Cargando…
Comparing the efficacy of regen-cov, remdesivir, and favipiravir in reducing invasive mechanical ventilation need in hospitalized COVID-19 patients
BACKGROUND: Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic stimulates research works to find a solution to this crisis from starting 2020 year up to now. With ending of the 2021-year, various advances in pharmacotherapy against COVID-19 have emerged. Regarding antiviral therapy, casirivimab and imdevi...
Autores principales: | , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Baishideng Publishing Group Inc
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10507553/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37731581 http://dx.doi.org/10.12998/wjcc.v11.i26.6105 |
_version_ | 1785107342379974656 |
---|---|
author | Hegazy, Sahar Kmal Tharwat, Samar Hassan, Ahmed Hosny |
author_facet | Hegazy, Sahar Kmal Tharwat, Samar Hassan, Ahmed Hosny |
author_sort | Hegazy, Sahar Kmal |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic stimulates research works to find a solution to this crisis from starting 2020 year up to now. With ending of the 2021-year, various advances in pharmacotherapy against COVID-19 have emerged. Regarding antiviral therapy, casirivimab and imdevimab antibody combination is a type of new immunotherapy against COVID-19. Standard antiviral therapy against COVID-19 includes Remdesivir and Favipiravir. AIM: To evaluate the efficacy of antibodies cocktail (casirivimab and imdevimab) compared to standard antiviral therapy in reducing the need for invasive mechanical ventilation (IMV). METHODS: 265 COVID-19 polymerase chain reaction confirmed patients with indication for antiviral therapy were included in this study and were divided into 3 groups (1: 2: 2): Group A: REGN3048-3051 antibodies cocktail (casirivimab and imdevimab), group B: Remdesivir, group C: Favipiravir. The study design is a single-blind non-randomized controlled trial Mansoura University Hospital owns the study’s drugs. The duration of the study was about 6 mo after ethical approval. RESULTS: Casirivimab and imdevimab achieve less need for O(2) therapy and IMV, with less duration of this need than remdesivir and favipiravir. CONCLUSION: Group A (casirivimab and imdevimab) achieve better clinical outcomes than groups B (remdesivir) and C (favipiravir) intervention groups. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-10507553 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2023 |
publisher | Baishideng Publishing Group Inc |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-105075532023-09-20 Comparing the efficacy of regen-cov, remdesivir, and favipiravir in reducing invasive mechanical ventilation need in hospitalized COVID-19 patients Hegazy, Sahar Kmal Tharwat, Samar Hassan, Ahmed Hosny World J Clin Cases Clinical Trials Study BACKGROUND: Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic stimulates research works to find a solution to this crisis from starting 2020 year up to now. With ending of the 2021-year, various advances in pharmacotherapy against COVID-19 have emerged. Regarding antiviral therapy, casirivimab and imdevimab antibody combination is a type of new immunotherapy against COVID-19. Standard antiviral therapy against COVID-19 includes Remdesivir and Favipiravir. AIM: To evaluate the efficacy of antibodies cocktail (casirivimab and imdevimab) compared to standard antiviral therapy in reducing the need for invasive mechanical ventilation (IMV). METHODS: 265 COVID-19 polymerase chain reaction confirmed patients with indication for antiviral therapy were included in this study and were divided into 3 groups (1: 2: 2): Group A: REGN3048-3051 antibodies cocktail (casirivimab and imdevimab), group B: Remdesivir, group C: Favipiravir. The study design is a single-blind non-randomized controlled trial Mansoura University Hospital owns the study’s drugs. The duration of the study was about 6 mo after ethical approval. RESULTS: Casirivimab and imdevimab achieve less need for O(2) therapy and IMV, with less duration of this need than remdesivir and favipiravir. CONCLUSION: Group A (casirivimab and imdevimab) achieve better clinical outcomes than groups B (remdesivir) and C (favipiravir) intervention groups. Baishideng Publishing Group Inc 2023-09-16 2023-09-16 /pmc/articles/PMC10507553/ /pubmed/37731581 http://dx.doi.org/10.12998/wjcc.v11.i26.6105 Text en ©The Author(s) 2023. Published by Baishideng Publishing Group Inc. All rights reserved. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This article is an open-access article that was selected by an in-house editor and fully peer-reviewed by external reviewers. It is distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution NonCommercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited and the use is non-commercial. |
spellingShingle | Clinical Trials Study Hegazy, Sahar Kmal Tharwat, Samar Hassan, Ahmed Hosny Comparing the efficacy of regen-cov, remdesivir, and favipiravir in reducing invasive mechanical ventilation need in hospitalized COVID-19 patients |
title | Comparing the efficacy of regen-cov, remdesivir, and favipiravir in reducing invasive mechanical ventilation need in hospitalized COVID-19 patients |
title_full | Comparing the efficacy of regen-cov, remdesivir, and favipiravir in reducing invasive mechanical ventilation need in hospitalized COVID-19 patients |
title_fullStr | Comparing the efficacy of regen-cov, remdesivir, and favipiravir in reducing invasive mechanical ventilation need in hospitalized COVID-19 patients |
title_full_unstemmed | Comparing the efficacy of regen-cov, remdesivir, and favipiravir in reducing invasive mechanical ventilation need in hospitalized COVID-19 patients |
title_short | Comparing the efficacy of regen-cov, remdesivir, and favipiravir in reducing invasive mechanical ventilation need in hospitalized COVID-19 patients |
title_sort | comparing the efficacy of regen-cov, remdesivir, and favipiravir in reducing invasive mechanical ventilation need in hospitalized covid-19 patients |
topic | Clinical Trials Study |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10507553/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37731581 http://dx.doi.org/10.12998/wjcc.v11.i26.6105 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT hegazysaharkmal comparingtheefficacyofregencovremdesivirandfavipiravirinreducinginvasivemechanicalventilationneedinhospitalizedcovid19patients AT tharwatsamar comparingtheefficacyofregencovremdesivirandfavipiravirinreducinginvasivemechanicalventilationneedinhospitalizedcovid19patients AT hassanahmedhosny comparingtheefficacyofregencovremdesivirandfavipiravirinreducinginvasivemechanicalventilationneedinhospitalizedcovid19patients |