Cargando…

Oncological recurrence following pathological complete response after neoadjuvant treatment in patients with esophageal cancer — a retrospective cohort study

BACKGROUND: To evaluate recurrence in patients with post-neoadjuvant pathological complete response (pCR) and in patients with complete response of primary tumor but persisting lymphatic spread of disease (non-pCR, ypT0ypN +) of esophageal cancer. METHODS: Seventy-five patients (63 pCR, 12 non-pCR)...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Hipp, Julian, Kuvendjiska, Jasmina, Hillebrecht, Hans Christian, Herrmann, Stephan, Timme-Bronsert, Sylvia, Fichtner-Feigl, Stefan, Hoeppner, Jens, Diener, Markus K.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10506930/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37721586
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00423-023-03100-2
_version_ 1785107207414611968
author Hipp, Julian
Kuvendjiska, Jasmina
Hillebrecht, Hans Christian
Herrmann, Stephan
Timme-Bronsert, Sylvia
Fichtner-Feigl, Stefan
Hoeppner, Jens
Diener, Markus K.
author_facet Hipp, Julian
Kuvendjiska, Jasmina
Hillebrecht, Hans Christian
Herrmann, Stephan
Timme-Bronsert, Sylvia
Fichtner-Feigl, Stefan
Hoeppner, Jens
Diener, Markus K.
author_sort Hipp, Julian
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: To evaluate recurrence in patients with post-neoadjuvant pathological complete response (pCR) and in patients with complete response of primary tumor but persisting lymphatic spread of disease (non-pCR, ypT0ypN +) of esophageal cancer. METHODS: Seventy-five patients (63 pCR, 12 non-pCR) were analyzed retrospectively. Pattern and incidence of local and distant recurrence as well as the impact on overall (OS) and disease-free survival (DFS) were evaluated. The efficacy of neoadjuvant chemotherapy according to FLOT protocol was compared to neoadjuvant chemoradiation according to CROSS protocol. RESULTS: In the pCR group, isolated local recurrence was diagnosed in 3%, while no isolated local recurrence was observed in the non-pCR group due to the high incidence of distant recurrence. Distant recurrence was most common in both cohorts (isolated distant recurrence: pCR group 10% to non-pCR group 55%; simultaneous distant and local recurrence: pCR group 3% to non-pCR group 18%). Median time to distant recurrence was 5.5 months, and median time to local recurrence was 8.0 months. Cumulative incidence of distant recurrence (with and without simultaneous local recurrence) was 16% (± 6%) in pCR patients and 79% (± 13%) in non-pCR patients (hazard ratio (HR) 0.123) estimated by Kaplan–Meier method. OS (HR 0.231) and DFS (HR 0.226) were significantly improved in patients with pCR compared to patients with non-pCR. Advantages for FLOT protocol compared to CROSS protocol, especially with regard to distant control of disease (HR 0.278), were observed (OS (HR 0.361), DFS (HR 0.226)). CONCLUSION: Distant recurrence is the predominant site of treatment failure in patients with pCR and non-pCR grade 1a regression, whereby recurrence rates are much higher in patients with non-pCR. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s00423-023-03100-2.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10506930
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher Springer Berlin Heidelberg
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-105069302023-09-20 Oncological recurrence following pathological complete response after neoadjuvant treatment in patients with esophageal cancer — a retrospective cohort study Hipp, Julian Kuvendjiska, Jasmina Hillebrecht, Hans Christian Herrmann, Stephan Timme-Bronsert, Sylvia Fichtner-Feigl, Stefan Hoeppner, Jens Diener, Markus K. Langenbecks Arch Surg Research BACKGROUND: To evaluate recurrence in patients with post-neoadjuvant pathological complete response (pCR) and in patients with complete response of primary tumor but persisting lymphatic spread of disease (non-pCR, ypT0ypN +) of esophageal cancer. METHODS: Seventy-five patients (63 pCR, 12 non-pCR) were analyzed retrospectively. Pattern and incidence of local and distant recurrence as well as the impact on overall (OS) and disease-free survival (DFS) were evaluated. The efficacy of neoadjuvant chemotherapy according to FLOT protocol was compared to neoadjuvant chemoradiation according to CROSS