Cargando…

Rural-Urban Differences in Hospital and Patient-Reported Outcomes Following Total Hip Arthroplasty

BACKGROUND: Rural patients have unique health-care factors influencing outcomes of arthroplasty, hypothetically putting these patients at increased risk for complications following total joint arthroplasty. The aim of this study is to better understand differences in patient outcomes and satisfactio...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Lachance, Andrew D., Call, Catherine, Radford, Zachary, Stoddard, Henry, Sturgeon, Callahan, Babikian, George, Rana, Adam, McGrory, Brian J.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Elsevier 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10507436/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37731592
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.artd.2023.101190
_version_ 1785107317667135488
author Lachance, Andrew D.
Call, Catherine
Radford, Zachary
Stoddard, Henry
Sturgeon, Callahan
Babikian, George
Rana, Adam
McGrory, Brian J.
author_facet Lachance, Andrew D.
Call, Catherine
Radford, Zachary
Stoddard, Henry
Sturgeon, Callahan
Babikian, George
Rana, Adam
McGrory, Brian J.
author_sort Lachance, Andrew D.
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Rural patients have unique health-care factors influencing outcomes of arthroplasty, hypothetically putting these patients at increased risk for complications following total joint arthroplasty. The aim of this study is to better understand differences in patient outcomes and satisfaction between rural and urban patients receiving care in an urban setting and to provide more equitable care. METHODS: A retrospective chart review was performed on patients undergoing primary total hip arthroplasty at a single large academic center between January 2013 and August 2020. Demographic, operative, and hospital outcomes were obtained from the institutional electronic medical record. Rurality was determined by rural-urban code (RUC) classifications by zip code with RUC codes 1-3 defined as urban and RUC 4-10 defined as rural. RESULTS: Patients from urban areas were more likely to visit the emergency department within 30 days postoperatively (P = .006) and be readmitted within 90 days (P < .001). However, unplanned (P < .001) admissions were higher in the rural group. There was no statistical difference in postoperative complications (P = .4). At 6 months, rural patients had higher patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) including Hip Disability and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score total (P = .05), Hip Disability and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score interval (P = .05), self-reported functional improvement (P < .05), improvements in pain (P < .05), and that the surgery met expectations (P < .05). However, these values did not reach minimal clinically important difference. CONCLUSIONS: There may be differences in emergency department visits, readmissions, and PROMs in rural vs urban populations undergoing total hip arthroplasty in an urban setting. Patient access to care and attitudes of rural patients toward health care may underlie these findings. Understanding differences in PROMs, satisfaction, and hospital-based outcomes based on rurality is essential to provide equitable arthroplasty care.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10507436
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher Elsevier
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-105074362023-09-20 Rural-Urban Differences in Hospital and Patient-Reported Outcomes Following Total Hip Arthroplasty Lachance, Andrew D. Call, Catherine Radford, Zachary Stoddard, Henry Sturgeon, Callahan Babikian, George Rana, Adam McGrory, Brian J. Arthroplast Today Original Research BACKGROUND: Rural patients have unique health-care factors influencing outcomes of arthroplasty, hypothetically putting these patients at increased risk for complications following total joint arthroplasty. The aim of this study is to better understand differences in patient outcomes and satisfaction between rural and urban patients receiving care in an urban setting and to provide more equitable care. METHODS: A retrospective chart review was performed on patients undergoing primary total hip arthroplasty at a single large academic center between January 2013 and August 2020. Demographic, operative, and hospital outcomes were obtained from the institutional electronic medical record. Rurality was determined by rural-urban code (RUC) classifications by zip code with RUC codes 1-3 defined as urban and RUC 4-10 defined as rural. RESULTS: Patients from urban areas were more likely to visit the emergency department within 30 days postoperatively (P = .006) and be readmitted within 90 days (P < .001). However, unplanned (P < .001) admissions were higher in the rural group. There was no statistical difference in postoperative complications (P = .4). At 6 months, rural patients had higher patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) including Hip Disability and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score total (P = .05), Hip Disability and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score interval (P = .05), self-reported functional improvement (P < .05), improvements in pain (P < .05), and that the surgery met expectations (P < .05). However, these values did not reach minimal clinically important difference. CONCLUSIONS: There may be differences in emergency department visits, readmissions, and PROMs in rural vs urban populations undergoing total hip arthroplasty in an urban setting. Patient access to care and attitudes of rural patients toward health care may underlie these findings. Understanding differences in PROMs, satisfaction, and hospital-based outcomes based on rurality is essential to provide equitable arthroplasty care. Elsevier 2023-09-14 /pmc/articles/PMC10507436/ /pubmed/37731592 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.artd.2023.101190 Text en © 2023 The Authors https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).
spellingShingle Original Research
Lachance, Andrew D.
Call, Catherine
Radford, Zachary
Stoddard, Henry
Sturgeon, Callahan
Babikian, George
Rana, Adam
McGrory, Brian J.
Rural-Urban Differences in Hospital and Patient-Reported Outcomes Following Total Hip Arthroplasty
title Rural-Urban Differences in Hospital and Patient-Reported Outcomes Following Total Hip Arthroplasty
title_full Rural-Urban Differences in Hospital and Patient-Reported Outcomes Following Total Hip Arthroplasty
title_fullStr Rural-Urban Differences in Hospital and Patient-Reported Outcomes Following Total Hip Arthroplasty
title_full_unstemmed Rural-Urban Differences in Hospital and Patient-Reported Outcomes Following Total Hip Arthroplasty
title_short Rural-Urban Differences in Hospital and Patient-Reported Outcomes Following Total Hip Arthroplasty
title_sort rural-urban differences in hospital and patient-reported outcomes following total hip arthroplasty
topic Original Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10507436/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37731592
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.artd.2023.101190
work_keys_str_mv AT lachanceandrewd ruralurbandifferencesinhospitalandpatientreportedoutcomesfollowingtotalhiparthroplasty
AT callcatherine ruralurbandifferencesinhospitalandpatientreportedoutcomesfollowingtotalhiparthroplasty
AT radfordzachary ruralurbandifferencesinhospitalandpatientreportedoutcomesfollowingtotalhiparthroplasty
AT stoddardhenry ruralurbandifferencesinhospitalandpatientreportedoutcomesfollowingtotalhiparthroplasty
AT sturgeoncallahan ruralurbandifferencesinhospitalandpatientreportedoutcomesfollowingtotalhiparthroplasty
AT babikiangeorge ruralurbandifferencesinhospitalandpatientreportedoutcomesfollowingtotalhiparthroplasty
AT ranaadam ruralurbandifferencesinhospitalandpatientreportedoutcomesfollowingtotalhiparthroplasty
AT mcgrorybrianj ruralurbandifferencesinhospitalandpatientreportedoutcomesfollowingtotalhiparthroplasty