Cargando…
Process evaluations of health-promotion interventions in sports settings: a systematic review
Sports settings have been identified as an ideal place to conduct complex multi-level health-promotion interventions, with the potential to engage a broad audience. Whilst the benefits of delivering health-promotion interventions in sports settings are well documented, such interventions’ real-world...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Oxford University Press
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10506172/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37721373 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/heapro/daad114 |
_version_ | 1785107064507334656 |
---|---|
author | Lim, Angie S X Schweickle, Matthew J Liddelow, Caitlin Liddle, Sarah K Vella, Stewart A |
author_facet | Lim, Angie S X Schweickle, Matthew J Liddelow, Caitlin Liddle, Sarah K Vella, Stewart A |
author_sort | Lim, Angie S X |
collection | PubMed |
description | Sports settings have been identified as an ideal place to conduct complex multi-level health-promotion interventions, with the potential to engage a broad audience. Whilst the benefits of delivering health-promotion interventions in sports settings are well documented, such interventions’ real-world implementation and success must be better understood. Process evaluations can be conducted to provide information related to an intervention’s fidelity, replication, scaling, adoption, and the underlying mechanisms driving outcomes. This systematic review summarizes how process evaluations of health-promotion interventions are conducted in sports settings and highlight facilitators and barriers to health-promotion intervention delivery using narrative synthesis. Following the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis guidelines, searches included original peer-reviewed articles from inception—January 2023. We searched eight electronic databases: Academic Search Complete; MEDLINE, PsycARTICLES; PsycINFO; SPORTSDiscus with Full Text; MEDLINE; SCOPUS; Pub Med, and Pro Quest Central. Thirty-two studies were included. Findings suggest that most process evaluations of health-promotion interventions have acknowledged the inherent complexity of sports settings, and investigated factors that explain their intervention’s success (e.g. trust building, engagement). However, poor use of process evaluation frameworks or guidelines resulted in wide variations of how process evaluations are conducted and reported, which made findings difficult to integrate and standardize with consistency. Accordingly, this review provides a guide on how future process evaluations can be conducted to improve health-promotion interventions’ transparency, replicability and reliability in real-world settings. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-10506172 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2023 |
publisher | Oxford University Press |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-105061722023-09-19 Process evaluations of health-promotion interventions in sports settings: a systematic review Lim, Angie S X Schweickle, Matthew J Liddelow, Caitlin Liddle, Sarah K Vella, Stewart A Health Promot Int Article Sports settings have been identified as an ideal place to conduct complex multi-level health-promotion interventions, with the potential to engage a broad audience. Whilst the benefits of delivering health-promotion interventions in sports settings are well documented, such interventions’ real-world implementation and success must be better understood. Process evaluations can be conducted to provide information related to an intervention’s fidelity, replication, scaling, adoption, and the underlying mechanisms driving outcomes. This systematic review summarizes how process evaluations of health-promotion interventions are conducted in sports settings and highlight facilitators and barriers to health-promotion intervention delivery using narrative synthesis. Following the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis guidelines, searches included original peer-reviewed articles from inception—January 2023. We searched eight electronic databases: Academic Search Complete; MEDLINE, PsycARTICLES; PsycINFO; SPORTSDiscus with Full Text; MEDLINE; SCOPUS; Pub Med, and Pro Quest Central. Thirty-two studies were included. Findings suggest that most process evaluations of health-promotion interventions have acknowledged the inherent complexity of sports settings, and investigated factors that explain their intervention’s success (e.g. trust building, engagement). However, poor use of process evaluation frameworks or guidelines resulted in wide variations of how process evaluations are conducted and reported, which made findings difficult to integrate and standardize with consistency. Accordingly, this review provides a guide on how future process evaluations can be conducted to improve health-promotion interventions’ transparency, replicability and reliability in real-world settings. Oxford University Press 2023-09-18 /pmc/articles/PMC10506172/ /pubmed/37721373 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/heapro/daad114 Text en © The Author(s) 2023. Published by Oxford University Press. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted reuse, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Article Lim, Angie S X Schweickle, Matthew J Liddelow, Caitlin Liddle, Sarah K Vella, Stewart A Process evaluations of health-promotion interventions in sports settings: a systematic review |
title | Process evaluations of health-promotion interventions in sports settings: a systematic review |
title_full | Process evaluations of health-promotion interventions in sports settings: a systematic review |
title_fullStr | Process evaluations of health-promotion interventions in sports settings: a systematic review |
title_full_unstemmed | Process evaluations of health-promotion interventions in sports settings: a systematic review |
title_short | Process evaluations of health-promotion interventions in sports settings: a systematic review |
title_sort | process evaluations of health-promotion interventions in sports settings: a systematic review |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10506172/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37721373 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/heapro/daad114 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT limangiesx processevaluationsofhealthpromotioninterventionsinsportssettingsasystematicreview AT schweicklematthewj processevaluationsofhealthpromotioninterventionsinsportssettingsasystematicreview AT liddelowcaitlin processevaluationsofhealthpromotioninterventionsinsportssettingsasystematicreview AT liddlesarahk processevaluationsofhealthpromotioninterventionsinsportssettingsasystematicreview AT vellastewarta processevaluationsofhealthpromotioninterventionsinsportssettingsasystematicreview |