Cargando…

European Headache Federation (EHF) critical re-appraisal and meta-analysis of oral drugs in migraine prevention—part 2: flunarizine

OBJECTIVE: Novel disease-specific and mechanism-based treatments sharing good evidence of efficacy for migraine have been recently marketed. However, reimbursement by insurers depends on treatment failure with classic anti-migraine drugs. In this systematic review and meta-analysis, we aimed to iden...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Deligianni, Christina I., Sacco, Simona, Ekizoglu, Esme, Uluduz, Derya, Gil-Gouveia, Raquel, MaassenVanDenBrink, Antoinette, Ornello, Raffaele, Sanchez-del-Rio, Margarita, Reuter, Uwe, Versijpt, Jan, de Vries, Tessa, Hussain, Muizz, Zeraatkar, Dena, Lampl, Christian
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer Milan 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10507915/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37723437
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s10194-023-01657-3
_version_ 1785107415816994816
author Deligianni, Christina I.
Sacco, Simona
Ekizoglu, Esme
Uluduz, Derya
Gil-Gouveia, Raquel
MaassenVanDenBrink, Antoinette
Ornello, Raffaele
Sanchez-del-Rio, Margarita
Reuter, Uwe
Versijpt, Jan
de Vries, Tessa
Hussain, Muizz
Zeraatkar, Dena
Lampl, Christian
author_facet Deligianni, Christina I.
Sacco, Simona
Ekizoglu, Esme
Uluduz, Derya
Gil-Gouveia, Raquel
MaassenVanDenBrink, Antoinette
Ornello, Raffaele
Sanchez-del-Rio, Margarita
Reuter, Uwe
Versijpt, Jan
de Vries, Tessa
Hussain, Muizz
Zeraatkar, Dena
Lampl, Christian
author_sort Deligianni, Christina I.
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVE: Novel disease-specific and mechanism-based treatments sharing good evidence of efficacy for migraine have been recently marketed. However, reimbursement by insurers depends on treatment failure with classic anti-migraine drugs. In this systematic review and meta-analysis, we aimed to identify and rate the evidence for efficacy of flunarizine, a repurposed, first- or second-line treatment for migraine prophylaxis. METHODS: A systematic search in MEDLINE, Cochrane CENTRAL, and ClinicalTrials.gov was performed for trials of pharmacological treatment in migraine prophylaxis, following the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews (PRISMA). Eligible trials for meta-analysis were randomized, placebo–controlled studies comparing flunarizine with placebo. Outcomes of interest according to the Outcome Set for preventive intervention trials in chronic and episodic migraine (COSMIG) were the proportion of patients reaching a 50% or more reduction in monthly migraine days, the change in monthly migraine days (MMDs), and Adverse Events (AEs) leading to discontinuation. RESULTS: Five trials were eligible for narrative description and three for data synthesis and analysis. No studies reported the predefined outcomes, but one study assessed the 50% reduction in monthly migraine attacks with flunarizine as compared to placebo showing a benefit from flunarizine with a low or probably low risk of bias. We found that flunarizine may increase the proportion of patients who discontinue due to adverse events compared to placebo (risk difference: 0.02; 95% CI -0.03 to 0.06). CONCLUSIONS: Published flunarizine trials predate the recommended endpoints for evaluating migraine prophylaxis drugs, hence the lack of an adequate assessment for these endpoints. Further, modern-day, large‐scale studies would be valuable in re-evaluating the efficacy of flunarizine for the treatment of migraines, offering additional insights into its potential benefits. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s10194-023-01657-3.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10507915
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher Springer Milan
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-105079152023-09-20 European Headache Federation (EHF) critical re-appraisal and meta-analysis of oral drugs in migraine prevention—part 2: flunarizine Deligianni, Christina I. Sacco, Simona Ekizoglu, Esme Uluduz, Derya Gil-Gouveia, Raquel MaassenVanDenBrink, Antoinette Ornello, Raffaele Sanchez-del-Rio, Margarita Reuter, Uwe Versijpt, Jan de Vries, Tessa Hussain, Muizz Zeraatkar, Dena Lampl, Christian J Headache Pain Review OBJECTIVE: Novel disease-specific and mechanism-based treatments sharing good evidence of efficacy for migraine have been recently marketed. However, reimbursement by insurers depends on treatment failure with classic anti-migraine drugs. In this systematic review and meta-analysis, we aimed to identify and rate the evidence for efficacy of flunarizine, a repurposed, first- or second-line treatment for migraine prophylaxis. METHODS: A systematic search in MEDLINE, Cochrane CENTRAL, and ClinicalTrials.gov was performed for trials of pharmacological treatment in migraine prophylaxis, following the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews (PRISMA). Eligible trials for meta-analysis were randomized, placebo–controlled studies comparing flunarizine with placebo. Outcomes of interest according to the Outcome Set for preventive intervention trials in chronic and episodic migraine (COSMIG) were the proportion of patients reaching a 50% or more reduction in monthly migraine days, the change in monthly migraine days (MMDs), and Adverse Events (AEs) leading to discontinuation. RESULTS: Five trials were eligible for narrative description and three for data synthesis and analysis. No studies reported the predefined outcomes, but one study assessed the 50% reduction in monthly migraine attacks with flunarizine as compared to placebo showing a benefit from flunarizine with a low or probably low risk of bias. We found that flunarizine may increase the proportion of patients who discontinue due to adverse events compared to placebo (risk difference: 0.02; 95% CI -0.03 to 0.06). CONCLUSIONS: Published flunarizine trials predate the recommended endpoints for evaluating migraine prophylaxis drugs, hence the lack of an adequate assessment for these endpoints. Further, modern-day, large‐scale studies would be valuable in re-evaluating the efficacy of flunarizine for the treatment of migraines, offering additional insights into its potential benefits. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s10194-023-01657-3. Springer Milan 2023-09-19 /pmc/articles/PMC10507915/ /pubmed/37723437 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s10194-023-01657-3 Text en © The Author(s) 2023 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
spellingShingle Review
Deligianni, Christina I.
