Cargando…
Quantification of time delay between screening and subsequent initiation of contact isolation for carriers of extended-spectrum beta-lactamase (ESBL)–producing Enterobacterales: A post hoc subgroup analysis of the R-GNOSIS WP5 Trial
OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study was to quantify the time delay between screening and initiation of contact isolation for carriers of extended-spectrum beta-lactamase (ESBL)–producing Enterobacterales (ESBL-E). METHODS: This study was a secondary analysis of contact isolation periods in a cluster-r...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Cambridge University Press
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10507499/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36912321 http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/ice.2022.285 |
_version_ | 1785107331595370496 |
---|---|
author | Maechler, Friederike Schwab, Frank Hansen, Sonja Behnke, Michael Bonten, Marc J. Canton, Rafael Diaz Agero, Cristina Fankhauser, Carolina Harbarth, Stephan Huttner, Benedikt D. Kola, Axel Gastmeier, Petra |
author_facet | Maechler, Friederike Schwab, Frank Hansen, Sonja Behnke, Michael Bonten, Marc J. Canton, Rafael Diaz Agero, Cristina Fankhauser, Carolina Harbarth, Stephan Huttner, Benedikt D. Kola, Axel Gastmeier, Petra |
author_sort | Maechler, Friederike |
collection | PubMed |
description | OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study was to quantify the time delay between screening and initiation of contact isolation for carriers of extended-spectrum beta-lactamase (ESBL)–producing Enterobacterales (ESBL-E). METHODS: This study was a secondary analysis of contact isolation periods in a cluster-randomized controlled trial that compared 2 strategies to control ESBL-E (trial no. ISRCTN57648070). Patients admitted to 20 non-ICU wards in Germany, the Netherlands, Spain, and Switzerland were screened for ESBL-E carriage on admission, weekly thereafter, and on discharge. Data collection included the day of sampling, the day the wards were notified of the result, and subsequent ESBL-E isolation days. RESULTS: Between January 2014 and August 2016, 19,122 patients, with a length of stay ≥2 days were included. At least 1 culture was collected for 16,091 patients (84%), with a median duration between the admission day and the day of first sample collection of 2 days (interquartile range [IQR], 1–3). Moreover, 854 (41%) of all 2,078 ESBL-E carriers remained without isolation during their hospital stay. In total, 6,040 ESBL-E days (32% of all ESBL-E days) accrued for patients who were not isolated. Of 2,078 ESBL-E-carriers, 1,478 ESBL-E carriers (71%) had no previous history of ESBL-E carriage. Also, 697 (34%) were placed in contact isolation with a delay of 4 days (IQR, 2–5), accounting for 2,723 nonisolation days (15% of ESBL-E days). CONCLUSIONS: Even with extensive surveillance screening, almost one-third of all ESBL-E days were nonisolation days. Limitations in routine culture-based ESBL-E detection impeded timely and exhaustive implementation of targeted contact isolation. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-10507499 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2023 |
publisher | Cambridge University Press |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-105074992023-09-20 Quantification of time delay between screening and subsequent initiation of contact isolation for carriers of extended-spectrum beta-lactamase (ESBL)–producing Enterobacterales: A post hoc subgroup analysis of the R-GNOSIS WP5 Trial Maechler, Friederike Schwab, Frank Hansen, Sonja Behnke, Michael Bonten, Marc J. Canton, Rafael Diaz Agero, Cristina Fankhauser, Carolina Harbarth, Stephan Huttner, Benedikt D. Kola, Axel Gastmeier, Petra Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol Original Article OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study was to quantify the time delay between screening and initiation of contact isolation for carriers of extended-spectrum beta-lactamase (ESBL)–producing Enterobacterales (ESBL-E). METHODS: This study was a secondary analysis of contact isolation periods in a cluster-randomized controlled trial that compared 2 strategies to control ESBL-E (trial no. ISRCTN57648070). Patients admitted to 20 non-ICU wards in Germany, the Netherlands, Spain, and Switzerland were screened for ESBL-E carriage on admission, weekly thereafter, and on discharge. Data collection included the day of sampling, the day the wards were notified of the result, and subsequent ESBL-E isolation days. RESULTS: Between January 2014 and August 2016, 19,122 patients, with a length of stay ≥2 days were included. At least 1 culture was collected for 16,091 patients (84%), with a median duration between the admission day and the day of first sample collection of 2 days (interquartile range [IQR], 1–3). Moreover, 854 (41%) of all 2,078 ESBL-E carriers remained without isolation during their hospital stay. In total, 6,040 ESBL-E days (32% of all ESBL-E days) accrued for patients who were not isolated. Of 2,078 ESBL-E-carriers, 1,478 ESBL-E carriers (71%) had no previous history of ESBL-E carriage. Also, 697 (34%) were placed in contact isolation with a delay of 4 days (IQR, 2–5), accounting for 2,723 nonisolation days (15% of ESBL-E days). CONCLUSIONS: Even with extensive surveillance screening, almost one-third