Cargando…
Efficacy and safety of intranasal agents for the acute treatment of migraine: a systematic review and network meta-analysis
BACKGROUND: Intranasal agents may be ideal for the treatment of migraine patients. Many new acute intranasal-specific therapies have been developed, but few of them have been directly compared. The aim of this network meta-analysis (NMA) was to compare the efficacy and safety of various intranasal a...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Springer Milan
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10506288/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37723470 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s10194-023-01662-6 |
_version_ | 1785107091466223616 |
---|---|
author | Li, Guanglu Duan, Shaojie Zhu, Tiantian Ren, Zhiying Xia, Hui Wang, Ziyao Liu, Lei Liu, Zunjing |
author_facet | Li, Guanglu Duan, Shaojie Zhu, Tiantian Ren, Zhiying Xia, Hui Wang, Ziyao Liu, Lei Liu, Zunjing |
author_sort | Li, Guanglu |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Intranasal agents may be ideal for the treatment of migraine patients. Many new acute intranasal-specific therapies have been developed, but few of them have been directly compared. The aim of this network meta-analysis (NMA) was to compare the efficacy and safety of various intranasal agents for the treatment of acute migraine in adult patients. METHODS: The Cochrane Register of Controlled Trials, Embase, and PubMed were searched from inception to 15 August 2023. Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) using intranasal agents (no restrictions on dose, formulation, dosing regimen or timing of the first dose) to treat adult patients with acute migraine were included. The primary efficacy endpoint was pain freedom at 2 h, and the primary safety endpoint was adverse events (AEs). The analysis process followed the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines. RESULTS: Nineteen studies (21 RCTs, 9738 participants) were included. Compared to the placebo, 5 mg of zolmitriptan using a conventional liquid nasal spray device was the most effective for pain freedom at 2 h [odds ratio (OR): 4.67, 95% confidence interval (CI): 3.43 to 6.43] and 24 h (OR: 5.49, 95% CI: 3.58 to 8.42) among all the interventions. Butorphanol nasal spray 1 mg was the most effective (OR: 8.62, 95% CI: 1.11 to 66.92) for pain freedom at 1 h, but with low-quality evidence. DFN-02 presented the highest freedom from nausea (OR: 4.95, 95% CI: 1.29 to 19.01) and phonophobia (OR: 5.36, 95% CI: 1.67 to 17.22) at 2 h, albeit with lower odds of achieving complete pain freedom. ROX-828 showed the highest improvement in freedom from photophobia at 2 h (OR: 4.03, 95% CI: 1.66 to 9.81). Dihydroergotamine nasal spray was significantly associated with the highest risk of AEs (OR: 9.65, 95% CI: 4.39 to 21.22) and was not recommended for routine use. Zavegepant nasal spray demonstrated the lowest risk of AEs (OR: 2.04, 95% CI: 1.37 to 3.03). The results of sensitivity analyses for the primary endpoints (pain freedom at 2 h and AEs) were generally consistent with those of the base case model. CONCLUSIONS: Compared with other new intranasal-specific therapies in treating migraine attacks, zolmitriptan nasal spray 5 mg was the most effective agent for pain freedom at 2 h. Zavegepant nasal spray 10 mg had the fewest adverse side effects. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s10194-023-01662-6. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-10506288 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2023 |
publisher | Springer Milan |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-105062882023-09-19 Efficacy and safety of intranasal agents for the acute treatment of migraine: a systematic review and network meta-analysis Li, Guanglu Duan, Shaojie Zhu, Tiantian Ren, Zhiying Xia, Hui Wang, Ziyao Liu, Lei Liu, Zunjing J Headache Pain Review BACKGROUND: Intranasal agents may be ideal for the treatment of migraine patients. Many new acute intranasal-specific therapies have been developed, but few of them have been directly compared. The aim of this network meta-analysis (NMA) was to compare the efficacy and safety of various intranasal agents for the treatment of acute migraine in adult patients. METHODS: The Cochrane Register of Controlled Trials, Embase, and PubMed were searched from inception to 15 August 2023. Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) using intranasal agents (no restrictions on dose, formulation, dosing regimen or timing of the first dose) to treat adult patients with acute migraine were included. The primary efficacy endpoint was pain freedom at 2 h, and the primary safety endpoint was adverse events (AEs). The analysis process followed the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines. RESULTS: Nineteen studies (21 RCTs, 9738 participants) were included. Compared to the placebo, 5 mg of zolmitriptan using a conventional liquid nasal spray device was the most effective for pain freedom at 2 h [odds ratio (OR): 4.67, 95% confidence interval (CI): 3.43 to 6.43] and 24 h (OR: 5.49, 95% CI: 3.58 to 8.42) among all the interventions. Butorphanol nasal spray 1 mg was the most effective (OR: 8.62, 95% CI: 1.11 to 66.92) for pain freedom at 1 h, but with low-quality evidence. DFN-02 presented the highest freedom from nausea (OR: 4.95, 95% CI: 1.29 to 19.01) and phonophobia (OR: 5.36, 95% CI: 1.67 to 17.22) at 2 h, albeit with lower odds of achieving complete pain freedom. ROX-828 showed the highest improvement in freedom from photophobia at 2 h (OR: 4.03, 95% CI: 1.66 to 9.81). Dihydroergotamine nasal spray was significantly associated with the highest risk of AEs (OR: 9.65, 95% CI: 4.39 to 21.22) and was not recommended for routine use. Zavegepant nasal spray demonstrated the lowest risk of AEs (OR: 2.04, 95% CI: 1.37 to 3.03). The results of sensitivity analyses for the primary endpoints (pain freedom at 2 h and AEs) were generally consistent with those of the base case model. CONCLUSIONS: Compared with other new intranasal-specific therapies in treating migraine attacks, zolmitriptan nasal spray 5 mg was the most effective agent for pain freedom at 2 h. Zavegepant nasal spray 10 mg had the fewest adverse side effects. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s10194-023-01662-6. Springer Milan 2023-09-18 /pmc/articles/PMC10506288/ /pubmed/37723470 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s10194-023-01662-6 Text en © The Author(s) 2023 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data. |
spellingShingle | Review Li, Guanglu Duan, Shaojie Zhu, Tiantian Ren, Zhiying Xia, Hui Wang, Ziyao Liu, Lei Liu, Zunjing Efficacy and safety of intranasal agents for the acute treatment of migraine: a systematic review and network meta-analysis |
title | Efficacy and safety of intranasal agents for the acute treatment of migraine: a systematic review and network meta-analysis |
title_full | Efficacy and safety of intranasal agents for the acute treatment of migraine: a systematic review and network meta-analysis |
title_fullStr | Efficacy and safety of intranasal agents for the acute treatment of migraine: a systematic review and network meta-analysis |
title_full_unstemmed | Efficacy and safety of intranasal agents for the acute treatment of migraine: a systematic review and network meta-analysis |
title_short | Efficacy and safety of intranasal agents for the acute treatment of migraine: a systematic review and network meta-analysis |
title_sort | efficacy and safety of intranasal agents for the acute treatment of migraine: a systematic review and network meta-analysis |
topic | Review |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10506288/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37723470 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s10194-023-01662-6 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT liguanglu efficacyandsafetyofintranasalagentsfortheacutetreatmentofmigraineasystematicreviewandnetworkmetaanalysis AT duanshaojie efficacyandsafetyofintranasalagentsfortheacutetreatmentofmigraineasystematicreviewandnetworkmetaanalysis AT zhutiantian efficacyandsafetyofintranasalagentsfortheacutetreatmentofmigraineasystematicreviewandnetworkmetaanalysis AT renzhiying efficacyandsafetyofintranasalagentsfortheacutetreatmentofmigraineasystematicreviewandnetworkmetaanalysis AT xiahui efficacyandsafetyofintranasalagentsfortheacutetreatmentofmigraineasystematicreviewandnetworkmetaanalysis AT wangziyao efficacyandsafetyofintranasalagentsfortheacutetreatmentofmigraineasystematicreviewandnetworkmetaanalysis AT liulei efficacyandsafetyofintranasalagentsfortheacutetreatmentofmigraineasystematicreviewandnetworkmetaanalysis AT liuzunjing efficacyandsafetyofintranasalagentsfortheacutetreatmentofmigraineasystematicreviewandnetworkmetaanalysis |