Cargando…
Risk stratification tools for patients with syncope in emergency medical services and emergency departments: a scoping review
BACKGROUND: Patients with a syncope constitute a challenge for risk stratification in (prehospital) emergency care. Professionals in EMS and ED need to differentiate the high-risk from the low-risk syncope patient, with limited time and resources. Clinical decision rules (CDRs) are designed to suppo...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10508018/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37723535 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13049-023-01102-z |
_version_ | 1785107440536125440 |
---|---|
author | uit het Broek, Lucia G. Ort, B. Bastiaan A. Vermeulen, Hester Pelgrim, Thomas Vloet, Lilian C.M. Berben, Sivera A.A. |
author_facet | uit het Broek, Lucia G. Ort, B. Bastiaan A. Vermeulen, Hester Pelgrim, Thomas Vloet, Lilian C.M. Berben, Sivera A.A. |
author_sort | uit het Broek, Lucia G. |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Patients with a syncope constitute a challenge for risk stratification in (prehospital) emergency care. Professionals in EMS and ED need to differentiate the high-risk from the low-risk syncope patient, with limited time and resources. Clinical decision rules (CDRs) are designed to support professionals in risk stratification and clinical decision-making. Current CDRs seem unable to meet the standards to be used in the chain of emergency care. However, the need for a structured approach for syncope patients remains. We aimed to generate a broad overview of the available risk stratification tools and identify key elements, scoring systems and measurement properties of these tools. METHODS: We performed a scoping review with a literature search in MEDLINE, CINAHL, Pubmed, Embase, Cochrane and Web of Science from January 2010 to May 2022. Study selection was done by two researchers independently and was supervised by a third researcher. Data extraction was performed through a data extraction form, and data were summarised through descriptive synthesis. A quality assessment of included studies was performed using a generic quality assessment tool for quantitative research and the AMSTAR-2 for systematic reviews. RESULTS: The literature search identified 5385 unique studies; 38 were included in the review. We discovered 19 risk stratification tools, one of which was established in EMS patient care. One-third of risk stratification tools have been validated. Two main approaches for the application of the tools were identified. Elements of the tools were categorised in history taking, physical examination, electrocardiogram, additional examinations and other variables. Evaluation of measurement properties showed that negative and positive predictive value was used in half of the studies to assess the accuracy of tools. CONCLUSION: A total of 19 risk stratification tools for syncope patients were identified. They were primarily established in ED patient care; most are not validated properly. Key elements in the risk stratification related to a potential cardiac problem as cause for the syncope. These insights provide directions for the key elements of a risk stratification tool and for a more advanced process to validate risk stratification tools. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s13049-023-01102-z. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-10508018 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2023 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-105080182023-09-20 Risk stratification tools for patients with syncope in emergency medical services and emergency departments: a scoping review uit het Broek, Lucia G. Ort, B. Bastiaan A. Vermeulen, Hester Pelgrim, Thomas Vloet, Lilian C.M. Berben, Sivera A.A. Scand J Trauma Resusc Emerg Med Review BACKGROUND: Patients with a syncope constitute a challenge for risk stratification in (prehospital) emergency care. Professionals in EMS and ED need to differentiate the high-risk from the low-risk syncope patient, with limited time and resources. Clinical decision rules (CDRs) are designed to support professionals in risk stratification and clinical decision-making. Current CDRs seem unable to meet the standards to be used in the chain of emergency care. However, the need for a structured approach for syncope patients remains. We aimed to generate a broad overview of the available risk stratification tools and identify key elements, scoring systems and measurement properties of these tools. METHODS: We performed a scoping review with a literature search in MEDLINE, CINAHL, Pubmed, Embase, Cochrane and Web of Science from January 2010 to May 2022. Study selection was done by two researchers independently and was supervised by a third researcher. Data extraction was performed through a data extraction form, and data were summarised through descriptive synthesis. A quality assessment of included studies was performed using a generic quality assessment tool for quantitative research and the AMSTAR-2 for systematic reviews. RESULTS: The literature search identified 5385 unique studies; 38 were included in the review. We discovered 19 risk stratification tools, one of which was established in EMS patient care. One-third of risk stratification tools have been validated. Two main approaches for the application of the tools were identified. Elements of the tools were categorised in history taking, physical examination, electrocardiogram, additional examinations and other variables. Evaluation of measurement properties showed that negative and positive predictive value was used in half of the studies to assess the accuracy of tools. CONCLUSION: A total of 19 risk stratification tools for syncope patients were identified. They were primarily established in ED patient care; most are not validated properly. Key elements in the risk stratification related to a potential cardiac problem as cause for the syncope. These insights provide directions for the key elements of a risk stratification tool and for a more advanced process to validate risk stratification tools. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s13049-023-01102-z. BioMed Central 2023-09-18 /pmc/articles/PMC10508018/ /pubmed/37723535 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13049-023-01102-z Text en © The Author(s) 2023 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data. |
spellingShingle | Review uit het Broek, Lucia G. Ort, B. Bastiaan A. Vermeulen, Hester Pelgrim, Thomas Vloet, Lilian C.M. Berben, Sivera A.A. Risk stratification tools for patients with syncope in emergency medical services and emergency departments: a scoping review |
title | Risk stratification tools for patients with syncope in emergency medical services and emergency departments: a scoping review |
title_full | Risk stratification tools for patients with syncope in emergency medical services and emergency departments: a scoping review |
title_fullStr | Risk stratification tools for patients with syncope in emergency medical services and emergency departments: a scoping review |
title_full_unstemmed | Risk stratification tools for patients with syncope in emergency medical services and emergency departments: a scoping review |
title_short | Risk stratification tools for patients with syncope in emergency medical services and emergency departments: a scoping review |
title_sort | risk stratification tools for patients with syncope in emergency medical services and emergency departments: a scoping review |
topic | Review |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10508018/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37723535 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13049-023-01102-z |
work_keys_str_mv | AT uithetbroekluciag riskstratificationtoolsforpatientswithsyncopeinemergencymedicalservicesandemergencydepartmentsascopingreview AT ortbbastiaana riskstratificationtoolsforpatientswithsyncopeinemergencymedicalservicesandemergencydepartmentsascopingreview AT vermeulenhester riskstratificationtoolsforpatientswithsyncopeinemergencymedicalservicesandemergencydepartmentsascopingreview AT pelgrimthomas riskstratificationtoolsforpatientswithsyncopeinemergencymedicalservicesandemergencydepartmentsascopingreview AT vloetliliancm riskstratificationtoolsforpatientswithsyncopeinemergencymedicalservicesandemergencydepartmentsascopingreview AT berbensiveraaa riskstratificationtoolsforpatientswithsyncopeinemergencymedicalservicesandemergencydepartmentsascopingreview |