Cargando…

A clinical practice review on process efficiency in autologous breast reconstruction

Autologous breast reconstruction is considered the gold standard technique for breast reconstruction following mastectomy. Thanks to recent refinements the main focus of surgery has shifted from flaps survival and donor site morbidity to optimal aesthetic outcomes and patients’ satisfaction. However...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Haddock, Nicholas T., Facchin, Federico, Teotia, Sumeet S.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: AME Publishing Company 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10506120/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37727338
http://dx.doi.org/10.21037/gs-22-680
_version_ 1785107055075393536
author Haddock, Nicholas T.
Facchin, Federico
Teotia, Sumeet S.
author_facet Haddock, Nicholas T.
Facchin, Federico
Teotia, Sumeet S.
author_sort Haddock, Nicholas T.
collection PubMed
description Autologous breast reconstruction is considered the gold standard technique for breast reconstruction following mastectomy. Thanks to recent refinements the main focus of surgery has shifted from flaps survival and donor site morbidity to optimal aesthetic outcomes and patients’ satisfaction. However, prolonged operative time remains a limiting aspect for many patients and surgeons who aim in improving access to care and outcomes. Process mapping is a quality improvement strategy consisting of the creation of a visual representation of a process to recognize errors, minimize waste and optimize outcomes. It has been effectively applied in abdominal based autologous breast reconstruction in nine papers. The process segments and analysis varied between published papers, but all authors focused on intraoperative process mapping and reported reduced operative times. Additional preoperative and postoperative factors have been studied and are commonly applied to further optimize efficiency (such as preoperative CTA, co-surgery model, flap perfusion evaluation, postoperative monitoring, and ERAS protocol). Although shorter operative times are related to decrease surgical morbidity and faster recovery time, and safety, the aesthetic outcome should remain the main focus in autologous breast reconstruction. In fact, the true ultimate aim should be the achievement of high patient satisfaction.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10506120
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher AME Publishing Company
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-105061202023-09-19 A clinical practice review on process efficiency in autologous breast reconstruction Haddock, Nicholas T. Facchin, Federico Teotia, Sumeet S. Gland Surg Review Article Autologous breast reconstruction is considered the gold standard technique for breast reconstruction following mastectomy. Thanks to recent refinements the main focus of surgery has shifted from flaps survival and donor site morbidity to optimal aesthetic outcomes and patients’ satisfaction. However, prolonged operative time remains a limiting aspect for many patients and surgeons who aim in improving access to care and outcomes. Process mapping is a quality improvement strategy consisting of the creation of a visual representation of a process to recognize errors, minimize waste and optimize outcomes. It has been effectively applied in abdominal based autologous breast reconstruction in nine papers. The process segments and analysis varied between published papers, but all authors focused on intraoperative process mapping and reported reduced operative times. Additional preoperative and postoperative factors have been studied and are commonly applied to further optimize efficiency (such as preoperative CTA, co-surgery model, flap perfusion evaluation, postoperative monitoring, and ERAS protocol). Although shorter operative times are related to decrease surgical morbidity and faster recovery time, and safety, the aesthetic outcome should remain the main focus in autologous breast reconstruction. In fact, the true ultimate aim should be the achievement of high patient satisfaction. AME Publishing Company 2023-06-30 2023-07-31 /pmc/articles/PMC10506120/ /pubmed/37727338 http://dx.doi.org/10.21037/gs-22-680 Text en 2023 Gland Surgery. All rights reserved. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/Open Access Statement: This is an Open Access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 4.0 International License (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0), which permits the non-commercial replication and distribution of the article with the strict proviso that no changes or edits are made and the original work is properly cited (including links to both the formal publication through the relevant DOI and the license). See: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0 (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Review Article
Haddock, Nicholas T.
Facchin, Federico
Teotia, Sumeet S.
A clinical practice review on process efficiency in autologous breast reconstruction
title A clinical practice review on process efficiency in autologous breast reconstruction
title_full A clinical practice review on process efficiency in autologous breast reconstruction
title_fullStr A clinical practice review on process efficiency in autologous breast reconstruction
title_full_unstemmed A clinical practice review on process efficiency in autologous breast reconstruction
title_short A clinical practice review on process efficiency in autologous breast reconstruction
title_sort clinical practice review on process efficiency in autologous breast reconstruction
topic Review Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10506120/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37727338
http://dx.doi.org/10.21037/gs-22-680
work_keys_str_mv AT haddocknicholast aclinicalpracticereviewonprocessefficiencyinautologousbreastreconstruction
AT facchinfederico aclinicalpracticereviewonprocessefficiencyinautologousbreastreconstruction
AT teotiasumeets aclinicalpracticereviewonprocessefficiencyinautologousbreastreconstruction
AT haddocknicholast clinicalpracticereviewonprocessefficiencyinautologousbreastreconstruction
AT facchinfederico clinicalpracticereviewonprocessefficiencyinautologousbreastreconstruction
AT teotiasumeets clinicalpracticereviewonprocessefficiencyinautologousbreastreconstruction