of all ESBL-E days were nonisolation days. Limitations in routine culture-based ESBL-E detection impeded timely and exhaustive implementation of targeted contact isolation. Cambridge University Press 2023-09 2023-03-13 /pmc/articles/PMC10507499/ /pubmed/36912321 http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/ice.2022.285 Text en © The Author(s) 2023 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution licence (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted re-use, distribution and reproduction, provided the original article is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Original Article Maechler, Friederike Schwab, Frank Hansen, Sonja Behnke, Michael Bonten, Marc J. Canton, Rafael Diaz Agero, Cristina Fankhauser, Carolina Harbarth, Stephan Huttner, Benedikt D. Kola, Axel Gastmeier, Petra Quantification of time delay between screening and subsequent initiation of contact isolation for carriers of extended-spectrum beta-lactamase (ESBL)–producing Enterobacterales: A post hoc subgroup analysis of the R-GNOSIS WP5 Trial |
title | Quantification of time delay between screening and subsequent initiation of contact isolation for carriers of extended-spectrum beta-lactamase (ESBL)–producing Enterobacterales: A post hoc subgroup analysis of the R-GNOSIS WP5 Trial |
title_full | Quantification of time delay between screening and subsequent initiation of contact isolation for carriers of extended-spectrum beta-lactamase (ESBL)–producing Enterobacterales: A post hoc subgroup analysis of the R-GNOSIS WP5 Trial |
title_fullStr | Quantification of time delay between screening and subsequent initiation of contact isolation for carriers of extended-spectrum beta-lactamase (ESBL)–producing Enterobacterales: A post hoc subgroup analysis of the R-GNOSIS WP5 Trial |
title_full_unstemmed | Quantification of time delay between screening and subsequent initiation of contact isolation for carriers of extended-spectrum beta-lactamase (ESBL)–producing Enterobacterales: A post hoc subgroup analysis of the R-GNOSIS WP5 Trial |
title_short | Quantification of time delay between screening and subsequent initiation of contact isolation for carriers of extended-spectrum beta-lactamase (ESBL)–producing Enterobacterales: A post hoc subgroup analysis of the R-GNOSIS WP5 Trial |
title_sort | quantification of time delay between screening and subsequent initiation of contact isolation for carriers of extended-spectrum beta-lactamase (esbl)–producing enterobacterales: a post hoc subgroup analysis of the r-gnosis wp5 trial |
topic | Original Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10507499/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36912321 http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/ice.2022.285 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT maechlerfriederike quantificationoftimedelaybetweenscreeningandsubsequentinitiationofcontactisolationforcarriersofextendedspectrumbetalactamaseesblproducingenterobacteralesaposthocsubgroupanalysisofthergnosiswp5trial AT schwabfrank quantificationoftimedelaybetweenscreeningandsubsequentinitiationofcontactisolationforcarriersofextendedspectrumbetalactamaseesblproducingenterobacteralesaposthocsubgroupanalysisofthergnosiswp5trial AT hansensonja quantificationoftimedelaybetweenscreeningandsubsequentinitiationofcontactisolationforcarriersofextendedspectrumbetalactamaseesblproducingenterobacteralesaposthocsubgroupanalysisofthergnosiswp5trial AT behnkemichael quantificationoftimedelaybetweenscreeningandsubsequentinitiationofcontactisolationforcarriersofextendedspectrumbetalactamaseesblproducingenterobacteralesaposthocsubgroupanalysisofthergnosiswp5trial AT bontenmarcj quantificationoftimedelaybetweenscreeningandsubsequentinitiationofcontactisolationforcarriersofextendedspectrumbetalactamaseesblproducingenterobacteralesaposthocsubgroupanalysisofthergnosiswp5trial AT cantonrafael quantificationoftimedelaybetweenscreeningandsubsequentinitiationofcontactisolationforcarriersofextendedspectrumbetalactamaseesblproducingenterobacteralesaposthocsubgroupanalysisofthergnosiswp5trial AT diazagerocristina quantificationoftimedelaybetweenscreeningandsubsequentinitiationofcontactisolationforcarriersofextendedspectrumbetalactamaseesblproducingenterobacteralesaposthocsubgroupanalysisofthergnosiswp5trial AT fankhausercarolina quantificationoftimedelaybetweenscreeningandsubsequentinitiationofcontactisolationforcarriersofextendedspectrumbetalactamaseesblproducingenterobacteralesaposthocsubgroupanalysisofthergnosiswp5trial AT harbarthstephan quantificationoftimedelaybetweenscreeningandsubsequentinitiationofcontactisolationforcarriersofextendedspectrumbetalactamaseesblproducingenterobacteralesaposthocsubgroupanalysisofthergnosiswp5trial AT huttnerbenediktd quantificationoftimedelaybetweenscreeningandsubsequentinitiationofcontactisolationforcarriersofextendedspectrumbetalactamaseesblproducingenterobacteralesaposthocsubgroupanalysisofthergnosiswp5trial AT kolaaxel quantificationoftimedelaybetweenscreeningandsubsequentinitiationofcontactisolationforcarriersofextendedspectrumbetalactamaseesblproducingenterobacteralesaposthocsubgroupanalysisofthergnosiswp5trial AT gastmeierpetra quantificationoftimedelaybetweenscreeningandsubsequentinitiationofcontactisolationforcarriersofextendedspectrumbetalactamaseesblproducingenterobacteralesaposthocsubgroupanalysisofthergnosiswp5trial |