Cargando…
A clinical practice review on process efficiency in autologous breast reconstruction
Autologous breast reconstruction is considered the gold standard technique for breast reconstruction following mastectomy. Thanks to recent refinements the main focus of surgery has shifted from flaps survival and donor site morbidity to optimal aesthetic outcomes and patients’ satisfaction. However...
Autores principales: | , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
AME Publishing Company
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10506120/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37727338 http://dx.doi.org/10.21037/gs-22-680 |
_version_ | 1785107055075393536 |
---|---|
author | Haddock, Nicholas T. Facchin, Federico Teotia, Sumeet S. |
author_facet | Haddock, Nicholas T. Facchin, Federico Teotia, Sumeet S. |
author_sort | Haddock, Nicholas T. |
collection | PubMed |
description | Autologous breast reconstruction is considered the gold standard technique for breast reconstruction following mastectomy. Thanks to recent refinements the main focus of surgery has shifted from flaps survival and donor site morbidity to optimal aesthetic outcomes and patients’ satisfaction. However, prolonged operative time remains a limiting aspect for many patients and surgeons who aim in improving access to care and outcomes. Process mapping is a quality improvement strategy consisting of the creation of a visual representation of a process to recognize errors, minimize waste and optimize outcomes. It has been effectively applied in abdominal based autologous breast reconstruction in nine papers. The process segments and analysis varied between published papers, but all authors focused on intraoperative process mapping and reported reduced operative times. Additional preoperative and postoperative factors have been studied and are commonly applied to further optimize efficiency (such as preoperative CTA, co-surgery model, flap perfusion evaluation, postoperative monitoring, and ERAS protocol). Although shorter operative times are related to decrease surgical morbidity and faster recovery time, and safety, the aesthetic outcome should remain the main focus in autologous breast reconstruction. In fact, the true ultimate aim should be the achievement of high patient satisfaction. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-10506120 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2023 |
publisher | AME Publishing Company |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-105061202023-09-19 A clinical practice review on process efficiency in autologous breast reconstruction Haddock, Nicholas T. Facchin, Federico Teotia, Sumeet S. Gland Surg Review Article Autologous breast reconstruction is considered the gold standard technique for breast reconstruction following mastectomy. Thanks to recent refinements the main focus of surgery has shifted from flaps survival and donor site morbidity to optimal aesthetic outcomes and patients’ satisfaction. However, prolonged operative time remains a limiting aspect for many patients and surgeons who aim in improving access to care and outcomes. Process mapping is a quality improvement strategy consisting of the creation of a visual representation of a process to recognize errors, minimize waste and optimize outcomes. It has been effectively applied in abdominal based autologous breast reconstruction in nine papers. The process segments and analysis varied between published papers, but all authors focused on intraoperative process mapping and reported reduced operative times. Additional preoperative and postoperative factors have been studied and are commonly applied to further optimize efficiency (such as preoperative CTA, co-surgery model, flap perfusion evaluation, postoperative monitoring, and ERAS protocol). Although shorter operative times are related to decrease surgical morbidity and faster recovery time, and safety, the aesthetic outcome should remain the main focus in autologous breast reconstruction. In fact, the true ultimate aim should be the achievement of high patient satisfaction. AME Publishing Company 2023-06-30 2023-07-31 /pmc/articles/PMC10506120/ /pubmed/37727338 http://dx.doi.org/10.21037/gs-22-680 Text en 2023 Gland Surgery. All rights reserved. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/Open Access Statement: This is an Open Access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 4.0 International License (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0), which permits the non-commercial replication and distribution of the article with the strict proviso that no changes or edits are made and the original work is properly cited (including links to both the formal publication through the relevant DOI and the license). See: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0 (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/) . |
spellingShingle | Review Article Haddock, Nicholas T. Facchin, Federico Teotia, Sumeet S. A clinical practice review on process efficiency in autologous breast reconstruction |
title | A clinical practice review on process efficiency in autologous breast reconstruction |
title_full | A clinical practice review on process efficiency in autologous breast reconstruction |
title_fullStr | A clinical practice review on process efficiency in autologous breast reconstruction |
title_full_unstemmed | A clinical practice review on process efficiency in autologous breast reconstruction |
title_short | A clinical practice review on process efficiency in autologous breast reconstruction |
title_sort | clinical practice review on process efficiency in autologous breast reconstruction |
topic | Review Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10506120/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37727338 http://dx.doi.org/10.21037/gs-22-680 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT haddocknicholast aclinicalpracticereviewonprocessefficiencyinautologousbreastreconstruction AT facchinfederico aclinicalpracticereviewonprocessefficiencyinautologousbreastreconstruction AT teotiasumeets aclinicalpracticereviewonprocessefficiencyinautologousbreastreconstruction AT haddocknicholast clinicalpracticereviewonprocessefficiencyinautologousbreastreconstruction AT facchinfederico clinicalpracticereviewonprocessefficiencyinautologousbreastreconstruction AT teotiasumeets clinicalpracticereviewonprocessefficiencyinautologousbreastreconstruction |