Cargando…

Quantification of time delay between screening and subsequent initiation of contact isolation for carriers of extended-spectrum beta-lactamase (ESBL)–producing Enterobacterales: A post hoc subgroup analysis of the R-GNOSIS WP5 Trial

OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study was to quantify the time delay between screening and initiation of contact isolation for carriers of extended-spectrum beta-lactamase (ESBL)–producing Enterobacterales (ESBL-E). METHODS: This study was a secondary analysis of contact isolation periods in a cluster-r...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Maechler, Friederike, Schwab, Frank, Hansen, Sonja, Behnke, Michael, Bonten, Marc J., Canton, Rafael, Diaz Agero, Cristina, Fankhauser, Carolina, Harbarth, Stephan, Huttner, Benedikt D., Kola, Axel, Gastmeier, Petra
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Cambridge University Press 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10507499/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36912321
http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/ice.2022.285
_version_ 1785107331595370496
author Maechler, Friederike
Schwab, Frank
Hansen, Sonja
Behnke, Michael
Bonten, Marc J.
Canton, Rafael
Diaz Agero, Cristina
Fankhauser, Carolina
Harbarth, Stephan
Huttner, Benedikt D.
Kola, Axel
Gastmeier, Petra
author_facet Maechler, Friederike
Schwab, Frank
Hansen, Sonja
Behnke, Michael
Bonten, Marc J.
Canton, Rafael
Diaz Agero, Cristina
Fankhauser, Carolina
Harbarth, Stephan
Huttner, Benedikt D.
Kola, Axel
Gastmeier, Petra
author_sort Maechler, Friederike
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study was to quantify the time delay between screening and initiation of contact isolation for carriers of extended-spectrum beta-lactamase (ESBL)–producing Enterobacterales (ESBL-E). METHODS: This study was a secondary analysis of contact isolation periods in a cluster-randomized controlled trial that compared 2 strategies to control ESBL-E (trial no. ISRCTN57648070). Patients admitted to 20 non-ICU wards in Germany, the Netherlands, Spain, and Switzerland were screened for ESBL-E carriage on admission, weekly thereafter, and on discharge. Data collection included the day of sampling, the day the wards were notified of the result, and subsequent ESBL-E isolation days. RESULTS: Between January 2014 and August 2016, 19,122 patients, with a length of stay ≥2 days were included. At least 1 culture was collected for 16,091 patients (84%), with a median duration between the admission day and the day of first sample collection of 2 days (interquartile range [IQR], 1–3). Moreover, 854 (41%) of all 2,078 ESBL-E carriers remained without isolation during their hospital stay. In total, 6,040 ESBL-E days (32% of all ESBL-E days) accrued for patients who were not isolated. Of 2,078 ESBL-E-carriers, 1,478 ESBL-E carriers (71%) had no previous history of ESBL-E carriage. Also, 697 (34%) were placed in contact isolation with a delay of 4 days (IQR, 2–5), accounting for 2,723 nonisolation days (15% of ESBL-E days). CONCLUSIONS: Even with extensive surveillance screening, almost one-third of all ESBL-E days were nonisolation days. Limitations in routine culture-based ESBL-E detection impeded timely and exhaustive implementation of targeted contact isolation.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10507499
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher Cambridge University Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-105074992023-09-20 Quantification of time delay between screening and subsequent initiation of contact isolation for carriers of extended-spectrum beta-lactamase (ESBL)–producing Enterobacterales: A post hoc subgroup analysis of the R-GNOSIS WP5 Trial Maechler, Friederike Schwab, Frank Hansen, Sonja Behnke, Michael Bonten, Marc J. Canton, Rafael Diaz Agero, Cristina Fankhauser, Carolina Harbarth, Stephan Huttner, Benedikt D. Kola, Axel Gastmeier, Petra Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol Original Article OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study was to quantify the time delay between screening and initiation of contact isolation for carriers of extended-spectrum beta-lactamase (ESBL)–producing Enterobacterales (ESBL-E). METHODS: This study was a secondary analysis of contact isolation periods in a cluster-randomized controlled trial that compared 2 strategies to control ESBL-E (trial no. ISRCTN57648070). Patients admitted to 20 non-ICU wards in Germany, the Netherlands, Spain, and Switzerland were screened for ESBL-E carriage on admission, weekly thereafter, and on discharge. Data collection included the day of sampling, the day the wards were notified of the result, and subsequent ESBL-E isolation days. RESULTS: Between January 2014 and August 2016, 19,122 patients, with a length of stay ≥2 days were included. At least 1 culture was collected for 16,091 patients (84%), with a median duration between the admission day and the day of first sample collection of 2 days (interquartile range [IQR], 1–3). Moreover, 854 (41%) of all 2,078 ESBL-E carriers remained without isolation during their hospital stay. In total, 6,040 ESBL-E days (32% of all ESBL-E days) accrued for patients who were not isolated. Of 2,078 ESBL-E-carriers, 1,478 ESBL-E carriers (71%) had no previous history of ESBL-E carriage. Also, 697 (34%) were placed in contact isolation with a delay of 4 days (IQR, 2–5), accounting for 2,723 nonisolation days (15% of ESBL-E days). CONCLUSIONS: Even with extensive surveillance screening, almost one-third of all ESBL-E days were nonisolation days. Limitations in routine culture-based ESBL-E detection impeded timely and exhaustive implementation of targeted contact isolation. Cambridge University Press 2023-09 2023-03-13 /pmc/articles/PMC10507499/ /pubmed/36912321 http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/ice.2022.285 Text en © The Author(s) 2023 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution licence (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted re-use, distribution and reproduction, provided the original article is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Article
Maechler, Friederike
Schwab, Frank
Hansen, Sonja
Behnke, Michael
Bonten, Marc J.