Sacco, Simona
Ekizoglu, Esme
Uluduz, Derya
Gil-Gouveia, Raquel
MaassenVanDenBrink, Antoinette
Ornello, Raffaele
Sanchez-del-Rio, Margarita
Reuter, Uwe
Versijpt, Jan
de Vries, Tessa
Hussain, Muizz
Zeraatkar, Dena
Lampl, Christian
European Headache Federation (EHF) critical re-appraisal and meta-analysis of oral drugs in migraine prevention—part 2: flunarizine
title European Headache Federation (EHF) critical re-appraisal and meta-analysis of oral drugs in migraine prevention—part 2: flunarizine
title_full European Headache Federation (EHF) critical re-appraisal and meta-analysis of oral drugs in migraine prevention—part 2: flunarizine
title_fullStr European Headache Federation (EHF) critical re-appraisal and meta-analysis of oral drugs in migraine prevention—part 2: flunarizine
title_full_unstemmed European Headache Federation (EHF) critical re-appraisal and meta-analysis of oral drugs in migraine prevention—part 2: flunarizine
title_short European Headache Federation (EHF) critical re-appraisal and meta-analysis of oral drugs in migraine prevention—part 2: flunarizine
title_sort european headache federation (ehf) critical re-appraisal and meta-analysis of oral drugs in migraine prevention—part 2: flunarizine
topic Review
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10507915/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37723437
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s10194-023-01657-3
work_keys_str_mv AT deligiannichristinai europeanheadachefederationehfcriticalreappraisalandmetaanalysisoforaldrugsinmigrainepreventionpart2flunarizine
AT saccosimona europeanheadachefederationehfcriticalreappraisalandmetaanalysisoforaldrugsinmigrainepreventionpart2flunarizine
AT ekizogluesme europeanheadachefederationehfcriticalreappraisalandmetaanalysisoforaldrugsinmigrainepreventionpart2flunarizine
AT uluduzderya europeanheadachefederationehfcriticalreappraisalandmetaanalysisoforaldrugsinmigrainepreventionpart2flunarizine
AT gilgouveiaraquel europeanheadachefederationehfcriticalreappraisalandmetaanalysisoforaldrugsinmigrainepreventionpart2flunarizine
AT maassenvandenbrinkantoinette europeanheadachefederationehfcriticalreappraisalandmetaanalysisoforaldrugsinmigrainepreventionpart2flunarizine
AT ornelloraffaele europeanheadachefederationehfcriticalreappraisalandmetaanalysisoforaldrugsinmigrainepreventionpart2flunarizine
AT sanchezdelriomargarita europeanheadachefederationehfcriticalreappraisalandmetaanalysisoforaldrugsinmigrainepreventionpart2flunarizine
AT reuteruwe europeanheadachefederationehfcriticalreappraisalandmetaanalysisoforaldrugsinmigrainepreventionpart2flunarizine
AT versijptjan europeanheadachefederationehfcriticalreappraisalandmetaanalysisoforaldrugsinmigrainepreventionpart2flunarizine
AT devriestessa europeanheadachefederationehfcriticalreappraisalandmetaanalysisoforaldrugsinmigrainepreventionpart2flunarizine
AT hussainmuizz europeanheadachefederationehfcriticalreappraisalandmetaanalysisoforaldrugsinmigrainepreventionpart2flunarizine
AT zeraatkardena europeanheadachefederationehfcriticalreappraisalandmetaanalysisoforaldrugsinmigrainepreventionpart2flunarizine
AT lamplchristian europeanheadachefederationehfcriticalreappraisalandmetaanalysisoforaldrugsinmigrainepreventionpart2flunarizine