Cargando…

Facial mimicry is not modulated by dopamine D2/3 and opioid receptor antagonism

RATIONALE: According to theories of embodied cognition, facial mimicry — the spontaneous, low-intensity imitation of a perceived emotional facial expression — is first an automatic motor response, whose accompanying proprioceptive feedback contributes to emotion recognition. Alternative theoretical...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Korb, Sebastian, Clarke, Alasdair, Massaccesi, Claudia, Willeit, Matthäus, Silani, Giorgia
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10506945/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37477676
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00213-023-06426-3
_version_ 1785107210956701696
author Korb, Sebastian
Clarke, Alasdair
Massaccesi, Claudia
Willeit, Matthäus
Silani, Giorgia
author_facet Korb, Sebastian
Clarke, Alasdair
Massaccesi, Claudia
Willeit, Matthäus
Silani, Giorgia
author_sort Korb, Sebastian
collection PubMed
description RATIONALE: According to theories of embodied cognition, facial mimicry — the spontaneous, low-intensity imitation of a perceived emotional facial expression — is first an automatic motor response, whose accompanying proprioceptive feedback contributes to emotion recognition. Alternative theoretical accounts, however, view facial mimicry as an emotional response to a rewarding stimulus, and/or an affiliative signal, and thus reject the view of an automatic motor copy. OBJECTIVES: To contribute to this debate and further investigate the neural basis of facial mimicry, as well as its relation to reward processing, we measured facial reactions to dynamic happy and angry faces after pharmacologically manipulating the opioid and dopamine systems — respectively, thought to subserve ‘liking’ and ‘wanting’ of rewards. METHODS: In a placebo-controlled, double-blind experiment, 130 volunteers received in a between-subjects design 50 mg of the opioidergic antagonist naltrexone, 400 mg of the dopaminergic antagonist amisulpride, or placebo. RESULTS: Clear occurrence of facial mimicry, measured 4 h after drug intake with electromyography (EMG) of the zygomaticus major and corrugator supercilii muscles, was found. However, facial mimicry was not affected by either compound, as shown with both frequentist statistics, and a Bayesian asymptotic regression model. CONCLUSIONS: This null finding does not support the hypothesis that facial mimicry (of happiness) reflects an emotional response to a rewarding stimulus, leaving open the possibility of facial mimicry being an automatic motor copy. The results are relevant to the discussion about the psychological nature and the neural basis of facial mimicry, although they should be considered preliminary, given the challenges of interpreting null findings when targeting a novel effect of unknown size. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s00213-023-06426-3.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10506945
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher Springer Berlin Heidelberg
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-105069452023-09-20 Facial mimicry is not modulated by dopamine D2/3 and opioid receptor antagonism Korb, Sebastian Clarke, Alasdair Massaccesi, Claudia Willeit, Matthäus Silani, Giorgia Psychopharmacology (Berl) Original Investigation RATIONALE: According to theories of embodied cognition, facial mimicry — the spontaneous, low-intensity imitation of a perceived emotional facial expression — is first an automatic motor response, whose accompanying proprioceptive feedback contributes to emotion recognition. Alternative theoretical accounts, however, view facial mimicry as an emotional response to a rewarding stimulus, and/or an affiliative signal, and thus reject the view of an automatic motor copy. OBJECTIVES: To contribute to this debate and further investigate the neural basis of facial mimicry, as well as its relation to reward processing, we measured facial reactions to dynamic happy and angry faces after pharmacologically manipulating the opioid and dopamine systems — respectively, thought to subserve ‘liking’ and ‘wanting’ of rewards. METHODS: In a placebo-controlled, double-blind experiment, 130 volunteers received in a between-subjects design 50 mg of the opioidergic antagonist naltrexone, 400 mg of the dopaminergic antagonist amisulpride, or placebo. RESULTS: Clear occurrence of facial mimicry, measured 4 h after drug intake with electromyography (EMG) of the zygomaticus major and corrugator supercilii muscles, was found. However, facial mimicry was not affected by either compound, as shown with both frequentist statistics, and a Bayesian asymptotic regression model. CONCLUSIONS: This null finding does not support the hypothesis that facial mimicry (of happiness) reflects an emotional response to a rewarding stimulus, leaving open the possibility of facial mimicry being an automatic motor copy. The results are relevant to the discussion about the psychological nature and the neural basis of facial mimicry, although they should be considered preliminary, given the challenges of interpreting null findings when targeting a novel effect of unknown size. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s00213-023-06426-3. Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2023-07-21 2023 /pmc/articles/PMC10506945/ /pubmed/37477676 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00213-023-06426-3 Text en © The Author(s) 2023 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Original Investigation
Korb, Sebastian
Clarke, Alasdair
Massaccesi, Claudia
Willeit, Matthäus
Silani, Giorgia
Facial mimicry is not modulated by dopamine D2/3 and opioid receptor antagonism
title Facial mimicry is not modulated by dopamine D2/3 and opioid receptor antagonism
title_full Facial mimicry is not modulated by dopamine D2/3 and opioid receptor antagonism
title_fullStr Facial mimicry is not modulated by dopamine D2/3 and opioid receptor antagonism
title_full_unstemmed Facial mimicry is not modulated by dopamine D2/3 and opioid receptor antagonism
title_short Facial mimicry is not modulated by dopamine D2/3 and opioid receptor antagonism
title_sort facial mimicry is not modulated by dopamine d2/3 and opioid receptor antagonism
topic Original Investigation
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10506945/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37477676
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00213-023-06426-3
work_keys_str_mv AT korbsebastian facialmimicryisnotmodulatedbydopamined23andopioidreceptorantagonism
AT clarkealasdair facialmimicryisnotmodulatedbydopamined23andopioidreceptorantagonism
AT massaccesiclaudia facialmimicryisnotmodulatedbydopamined23andopioidreceptorantagonism
AT willeitmatthaus facialmimicryisnotmodulatedbydopamined23andopioidreceptorantagonism
AT silanigiorgia facialmimicryisnotmodulatedbydopamined23andopioidreceptorantagonism