Cargando…

Reconstruction with a double-constrained implant design after complex shoulder extra-articular resection

BACKGROUND: Approximately, one-third of patients with tumors of proximal humerus will require an extra-articular resection to achieve oncologic margins. This procedure yields poor functional outcomes with a considerable rate of revisions. Unconstrained implants are prone to instability hindering als...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Lesensky, Jan, Belzarena, Ana C., Daniel, Matej
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10506192/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37723520
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12957-023-03173-9
_version_ 1785107068133310464
author Lesensky, Jan
Belzarena, Ana C.
Daniel, Matej
author_facet Lesensky, Jan
Belzarena, Ana C.
Daniel, Matej
author_sort Lesensky, Jan
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Approximately, one-third of patients with tumors of proximal humerus will require an extra-articular resection to achieve oncologic margins. This procedure yields poor functional outcomes with a considerable rate of revisions. Unconstrained implants are prone to instability hindering also function of the elbow and hand, whereas constrained shoulder reconstructions suffer from early aseptic loosening of the glenoid component due to bone overload. The purpose of this study was to develop a constrained implant suitable for extra-articular resection with loss of function in deltoid and rotator cuff, which would provide both stability and passive motion, whilst also decreasing the risk of aseptic loosening of the glenoid component. METHODS: In cooperation with Czech Technical University in Prague, we devised an implant consisting of two constrained joints in series connected by a dumbbell piece. The biomechanical analysis showed a reduction of load transfer to the glenoid component with a torque of 8.6 Nm capable of generating an 865-N pulling force on bone screw to just 0.07 Nm, hence shielding the glenoid component from undesired forces and decreasing the risk of aseptic loosening. Three patients with extra-articular resection with a total loss of function of both rotator cuff and deltoid muscle received this type of reconstruction. The average follow-up was 16 months. RESULTS: The surgical technique is straightforward. The surgery took 175 min on average with average blood loss of 516 ml. There were no surgical- or implant-related complications. All three patients were pain-free and had a stable shoulder joint after the reconstruction. All had fully functional elbow, wrist, and hand joints. The average Musculoskeletal Tumor Society (MSTS) score was 21/30 (70%). All patients were pleased with the results. CONCLUSION: The presented innovative implant design has demonstrated to be a promising alternative for reconstruction in these challenging cases.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10506192
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-105061922023-09-19 Reconstruction with a double-constrained implant design after complex shoulder extra-articular resection Lesensky, Jan Belzarena, Ana C. Daniel, Matej World J Surg Oncol Research BACKGROUND: Approximately, one-third of patients with tumors of proximal humerus will require an extra-articular resection to achieve oncologic margins. This procedure yields poor functional outcomes with a considerable rate of revisions. Unconstrained implants are prone to instability hindering also function of the elbow and hand, whereas constrained shoulder reconstructions suffer from early aseptic loosening of the glenoid component due to bone overload. The purpose of this study was to develop a constrained implant suitable for extra-articular resection with loss of function in deltoid and rotator cuff, which would provide both stability and passive motion, whilst also decreasing the risk of aseptic loosening of the glenoid component. METHODS: In cooperation with Czech Technical University in Prague, we devised an implant consisting of two constrained joints in series connected by a dumbbell piece. The biomechanical analysis showed a reduction of load transfer to the glenoid component with a torque of 8.6 Nm capable of generating an 865-N pulling force on bone screw to just 0.07 Nm, hence shielding the glenoid component from undesired forces and decreasing the risk of aseptic loosening. Three patients with extra-articular resection with a total loss of function of both rotator cuff and deltoid muscle received this type of reconstruction. The average follow-up was 16 months. RESULTS: The surgical technique is straightforward. The surgery took 175 min on average with average blood loss of 516 ml. There were no surgical- or implant-related complications. All three patients were pain-free and had a stable shoulder joint after the reconstruction. All had fully functional elbow, wrist, and hand joints. The average Musculoskeletal Tumor Society (MSTS) score was 21/30 (70%). All patients were pleased with the results. CONCLUSION: The presented innovative implant design has demonstrated to be a promising alternative for reconstruction in these challenging cases. BioMed Central 2023-09-18 /pmc/articles/PMC10506192/ /pubmed/37723520 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12957-023-03173-9 Text en © The Author(s) 2023 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
spellingShingle Research
Lesensky, Jan
Belzarena, Ana C.
Daniel, Matej
Reconstruction with a double-constrained implant design after complex shoulder extra-articular resection
title Reconstruction with a double-constrained implant design after complex shoulder extra-articular resection
title_full Reconstruction with a double-constrained implant design after complex shoulder extra-articular resection
title_fullStr Reconstruction with a double-constrained implant design after complex shoulder extra-articular resection
title_full_unstemmed Reconstruction with a double-constrained implant design after complex shoulder extra-articular resection
title_short Reconstruction with a double-constrained implant design after complex shoulder extra-articular resection
title_sort reconstruction with a double-constrained implant design after complex shoulder extra-articular resection
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10506192/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37723520
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12957-023-03173-9
work_keys_str_mv AT lesenskyjan reconstructionwithadoubleconstrainedimplantdesignaftercomplexshoulderextraarticularresection
AT belzarenaanac reconstructionwithadoubleconstrainedimplantdesignaftercomplexshoulderextraarticularresection
AT danielmatej reconstructionwithadoubleconstrainedimplantdesignaftercomplexshoulderextraarticularresection