Cargando…

In vitro, in vivo and clinical studies comparing the efficacy of ceftazidime-avibactam monotherapy with ceftazidime-avibactam-containing combination regimens against carbapenem-resistant Enterobacterales and multidrug-resistant Pseudomonas aeruginosa isolates or infections: a scoping review

INTRODUCTION: Carbapenem-resistant Enterobacterales (CRE) and multidrug-resistant Pseudomonas aeruginosa (MDR-PA) infections are associated with a high risk of morbidity, mortality, and treatment costs. We aimed to evaluate in vitro, in vivo and clinical studies comparing the efficacy of ceftazidime...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Aslan, Abdullah Tarık, Ezure, Yukiko, Horcajada, Juan Pablo, Harris, Patrick N. A., Paterson, David L.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Media S.A. 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10506411/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37727767
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fmed.2023.1249030
_version_ 1785107113896312832
author Aslan, Abdullah Tarık
Ezure, Yukiko
Horcajada, Juan Pablo
Harris, Patrick N. A.
Paterson, David L.
author_facet Aslan, Abdullah Tarık
Ezure, Yukiko
Horcajada, Juan Pablo
Harris, Patrick N. A.
Paterson, David L.
author_sort Aslan, Abdullah Tarık
collection PubMed
description INTRODUCTION: Carbapenem-resistant Enterobacterales (CRE) and multidrug-resistant Pseudomonas aeruginosa (MDR-PA) infections are associated with a high risk of morbidity, mortality, and treatment costs. We aimed to evaluate in vitro, in vivo and clinical studies comparing the efficacy of ceftazidime-avibactam (CZA) combination regimens with CZA alone against CRE and/or MDR-PA isolates or infections. METHODS: We systematically reviewed the relevant literature in CINAHL/MEDLINE, Pubmed, Cochrane, Web of Science, Embase, and Scopus until December 1, 2022. Review articles, grey literature, abstracts, comments, editorials, non-peer reviewed articles, non-English articles, and in vitro synergy studies conducted on single isolates were excluded. RESULTS: 22 in vitro, 7 in vivo and 20 clinical studies were evaluated. In vitro studies showed reliable synergy between CZA and aztreonam against metallo-β-lactamase (MBL)-producing isolates. Some studies indicated good in vitro synergy between CZA and amikacin, meropenem, fosfomycin and polymyxins against CRE isolates. For MDR-PA isolates, there are comparatively fewer in vitro or in vivo studies. In observational clinical studies, mortality, clinical cure, adverse events, and development of CZA resistance after exposure were generally similar in monotherapy and combination therapy groups. However, antibiotic-related nephrotoxicity and infection relapses were higher in patients receiving CZA combination therapies. DISCUSSION: The benefit, if any, of CZA combination regimens in MDR-PA infections is elusive, as very few clinical studies have included these infections. There is no currently documented clinical benefit for the use of CZA combination regimens rather than CZA monotherapy. CZA combined with aztreonam for serious infections due to MBL producers should be evaluated by randomized controlled trials. SYSTEMATIC REVIEW REGISTRATION: https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/display_record.php?RecordID=278552, CRD42021278552.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10506411
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-105064112023-09-19 In vitro, in vivo and clinical studies comparing the efficacy of ceftazidime-avibactam monotherapy with ceftazidime-avibactam-containing combination regimens against carbapenem-resistant Enterobacterales and multidrug-resistant Pseudomonas aeruginosa isolates or infections: a scoping review Aslan, Abdullah Tarık Ezure, Yukiko Horcajada, Juan Pablo Harris, Patrick N. A. Paterson, David L. Front Med (Lausanne) Medicine INTRODUCTION: Carbapenem-resistant Enterobacterales (CRE) and multidrug-resistant Pseudomonas aeruginosa (MDR-PA) infections are associated with a high risk of morbidity, mortality, and treatment costs. We aimed to evaluate in vitro, in vivo and clinical studies comparing the efficacy of ceftazidime-avibactam (CZA) combination regimens with CZA alone against CRE and/or MDR-PA isolates or infections. METHODS: We systematically reviewed the relevant literature in CINAHL/MEDLINE, Pubmed, Cochrane, Web of Science, Embase, and Scopus until December 1, 2022. Review articles, grey literature, abstracts, comments, editorials, non-peer reviewed articles, non-English articles, and in vitro synergy studies conducted on single isolates were excluded. RESULTS: 22 in vitro, 7 in vivo and 20 clinical studies were evaluated. In vitro studies showed reliable synergy between CZA and aztreonam against metallo-β-lactamase (MBL)-producing isolates. Some studies indicated good in vitro synergy between CZA and amikacin, meropenem, fosfomycin and polymyxins against CRE isolates. For MDR-PA isolates, there are comparatively fewer in vitro or in vivo studies. In observational clinical studies, mortality, clinical cure, adverse events, and development of CZA resistance after exposure were generally similar in monotherapy and combination therapy groups. However, antibiotic-related nephrotoxicity and infection relapses were higher in patients receiving CZA combination therapies. DISCUSSION: The benefit, if any, of CZA combination regimens in MDR-PA infections is elusive, as very few clinical studies have included these infections. There is no currently documented clinical benefit for the use of CZA combination regimens rather than CZA monotherapy. CZA combined with aztreonam for serious infections due to MBL producers should be evaluated by randomized controlled trials. SYSTEMATIC REVIEW REGISTRATION: https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/display_record.php?RecordID=278552, CRD42021278552. Frontiers Media S.A. 2023-09-04 /pmc/articles/PMC10506411/ /pubmed/37727767 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fmed.2023.1249030 Text en Copyright © 2023 Aslan, Ezure, Horcajada, Harris and Paterson. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
spellingShingle Medicine
Aslan, Abdullah Tarık
Ezure, Yukiko
Horcajada, Juan Pablo
Harris, Patrick N. A.
