Cargando…

The novel use and feasibility of hemostatic oxidized regenerated cellulose agent (SurgiGuard(®)): multicenter retrospective study

BACKGROUND: SurgiGuard(®) is an absorbent hemostatic agent based on oxidized regenerated cellulose. The efficacy, effects and safety of SurgiGuard(®) are equivalent to existing hemostatic agents in animal experiments. This study was designed to confirm that the use of SurgiGuard(®) alone is effectiv...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Rho, Seoung Yoon, Jin, Miryung, Kim, Hyun Koo, Park, Jeong-Ik, Park, Jong-Hwa, Yun, Sangchul, Lee, Maria, Choi, Sae Byeol, Hong, Jae-Young, Kim, Kyung Sik
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: AME Publishing Company 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10506122/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37727334
http://dx.doi.org/10.21037/gs-22-675
_version_ 1785107055545155584
author Rho, Seoung Yoon
Jin, Miryung
Kim, Hyun Koo
Park, Jeong-Ik
Park, Jong-Hwa
Yun, Sangchul
Lee, Maria
Choi, Sae Byeol
Hong, Jae-Young
Kim, Kyung Sik
author_facet Rho, Seoung Yoon
Jin, Miryung
Kim, Hyun Koo
Park, Jeong-Ik
Park, Jong-Hwa
Yun, Sangchul
Lee, Maria
Choi, Sae Byeol
Hong, Jae-Young
Kim, Kyung Sik
author_sort Rho, Seoung Yoon
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: SurgiGuard(®) is an absorbent hemostatic agent based on oxidized regenerated cellulose. The efficacy, effects and safety of SurgiGuard(®) are equivalent to existing hemostatic agents in animal experiments. This study was designed to confirm that the use of SurgiGuard(®) alone is effective, safe and feasible compared to combination with other hemostatic methods. METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed clinical data from 12 surgery departments in seven tertiary centers in South Korea nationwide. All surgeries were performed between January and December 2018. RESULTS: A total of 807 patients were enrolled; 447 patients (55.4%) had comorbidities. The rate of major surgery (operative time ≥4 hours) was 44% (n=355 patients). Regarding the type of SurgiGuard(®) used in surgery, more than 70% of minor surgeries used non-woven types. In major surgery, more than five SurgiGuards(®) were used in 7.3% (26 patients), and the proportion of co-usage (with four other hemostatic products) was 19.7% (70 patients). The effectiveness score was higher when SurgiGuard(®) was used alone in both major (5.3±0.5 vs. 5.1±0.6, P=0.048) and minor surgery (5.4±0.6 vs. 5.2±0.4, P<0.001). Seven patients had immediate re-bleeding, and all of them used SurgiGuard(®) and other products together. Nine patients reported adverse effects, such as abscess, bleeding, or leg swelling, but we found no direct correlation with SurgiGuard(®). CONCLUSIONS: SurgiGuard(®) exhibited greater effectiveness when used alone. No direct adverse effects associated with SurgiGuard(®) use were reported, and SurgiGuard(®) had stable feasibility. Prospective comparative studies are needed in the future.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10506122
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher AME Publishing Company
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-105061222023-09-19 The novel use and feasibility of hemostatic oxidized regenerated cellulose agent (SurgiGuard(®)): multicenter retrospective study Rho, Seoung Yoon Jin, Miryung Kim, Hyun Koo Park, Jeong-Ik Park, Jong-Hwa Yun, Sangchul Lee, Maria Choi, Sae Byeol Hong, Jae-Young Kim, Kyung Sik Gland Surg Original Article BACKGROUND: SurgiGuard(®) is an absorbent hemostatic agent based on oxidized regenerated cellulose. The efficacy, effects and safety of SurgiGuard(®) are equivalent to existing hemostatic agents in animal experiments. This study was designed to confirm that the use of SurgiGuard(®) alone is effective, safe and feasible compared to combination with other hemostatic methods. METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed clinical data from 12 surgery departments in seven tertiary centers in South Korea nationwide. All surgeries were performed between January and December 2018. RESULTS: A total of 807 patients were enrolled; 447 patients (55.4%) had comorbidities. The rate of major surgery (operative time ≥4 hours) was 44% (n=355 patients). Regarding the type of SurgiGuard(®) used in surgery, more than 70% of minor surgeries used non-woven types. In major surgery, more than five SurgiGuards(®) were used in 7.3% (26 patients), and the proportion of co-usage (with four other hemostatic products) was 19.7% (70 patients). The effectiveness score was higher when SurgiGuard(®) was used alone in both major (5.3±0.5 vs. 5.1±0.6, P=0.048) and minor surgery (5.4±0.6 vs. 5.2±0.4, P<0.001). Seven patients had immediate re-bleeding, and all of them used SurgiGuard(®) and other products together. Nine patients reported adverse effects, such as abscess, bleeding, or leg swelling, but we found no direct correlation with SurgiGuard(®). CONCLUSIONS: SurgiGuard(®) exhibited greater effectiveness when used alone. No direct adverse effects associated with SurgiGuard(®) use were reported, and SurgiGuard(®) had stable feasibility. Prospective comparative studies are needed in the future. AME Publishing Company 2023-07-31 2023-07-31 /pmc/articles/PMC10506122/ /pubmed/37727334 http://dx.doi.org/10.21037/gs-22-675 Text en 2023 Gland Surgery. All rights reserved. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/Open Access Statement: This is an Open Access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 4.0 International License (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0), which permits the non-commercial replication and distribution of the article with the strict proviso that no changes or edits are made and the original work is properly cited (including links to both the formal publication through the relevant DOI and the license). See: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0 (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Original Article
Rho, Seoung Yoon
Jin, Miryung
Kim, Hyun Koo
Park, Jeong-Ik
Park, Jong-Hwa
Yun, Sangchul
Lee, Maria
Choi, Sae Byeol
Hong, Jae-Young
Kim, Kyung Sik
The novel use and feasibility of hemostatic oxidized regenerated cellulose agent (SurgiGuard(®)): multicenter retrospective study
title The novel use and feasibility of hemostatic oxidized regenerated cellulose agent (SurgiGuard(®)): multicenter retrospective study
title_full The novel use and feasibility of hemostatic oxidized regenerated cellulose agent (SurgiGuard(®)): multicenter retrospective study
title_fullStr The novel use and feasibility of hemostatic oxidized regenerated cellulose agent (SurgiGuard(®)): multicenter retrospective study
title_full_unstemmed The novel use and feasibility of hemostatic oxidized regenerated cellulose agent (SurgiGuard(®)): multicenter retrospective study
title_short The novel use and feasibility of hemostatic oxidized regenerated cellulose agent (SurgiGuard(®)): multicenter retrospective study
title_sort novel use and feasibility of hemostatic oxidized regenerated cellulose agent (surgiguard(®)): multicenter retrospective study
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10506122/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37727334
http://dx.doi.org/10.21037/gs-22-675
work_keys_str_mv AT rhoseoungyoon thenoveluseandfeasibilityofhemostaticoxidizedregeneratedcelluloseagentsurgiguardmulticenterretrospectivestudy
AT jinmiryung thenoveluseandfeasibilityofhemostaticoxidizedregeneratedcelluloseagentsurgiguardmulticenterretrospectivestudy
AT kimhyunkoo thenoveluseandfeasibilityofhemostaticoxidizedregeneratedcelluloseagentsurgiguardmulticenterretrospectivestudy
AT parkjeongik thenoveluseandfeasibilityofhemostaticoxidizedregeneratedcelluloseagentsurgiguardmulticenterretrospectivestudy
AT parkjonghwa thenoveluseandfeasibilityofhemostaticoxidizedregeneratedcelluloseagentsurgiguardmulticenterretrospectivestudy
AT yunsangchul thenoveluseandfeasibilityofhemostaticoxidizedregeneratedcelluloseagentsurgiguardmulticenterretrospectivestudy
AT leemaria thenoveluseandfeasibilityofhemostaticoxidizedregeneratedcelluloseagentsurgiguardmulticenterretrospectivestudy
AT choisaebyeol thenoveluseandfeasibilityofhemostaticoxidizedregeneratedcelluloseagentsurgiguardmulticenterretrospectivestudy
AT hongjaeyoung thenoveluseandfeasibilityofhemostaticoxidizedregeneratedcelluloseagentsurgiguardmulticenterretrospectivestudy
AT kimkyungsik thenoveluseandfeasibilityofhemostaticoxidizedregeneratedcelluloseagentsurgiguardmulticenterretrospectivestudy
AT rhoseoungyoon noveluseandfeasibilityofhemostaticoxidizedregeneratedcelluloseagentsurgiguardmulticenterretrospectivestudy
AT jinmiryung noveluseandfeasibilityofhemostaticoxidizedregeneratedcelluloseagentsurgiguardmulticenterretrospectivestudy
AT kimhyunkoo noveluseandfeasibilityofhemostaticoxidizedregeneratedcelluloseagentsurgiguardmulticenterretrospectivestudy
AT parkjeongik noveluseandfeasibilityofhemostaticoxidizedregeneratedcelluloseagentsurgiguardmulticenterretrospectivestudy
AT parkjonghwa noveluseandfeasibilityofhemostaticoxidizedregeneratedcelluloseagentsurgiguardmulticenterretrospectivestudy
AT yunsangchul noveluseandfeasibilityofhemostaticoxidizedregeneratedcelluloseagentsurgiguardmulticenterretrospectivestudy
AT leemaria noveluseandfeasibilityofhemostaticoxidizedregeneratedcelluloseagentsurgiguardmulticenterretrospectivestudy
AT choisaebyeol noveluseandfeasibilityofhemostaticoxidizedregeneratedcelluloseagentsurgiguardmulticenterretrospectivestudy
AT hongjaeyoung noveluseandfeasibilityofhemostaticoxidizedregeneratedcelluloseagentsurgiguardmulticenterretrospectivestudy
AT kimkyungsik noveluseandfeasibilityofhemostaticoxidizedregeneratedcelluloseagentsurgiguardmulticenterretrospectivestudy