Canton, Rafael
Diaz Agero, Cristina
Fankhauser, Carolina
Harbarth, Stephan
Huttner, Benedikt D.
Kola, Axel
Gastmeier, Petra
Quantification of time delay between screening and subsequent initiation of contact isolation for carriers of extended-spectrum beta-lactamase (ESBL)–producing Enterobacterales: A post hoc subgroup analysis of the R-GNOSIS WP5 Trial
title Quantification of time delay between screening and subsequent initiation of contact isolation for carriers of extended-spectrum beta-lactamase (ESBL)–producing Enterobacterales: A post hoc subgroup analysis of the R-GNOSIS WP5 Trial
title_full Quantification of time delay between screening and subsequent initiation of contact isolation for carriers of extended-spectrum beta-lactamase (ESBL)–producing Enterobacterales: A post hoc subgroup analysis of the R-GNOSIS WP5 Trial
title_fullStr Quantification of time delay between screening and subsequent initiation of contact isolation for carriers of extended-spectrum beta-lactamase (ESBL)–producing Enterobacterales: A post hoc subgroup analysis of the R-GNOSIS WP5 Trial
title_full_unstemmed Quantification of time delay between screening and subsequent initiation of contact isolation for carriers of extended-spectrum beta-lactamase (ESBL)–producing Enterobacterales: A post hoc subgroup analysis of the R-GNOSIS WP5 Trial
title_short Quantification of time delay between screening and subsequent initiation of contact isolation for carriers of extended-spectrum beta-lactamase (ESBL)–producing Enterobacterales: A post hoc subgroup analysis of the R-GNOSIS WP5 Trial
title_sort quantification of time delay between screening and subsequent initiation of contact isolation for carriers of extended-spectrum beta-lactamase (esbl)–producing enterobacterales: a post hoc subgroup analysis of the r-gnosis wp5 trial
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10507499/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36912321
http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/ice.2022.285
work_keys_str_mv AT maechlerfriederike quantificationoftimedelaybetweenscreeningandsubsequentinitiationofcontactisolationforcarriersofextendedspectrumbetalactamaseesblproducingenterobacteralesaposthocsubgroupanalysisofthergnosiswp5trial
AT schwabfrank quantificationoftimedelaybetweenscreeningandsubsequentinitiationofcontactisolationforcarriersofextendedspectrumbetalactamaseesblproducingenterobacteralesaposthocsubgroupanalysisofthergnosiswp5trial
AT hansensonja quantificationoftimedelaybetweenscreeningandsubsequentinitiationofcontactisolationforcarriersofextendedspectrumbetalactamaseesblproducingenterobacteralesaposthocsubgroupanalysisofthergnosiswp5trial
AT behnkemichael quantificationoftimedelaybetweenscreeningandsubsequentinitiationofcontactisolationforcarriersofextendedspectrumbetalactamaseesblproducingenterobacteralesaposthocsubgroupanalysisofthergnosiswp5trial
AT bontenmarcj quantificationoftimedelaybetweenscreeningandsubsequentinitiationofcontactisolationforcarriersofextendedspectrumbetalactamaseesblproducingenterobacteralesaposthocsubgroupanalysisofthergnosiswp5trial
AT cantonrafael quantificationoftimedelaybetweenscreeningandsubsequentinitiationofcontactisolationforcarriersofextendedspectrumbetalactamaseesblproducingenterobacteralesaposthocsubgroupanalysisofthergnosiswp5trial
AT diazagerocristina quantificationoftimedelaybetweenscreeningandsubsequentinitiationofcontactisolationforcarriersofextendedspectrumbetalactamaseesblproducingenterobacteralesaposthocsubgroupanalysisofthergnosiswp5trial
AT fankhausercarolina quantificationoftimedelaybetweenscreeningandsubsequentinitiationofcontactisolationforcarriersofextendedspectrumbetalactamaseesblproducingenterobacteralesaposthocsubgroupanalysisofthergnosiswp5trial
AT harbarthstephan quantificationoftimedelaybetweenscreeningandsubsequentinitiationofcontactisolationforcarriersofextendedspectrumbetalactamaseesblproducingenterobacteralesaposthocsubgroupanalysisofthergnosiswp5trial
AT huttnerbenediktd quantificationoftimedelaybetweenscreeningandsubsequentinitiationofcontactisolationforcarriersofextendedspectrumbetalactamaseesblproducingenterobacteralesaposthocsubgroupanalysisofthergnosiswp5trial
AT kolaaxel quantificationoftimedelaybetweenscreeningandsubsequentinitiationofcontactisolationforcarriersofextendedspectrumbetalactamaseesblproducingenterobacteralesaposthocsubgroupanalysisofthergnosiswp5trial
AT gastmeierpetra quantificationoftimedelaybetweenscreeningandsubsequentinitiationofcontactisolationforcarriersofextendedspectrumbetalactamaseesblproducingenterobacteralesaposthocsubgroupanalysisofthergnosiswp5trial