Cargando…
Oncological recurrence following pathological complete response after neoadjuvant treatment in patients with esophageal cancer — a retrospective cohort study
BACKGROUND: To evaluate recurrence in patients with post-neoadjuvant pathological complete response (pCR) and in patients with complete response of primary tumor but persisting lymphatic spread of disease (non-pCR, ypT0ypN +) of esophageal cancer. METHODS: Seventy-five patients (63 pCR, 12 non-pCR)...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10506930/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37721586 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00423-023-03100-2 |
_version_ | 1785107207414611968 |
---|---|
author | Hipp, Julian Kuvendjiska, Jasmina Hillebrecht, Hans Christian Herrmann, Stephan Timme-Bronsert, Sylvia Fichtner-Feigl, Stefan Hoeppner, Jens Diener, Markus K. |
author_facet | Hipp, Julian Kuvendjiska, Jasmina Hillebrecht, Hans Christian Herrmann, Stephan Timme-Bronsert, Sylvia Fichtner-Feigl, Stefan Hoeppner, Jens Diener, Markus K. |
author_sort | Hipp, Julian |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: To evaluate recurrence in patients with post-neoadjuvant pathological complete response (pCR) and in patients with complete response of primary tumor but persisting lymphatic spread of disease (non-pCR, ypT0ypN +) of esophageal cancer. METHODS: Seventy-five patients (63 pCR, 12 non-pCR) were analyzed retrospectively. Pattern and incidence of local and distant recurrence as well as the impact on overall (OS) and disease-free survival (DFS) were evaluated. The efficacy of neoadjuvant chemotherapy according to FLOT protocol was compared to neoadjuvant chemoradiation according to CROSS protocol. RESULTS: In the pCR group, isolated local recurrence was diagnosed in 3%, while no isolated local recurrence was observed in the non-pCR group due to the high incidence of distant recurrence. Distant recurrence was most common in both cohorts (isolated distant recurrence: pCR group 10% to non-pCR group 55%; simultaneous distant and local recurrence: pCR group 3% to non-pCR group 18%). Median time to distant recurrence was 5.5 months, and median time to local recurrence was 8.0 months. Cumulative incidence of distant recurrence (with and without simultaneous local recurrence) was 16% (± 6%) in pCR patients and 79% (± 13%) in non-pCR patients (hazard ratio (HR) 0.123) estimated by Kaplan–Meier method. OS (HR 0.231) and DFS (HR 0.226) were significantly improved in patients with pCR compared to patients with non-pCR. Advantages for FLOT protocol compared to CROSS protocol, especially with regard to distant control of disease (HR 0.278), were observed (OS (HR 0.361), DFS (HR 0.226)). CONCLUSION: Distant recurrence is the predominant site of treatment failure in patients with pCR and non-pCR grade 1a regression, whereby recurrence rates are much higher in patients with non-pCR. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s00423-023-03100-2. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-10506930 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2023 |
publisher | Springer Berlin Heidelberg |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-105069302023-09-20 Oncological recurrence following pathological complete response after neoadjuvant treatment in patients with esophageal cancer — a retrospective cohort study Hipp, Julian Kuvendjiska, Jasmina Hillebrecht, Hans Christian Herrmann, Stephan Timme-Bronsert, Sylvia Fichtner-Feigl, Stefan Hoeppner, Jens Diener, Markus K. Langenbecks Arch Surg Research BACKGROUND: To evaluate recurrence in patients with post-neoadjuvant pathological complete response (pCR) and in patients with complete response of primary tumor but persisting lymphatic spread of disease (non-pCR, ypT0ypN +) of esophageal cancer. METHODS: Seventy-five patients (63 pCR, 12 non-pCR) were analyzed retrospectively. Pattern and incidence of local and distant recurrence as well as the impact on overall (OS) and disease-free survival (DFS) were evaluated. The efficacy of neoadjuvant chemotherapy according to FLOT protocol was compared to neoadjuvant chemoradiation according to CROSS protocol. RESULTS: In the pCR group, isolated local recurrence was diagnosed in 3%, while no isolated local recurrence was observed in the