Cargando…

“Comparative Evaluation of Three Different Microabrasion Techniques in Esthetic Management of Fluorosis”: An In Vivo Study

AIM: “Comparative evaluation of three different microabrasion techniques in esthetic management of fluorosis”—an in vivo study. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A total of 48 permanent incisors in children between the age-groups of 8–12 years with Dean's fluorosis index modified criteria 1, 2, and 3 were...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Reddy, Vatsala N, Nagar, Priya, Lakhotia, Richa, Jenny, Anisha, Ravi, Pooja H, Kanugondappa, Raghunath
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Jaypee Brothers Medical Publishers 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10507311/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37731804
http://dx.doi.org/10.5005/jp-journals-10005-2610
_version_ 1785107288195858432
author Reddy, Vatsala N
Nagar, Priya
Lakhotia, Richa
Jenny, Anisha
Ravi, Pooja H
Kanugondappa, Raghunath
author_facet Reddy, Vatsala N
Nagar, Priya
Lakhotia, Richa
Jenny, Anisha
Ravi, Pooja H
Kanugondappa, Raghunath
author_sort Reddy, Vatsala N
collection PubMed
description AIM: “Comparative evaluation of three different microabrasion techniques in esthetic management of fluorosis”—an in vivo study. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A total of 48 permanent incisors in children between the age-groups of 8–12 years with Dean's fluorosis index modified criteria 1, 2, and 3 were included. The patients were randomly divided into three groups; each group included 16 samples. Group I—phosphoric acid and pumice microabrasion (37% phosphoric acid and pumice as abrasive), group II—opalustre microabrasion [6.6% hydrochloric (HCL) acid and silicon dicarbide (SiC(2))], and group III—icon etch microabrasion (15% HCL acid gel as icon etch, pumice, and resin infiltrate). Preoperative sensitivity and pulp vitality of each tooth were evaluated. Standardized preoperative photographs were captured for the evaluation of color parameters L1, a1, and b1 by Adobe Photoshop 7 software and an assessment of color enhancement was carried out. Preoperative surface roughness was evaluated with two methods like, cellulose acetate replicating tape and confocal microscope, and Epoxy resin replica obtained from the preoperative impression of teeth using additional silicone and contact profilometer. Microabrasion was done accordingly. Postoperative values of all the parameters were evaluated. RESULTS: Phosphoric acid and pumice showed the best color change, followed by icon etch resin infiltrate. Opalustre (6.6% HCL acid and SiC(2)) and was unsuccessful as it had less concentration and was more abrasive. CONCLUSION: Phosphoric acid and pumice showed the best color enhancement, followed by icon etch resin infiltrate and opalustre. Icon etch resin infiltrate showed minimal surface roughness followed by phosphoric acid and pumice and opaluster group. HOW TO CITE THIS ARTICLE: Reddy VN, Nagar P, Lakhotia R, et al. “Comparative Evaluation of Three Different Microabrasion Techniques in Esthetic Management of Fluorosis”: An In Vivo Study. Int J Clin Pediatr Dent 2023;16(4):572–581.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10507311
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher Jaypee Brothers Medical Publishers
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-105073112023-09-20 “Comparative Evaluation of Three Different Microabrasion Techniques in Esthetic Management of Fluorosis”: An In Vivo Study Reddy, Vatsala N Nagar, Priya Lakhotia, Richa Jenny, Anisha Ravi, Pooja H Kanugondappa, Raghunath Int J Clin Pediatr Dent Original Research AIM: “Comparative evaluation of three different microabrasion techniques in esthetic management of fluorosis”—an in vivo study. