Cargando…

Validation of the French version of the Revised Diagnostic Interview for Borderlines (DIB-R) for assessing the psychopathology of borderline personality disorder

BACKGROUND: Borderline personality disorder (BPD) is frequently subject to misdiagnosis or underdiagnosis. As a matter of fact, its evaluation poses several challenges, highlighting the importance of having validated evaluation instruments. The Revised Diagnostic Interview for Borderlines (DIB-R) is...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Culina, Ines, Maillard, Pauline, Loosli, Janice, Martin-Soelch, Chantal, Berney, Sylvie, Kolly, Stéphane, Kramer, Ueli
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10506241/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37718410
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40479-023-00233-0
_version_ 1785107080050376704
author Culina, Ines
Maillard, Pauline
Loosli, Janice
Martin-Soelch, Chantal
Berney, Sylvie
Kolly, Stéphane
Kramer, Ueli
author_facet Culina, Ines
Maillard, Pauline
Loosli, Janice
Martin-Soelch, Chantal
Berney, Sylvie
Kolly, Stéphane
Kramer, Ueli
author_sort Culina, Ines
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Borderline personality disorder (BPD) is frequently subject to misdiagnosis or underdiagnosis. As a matter of fact, its evaluation poses several challenges, highlighting the importance of having validated evaluation instruments. The Revised Diagnostic Interview for Borderlines (DIB-R) is widely used and recognized for its validity when it comes to assessing the psychopathology of BPD, but, as for now, no French version of the interview exists. The aim of the current work is to validate a French version of the DIB-R. METHODS: The sample consists of N = 65 patients with borderline personality disorder (BPD) and N = 57 treatment seeking patients (non-BPD comparison group). For inter-rater reliability, a subsample of N = 84 interviews will be assessed by two raters, n = 47 for the BPD group and n = 37 for the non-BPD comparison group. RESULTS: To assess reliability, we conducted analyses of internal consistency and inter-rater reliability. The results were good for the overall interview as well as for the four domains of the DIB-R. To assess validity, we calculated the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve, sensitivity, specificity, predictive values, convergent and discriminative validity. The optimal cutoff was found to be 7. Regarding convergent validity, we found strong convergence between the Borderline Symptom List (BSL-23) and the DIB-R total score. Additionally, the two groups statistically differed on all the DIB-R scores, which indicates that the interview discriminates between the two groups. CONCLUSIONS: Our results indicate good psychometric properties of the French version of the DIB-R. This has important implications as the interview is useful both in clinical settings and for research purposes. Additionally, the present paper aims to contribute to the more general effort of demonstrating generalizability and transportability of the scale.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10506241
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-105062412023-09-19 Validation of the French version of the Revised Diagnostic Interview for Borderlines (DIB-R) for assessing the psychopathology of borderline personality disorder Culina, Ines Maillard, Pauline Loosli, Janice Martin-Soelch, Chantal Berney, Sylvie Kolly, Stéphane Kramer, Ueli Borderline Personal Disord Emot Dysregul Research BACKGROUND: Borderline personality disorder (BPD) is frequently subject to misdiagnosis or underdiagnosis. As a matter of fact, its evaluation poses several challenges, highlighting the importance of having validated evaluation instruments. The Revised Diagnostic Interview for Borderlines (DIB-R) is widely used and recognized for its validity when it comes to assessing the psychopathology of BPD, but, as for now, no French version of the interview exists. The aim of the current work is to validate a French version of the DIB-R. METHODS: The sample consists of N = 65 patients with borderline personality disorder (BPD) and N = 57 treatment seeking patients (non-BPD comparison group). For inter-rater reliability, a subsample of N = 84 interviews will be assessed by two raters, n = 47 for the BPD group and n = 37 for the non-BPD comparison group. RESULTS: To assess reliability, we conducted analyses of internal consistency and inter-rater reliability. The results were good for the overall interview as well as for the four domains of the DIB-R. To assess validity, we calculated the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve, sensitivity, specificity, predictive values, convergent and discriminative validity. The optimal cutoff was found to be 7. Regarding convergent validity, we found strong convergence between the Borderline Symptom List (BSL-23) and the DIB-R total score. Additionally, the two groups statistically differed on all the DIB-R scores, which indicates that the interview discriminates between the two groups. CONCLUSIONS: Our results indicate good psychometric properties of the French version of the DIB-R. This has important implications as the interview is useful both in clinical settings and for research purposes. Additionally, the present paper aims to contribute to the more general effort of demonstrating generalizability and transportability of the scale. BioMed Central 2023-09-18 /pmc/articles/PMC10506241/ /pubmed/37718410 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40479-023-00233-0 Text en © The Author(s) 2023 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
spellingShingle Research
Culina, Ines
Maillard, Pauline
Loosli, Janice
Martin-Soelch, Chantal
Berney, Sylvie
Kolly, Stéphane
Kramer, Ueli
Validation of the French version of the Revised Diagnostic Interview for Borderlines (DIB-R) for assessing the psychopathology of borderline personality disorder
title Validation of the French version of the Revised Diagnostic Interview for Borderlines (DIB-R) for assessing the psychopathology of borderline personality disorder
title_full Validation of the French version of the Revised Diagnostic Interview for Borderlines (DIB-R) for assessing the psychopathology of borderline personality disorder
title_fullStr Validation of the French version of the Revised Diagnostic Interview for Borderlines (DIB-R) for assessing the psychopathology of borderline personality disorder
title_full_unstemmed Validation of the French version of the Revised Diagnostic Interview for Borderlines (DIB-R) for assessing the psychopathology of borderline personality disorder
title_short Validation of the French version of the Revised Diagnostic Interview for Borderlines (DIB-R) for assessing the psychopathology of borderline personality disorder
title_sort validation of the french version of the revised diagnostic interview for borderlines (dib-r) for assessing the psychopathology of borderline personality disorder
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10506241/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37718410
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40479-023-00233-0
work_keys_str_mv AT culinaines validationofthefrenchversionofthereviseddiagnosticinterviewforborderlinesdibrforassessingthepsychopathologyofborderlinepersonalitydisorder
AT maillardpauline validationofthefrenchversionofthereviseddiagnosticinterviewforborderlinesdibrforassessingthepsychopathologyofborderlinepersonalitydisorder
AT looslijanice validationofthefrenchversionofthereviseddiagnosticinterviewforborderlinesdibrforassessingthepsychopathologyofborderlinepersonalitydisorder
AT martinsoelchchantal validationofthefrenchversionofthereviseddiagnosticinterviewforborderlinesdibrforassessingthepsychopathologyofborderlinepersonalitydisorder
AT berneysylvie validationofthefrenchversionofthereviseddiagnosticinterviewforborderlinesdibrforassessingthepsychopathologyofborderlinepersonalitydisorder
AT kollystephane validationofthefrenchversionofthereviseddiagnosticinterviewforborderlinesdibrforassessingthepsychopathologyofborderlinepersonalitydisorder
AT kramerueli validationofthefrenchversionofthereviseddiagnosticinterviewforborderlinesdibrforassessingthepsychopathologyofborderlinepersonalitydisorder