Cargando…

Surgical Strategy and Application of Robotic-Assisted Benign Sacral Neurogenic Tumor Resection

BACKGROUND: Robotic surgery may be advantageous in neurogenic sacral tumor resection but only a few studies reported robotic-assisted neurogenic sacral tumor resection. OBJECTIVE: To propose a new surgical strategy for robotic-assisted benign sacral neurogenic tumor resection and introduce the ultra...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Wu, Hui, Fu, Yi-wei, Gao, Zhen-hua, Zhong, Zhi-hai, Shen, Jing-nan, Yin, Jun-qiang
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Wolters Kluwer 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10508466/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36701567
http://dx.doi.org/10.1227/ons.0000000000000493
Descripción
Sumario:BACKGROUND: Robotic surgery may be advantageous in neurogenic sacral tumor resection but only a few studies reported robotic-assisted neurogenic sacral tumor resection. OBJECTIVE: To propose a new surgical strategy for robotic-assisted benign sacral neurogenic tumor resection and introduce the ultrasonic osteotomy surgical system in robotic surgery. METHODS: Twelve patients who had robotic-assisted primary benign sacral neurogenic tumor resection between May 2015 and March 2021 were included. Our surgical strategy divides tumors into 4 types. Type I: Presacral tumors with diameter <10 cm. Type II: Narrow-base tumors involving the sacrum with diameter <10 cm. Type III: Broad-base tumors involving the sacrum with diameter <10 cm. Type IV: Tumors involving sacral nerve roots ≥2 levels and/or with diameter ≥10 cm. RESULTS: Five type I, 5 type II, and 1 type III patients underwent tumor resection via an anterior approach, and 1 type IV patient via a combined approach. The median operation time, blood loss, and postoperative hospital stay of type I and II were much less than those of type IV. The ultrasonic osteotomy surgical system facilitated osteotomy in 2 type II and 1 type III patients. Eleven patients had total resections, and 1 type III patient had a partial resection. During the follow-up period of 7.9 to 70.9 months (median: 28.5 months), no local recurrences or deaths were noted. CONCLUSION: With the largest single-center series to our knowledge, this surgical strategy helped to guide robotic-assisted benign sacral neurogenic tumor resection. The ultrasonic osteotomy surgical system was effective for type II and III.