Cargando…

The Comparison of Anxiety Tactile Using the RMS Tactile Scan in Visually Impaired Children After Performing Oral Prophylaxis by Explaining to Them the Procedure by Verbal Tactile Method

BACKGROUND: Dental anxiety assessment for blind children is important. Appropriate knowledge of the patient's anxiety will help to review management options specific to every child. AIM: The aim of this study was to evaluate the anxiety level using the Raghavendra, Madhuri, Sujata (RMS) tactile...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Kumbar, Sandhyarani, Rathod, Sapana A, Patil, Anil T, Gunda, Sachin, Patil, Krishna, Singh, Devendrapratap M
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Jaypee Brothers Medical Publishers 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10507308/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37731809
http://dx.doi.org/10.5005/jp-journals-10005-2446
_version_ 1785107287482826752
author Kumbar, Sandhyarani
Rathod, Sapana A
Patil, Anil T
Gunda, Sachin
Patil, Krishna
Singh, Devendrapratap M
author_facet Kumbar, Sandhyarani
Rathod, Sapana A
Patil, Anil T
Gunda, Sachin
Patil, Krishna
Singh, Devendrapratap M
author_sort Kumbar, Sandhyarani
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Dental anxiety assessment for blind children is important. Appropriate knowledge of the patient's anxiety will help to review management options specific to every child. AIM: The aim of this study was to evaluate the anxiety level using the Raghavendra, Madhuri, Sujata (RMS) tactile scale (RMS-TS) of visually impaired children after explaining the oral prophylaxis procedure verbally and by the verbal-tactile method followed by performing the oral prophylaxis procedure. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A total of 30 children aged between 6 and 13 years were included in this study from a residential school for visually impaired children. These children were divided into two equal groups. One group was explained oral prophylaxis by verbal method and another was explained in a verbal-tactile method, preintervention and postintervention anxiety of the children was checked on the RMS-TS. RESULTS: A comparison of mean values between the two groups was done using a t-test. Comparison of mean values in each group for before and after values were done using paired t-test and was found that anxiety had reduced in the verbal-tactile group more significantly than that of the verbal group. CONCLUSION: The study shows that the combination of verbal and tactile models for explaining the dental procedure is an effective way to reduce anxiety in blind children. HOW TO CITE THIS ARTICLE: Kumbar S, Rathod SA, Patil AT, et al. The Comparison of Anxiety Tactile Using the RMS Tactile Scan in Visually Impaired Children After Performing Oral Prophylaxis by Explaining to Them the Procedure by Verbal Tactile Method. Int J Clin Pediatr Dent 2023;16(4):551–554.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10507308
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher Jaypee Brothers Medical Publishers
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-105073082023-09-20 The Comparison of Anxiety Tactile Using the RMS Tactile Scan in Visually Impaired Children After Performing Oral Prophylaxis by Explaining to Them the Procedure by Verbal Tactile Method Kumbar, Sandhyarani Rathod, Sapana A Patil, Anil T Gunda, Sachin Patil, Krishna Singh, Devendrapratap M Int J Clin Pediatr Dent Original Research BACKGROUND: Dental anxiety assessment for blind children is important. Appropriate knowledge of the patient's anxiety will help to review management options specific to every child. AIM: The aim of this study was to evaluate the anxiety level using the Raghavendra, Madhuri, Sujata (RMS) tactile scale (RMS-TS) of visually impaired children after explaining the oral prophylaxis procedure verbally and by the verbal-tactile method followed by performing the oral prophylaxis procedure. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A total of 30 children aged between 6 and 13 years were included in this study from a residential school for visually impaired children. These children were divided into two equal groups. One group was explained oral prophylaxis by verbal method and another was explained in a verbal-tactile method, preintervention and postintervention anxiety of the children was checked on the RMS-TS. RESULTS: A comparison of mean values between the two groups was done using a t-test. Comparison of mean values in each group for before and after values were done using paired t-test and was found that anxiety had reduced in the verbal-tactile group more significantly