Cargando…

Association between ultra-processed food consumption and risk of breast cancer: a systematic review and dose-response meta-analysis of observational studies

BACKGROUND: Some epidemiological studies have examined the association between consumption of ultra-processed food (UPF) and the risk of breast cancer. However, the results were inconsistent. Therefore, we carried out a systematic review and dose-response meta-analysis to examine whether an associat...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Shu, Long, Zhang, Xiaoyan, Zhu, Qin, Lv, Xiaoling, Si, Caijuan
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Media S.A. 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10507475/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37731393
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fnut.2023.1250361
_version_ 1785107326002266112
author Shu, Long
Zhang, Xiaoyan
Zhu, Qin
Lv, Xiaoling
Si, Caijuan
author_facet Shu, Long
Zhang, Xiaoyan
Zhu, Qin
Lv, Xiaoling
Si, Caijuan
author_sort Shu, Long
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Some epidemiological studies have examined the association between consumption of ultra-processed food (UPF) and the risk of breast cancer. However, the results were inconsistent. Therefore, we carried out a systematic review and dose-response meta-analysis to examine whether an association exists between high consumption of UPF and breast cancer risk. METHODS: PubMed/MEDLINE, ISI Web of Science, EBSCO and CNKI databases were systematically searched from inception to May 2023. The summary relative risks (RRs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) associated with UPF consumption and breast cancer were calculated using a random-effects model (DerSimonian-Laird method). Heterogeneity between included studies was examined using the Cochran’s Q test and I-square (I(2)) statistics. Publication bias was studied by visual inspection of funnel plot asymmetry and Begg’s and Egger’s tests. RESULTS: Overall, six articles involving 462,292 participants, were eligible to be included in this study. Compared to the lowest consumption, highest consumption of UPF was related to a higher risk of breast cancer (RR = 1.10; 95%CI: 1.00–1.22, p = 0.056). Besides, the linear dose–response analysis showed that each 10% increment in UPF consumption was related to a 5% higher risk of breast cancer (RR = 1.05; 95%CI: 1.00–1.10, p = 0.048). Subgroup analyses suggested that UPF consumption was positively associated with breast cancer risk in case-control studies (RR = 1.13; 95%CI: 1.01–1.26, p = 0.028). Additionally, there was also a significant positive association between UPF consumption and breast cancer risk in the subgroup with sample size<5,000(RR = 1.17; 95%CI: 1.02–1.35, p = 0.028). CONCLUSION: Our results indicate that higher consumption of UPF is slightly related to a higher risk of breast cancer. Further studies in particular of large prospective cohort studies are warranted to confirm these results.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10507475
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-105074752023-09-20 Association between ultra-processed food consumption and risk of breast cancer: a systematic review and dose-response meta-analysis of observational studies Shu, Long Zhang, Xiaoyan Zhu, Qin Lv, Xiaoling Si, Caijuan Front Nutr Nutrition BACKGROUND: Some epidemiological studies have examined the association between consumption of ultra-processed food (UPF) and the risk of breast cancer. However, the results were inconsistent. Therefore, we carried out a systematic review and dose-response meta-analysis to examine whether an association exists between high consumption of UPF and breast cancer risk. METHODS: PubMed/MEDLINE, ISI Web of Science, EBSCO and CNKI databases were systematically searched from inception to May 2023. The summary relative risks (RRs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) associated with UPF consumption and breast cancer were calculated using a random-effects model (DerSimonian-Laird method). Heterogeneity between included studies was examined using the Cochran’s Q test and I-square (I(2)) statistics. Publication bias was studied by visual inspection of funnel plot asymmetry and Begg’s and Egger’s tests. RESULTS: Overall, six articles involving 462,292 participants, were eligible to be included in this study. Compared to the lowest consumption, highest consumption of UPF was related to a higher risk of breast cancer (RR = 1.10; 95%CI: 1.00–1.22, p = 0.056). Besides, the linear dose–response analysis showed that each 10% increment in UPF consumption was related to a 5% higher risk of breast cancer (RR = 1.05; 95%CI: 1.00–1.10, p = 0.048). Subgroup analyses suggested that UPF consumption was positively associated with breast cancer risk in case-control studies (RR = 1.13; 95%CI: 1.01–1.26, p = 0.028). Additionally, there was also a significant positive association between UPF consumption and breast cancer risk in the subgroup with sample size<5,000(RR = 1.17; 95%CI: 1.02–1.35, p = 0.028). CONCLUSION: Our results indicate that higher consumption of UPF is slightly related to a higher risk of breast cancer. Further studies in particular of large prospective cohort studies are warranted to confirm these results. Frontiers Media S.A. 2023-09-04 /pmc/articles/PMC10507475/ /pubmed/37731393 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fnut.2023.1250361 Text en Copyright © 2023 Shu, Zhang, Zhu, Lv and Si. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
spellingShingle Nutrition
Shu, Long
Zhang, Xiaoyan
Zhu, Qin
Lv, Xiaoling
Si, Caijuan
Association between ultra-processed food consumption and risk of breast cancer: a systematic review and dose-response meta-analysis of observational studies
title Association between ultra-processed food consumption and risk of breast cancer: a systematic review and dose-response meta-analysis of observational studies
title_full Association between ultra-processed food consumption and risk of breast cancer: a systematic review and dose-response meta-analysis of observational studies
title_fullStr Association between ultra-processed food consumption and risk of breast cancer: a systematic review and dose-response meta-analysis of observational studies
title_full_unstemmed Association between ultra-processed food consumption and risk of breast cancer: a systematic review and dose-response meta-analysis of observational studies
title_short Association between ultra-processed food consumption and risk of breast cancer: a systematic review and dose-response meta-analysis of observational studies
title_sort association between ultra-processed food consumption and risk of breast cancer: a systematic review and dose-response meta-analysis of observational studies
topic Nutrition
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10507475/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37731393
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fnut.2023.1250361
work_keys_str_mv AT shulong associationbetweenultraprocessedfoodconsumptionandriskofbreastcancerasystematicreviewanddoseresponsemetaanalysisofobservationalstudies
AT zhangxiaoyan associationbetweenultraprocessedfoodconsumptionandriskofbreastcancerasystematicreviewanddoseresponsemetaanalysisofobservationalstudies
AT zhuqin associationbetweenultraprocessedfoodconsumptionandriskofbreastcancerasystematicreviewanddoseresponsemetaanalysisofobservationalstudies
AT lvxiaoling associationbetweenultraprocessedfoodconsumptionandriskofbreastcancerasystematicreviewanddoseresponsemetaanalysisofobservationalstudies
AT sicaijuan associationbetweenultraprocessedfoodconsumptionandriskofbreastcancerasystematicreviewanddoseresponsemetaanalysisofobservationalstudies