Cargando…
The novel use and feasibility of hemostatic oxidized regenerated cellulose agent (SurgiGuard(®)): multicenter retrospective study
BACKGROUND: SurgiGuard(®) is an absorbent hemostatic agent based on oxidized regenerated cellulose. The efficacy, effects and safety of SurgiGuard(®) are equivalent to existing hemostatic agents in animal experiments. This study was designed to confirm that the use of SurgiGuard(®) alone is effectiv...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
AME Publishing Company
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10506122/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37727334 http://dx.doi.org/10.21037/gs-22-675 |
_version_ | 1785107055545155584 |
---|---|
author | Rho, Seoung Yoon Jin, Miryung Kim, Hyun Koo Park, Jeong-Ik Park, Jong-Hwa Yun, Sangchul Lee, Maria Choi, Sae Byeol Hong, Jae-Young Kim, Kyung Sik |
author_facet | Rho, Seoung Yoon Jin, Miryung Kim, Hyun Koo Park, Jeong-Ik Park, Jong-Hwa Yun, Sangchul Lee, Maria Choi, Sae Byeol Hong, Jae-Young Kim, Kyung Sik |
author_sort | Rho, Seoung Yoon |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: SurgiGuard(®) is an absorbent hemostatic agent based on oxidized regenerated cellulose. The efficacy, effects and safety of SurgiGuard(®) are equivalent to existing hemostatic agents in animal experiments. This study was designed to confirm that the use of SurgiGuard(®) alone is effective, safe and feasible compared to combination with other hemostatic methods. METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed clinical data from 12 surgery departments in seven tertiary centers in South Korea nationwide. All surgeries were performed between January and December 2018. RESULTS: A total of 807 patients were enrolled; 447 patients (55.4%) had comorbidities. The rate of major surgery (operative time ≥4 hours) was 44% (n=355 patients). Regarding the type of SurgiGuard(®) used in surgery, more than 70% of minor surgeries used non-woven types. In major surgery, more than five SurgiGuards(®) were used in 7.3% (26 patients), and the proportion of co-usage (with four other hemostatic products) was 19.7% (70 patients). The effectiveness score was higher when SurgiGuard(®) was used alone in both major (5.3±0.5 vs. 5.1±0.6, P=0.048) and minor surgery (5.4±0.6 vs. 5.2±0.4, P<0.001). Seven patients had immediate re-bleeding, and all of them used SurgiGuard(®) and other products together. Nine patients reported adverse effects, such as abscess, bleeding, or leg swelling, but we found no direct correlation with SurgiGuard(®). CONCLUSIONS: SurgiGuard(®) exhibited greater effectiveness when used alone. No direct adverse effects associated with SurgiGuard(®) use were reported, and SurgiGuard(®) had stable feasibility. Prospective comparative studies are needed in the future. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-10506122 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2023 |
publisher | AME Publishing Company |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-105061222023-09-19 The novel use and feasibility of hemostatic oxidized regenerated cellulose agent (SurgiGuard(®)): multicenter retrospective study Rho, Seoung Yoon Jin, Miryung Kim, Hyun Koo Park, Jeong-Ik Park, Jong-Hwa Yun, Sangchul Lee, Maria Choi, Sae Byeol Hong, Jae-Young Kim, Kyung Sik Gland Surg Original Article BACKGROUND: SurgiGuard(®) is an absorbent hemostatic agent based on oxidized regenerated cellulose. The efficacy, effects and safety of SurgiGuard(®) are equivalent to existing hemostatic agents in animal experiments. This study was designed to confirm that the use of SurgiGuard(®) alone is effective, safe and feasible compared to combination with other hemostatic methods. METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed clinical data from 12 surgery departments in seven tertiary centers in South Korea nationwide. All surgeries were performed between January and December 2018. RESULTS: A total of 807 patients were enrolled; 447 patients (55.4%) had comorbidities. The rate of major surgery (operative time ≥4 hours) was 44% (n=355 patients). Regarding the type of SurgiGuard(®) used in surgery, more than 70% of minor surgeries used non-woven types. In major surgery, more than five SurgiGuards(®) were used in 7.3% (26 patients), and the proportion of co-usage (with four other hemostatic products) was 19.7% (70 patients). The effectiveness score was higher when SurgiGuard(®) was used alone in both major (5.3±0.5 vs. 5.1±0.6, P=0.048) and minor surgery (5.4±0.6 vs. 5.2±0.4, P<0.001). Seven patients had immediate re-bleeding, and all of them used SurgiGuard(®) and other products together. Nine patients reported adverse effects, such as abscess, bleeding, or leg swelling, but we found no direct correlation with SurgiGuard(®). CONCLUSIONS: SurgiGuard(®) exhibited greater effectiveness when used alone. No direct adverse effects associated with SurgiGuard(®) use were reported, and SurgiGuard(®) had stable feasibility. Prospective comparative studies are needed in the future. AME Publishing Company 2023-07-31 2023-07-31 /pmc/articles/PMC10506122/ /pubmed/37727334 http://dx.doi.org/10.21037/gs-22-675 Text en 2023 Gland Surgery. All rights reserved. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/Open Access Statement: This is an Open Access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 4.0 International License (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0), which permits the non-commercial replication and distribution of the article with the strict proviso that no changes or edits are made and the original work is properly cited (including links to both the formal publication through the relevant DOI and the license). See: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0 (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/) . |
spellingShingle | Original Article Rho, Seoung Yoon Jin, Miryung Kim, Hyun Koo Park, Jeong-Ik Park, Jong-Hwa Yun, Sangchul Lee, Maria Choi, Sae Byeol Hong, Jae-Young Kim, Kyung Sik The novel use and feasibility of hemostatic oxidized regenerated cellulose agent (SurgiGuard(®)): multicenter retrospective study |
title | The novel use and feasibility of hemostatic oxidized regenerated cellulose agent (SurgiGuard(®)): multicenter retrospective study |
title_full | The novel use and feasibility of hemostatic oxidized regenerated cellulose agent (SurgiGuard(®)): multicenter retrospective study |
title_fullStr | The novel use and feasibility of hemostatic oxidized regenerated cellulose agent (SurgiGuard(®)): multicenter retrospective study |
title_full_unstemmed | The novel use and feasibility of hemostatic oxidized regenerated cellulose agent (SurgiGuard(®)): multicenter retrospective study |
title_short | The novel use and feasibility of hemostatic oxidized regenerated cellulose agent (SurgiGuard(®)): multicenter retrospective study |
title_sort | novel use and feasibility of hemostatic oxidized regenerated cellulose agent (surgiguard(®)): multicenter retrospective study |
topic | Original Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10506122/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37727334 http://dx.doi.org/10.21037/gs-22-675 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT rhoseoungyoon thenoveluseandfeasibilityofhemostaticoxidizedregeneratedcelluloseagentsurgiguardmulticenterretrospectivestudy AT jinmiryung thenoveluseandfeasibilityofhemostaticoxidizedregeneratedcelluloseagentsurgiguardmulticenterretrospectivestudy AT kimhyunkoo thenoveluseandfeasibilityofhemostaticoxidizedregeneratedcelluloseagentsurgiguardmulticenterretrospectivestudy AT parkjeongik thenoveluseandfeasibilityofhemostaticoxidizedregeneratedcelluloseagentsurgiguardmulticenterretrospectivestudy AT parkjonghwa thenoveluseandfeasibilityofhemostaticoxidizedregeneratedcelluloseagentsurgiguardmulticenterretrospectivestudy AT yunsangchul thenoveluseandfeasibilityofhemostaticoxidizedregeneratedcelluloseagentsurgiguardmulticenterretrospectivestudy AT leemaria thenoveluseandfeasibilityofhemostaticoxidizedregeneratedcelluloseagentsurgiguardmulticenterretrospectivestudy AT choisaebyeol thenoveluseandfeasibilityofhemostaticoxidizedregeneratedcelluloseagentsurgiguardmulticenterretrospectivestudy AT hongjaeyoung thenoveluseandfeasibilityofhemostaticoxidizedregeneratedcelluloseagentsurgiguardmulticenterretrospectivestudy AT kimkyungsik thenoveluseandfeasibilityofhemostaticoxidizedregeneratedcelluloseagentsurgiguardmulticenterretrospectivestudy AT rhoseoungyoon noveluseandfeasibilityofhemostaticoxidizedregeneratedcelluloseagentsurgiguardmulticenterretrospectivestudy AT jinmiryung noveluseandfeasibilityofhemostaticoxidizedregeneratedcelluloseagentsurgiguardmulticenterretrospectivestudy AT kimhyunkoo noveluseandfeasibilityofhemostaticoxidizedregeneratedcelluloseagentsurgiguardmulticenterretrospectivestudy AT parkjeongik noveluseandfeasibilityofhemostaticoxidizedregeneratedcelluloseagentsurgiguardmulticenterretrospectivestudy AT parkjonghwa noveluseandfeasibilityofhemostaticoxidizedregeneratedcelluloseagentsurgiguardmulticenterretrospectivestudy AT yunsangchul noveluseandfeasibilityofhemostaticoxidizedregeneratedcelluloseagentsurgiguardmulticenterretrospectivestudy AT leemaria noveluseandfeasibilityofhemostaticoxidizedregeneratedcelluloseagentsurgiguardmulticenterretrospectivestudy AT choisaebyeol noveluseandfeasibilityofhemostaticoxidizedregeneratedcelluloseagentsurgiguardmulticenterretrospectivestudy AT hongjaeyoung noveluseandfeasibilityofhemostaticoxidizedregeneratedcelluloseagentsurgiguardmulticenterretrospectivestudy AT kimkyungsik noveluseandfeasibilityofhemostaticoxidizedregeneratedcelluloseagentsurgiguardmulticenterretrospectivestudy |