protocol. RESULTS: In the pCR group, isolated local recurrence was diagnosed in 3%, while no isolated local recurrence was observed in the non-pCR group due to the high incidence of distant recurrence. Distant recurrence was most common in both cohorts (isolated distant recurrence: pCR group 10% to non-pCR group 55%; simultaneous distant and local recurrence: pCR group 3% to non-pCR group 18%). Median time to distant recurrence was 5.5 months, and median time to local recurrence was 8.0 months. Cumulative incidence of distant recurrence (with and without simultaneous local recurrence) was 16% (± 6%) in pCR patients and 79% (± 13%) in non-pCR patients (hazard ratio (HR) 0.123) estimated by Kaplan–Meier method. OS (HR 0.231) and DFS (HR 0.226) were significantly improved in patients with pCR compared to patients with non-pCR. Advantages for FLOT protocol compared to CROSS protocol, especially with regard to distant control of disease (HR 0.278), were observed (OS (HR 0.361), DFS (HR 0.226)). CONCLUSION: Distant recurrence is the predominant site of treatment failure in patients with pCR and non-pCR grade 1a regression, whereby recurrence rates are much higher in patients with non-pCR. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s00423-023-03100-2. Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2023-09-18 2023 /pmc/articles/PMC10506930/ /pubmed/37721586 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00423-023-03100-2 Text en © The Author(s) 2023 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Research
Hipp, Julian
Kuvendjiska, Jasmina
Hillebrecht, Hans Christian
Herrmann, Stephan
Timme-Bronsert, Sylvia
Fichtner-Feigl, Stefan
Hoeppner, Jens
Diener, Markus K.
Oncological recurrence following pathological complete response after neoadjuvant treatment in patients with esophageal cancer — a retrospective cohort study
title Oncological recurrence following pathological complete response after neoadjuvant treatment in patients with esophageal cancer — a retrospective cohort study
title_full Oncological recurrence following pathological complete response after neoadjuvant treatment in patients with esophageal cancer — a retrospective cohort study
title_fullStr Oncological recurrence following pathological complete response after neoadjuvant treatment in patients with esophageal cancer — a retrospective cohort study
title_full_unstemmed Oncological recurrence following pathological complete response after neoadjuvant treatment in patients with esophageal cancer — a retrospective cohort study
title_short Oncological recurrence following pathological complete response after neoadjuvant treatment in patients with esophageal cancer — a retrospective cohort study
title_sort oncological recurrence following pathological complete response after neoadjuvant treatment in patients with esophageal cancer — a retrospective cohort study
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10506930/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37721586
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00423-023-03100-2
work_keys_str_mv AT hippjulian oncologicalrecurrencefollowingpathologicalcompleteresponseafterneoadjuvanttreatmentinpatientswithesophagealcanceraretrospectivecohortstudy
AT kuvendjiskajasmina oncologicalrecurrencefollowingpathologicalcompleteresponseafterneoadjuvanttreatmentinpatientswithesophagealcanceraretrospectivecohortstudy
AT hillebrechthanschristian oncologicalrecurrencefollowingpathologicalcompleteresponseafterneoadjuvanttreatmentinpatientswithesophagealcanceraretrospectivecohortstudy
AT herrmannstephan oncologicalrecurrencefollowingpathologicalcompleteresponseafterneoadjuvanttreatmentinpatientswithesophagealcanceraretrospectivecohortstudy
AT timmebronsertsylvia oncologicalrecurrencefollowingpathologicalcompleteresponseafterneoadjuvanttreatmentinpatientswithesophagealcanceraretrospectivecohortstudy
AT fichtnerfeiglstefan oncologicalrecurrencefollowingpathologicalcompleteresponseafterneoadjuvanttreatmentinpatientswithesophagealcanceraretrospectivecohortstudy
AT hoeppnerjens oncologicalrecurrencefollowingpathologicalcompleteresponseafterneoadjuvanttreatmentinpatientswithesophagealcanceraretrospectivecohortstudy
AT dienermarkusk oncologicalrecurrencefollowingpathologicalcompleteresponseafterneoadjuvanttreatmentinpatientswithesophagealcanceraretrospectivecohortstudy