Cargando…

Model‐based prediction of progression‐free survival for combination therapies in oncology

Progression‐free survival (PFS) is an important clinical metric for comparing and evaluating similar treatments for the same disease within oncology. After the completion of a clinical trial, a descriptive analysis of the patients' PFS is often performed post hoc using the Kaplan–Meier estimato...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Baaz, Marcus, Cardilin, Tim, Jirstrand, Mats
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10508530/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37300376
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/psp4.13003
_version_ 1785107557514215424
author Baaz, Marcus
Cardilin, Tim
Jirstrand, Mats
author_facet Baaz, Marcus
Cardilin, Tim
Jirstrand, Mats
author_sort Baaz, Marcus
collection PubMed
description Progression‐free survival (PFS) is an important clinical metric for comparing and evaluating similar treatments for the same disease within oncology. After the completion of a clinical trial, a descriptive analysis of the patients' PFS is often performed post hoc using the Kaplan–Meier estimator. However, to perform predictions, more sophisticated quantitative methods are needed. Tumor growth inhibition models are commonly used to describe and predict the dynamics of preclinical and clinical tumor size data. Moreover, frameworks also exist for describing the probability of different types of events, such as tumor metastasis or patient dropout. Combining these two types of models into a so‐called joint model enables model‐based prediction of PFS. In this paper, we have constructed a joint model from clinical data comparing the efficacy of FOLFOX against FOLFOX + panitumumab in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer. The nonlinear mixed effects framework was used to quantify interindividual variability (IIV). The model describes tumor size and PFS data well, and showed good predictive capabilities using truncated as well as external data. A machine‐learning guided analysis was performed to reduce unexplained IIV by incorporating patient covariates. The model‐based approach illustrated in this paper could be useful to help design clinical trials or to determine new promising drug candidates for combination therapy trials.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10508530
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-105085302023-09-20 Model‐based prediction of progression‐free survival for combination therapies in oncology Baaz, Marcus Cardilin, Tim Jirstrand, Mats CPT Pharmacometrics Syst Pharmacol Research Progression‐free survival (PFS) is an important clinical metric for comparing and evaluating similar treatments for the same disease within oncology. After the completion of a clinical trial, a descriptive analysis of the patients' PFS is often performed post hoc using the Kaplan–Meier estimator. However, to perform predictions, more sophisticated quantitative methods are needed. Tumor growth inhibition models are commonly used to describe and predict the dynamics of preclinical and clinical tumor size data. Moreover, frameworks also exist for describing the probability of different types of events, such as tumor metastasis or patient dropout. Combining these two types of models into a so‐called joint model enables model‐based prediction of PFS. In this paper, we have constructed a joint model from clinical data comparing the efficacy of FOLFOX against FOLFOX + panitumumab in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer. The nonlinear mixed effects framework was used to quantify interindividual variability (IIV). The model describes tumor size and PFS data well, and showed good predictive capabilities using truncated as well as external data. A machine‐learning guided analysis was performed to reduce unexplained IIV by incorporating patient covariates. The model‐based approach illustrated in this paper could be useful to help design clinical trials or to determine new promising drug candidates for combination therapy trials. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2023-06-16 /pmc/articles/PMC10508530/ /pubmed/37300376 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/psp4.13003 Text en © 2023 The Authors. CPT: Pharmacometrics & Systems Pharmacology published by Wiley Periodicals LLC on behalf of American Society for Clinical Pharmacology and Therapeutics. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited and is not used for commercial purposes.
spellingShingle Research
Baaz, Marcus
Cardilin, Tim
Jirstrand, Mats
Model‐based prediction of progression‐free survival for combination therapies in oncology
title Model‐based prediction of progression‐free survival for combination therapies in oncology
title_full Model‐based prediction of progression‐free survival for combination therapies in oncology
title_fullStr Model‐based prediction of progression‐free survival for combination therapies in oncology
title_full_unstemmed Model‐based prediction of progression‐free survival for combination therapies in oncology
title_short Model‐based prediction of progression‐free survival for combination therapies in oncology
title_sort model‐based prediction of progression‐free survival for combination therapies in oncology
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10508530/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37300376
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/psp4.13003
work_keys_str_mv AT baazmarcus modelbasedpredictionofprogressionfreesurvivalforcombinationtherapiesinoncology
AT cardilintim modelbasedpredictionofprogressionfreesurvivalforcombinationtherapiesinoncology
AT jirstrandmats modelbasedpredictionofprogressionfreesurvivalforcombinationtherapiesinoncology