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A total of 48 permanent incisors in children between the age-groups of 8–12 years with Dean's fluorosis index modified criteria 1, 2, and 3 were included. The patients were randomly divided into three groups; each group included 16 samples. Group I—phosphoric acid and pumice microabrasion (37% phosphoric acid and pumice as abrasive), group II—opalustre microabrasion [6.6% hydrochloric (HCL) acid and silicon dicarbide (SiC(2))], and group III—icon etch microabrasion (15% HCL acid gel as icon etch, pumice, and resin infiltrate). Preoperative sensitivity and pulp vitality of each tooth were evaluated. Standardized preoperative photographs were captured for the evaluation of color parameters L1, a1, and b1 by Adobe Photoshop 7 software and an assessment of color enhancement was carried out. Preoperative surface roughness was evaluated with two methods like, cellulose acetate replicating tape and confocal microscope, and Epoxy resin replica obtained from the preoperative impression of teeth using additional silicone and contact profilometer. Microabrasion was done accordingly. Postoperative values of all the parameters were evaluated. RESULTS: Phosphoric acid and pumice showed the best color change, followed by icon etch resin infiltrate. Opalustre (6.6% HCL acid and SiC(2)) and was unsuccessful as it had less concentration and was more abrasive. CONCLUSION: Phosphoric acid and pumice showed the best color enhancement, followed by icon etch resin infiltrate and opalustre. Icon etch resin infiltrate showed minimal surface roughness followed by phosphoric acid and pumice and opaluster group. HOW TO CITE THIS ARTICLE: Reddy VN, Nagar P, Lakhotia R, et al. “Comparative Evaluation of Three Different Microabrasion Techniques in Esthetic Management of Fluorosis”: An In Vivo Study. Int J Clin Pediatr Dent 2023;16(4):572–581. Jaypee Brothers Medical Publishers 2023 /pmc/articles/PMC10507311/ /pubmed/37731804 http://dx.doi.org/10.5005/jp-journals-10005-2610 Text en Copyright © 2023; The Author(s). https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/© The Author(s). 2023 Open Access This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and non-commercial reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Original Research
Reddy, Vatsala N
Nagar, Priya
Lakhotia, Richa
Jenny, Anisha
Ravi, Pooja H
Kanugondappa, Raghunath
“Comparative Evaluation of Three Different Microabrasion Techniques in Esthetic Management of Fluorosis”: An In Vivo Study
title “Comparative Evaluation of Three Different Microabrasion Techniques in Esthetic Management of Fluorosis”: An In Vivo Study
title_full “Comparative Evaluation of Three Different Microabrasion Techniques in Esthetic Management of Fluorosis”: An In Vivo Study
title_fullStr “Comparative Evaluation of Three Different Microabrasion Techniques in Esthetic Management of Fluorosis”: An In Vivo Study
title_full_unstemmed “Comparative Evaluation of Three Different Microabrasion Techniques in Esthetic Management of Fluorosis”: An In Vivo Study
title_short “Comparative Evaluation of Three Different Microabrasion Techniques in Esthetic Management of Fluorosis”: An In Vivo Study
title_sort “comparative evaluation of three different microabrasion techniques in esthetic management of fluorosis”: an in vivo study
topic Original Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10507311/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37731804
http://dx.doi.org/10.5005/jp-journals-10005-2610
work_keys_str_mv AT reddyvatsalan comparativeevaluationofthreedifferentmicroabrasiontechniquesinestheticmanagementoffluorosisaninvivostudy
AT nagarpriya comparativeevaluationofthreedifferentmicroabrasiontechniquesinestheticmanagementoffluorosisaninvivostudy
AT lakhotiaricha comparativeevaluationofthreedifferentmicroabrasiontechniquesinestheticmanagementoffluorosisaninvivostudy
AT jennyanisha comparativeevaluationofthreedifferentmicroabrasiontechniquesinestheticmanagementoffluorosisaninvivostudy
AT ravipoojah comparativeevaluationofthreedifferentmicroabrasiontechniquesinestheticmanagementoffluorosisaninvivostudy
AT kanugondapparaghunath comparativeevaluationofthreedifferentmicroabrasiontechniquesinestheticmanagementoffluorosisaninvivostudy