Cargando…

Boomerang latissimus dorsi flap in immediate or delayed breast reconstruction

BACKGROUND: Breast reconstruction using the latissimus dorsi (LD) flap is one of the most popular and common breast reconstruction techniques among Asian patients. There are increasing numbers of cases wherein breasts need to be reconstructed to moderate to large sizes among the Asian population. Mo...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Kim, Hyunbin, Eo, Philseon, Ryu, Jeong Yeop, Choi, Kang Young, Yang, Jung Dug, Chung, Ho Yun, Cho, Byung Chae, Kang, Byeongju, Lee, Jeeyeon, Park, Ho Yong, Lee, Joon Seok
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: AME Publishing Company 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10506123/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37727341
http://dx.doi.org/10.21037/gs-22-664
_version_ 1785107055802056704
author Kim, Hyunbin
Eo, Philseon
Ryu, Jeong Yeop
Choi, Kang Young
Yang, Jung Dug
Chung, Ho Yun
Cho, Byung Chae
Kang, Byeongju
Lee, Jeeyeon
Park, Ho Yong
Lee, Joon Seok
author_facet Kim, Hyunbin
Eo, Philseon
Ryu, Jeong Yeop
Choi, Kang Young
Yang, Jung Dug
Chung, Ho Yun
Cho, Byung Chae
Kang, Byeongju
Lee, Jeeyeon
Park, Ho Yong
Lee, Joon Seok
author_sort Kim, Hyunbin
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Breast reconstruction using the latissimus dorsi (LD) flap is one of the most popular and common breast reconstruction techniques among Asian patients. There are increasing numbers of cases wherein breasts need to be reconstructed to moderate to large sizes among the Asian population. Most reconstructive surgeons use abdominal-based flaps—such as the deep inferior epigastric perforator and transverse rectus abdominis myocutaneous flap, or LD flap with an implant—to supplement the volume. Here, we compare the usefulness of the boomerang LD (bLD) flap—a technique developed by modifying the design of the conventional extended LD flap—with that of the LD flap with implant (LDi). METHODS: This was a prospective cohort study including patients with breast cancer aged between 25 and 60 years who underwent unilateral total or skin/nipple-sparing mastectomy, or postmastectomy. The exclusion criteria were advanced breast cancer (stages 3 and 4); a history of cognitive impairment affecting ability to complete the self-reported questionnaire; a history of neurologic or musculoskeletal disorder; and a history of alcohol or drug abuse. Statistical analysis was performed, and correlations between the two technique types were analyzed [including age, body mass index, preoperative breast volume, operation time, flap elevation time, admission duration, adjuvant treatment (radiotherapy, chemotherapy), drain indwelling duration, and drain total sum volume]. RESULTS: In total, 85 patients who underwent immediate breast construction through the LDi group (n=63) or bLD group (n=25) techniques after total mastectomy between January 2015 and June 2022 were analyzed (mean age: LDi group, 46±7.7 years; bLD group, 45.6±7.8 years). We observed that the flap weight, operative time, mean admission duration, and drain indwelling duration were statistically significantly different in the bLD group (P<0.05). Body mass index, preoperative breast volume, specimen weight, flap elevation time, and drain total time were comparable between groups. CONCLUSIONS: Breast reconstruction using the bLD flap was found to be a suitable alternative technique for patients who desire an autologous tissue transfer (rather than an implant) but are contraindicated for abdominal-based flaps and do not mind long postoperative scars.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10506123
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher AME Publishing Company
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-105061232023-09-19 Boomerang latissimus dorsi flap in immediate or delayed breast reconstruction Kim, Hyunbin Eo, Philseon Ryu, Jeong Yeop Choi, Kang Young Yang, Jung Dug Chung, Ho Yun Cho, Byung Chae Kang, Byeongju Lee, Jeeyeon Park, Ho Yong Lee, Joon Seok Gland Surg Original Article BACKGROUND: Breast reconstruction using the latissimus dorsi (LD) flap is one of the most popular and common breast reconstruction techniques among Asian patients. There are increasing numbers of cases wherein breasts need to be reconstructed to moderate to large sizes among the Asian population. Most reconstructive surgeons use abdominal-based flaps—such as the deep inferior epigastric perforator and transverse rectus abdominis myocutaneous flap, or LD