the degree of stenosis. CEA or CAS could have been chosen for the current patient, who had severe carotid stenosis and an iodinated contrast allergy. After thoroughly communicating with the patient, the patient chose CAS for treatment. Therefore, we performed ultrasound-guided CAS to avoid the use of iodinated contrast. CASE SUMMARY: The main symptoms of the patient were numbness and weakness of the left limb. Computed tomography angiography of the head and neck at another hospital indicated multiple sites of stenosis in the arteries of the head and neck. The patient requested CAS for treatment but was allergic to iodinated contrast media. Thus, routine digital subtraction angiography (DSA) with iodinated contrast could not be used for the procedure. The diagnosis of this patient was as follows: (1) Right parietal lobe cerebral infarction; (2) multiple sites of stenosis in the arteries of the head and neck (severe stenosis of the right internal carotid artery, severe stenosis of the right subclavian artery); (3) right subclavian steal syndrome; and (4) hypertension (stage 3, high risk). The interventions included routine treatment for cerebral infarction, oral administration of clopidogrel (75 mg qd) and aspirin (100 mg qd), ultrasound-guided CAS, and postoperative follow-up. Postoperative color Doppler ultrasound and cerebrovascular magnetic resonance angiography of the carotid artery showed good vascular recovery, and the postoperative follow-up indicated a good prognosis. CONCLUSION: This case study suggests that ultrasound-guided endovascular treatment is a potential option for patients with contraindications to the iodinated contrast agents used in DSA-guided surgery, although excellent surgical operating skills are needed. Baishideng Publishing Group Inc 2023-09-06 2023-09-06 /pmc/articles/PMC10506023/ /pubmed/37727497 http://dx.doi.org/10.12998/wjcc.v11.i25.5926 Text en ©The Author(s) 2023. Published by Baishideng Publishing Group Inc. All rights reserved. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This article is an open-access article that was selected by an in-house editor and fully peer-reviewed by external reviewers. It is distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution NonCommercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited and the use is non-commercial.
spellingShingle Case Report
Li, Le
Wang, Zi-Yan
Liu, Bo
Ultrasound-guided carotid angioplasty and stenting in a patient with iodinated contrast allergy: A case report
title Ultrasound-guided carotid angioplasty and stenting in a patient with iodinated contrast allergy: A case report
title_full Ultrasound-guided carotid angioplasty and stenting in a patient with iodinated contrast allergy: A case report
title_fullStr Ultrasound-guided carotid angioplasty and stenting in a patient with iodinated contrast allergy: A case report
title_full_unstemmed Ultrasound-guided carotid angioplasty and stenting in a patient with iodinated contrast allergy: A case report
title_short Ultrasound-guided carotid angioplasty and stenting in a patient with iodinated contrast allergy: A case report
title_sort ultrasound-guided carotid angioplasty and stenting in a patient with iodinated contrast allergy: a case report
topic Case Report
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10506023/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37727497
http://dx.doi.org/10.12998/wjcc.v11.i25.5926
work_keys_str_mv AT lile ultrasoundguidedcarotidangioplastyandstentinginapatientwithiodinatedcontrastallergyacasereport
AT wangziyan ultrasoundguidedcarotidangioplastyandstentinginapatientwithiodinatedcontrastallergyacasereport
AT liubo ultrasoundguidedcarotidangioplastyandstentinginapatientwithiodinatedcontrastallergyacasereport