Cargando…
Exploring the Impact of Legislation Aiming to Ban Gender-Affirming Care on Pediatric Endocrine Providers: A Mixed-Methods Analysis
CONTEXT: Access to gender-affirming medical care is associated with better mental health outcomes in transgender and gender diverse youth. In 2021 and 2022, legislation aiming to ban gender-affirming medical care for youth was proposed in 24 states. OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to (1) assess the impa...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Oxford University Press
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10508250/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37732157 http://dx.doi.org/10.1210/jendso/bvad111 |
_version_ | 1785107493481873408 |
---|---|
author | Gupta, Pranav Barrera, Ellis Boskey, Elizabeth R Kremen, Jessica Roberts, Stephanie A |
author_facet | Gupta, Pranav Barrera, Ellis Boskey, Elizabeth R Kremen, Jessica Roberts, Stephanie A |
author_sort | Gupta, Pranav |
collection | PubMed |
description | CONTEXT: Access to gender-affirming medical care is associated with better mental health outcomes in transgender and gender diverse youth. In 2021 and 2022, legislation aiming to ban gender-affirming medical care for youth was proposed in 24 states. OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to (1) assess the impact of this legislation on pediatric providers based on legislative status of their state of practice and (2) identify the themes of concerns reported by them. METHODS: A mixed-methods study was conducted via an anonymous survey distributed to pediatric endocrinology providers. Survey responses were stratified based on US state of practice, with attention to whether legislation aiming to ban gender-affirming care had been considered. Data were analyzed both quantitatively and qualitatively. RESULTS: Of 223 respondents, 125 (56.0%) were currently providing gender-affirming medical care. A total of 103 (45.7%) respondents practiced in a state where legislation aiming to ban gender-affirming care had been proposed and/or passed between January 2021 to June 2022. Practicing in legislation-affected states was associated with negative experiences for providers including (1) institutional pressure that would limit the ability to provide care, (2) threats to personal safety, (3) concerns about legal action being taken against them, (4) concerns about their career, and (5) institutional concerns about engagement with media. Major qualitative themes emerging for providers in legislation-affected states included safety concerns and the impact of laws on medical practice. CONCLUSION: This study suggests that legislation aiming to ban health care for transgender youth may decrease access to qualified providers in affected states. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-10508250 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2023 |
publisher | Oxford University Press |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-105082502023-09-20 Exploring the Impact of Legislation Aiming to Ban Gender-Affirming Care on Pediatric Endocrine Providers: A Mixed-Methods Analysis Gupta, Pranav Barrera, Ellis Boskey, Elizabeth R Kremen, Jessica Roberts, Stephanie A J Endocr Soc Research Article CONTEXT: Access to gender-affirming medical care is associated with better mental health outcomes in transgender and gender diverse youth. In 2021 and 2022, legislation aiming to ban gender-affirming medical care for youth was proposed in 24 states. OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to (1) assess the impact of this legislation on pediatric providers based on legislative status of their state of practice and (2) identify the themes of concerns reported by them. METHODS: A mixed-methods study was conducted via an anonymous survey distributed to pediatric endocrinology providers. Survey responses were stratified based on US state of practice, with attention to whether legislation aiming to ban gender-affirming care had been considered. Data were analyzed both quantitatively and qualitatively. RESULTS: Of 223 respondents, 125 (56.0%) were currently providing gender-affirming medical care. A total of 103 (45.7%) respondents practiced in a state where legislation aiming to ban gender-affirming care had been proposed and/or passed between January 2021 to June 2022. Practicing in legislation-affected states was associated with negative experiences for providers including (1) institutional pressure that would limit the ability to provide care, (2) threats to personal safety, (3) concerns about legal action being taken against them, (4) concerns about their career, and (5) institutional concerns about engagement with media. Major qualitative themes emerging for providers in legislation-affected states included safety concerns and the impact of laws on medical practice. CONCLUSION: This study suggests that legislation aiming to ban health care for transgender youth may decrease access to qualified providers in affected states. Oxford University Press 2023-09-19 /pmc/articles/PMC10508250/ /pubmed/37732157 http://dx.doi.org/10.1210/jendso/bvad111 Text en © The Author(s) 2023. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the Endocrine Society. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs licence (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/), which permits non-commercial reproduction and distribution of the work, in any medium, provided the original work is not altered or transformed in any way, and that the work is properly cited. For commercial re-use, please contact journals.permissions@oup.com |
spellingShingle | Research Article Gupta, Pranav Barrera, Ellis Boskey, Elizabeth R Kremen, Jessica Roberts, Stephanie A Exploring the Impact of Legislation Aiming to Ban Gender-Affirming Care on Pediatric Endocrine Providers: A Mixed-Methods Analysis |
title | Exploring the Impact of Legislation Aiming to Ban Gender-Affirming Care on Pediatric Endocrine Providers: A Mixed-Methods Analysis |
title_full | Exploring the Impact of Legislation Aiming to Ban Gender-Affirming Care on Pediatric Endocrine Providers: A Mixed-Methods Analysis |
title_fullStr | Exploring the Impact of Legislation Aiming to Ban Gender-Affirming Care on Pediatric Endocrine Providers: A Mixed-Methods Analysis |
title_full_unstemmed | Exploring the Impact of Legislation Aiming to Ban Gender-Affirming Care on Pediatric Endocrine Providers: A Mixed-Methods Analysis |
title_short | Exploring the Impact of Legislation Aiming to Ban Gender-Affirming Care on Pediatric Endocrine Providers: A Mixed-Methods Analysis |
title_sort | exploring the impact of legislation aiming to ban gender-affirming care on pediatric endocrine providers: a mixed-methods analysis |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10508250/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37732157 http://dx.doi.org/10.1210/jendso/bvad111 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT guptapranav exploringtheimpactoflegislationaimingtobangenderaffirmingcareonpediatricendocrineprovidersamixedmethodsanalysis AT barreraellis exploringtheimpactoflegislationaimingtobangenderaffirmingcareonpediatricendocrineprovidersamixedmethodsanalysis AT boskeyelizabethr exploringtheimpactoflegislationaimingtobangenderaffirmingcareonpediatricendocrineprovidersamixedmethodsanalysis AT kremenjessica exploringtheimpactoflegislationaimingtobangenderaffirmingcareonpediatricendocrineprovidersamixedmethodsanalysis AT robertsstephaniea exploringtheimpactoflegislationaimingtobangenderaffirmingcareonpediatricendocrineprovidersamixedmethodsanalysis |