Cargando…

Biliary drainage in malignant biliary obstruction: an umbrella review of randomized controlled trials

BACKGROUND: There are still many controversies about biliary drainage in MBO, and we aimed to summarize and evaluate the evidence associated with biliary drainage. METHODS: We conducted an umbrella review of SRoMAs based on RCTs. Through July 28, 2022, Embase, PubMed, WOS, and Cochrane Database were...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Wang, Yaoqun, Wen, Ningyuan, Xiong, Xianze, Li, Bei, Lu, Jiong
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Media S.A. 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10508238/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37731638
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fonc.2023.1235490
_version_ 1785107490671689728
author Wang, Yaoqun
Wen, Ningyuan
Xiong, Xianze
Li, Bei
Lu, Jiong
author_facet Wang, Yaoqun
Wen, Ningyuan
Xiong, Xianze
Li, Bei
Lu, Jiong
author_sort Wang, Yaoqun
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: There are still many controversies about biliary drainage in MBO, and we aimed to summarize and evaluate the evidence associated with biliary drainage. METHODS: We conducted an umbrella review of SRoMAs based on RCTs. Through July 28, 2022, Embase, PubMed, WOS, and Cochrane Database were searched. Two reviewers independently screened the studies, extracted the data, and appraised the methodological quality of the included studies. GRADE was used to evaluate the quality of the evidence. RESULTS: 36 SRoMAs were identified. After excluding 24 overlapping studies, 12 SRoMAs, including 76 RCTs, and 124 clinical outcomes for biliary drainage in MBO were included. Of the 124 pieces of evidence evaluated, 13 were rated “High” quality, 38 were rated “Moderate”, and the rest were rated “Low” or “Very low”. For patients with MBO, (125)I seeds+stent can reduce the risk of stent occlusion, RFA+stent can improve the prognosis; compared with PC, SEMS can increase the risk of tumor ingrowth and reduce the occurrence of sludge formation, and the incidence of tumor ingrowth in C-SEMS/PC-SEMS was significantly lower than that in U-SEMS. There was no difference in the success rate of drainage between EUS-BD and ERCP-BD, but the use of EUS-BD can reduce the incidence of stent dysfunction. For patients with obstructive jaundice, PBD does not affect postoperative mortality compared to direct surgery. The use of MS in patients with periampullary cancer during PBD can reduce the risk of re-intervention and stent occlusion compared to PC. In addition, we included four RCTs that showed that when performing EUS-BD on MBO, hepaticogastrostomy has higher technical success rates than choledochoduodenostomy. Patients who received Bilateral-ENBD had a lower additional drainage rate than those who received Unilateral-ENBD. CONCLUSIONS: Our study summarizes a large amount of evidence related to biliary drainage, which helps to reduce the uncertainty in the selection of biliary drainage strategies for MBO patients under different circumstances.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10508238
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-105082382023-09-20 Biliary drainage in malignant biliary obstruction: an umbrella review of randomized controlled trials Wang, Yaoqun Wen, Ningyuan Xiong, Xianze Li, Bei Lu, Jiong Front Oncol Oncology BACKGROUND: There are still many controversies about biliary drainage in MBO, and we aimed to summarize and evaluate the evidence associated with biliary drainage. METHODS: We conducted an umbrella review of SRoMAs based on RCTs. Through July 28, 2022, Embase, PubMed, WOS, and Cochrane Database were searched. Two reviewers independently screened the studies, extracted the data, and appraised the methodological quality of the included studies. GRADE was used to evaluate the quality of the evidence. RESULTS: 36 SRoMAs were identified. After excluding 24 overlapping studies, 12 SRoMAs, including 76 RCTs, and 124 clinical outcomes for biliary drainage in MBO were included. Of the 124 pieces of evidence evaluated, 13 were rated “High” quality, 38 were rated “Moderate”, and the rest were rated “Low” or “Very low”. For patients with MBO, (125)I seeds+stent can reduce the risk of stent occlusion, RFA+stent can improve the prognosis; compared with PC, SEMS can increase the risk of tumor ingrowth and reduce the occurrence of sludge formation, and the incidence of tumor ingrowth in C-SEMS/PC-SEMS was significantly lower than that in U-SEMS. There was no difference in the success rate of drainage between EUS-BD and ERCP-BD, but the use of EUS-BD can reduce the incidence of stent dysfunction. For patients with obstructive jaundice, PBD does not affect postoperative mortality compared to direct surgery. The use of MS in patients with periampullary cancer during PBD can reduce the risk of re-intervention and stent occlusion compared to PC. In addition, we included four RCTs that showed that when performing EUS-BD on MBO, hepaticogastrostomy has higher technical success rates than choledochoduodenostomy. Patients who received Bilateral-ENBD had a lower additional drainage rate than those who received Unilateral-ENBD. CONCLUSIONS: Our study summarizes a large amount of evidence related to biliary drainage, which helps to reduce the uncertainty in the selection of biliary drainage strategies for MBO patients under different circumstances. Frontiers Media S.A. 2023-09-05 /pmc/articles/PMC10508238/ /pubmed/37731638 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fonc.2023.1235490 Text en Copyright © 2023 Wang, Wen, Xiong, Li and Lu https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
spellingShingle Oncology
Wang, Yaoqun
Wen, Ningyuan
Xiong, Xianze
Li, Bei
Lu, Jiong
Biliary drainage in malignant biliary obstruction: an umbrella review of randomized controlled trials
title Biliary drainage in malignant biliary obstruction: an umbrella review of randomized controlled trials
title_full Biliary drainage in malignant biliary obstruction: an umbrella review of randomized controlled trials
title_fullStr Biliary drainage in malignant biliary obstruction: an umbrella review of randomized controlled trials
title_full_unstemmed Biliary drainage in malignant biliary obstruction: an umbrella review of randomized controlled trials
title_short Biliary drainage in malignant biliary obstruction: an umbrella review of randomized controlled trials
title_sort biliary drainage in malignant biliary obstruction: an umbrella review of randomized controlled trials
topic Oncology
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10508238/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37731638
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fonc.2023.1235490
work_keys_str_mv AT wangyaoqun biliarydrainageinmalignantbiliaryobstructionanumbrellareviewofrandomizedcontrolledtrials
AT wenningyuan biliarydrainageinmalignantbiliaryobstructionanumbrellareviewofrandomizedcontrolledtrials
AT xiongxianze biliarydrainageinmalignantbiliaryobstructionanumbrellareviewofrandomizedcontrolledtrials
AT libei biliarydrainageinmalignantbiliaryobstructionanumbrellareviewofrandomizedcontrolledtrials
AT lujiong biliarydrainageinmalignantbiliaryobstructionanumbrellareviewofrandomizedcontrolledtrials