Paterson, David L.
In vitro, in vivo and clinical studies comparing the efficacy of ceftazidime-avibactam monotherapy with ceftazidime-avibactam-containing combination regimens against carbapenem-resistant Enterobacterales and multidrug-resistant Pseudomonas aeruginosa isolates or infections: a scoping review
title In vitro, in vivo and clinical studies comparing the efficacy of ceftazidime-avibactam monotherapy with ceftazidime-avibactam-containing combination regimens against carbapenem-resistant Enterobacterales and multidrug-resistant Pseudomonas aeruginosa isolates or infections: a scoping review
title_full In vitro, in vivo and clinical studies comparing the efficacy of ceftazidime-avibactam monotherapy with ceftazidime-avibactam-containing combination regimens against carbapenem-resistant Enterobacterales and multidrug-resistant Pseudomonas aeruginosa isolates or infections: a scoping review
title_fullStr In vitro, in vivo and clinical studies comparing the efficacy of ceftazidime-avibactam monotherapy with ceftazidime-avibactam-containing combination regimens against carbapenem-resistant Enterobacterales and multidrug-resistant Pseudomonas aeruginosa isolates or infections: a scoping review
title_full_unstemmed In vitro, in vivo and clinical studies comparing the efficacy of ceftazidime-avibactam monotherapy with ceftazidime-avibactam-containing combination regimens against carbapenem-resistant Enterobacterales and multidrug-resistant Pseudomonas aeruginosa isolates or infections: a scoping review
title_short In vitro, in vivo and clinical studies comparing the efficacy of ceftazidime-avibactam monotherapy with ceftazidime-avibactam-containing combination regimens against carbapenem-resistant Enterobacterales and multidrug-resistant Pseudomonas aeruginosa isolates or infections: a scoping review
title_sort in vitro, in vivo and clinical studies comparing the efficacy of ceftazidime-avibactam monotherapy with ceftazidime-avibactam-containing combination regimens against carbapenem-resistant enterobacterales and multidrug-resistant pseudomonas aeruginosa isolates or infections: a scoping review
topic Medicine
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10506411/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37727767
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fmed.2023.1249030
work_keys_str_mv AT aslanabdullahtarık invitroinvivoandclinicalstudiescomparingtheefficacyofceftazidimeavibactammonotherapywithceftazidimeavibactamcontainingcombinationregimensagainstcarbapenemresistantenterobacteralesandmultidrugresistantpseudomonasaeruginosaisolatesorinfectionsascopingreview
AT ezureyukiko invitroinvivoandclinicalstudiescomparingtheefficacyofceftazidimeavibactammonotherapywithceftazidimeavibactamcontainingcombinationregimensagainstcarbapenemresistantenterobacteralesandmultidrugresistantpseudomonasaeruginosaisolatesorinfectionsascopingreview
AT horcajadajuanpablo invitroinvivoandclinicalstudiescomparingtheefficacyofceftazidimeavibactammonotherapywithceftazidimeavibactamcontainingcombinationregimensagainstcarbapenemresistantenterobacteralesandmultidrugresistantpseudomonasaeruginosaisolatesorinfectionsascopingreview
AT harrispatrickna invitroinvivoandclinicalstudiescomparingtheefficacyofceftazidimeavibactammonotherapywithceftazidimeavibactamcontainingcombinationregimensagainstcarbapenemresistantenterobacteralesandmultidrugresistantpseudomonasaeruginosaisolatesorinfectionsascopingreview
AT patersondavidl invitroinvivoandclinicalstudiescomparingtheefficacyofceftazidimeavibactammonotherapywithceftazidimeavibactamcontainingcombinationregimensagainstcarbapenemresistantenterobacteralesandmultidrugresistantpseudomonasaeruginosaisolatesorinfectionsascopingreview