non-pCR group due to the high incidence of distant recurrence. Distant recurrence was most common in both cohorts (isolated distant recurrence: pCR group 10% to non-pCR group 55%; simultaneous distant and local recurrence: pCR group 3% to non-pCR group 18%). Median time to distant recurrence was 5.5 months, and median time to local recurrence was 8.0 months. Cumulative incidence of distant recurrence (with and without simultaneous local recurrence) was 16% (± 6%) in pCR patients and 79% (± 13%) in non-pCR patients (hazard ratio (HR) 0.123) estimated by Kaplan–Meier method. OS (HR 0.231) and DFS (HR 0.226) were significantly improved in patients with pCR compared to patients with non-pCR. Advantages for FLOT protocol compared to CROSS protocol, especially with regard to distant control of disease (HR 0.278), were observed (OS (HR 0.361), DFS (HR 0.226)). CONCLUSION: Distant recurrence is the predominant site of treatment failure in patients with pCR and non-pCR grade 1a regression, whereby recurrence rates are much higher in patients with non-pCR. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s00423-023-03100-2. Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2023-09-18 2023 /pmc/articles/PMC10506930/ /pubmed/37721586 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00423-023-03100-2 Text en © The Author(s) 2023 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . |
spellingShingle | Research Hipp, Julian Kuvendjiska, Jasmina Hillebrecht, Hans Christian Herrmann, Stephan Timme-Bronsert, Sylvia Fichtner-Feigl, Stefan Hoeppner, Jens Diener, Markus K. Oncological recurrence following pathological complete response after neoadjuvant treatment in patients with esophageal cancer — a retrospective cohort study |
title | Oncological recurrence following pathological complete response after neoadjuvant treatment in patients with esophageal cancer — a retrospective cohort study |
title_full | Oncological recurrence following pathological complete response after neoadjuvant treatment in patients with esophageal cancer — a retrospective cohort study |
title_fullStr | Oncological recurrence following pathological complete response after neoadjuvant treatment in patients with esophageal cancer — a retrospective cohort study |
title_full_unstemmed | Oncological recurrence following pathological complete response after neoadjuvant treatment in patients with esophageal cancer — a retrospective cohort study |
title_short | Oncological recurrence following pathological complete response after neoadjuvant treatment in patients with esophageal cancer — a retrospective cohort study |
title_sort | oncological recurrence following pathological complete response after neoadjuvant treatment in patients with esophageal cancer — a retrospective cohort study |
topic | Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10506930/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37721586 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00423-023-03100-2 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT hippjulian oncologicalrecurrencefollowingpathologicalcompleteresponseafterneoadjuvanttreatmentinpatientswithesophagealcanceraretrospectivecohortstudy AT kuvendjiskajasmina oncologicalrecurrencefollowingpathologicalcompleteresponseafterneoadjuvanttreatmentinpatientswithesophagealcanceraretrospectivecohortstudy AT hillebrechthanschristian oncologicalrecurrencefollowingpathologicalcompleteresponseafterneoadjuvanttreatmentinpatientswithesophagealcanceraretrospectivecohortstudy AT herrmannstephan oncologicalrecurrencefollowingpathologicalcompleteresponseafterneoadjuvanttreatmentinpatientswithesophagealcanceraretrospectivecohortstudy AT timmebronsertsylvia oncologicalrecurrencefollowingpathologicalcompleteresponseafterneoadjuvanttreatmentinpatientswithesophagealcanceraretrospectivecohortstudy AT fichtnerfeiglstefan oncologicalrecurrencefollowingpathologicalcompleteresponseafterneoadjuvanttreatmentinpatientswithesophagealcanceraretrospectivecohortstudy AT hoeppnerjens oncologicalrecurrencefollowingpathologicalcompleteresponseafterneoadjuvanttreatmentinpatientswithesophagealcanceraretrospectivecohortstudy AT dienermarkusk oncologicalrecurrencefollowingpathologicalcompleteresponseafterneoadjuvanttreatmentinpatientswithesophagealcanceraretrospectivecohortstudy |