than that of the verbal group. CONCLUSION: The study shows that the combination of verbal and tactile models for explaining the dental procedure is an effective way to reduce anxiety in blind children. HOW TO CITE THIS ARTICLE: Kumbar S, Rathod SA, Patil AT, et al. The Comparison of Anxiety Tactile Using the RMS Tactile Scan in Visually Impaired Children After Performing Oral Prophylaxis by Explaining to Them the Procedure by Verbal Tactile Method. Int J Clin Pediatr Dent 2023;16(4):551–554. Jaypee Brothers Medical Publishers 2023 /pmc/articles/PMC10507308/ /pubmed/37731809 http://dx.doi.org/10.5005/jp-journals-10005-2446 Text en Copyright © 2023; The Author(s). https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/© The Author(s). 2023 Open Access This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and non-commercial reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Original Research
Kumbar, Sandhyarani
Rathod, Sapana A
Patil, Anil T
Gunda, Sachin
Patil, Krishna
Singh, Devendrapratap M
The Comparison of Anxiety Tactile Using the RMS Tactile Scan in Visually Impaired Children After Performing Oral Prophylaxis by Explaining to Them the Procedure by Verbal Tactile Method
title The Comparison of Anxiety Tactile Using the RMS Tactile Scan in Visually Impaired Children After Performing Oral Prophylaxis by Explaining to Them the Procedure by Verbal Tactile Method
title_full The Comparison of Anxiety Tactile Using the RMS Tactile Scan in Visually Impaired Children After Performing Oral Prophylaxis by Explaining to Them the Procedure by Verbal Tactile Method
title_fullStr The Comparison of Anxiety Tactile Using the RMS Tactile Scan in Visually Impaired Children After Performing Oral Prophylaxis by Explaining to Them the Procedure by Verbal Tactile Method
title_full_unstemmed The Comparison of Anxiety Tactile Using the RMS Tactile Scan in Visually Impaired Children After Performing Oral Prophylaxis by Explaining to Them the Procedure by Verbal Tactile Method
title_short The Comparison of Anxiety Tactile Using the RMS Tactile Scan in Visually Impaired Children After Performing Oral Prophylaxis by Explaining to Them the Procedure by Verbal Tactile Method
title_sort comparison of anxiety tactile using the rms tactile scan in visually impaired children after performing oral prophylaxis by explaining to them the procedure by verbal tactile method
topic Original Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10507308/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37731809
http://dx.doi.org/10.5005/jp-journals-10005-2446
work_keys_str_mv AT kumbarsandhyarani thecomparisonofanxietytactileusingthermstactilescaninvisuallyimpairedchildrenafterperformingoralprophylaxisbyexplainingtothemtheprocedurebyverbaltactilemethod
AT rathodsapanaa thecomparisonofanxietytactileusingthermstactilescaninvisuallyimpairedchildrenafterperformingoralprophylaxisbyexplainingtothemtheprocedurebyverbaltactilemethod
AT patilanilt thecomparisonofanxietytactileusingthermstactilescaninvisuallyimpairedchildrenafterperformingoralprophylaxisbyexplainingtothemtheprocedurebyverbaltactilemethod
AT gundasachin thecomparisonofanxietytactileusingthermstactilescaninvisuallyimpairedchildrenafterperformingoralprophylaxisbyexplainingtothemtheprocedurebyverbaltactilemethod
AT patilkrishna thecomparisonofanxietytactileusingthermstactilescaninvisuallyimpairedchildrenafterperformingoralprophylaxisbyexplainingtothemtheprocedurebyverbaltactilemethod
AT singhdevendrapratapm thecomparisonofanxietytactileusingthermstactilescaninvisuallyimpairedchildrenafterperformingoralprophylaxisbyexplainingtothemtheprocedurebyverbaltactilemethod
AT kumbarsandhyarani comparisonofanxietytactileusingthermstactilescaninvisuallyimpairedchildrenafterperformingoralprophylaxisbyexplainingtothemtheprocedurebyverbaltactilemethod
AT rathodsapanaa comparisonofanxietytactileusingthermstactilescaninvisuallyimpairedchildrenafterperformingoralprophylaxisbyexplainingtothemtheprocedurebyverbaltactilemethod
AT patilanilt comparisonofanxietytactileusingthermstactilescaninvisuallyimpairedchildrenafterperformingoralprophylaxisbyexplainingtothemtheprocedurebyverbaltactilemethod
AT gundasachin comparisonofanxietytactileusingthermstactilescaninvisuallyimpairedchildrenafterperformingoralprophylaxisbyexplainingtothemtheprocedurebyverbaltactilemethod
AT patilkrishna comparisonofanxietytactileusingthermstactilescaninvisuallyimpairedchildrenafterperformingoralprophylaxisbyexplainingtothemtheprocedurebyverbaltactilemethod
AT singhdevendrapratapm comparisonofanxietytactileusingthermstactilescaninvisuallyimpairedchildrenafterperformingoralprophylaxisbyexplainingtothemtheprocedurebyverbaltactilemethod