flap with an implant—to supplement the volume. Here, we compare the usefulness of the boomerang LD (bLD) flap—a technique developed by modifying the design of the conventional extended LD flap—with that of the LD flap with implant (LDi). METHODS: This was a prospective cohort study including patients with breast cancer aged between 25 and 60 years who underwent unilateral total or skin/nipple-sparing mastectomy, or postmastectomy. The exclusion criteria were advanced breast cancer (stages 3 and 4); a history of cognitive impairment affecting ability to complete the self-reported questionnaire; a history of neurologic or musculoskeletal disorder; and a history of alcohol or drug abuse. Statistical analysis was performed, and correlations between the two technique types were analyzed [including age, body mass index, preoperative breast volume, operation time, flap elevation time, admission duration, adjuvant treatment (radiotherapy, chemotherapy), drain indwelling duration, and drain total sum volume]. RESULTS: In total, 85 patients who underwent immediate breast construction through the LDi group (n=63) or bLD group (n=25) techniques after total mastectomy between January 2015 and June 2022 were analyzed (mean age: LDi group, 46±7.7 years; bLD group, 45.6±7.8 years). We observed that the flap weight, operative time, mean admission duration, and drain indwelling duration were statistically significantly different in the bLD group (P<0.05). Body mass index, preoperative breast volume, specimen weight, flap elevation time, and drain total time were comparable between groups. CONCLUSIONS: Breast reconstruction using the bLD flap was found to be a suitable alternative technique for patients who desire an autologous tissue transfer (rather than an implant) but are contraindicated for abdominal-based flaps and do not mind long postoperative scars. AME Publishing Company 2023-07-05 2023-07-31 /pmc/articles/PMC10506123/ /pubmed/37727341 http://dx.doi.org/10.21037/gs-22-664 Text en 2023 Gland Surgery. All rights reserved. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/Open Access Statement: This is an Open Access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 4.0 International License (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0), which permits the non-commercial replication and distribution of the article with the strict proviso that no changes or edits are made and the original work is properly cited (including links to both the formal publication through the relevant DOI and the license). See: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0 (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Original Article
Kim, Hyunbin
Eo, Philseon
Ryu, Jeong Yeop
Choi, Kang Young
Yang, Jung Dug
Chung, Ho Yun
Cho, Byung Chae
Kang, Byeongju
Lee, Jeeyeon
Park, Ho Yong
Lee, Joon Seok
Boomerang latissimus dorsi flap in immediate or delayed breast reconstruction
title Boomerang latissimus dorsi flap in immediate or delayed breast reconstruction
title_full Boomerang latissimus dorsi flap in immediate or delayed breast reconstruction
title_fullStr Boomerang latissimus dorsi flap in immediate or delayed breast reconstruction
title_full_unstemmed Boomerang latissimus dorsi flap in immediate or delayed breast reconstruction
title_short Boomerang latissimus dorsi flap in immediate or delayed breast reconstruction
title_sort boomerang latissimus dorsi flap in immediate or delayed breast reconstruction
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10506123/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37727341
http://dx.doi.org/10.21037/gs-22-664
work_keys_str_mv AT kimhyunbin boomeranglatissimusdorsiflapinimmediateordelayedbreastreconstruction
AT eophilseon boomeranglatissimusdorsiflapinimmediateordelayedbreastreconstruction
AT ryujeongyeop boomeranglatissimusdorsiflapinimmediateordelayedbreastreconstruction
AT choikangyoung boomeranglatissimusdorsiflapinimmediateordelayedbreastreconstruction
AT yangjungdug boomeranglatissimusdorsiflapinimmediateordelayedbreastreconstruction
AT chunghoyun boomeranglatissimusdorsiflapinimmediateordelayedbreastreconstruction
AT chobyungchae boomeranglatissimusdorsiflapinimmediateordelayedbreastreconstruction
AT kangbyeongju boomeranglatissimusdorsiflapinimmediateordelayedbreastreconstruction
AT leejeeyeon boomeranglatissimusdorsiflapinimmediateordelayedbreastreconstruction
AT parkhoyong boomeranglatissimusdorsiflapinimmediateordelayedbreastreconstruction
AT leejoonseok boomeranglatissimusdorsiflapinimmediateordelayedbreastreconstruction