Cargando…
“Comparative Evaluation of Three Different Microabrasion Techniques in Esthetic Management of Fluorosis”: An In Vivo Study
AIM: “Comparative evaluation of three different microabrasion techniques in esthetic management of fluorosis”—an in vivo study. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A total of 48 permanent incisors in children between the age-groups of 8–12 years with Dean's fluorosis index modified criteria 1, 2, and 3 were...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Jaypee Brothers Medical Publishers
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10507311/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37731804 http://dx.doi.org/10.5005/jp-journals-10005-2610 |
_version_ | 1785107288195858432 |
---|---|
author | Reddy, Vatsala N Nagar, Priya Lakhotia, Richa Jenny, Anisha Ravi, Pooja H Kanugondappa, Raghunath |
author_facet | Reddy, Vatsala N Nagar, Priya Lakhotia, Richa Jenny, Anisha Ravi, Pooja H Kanugondappa, Raghunath |
author_sort | Reddy, Vatsala N |
collection | PubMed |
description | AIM: “Comparative evaluation of three different microabrasion techniques in esthetic management of fluorosis”—an in vivo study. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A total of 48 permanent incisors in children between the age-groups of 8–12 years with Dean's fluorosis index modified criteria 1, 2, and 3 were included. The patients were randomly divided into three groups; each group included 16 samples. Group I—phosphoric acid and pumice microabrasion (37% phosphoric acid and pumice as abrasive), group II—opalustre microabrasion [6.6% hydrochloric (HCL) acid and silicon dicarbide (SiC(2))], and group III—icon etch microabrasion (15% HCL acid gel as icon etch, pumice, and resin infiltrate). Preoperative sensitivity and pulp vitality of each tooth were evaluated. Standardized preoperative photographs were captured for the evaluation of color parameters L1, a1, and b1 by Adobe Photoshop 7 software and an assessment of color enhancement was carried out. Preoperative surface roughness was evaluated with two methods like, cellulose acetate replicating tape and confocal microscope, and Epoxy resin replica obtained from the preoperative impression of teeth using additional silicone and contact profilometer. Microabrasion was done accordingly. Postoperative values of all the parameters were evaluated. RESULTS: Phosphoric acid and pumice showed the best color change, followed by icon etch resin infiltrate. Opalustre (6.6% HCL acid and SiC(2)) and was unsuccessful as it had less concentration and was more abrasive. CONCLUSION: Phosphoric acid and pumice showed the best color enhancement, followed by icon etch resin infiltrate and opalustre. Icon etch resin infiltrate showed minimal surface roughness followed by phosphoric acid and pumice and opaluster group. HOW TO CITE THIS ARTICLE: Reddy VN, Nagar P, Lakhotia R, et al. “Comparative Evaluation of Three Different Microabrasion Techniques in Esthetic Management of Fluorosis”: An In Vivo Study. Int J Clin Pediatr Dent 2023;16(4):572–581. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-10507311 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2023 |
publisher | Jaypee Brothers Medical Publishers |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-105073112023-09-20 “Comparative Evaluation of Three Different Microabrasion Techniques in Esthetic Management of Fluorosis”: An In Vivo Study Reddy, Vatsala N Nagar, Priya Lakhotia, Richa Jenny, Anisha Ravi, Pooja H Kanugondappa, Raghunath Int J Clin Pediatr Dent Original Research AIM: “Comparative evaluation of three different microabrasion techniques in esthetic management of fluorosis”—an in vivo study. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A total of 48 permanent incisors in children between the age-groups of 8–12 years with Dean's fluorosis index modified criteria 1, 2, and 3 were included. The patients were randomly divided into three groups; each group included 16 samples. Group I—phosphoric acid and pumice microabrasion (37% phosphoric acid and pumice as abrasive), group II—opalustre microabrasion [6.6% hydrochloric (HCL) acid and silicon dicarbide (SiC(2))], and group III—icon etch microabrasion (15% HCL acid gel as icon etch, pumice, and resin infiltrate). Preoperative sensitivity and pulp vitality of each tooth were evaluated. Standardized preoperative photographs were captured for the evaluation of color parameters L1, a1, and b1 by Adobe Photoshop 7 software and an assessment of color enhancement was carried out. Preoperative surface roughness was evaluated with two methods like, cellulose acetate replicating tape and confocal microscope, and Epoxy resin replica obtained from the preoperative impression of teeth using additional silicone and contact profilometer. Microabrasion was done accordingly. Postoperative values of all the parameters were evaluated. RESULTS: Phosphoric acid and pumice showed the best color change, followed by icon etch resin infiltrate. Opalustre (6.6% HCL acid and SiC(2)) and was unsuccessful as it had less concentration and was more abrasive. CONCLUSION: Phosphoric acid and pumice showed the best color enhancement, followed by icon etch resin infiltrate and opalustre. Icon etch resin infiltrate showed minimal surface roughness followed by phosphoric acid and pumice and opaluster group. HOW TO CITE THIS ARTICLE: Reddy VN, Nagar P, Lakhotia R, et al. “Comparative Evaluation of Three Different Microabrasion Techniques in Esthetic Management of Fluorosis”: An In Vivo Study. Int J Clin Pediatr Dent 2023;16(4):572–581. Jaypee Brothers Medical Publishers 2023 /pmc/articles/PMC10507311/ /pubmed/37731804 http://dx.doi.org/10.5005/jp-journals-10005-2610 Text en Copyright © 2023; The Author(s). https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/© The Author(s). 2023 Open Access This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and non-commercial reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated. |
spellingShingle | Original Research Reddy, Vatsala N Nagar, Priya Lakhotia, Richa Jenny, Anisha Ravi, Pooja H Kanugondappa, Raghunath “Comparative Evaluation of Three Different Microabrasion Techniques in Esthetic Management of Fluorosis”: An In Vivo Study |
title | “Comparative Evaluation of Three Different Microabrasion Techniques in Esthetic Management of Fluorosis”: An In Vivo Study |
title_full | “Comparative Evaluation of Three Different Microabrasion Techniques in Esthetic Management of Fluorosis”: An In Vivo Study |
title_fullStr | “Comparative Evaluation of Three Different Microabrasion Techniques in Esthetic Management of Fluorosis”: An In Vivo Study |
title_full_unstemmed | “Comparative Evaluation of Three Different Microabrasion Techniques in Esthetic Management of Fluorosis”: An In Vivo Study |
title_short | “Comparative Evaluation of Three Different Microabrasion Techniques in Esthetic Management of Fluorosis”: An In Vivo Study |
title_sort | “comparative evaluation of three different microabrasion techniques in esthetic management of fluorosis”: an in vivo study |
topic | Original Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10507311/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37731804 http://dx.doi.org/10.5005/jp-journals-10005-2610 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT reddyvatsalan comparativeevaluationofthreedifferentmicroabrasiontechniquesinestheticmanagementoffluorosisaninvivostudy AT nagarpriya comparativeevaluationofthreedifferentmicroabrasiontechniquesinestheticmanagementoffluorosisaninvivostudy AT lakhotiaricha comparativeevaluationofthreedifferentmicroabrasiontechniquesinestheticmanagementoffluorosisaninvivostudy AT jennyanisha comparativeevaluationofthreedifferentmicroabrasiontechniquesinestheticmanagementoffluorosisaninvivostudy AT ravipoojah comparativeevaluationofthreedifferentmicroabrasiontechniquesinestheticmanagementoffluorosisaninvivostudy AT kanugondapparaghunath comparativeevaluationofthreedifferentmicroabrasiontechniquesinestheticmanagementoffluorosisaninvivostudy |