Cargando…

Evaluating the effects of direct‐fed microbial supplementation on the performance, milk quality and fatty acid of mid‐lactating dairy cows

BACKGROUND: The objective of the experiment was to investigate the effect of a mixture of direct‐fed microbial (DFM) on feed intake, nutrient digestibility, milk yield and composition, milk fatty acid and blood parameter in crossbred mid‐lactating cows. METHODS: Twenty‐four crossbred Holstein cows (...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Asil, Ali Kiani, Mohammadabadi, Tahereh, Chaji, Morteza, Direkvandi, Ehsan
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10508478/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37417715
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/vms3.1180
_version_ 1785107545191350272
author Asil, Ali Kiani
Mohammadabadi, Tahereh
Chaji, Morteza
Direkvandi, Ehsan
author_facet Asil, Ali Kiani
Mohammadabadi, Tahereh
Chaji, Morteza
Direkvandi, Ehsan
author_sort Asil, Ali Kiani
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: The objective of the experiment was to investigate the effect of a mixture of direct‐fed microbial (DFM) on feed intake, nutrient digestibility, milk yield and composition, milk fatty acid and blood parameter in crossbred mid‐lactating cows. METHODS: Twenty‐four crossbred Holstein cows (body weight = 650±15 kg; days in milk = 100±20; daily milk yield = 25±3 kg) were used in a completely randomized design with three treatments: (1) CON, without DFM; (2) LS, inoculation with Lactobacillus fermentum (4.5 × 10(8) CFU/day) plus Saccharomyces cerevisiae (1.4×10(10) CFU/day); and (3) LSM, inoculation with LS plus Megasphaera elsdenii (4.5 × 10(8) CFU/day). All animals received the same ration with 45.7% forage and 54.3% concentrate. RESULTS: Results showed that the highest feed intake was observed in treatments LS and LSM (p = 0.02). Compared with the CON, milk production, 4% fat‐corrected milk, energy‐corrected milk, fat (kg/day), protein (kg/day) and lactose (kg/day), FE and percent of fat were increased (p<0.05) by LSM, but unaffected by LS. Also, compared with the CON, both LS and LSM increased antioxidant activity (p<0.05). The concentration of C18:2c n‐6 increased significantly in treatment LSM compared with the CON (p = 0.003). The concentration of C20:0 increased significantly in treatment LS compared with the CON (p = 0.004). The highest concentrations of insulin, glucose, triglyceride and cholesterol were observed by LSM (p<0.05). Compared with the CON, both LS and LSM increased blood monocyte, neutrophil, eosinophil and basophil (p<0.05), and blood lymphocyte was increased (p = 0.02) only by LSM. CONCLUSIONS: The results of the research showed that the use of DFMs had no effect on the digestibility, microbial load and the major part of fatty acids in milk. However, it improved feed intake, milk yield and antioxidant activity of milk and also increased the milk concentration of C18:2 n‐6.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10508478
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-105084782023-09-20 Evaluating the effects of direct‐fed microbial supplementation on the performance, milk quality and fatty acid of mid‐lactating dairy cows Asil, Ali Kiani Mohammadabadi, Tahereh Chaji, Morteza Direkvandi, Ehsan Vet Med Sci RUMINANTS BACKGROUND: The objective of the experiment was to investigate the effect of a mixture of direct‐fed microbial (DFM) on feed intake, nutrient digestibility, milk yield and composition, milk fatty acid and blood parameter in crossbred mid‐lactating cows. METHODS: Twenty‐four crossbred Holstein cows (body weight = 650±15 kg; days in milk = 100±20; daily milk yield = 25±3 kg) were used in a completely randomized design with three treatments: (1) CON, without DFM; (2) LS, inoculation with Lactobacillus fermentum (4.5 × 10(8) CFU/day) plus Saccharomyces cerevisiae (1.4×10(10) CFU/day); and (3) LSM, inoculation with LS plus Megasphaera elsdenii (4.5 × 10(8) CFU/day). All animals received the same ration with 45.7% forage and 54.3% concentrate. RESULTS: Results showed that the highest feed intake was observed in treatments LS and LSM (p = 0.02). Compared with the CON, milk production, 4% fat‐corrected milk, energy‐corrected milk, fat (kg/day), protein (kg/day) and lactose (kg/day), FE and percent of fat were increased (p<0.05) by LSM, but unaffected by LS. Also, compared with the CON, both LS and LSM increased antioxidant activity (p<0.05). The concentration of C18:2c n‐6 increased significantly in treatment LSM compared with the CON (p = 0.003). The concentration of C20:0 increased significantly in treatment LS compared with the CON (p = 0.004). The highest concentrations of insulin, glucose, triglyceride and cholesterol were observed by LSM (p<0.05). Compared with the CON, both LS and LSM increased blood monocyte, neutrophil, eosinophil and basophil (p<0.05), and blood lymphocyte was increased (p = 0.02) only by LSM. CONCLUSIONS: The results of the research showed that the use of DFMs had no effect on the digestibility, microbial load and the major part of fatty acids in milk. However, it improved feed intake, milk yield and antioxidant activity of milk and also increased the milk concentration of C18:2 n‐6. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2023-07-07 /pmc/articles/PMC10508478/ /pubmed/37417715 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/vms3.1180 Text en © 2023 The Authors. Veterinary Medicine and Science published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited and is not used for commercial purposes.
spellingShingle RUMINANTS
Asil, Ali Kiani
Mohammadabadi, Tahereh
Chaji, Morteza
Direkvandi, Ehsan
Evaluating the effects of direct‐fed microbial supplementation on the performance, milk quality and fatty acid of mid‐lactating dairy cows
title Evaluating the effects of direct‐fed microbial supplementation on the performance, milk quality and fatty acid of mid‐lactating dairy cows
title_full Evaluating the effects of direct‐fed microbial supplementation on the performance, milk quality and fatty acid of mid‐lactating dairy cows
title_fullStr Evaluating the effects of direct‐fed microbial supplementation on the performance, milk quality and fatty acid of mid‐lactating dairy cows
title_full_unstemmed Evaluating the effects of direct‐fed microbial supplementation on the performance, milk quality and fatty acid of mid‐lactating dairy cows
title_short Evaluating the effects of direct‐fed microbial supplementation on the performance, milk quality and fatty acid of mid‐lactating dairy cows
title_sort evaluating the effects of direct‐fed microbial supplementation on the performance, milk quality and fatty acid of mid‐lactating dairy cows
topic RUMINANTS
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10508478/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37417715
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/vms3.1180
work_keys_str_mv AT asilalikiani evaluatingtheeffectsofdirectfedmicrobialsupplementationontheperformancemilkqualityandfattyacidofmidlactatingdairycows
AT mohammadabaditahereh evaluatingtheeffectsofdirectfedmicrobialsupplementationontheperformancemilkqualityandfattyacidofmidlactatingdairycows
AT chajimorteza evaluatingtheeffectsofdirectfedmicrobialsupplementationontheperformancemilkqualityandfattyacidofmidlactatingdairycows
AT direkvandiehsan evaluatingtheeffectsofdirectfedmicrobialsupplementationontheperformancemilkqualityandfattyacidofmidlactatingdairycows