Cargando…
The impact of atypical intrahospital transfers on patient outcomes: a mixed methods study
The architectural design of hospitals worldwide is centred around individual departments, which require the movement of patients between wards. However, patients do not always take the simplest route from admission to discharge, but can experience convoluted movement patterns, particularly when bed...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Nature Publishing Group UK
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10507077/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37723183 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-023-41966-w |
_version_ | 1785107233275641856 |
---|---|
author | Mendelsohn, Estera Honeyford, Kate Brittin, Andy Mercuri, Luca Klaber, Robert Edward Expert, Paul Costelloe, Céire |
author_facet | Mendelsohn, Estera Honeyford, Kate Brittin, Andy Mercuri, Luca Klaber, Robert Edward Expert, Paul Costelloe, Céire |
author_sort | Mendelsohn, Estera |
collection | PubMed |
description | The architectural design of hospitals worldwide is centred around individual departments, which require the movement of patients between wards. However, patients do not always take the simplest route from admission to discharge, but can experience convoluted movement patterns, particularly when bed availability is low. Few studies have explored the impact of these rarer, atypical trajectories. Using a mixed-method explanatory sequential study design, we firstly used three continuous years of electronic health record data prior to the Covid-19 pandemic, from 55,152 patients admitted to a London hospital network to define the ward specialities by patient type using the Herfindahl–Hirschman index. We explored the impact of ‘regular transfers’ between pairs of wards with shared specialities, ‘atypical transfers’ between pairs of wards with no shared specialities and ‘site transfers’ between pairs of wards in different hospital site locations, on length of stay, 30-day readmission and mortality. Secondly, to understand the possible reasons behind atypical transfers we conducted three focus groups and three in-depth interviews with site nurse practitioners and bed managers within the same hospital network. We found that at least one atypical transfer was experienced by 12.9% of patients. Each atypical transfer is associated with a larger increase in length of stay, 2.84 days (95% CI 2.56–3.12), compared to regular transfers, 1.92 days (95% CI 1.82–2.03). No association was found between odds of mortality, or 30-day readmission and atypical transfers after adjusting for confounders. Atypical transfers appear to be driven by complex patient conditions, a lack of hospital capacity, the need to reach specific services and facilities, and more exceptionally, rare events such as major incidents. Our work provides an important first step in identifying unusual patient movement and its impacts on key patient outcomes using a system-wide, data-driven approach. The broader impact of moving patients between hospital wards, and possible downstream effects should be considered in hospital policy and service planning. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-10507077 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2023 |
publisher | Nature Publishing Group UK |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-105070772023-09-20 The impact of atypical intrahospital transfers on patient outcomes: a mixed methods study Mendelsohn, Estera Honeyford, Kate Brittin, Andy Mercuri, Luca Klaber, Robert Edward Expert, Paul Costelloe, Céire Sci Rep Article The architectural design of hospitals worldwide is centred around individual departments, which require the movement of patients between wards. However, patients do not always take the simplest route from admission to discharge, but can experience convoluted movement patterns, particularly when bed availability is low. Few studies have explored the impact of these rarer, atypical trajectories. Using a mixed-method explanatory sequential study design, we firstly used three continuous years of electronic health record data prior to the Covid-19 pandemic, from 55,152 patients admitted to a London hospital network to define the ward specialities by patient type using the Herfindahl–Hirschman index. We explored the impact of ‘regular transfers’ between pairs of wards with shared specialities, ‘atypical transfers’ between pairs of wards with no shared specialities and ‘site transfers’ between pairs of wards in different hospital site locations, on length of stay, 30-day readmission and mortality. Secondly, to understand the possible reasons behind atypical transfers we conducted three focus groups and three in-depth interviews with site nurse practitioners and bed managers within the same hospital network. We found that at least one atypical transfer was experienced by 12.9% of patients. Each atypical transfer is associated with a larger increase in length of stay, 2.84 days (95% CI 2.56–3.12), compared to regular transfers, 1.92 days (95% CI 1.82–2.03). No association was found between odds of mortality, or 30-day readmission and atypical transfers after adjusting for confounders. Atypical transfers appear to be driven by complex patient conditions, a lack of hospital capacity, the need to reach specific services and facilities, and more exceptionally, rare events such as major incidents. Our work provides an important first step in identifying unusual patient movement and its impacts on key patient outcomes using a system-wide, data-driven approach. The broader impact of moving patients between hospital wards, and possible downstream effects should be considered in hospital policy and service planning. Nature Publishing Group UK 2023-09-18 /pmc/articles/PMC10507077/ /pubmed/37723183 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-023-41966-w Text en © The Author(s) 2023 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . |
spellingShingle | Article Mendelsohn, Estera Honeyford, Kate Brittin, Andy Mercuri, Luca Klaber, Robert Edward Expert, Paul Costelloe, Céire The impact of atypical intrahospital transfers on patient outcomes: a mixed methods study |
title | The impact of atypical intrahospital transfers on patient outcomes: a mixed methods study |
title_full | The impact of atypical intrahospital transfers on patient outcomes: a mixed methods study |
title_fullStr | The impact of atypical intrahospital transfers on patient outcomes: a mixed methods study |
title_full_unstemmed | The impact of atypical intrahospital transfers on patient outcomes: a mixed methods study |
title_short | The impact of atypical intrahospital transfers on patient outcomes: a mixed methods study |
title_sort | impact of atypical intrahospital transfers on patient outcomes: a mixed methods study |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10507077/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37723183 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-023-41966-w |
work_keys_str_mv | AT mendelsohnestera theimpactofatypicalintrahospitaltransfersonpatientoutcomesamixedmethodsstudy AT honeyfordkate theimpactofatypicalintrahospitaltransfersonpatientoutcomesamixedmethodsstudy AT brittinandy theimpactofatypicalintrahospitaltransfersonpatientoutcomesamixedmethodsstudy AT mercuriluca theimpactofatypicalintrahospitaltransfersonpatientoutcomesamixedmethodsstudy AT klaberrobertedward theimpactofatypicalintrahospitaltransfersonpatientoutcomesamixedmethodsstudy AT expertpaul theimpactofatypicalintrahospitaltransfersonpatientoutcomesamixedmethodsstudy AT costelloeceire theimpactofatypicalintrahospitaltransfersonpatientoutcomesamixedmethodsstudy AT mendelsohnestera impactofatypicalintrahospitaltransfersonpatientoutcomesamixedmethodsstudy AT honeyfordkate impactofatypicalintrahospitaltransfersonpatientoutcomesamixedmethodsstudy AT brittinandy impactofatypicalintrahospitaltransfersonpatientoutcomesamixedmethodsstudy AT mercuriluca impactofatypicalintrahospitaltransfersonpatientoutcomesamixedmethodsstudy AT klaberrobertedward impactofatypicalintrahospitaltransfersonpatientoutcomesamixedmethodsstudy AT expertpaul impactofatypicalintrahospitaltransfersonpatientoutcomesamixedmethodsstudy AT costelloeceire impactofatypicalintrahospitaltransfersonpatientoutcomesamixedmethodsstudy |